Shield of blame: Why parents shield blame from their children, not impose it

Many parents think children are to blame for something, meaning most parents want to blame their child for everything, and themselves for nothing. Many people misunderstand child surrender in this regard, meaning children surrender where it is safe, including safe from blame.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to children, telling parents everything and anything under the sun, not fearing punishment and control, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, with children showing gratitude and thanksgiving by emulating the example and instruction of parents. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: hupakouo) and literally translates "stirring up" a child to anger, namely the old Greek adage of "stirring the pot", ultimately referring, literally literally, to the offenses under the Eighth Commandment, namely here to the slightest of offense perceived by the child, coming from entitlement.

Christian love for a child is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to being struck with reverent terror for one's depraved and entitled adult nature, being convicted to surrender to God through one's child, giving up one's adult power and control at the child's footstool, sacrificing for one's child by figuratively taking up the cross for one's child, shielding them from blame...And that is the main job of a parent - to shield children from blame, and deflect all blame back to the parents, where it belongs. 

Children, within the realm of protection of the shield, were able to be aggressive and angry with their parents to the degree they fancied given their age and development. Children in biblical times were very outspoken about their needs, and petitioned to parents usually in a clingy way, but sometimes in an aggressive way, and parents just had to take it. Children first, parents last - that's how it was then, and how it should be now.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let the burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Pro-social punching bag: What to do when your child becomes physically aggressive

All parents have children that throw tantrums, at least some of the time, at least at some age. However, quite a few parents have children that throw aggressive tantrums, or tantrums in the form of an aggressive outburst. There is a way to listen to such children, if you know how - pro-social punching bag.

Christ said on the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew 5:38-39 KJV:

Ye have heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth: But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also.

This refers to non-violent resistance of children's aggressive or violent behaviors in layers, meaning if your child strikes you across the face, you are ideally to turn the other cheek also, and allow them to strike you there, embracing hopelessness and helplessness as an entrenched parent, allowing yourself to fully realize the helpless position you are in as a parent, then cry as any good parent would when humbled by the blows of their child. Usually, children just "shut off" by that point, as the tears of their bludgeoned parents shock them enough that it is real, and they try to clean up the mess they made through frantic reassurance. Children can be parasitic while in that completely enthralled state, looking for justice on their parent's body. Give it to them, and wear the bruises as a badge of honor that your child would even feel safe confiding such justice into you, so be grateful. At a glance, however, this refers simply to avoiding offense, in all parts of life, including parenting. It is a command you hold over yourself, not others, and involves avoiding offense taken against simple personal slights, and in parenting, not letting the behaviors of your child, or their defiance even, get under your skin. I save my anger for court, for a specific control dynamic usually, that is projectory in terms of information, meaning I only charge grooming offenses, or else wait for the insults to pile up.

Anger may consume you, but Christ said early in His sermon, in Matthew 5:21-22 KJV:

Ye have heard it was said of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever says, Thou fool, shall be in danger of Hell-fire.

"Whosoever" meaning anyone "is angry with his brother" referring to extrajudicial anger, meaning any anger outside of the court exchange "without a cause" meaning confronting your fellow man about a moral legal grievance without evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that they are guilty. No anger is to be expressed towards a child, as that implies taking the child to court, whilst a child cannot stand trial, meaning then any child under the age of majority. This meant parents had to hold in anger, often being human punching bags for rowdy, needy children that may not have had the words yet to obtain what they need any other way. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning secure, vulnerable rest and trust in parents, with children being able to be themselves, telling parents whatever they want, venting their upsets and anger into parents, including with parents as a punching bag, especially mothers, with mothers not feigning courage, and instead embracing vulnerability with their cries of mercy from their child. Ancient Israel and adjoining churches were a society that at times rationalized abuse of parents. Parent abuse is simple child aggression, and was normal then to varying degrees, namely little children, and if a parent struck back, that was seen as a sign of weakness. The dynamic of child surrender in the Bible is one of pro-social pedophilia and pro-social siphon, meaning parents siphoned the rambunctious energy of children into a home setting, where children could run around, maybe knock a vase over, play freely, and a parent doesn't even bat an eye, unless the child is into something dangerous, in which case they are simply to be removed from the situation, and reassured once they cry out of grief for that unsafe item or situation they wanted to explore. "Pro-social pedophilia" does not mean pedophilia is a good thing, but makes an example out of the unspoken, positive traits of the mental health condition, including the ability to have a special relationship with a child at the child's level.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the legal context of the Bible, meaning the slightest of offense perceived by a child through an entitled conduct or course of conduct from adults, leading to "stirring up" anger, upset, and resentment in children, referencing the old adage of "stirring the pot" (a Greek language saying). In the Colossian church, there was a spanking problem due to an influx of Greek and Roman newcomers to the parish, in which, in their culture, spanking and whipping children was legal as part of their pagan norms, as a pagan ritual to "cleanse" children. The Apostle Paul was giving a Divine Command from God to the Colossians in order to lay down the law - no punishment of children allowed. Only closeness and love. 

Parents weren't to lay "appropriate" blame on children, but to shield them from blame. Child surrender was surrendering blame to parents, with parents acting as a shield that took the blame of children, taking responsibility and apologizing for an unruly or mentally unstable child, with parents being a safe person to run to, to vent upset towards, and then heed instruction from - not out of fear of punishment, but allowance due to vulnerable trust, meaning nesting with parents in a way that one feels safe nesting next to parents. That shield meant enduring parent abuse from children, meaning children in biblical times were not sweet and innocent like children today, but were hyperactive in a clingy way, or else an aggressive way. Children up until the age of majority were seen as babies, in the sense precisely that they were not responsible for their actions. The problem then wasn't spanking in the Old Testament in particular, but false encouragement, meaning parents wanted to be seen as allowing their children to be free, and sometimes, fathers would slip in a dose of adultification to the freedom, or putting children in corrupting adult roles, which wasn't the norm then, but was the exception, and was illegal once found out. This was the problem in Hebraic circles among the Early Christians.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! Let them burn and rot, descending for ever and ever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand/

 

When are children grateful? (why not to force gratitude)

Parents in this country generally want their children to be grateful. The idea is, however, "make them feel grateful". This includes forcing children to clean their plate, and eat everything on their plate. This has no bearing on whether children are grateful, as the stomach stops eating the moment it tires of absorbing food.

Are you grateful for your child? Every single adult is guilty for their mere existence in relation to children, leading to being struck with terror, then convicted to surrender to God through one's child, giving up one's adult power and control in relation to children, leading to sacrifice for one's children just as Christ sacrificed for His children, symbolically taking up the cross, rendering oneself beneath one's children, devaluing oneself as their caregiver and servant, leading to good works and selfless acts of service towards children, expecting absolutely nothing in relation to children, being and feeling grateful for the fruit of one's labor and toil as a parent. This Christian love, as denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to good works for children for the sake of good works, and the conviction that comes with it. The results are spectacular! It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, or the secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the love and grace of parents, with parents supplying the every demand of a child, with children being able to be themselves, telling parents anything and everything under the sun, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless with children showing gratitude and thanksgiving for their kindness and respect by way of emulating the parent's example and teachings. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stirring up" anger and upset in children, referring to the Greek adage of "stirring the pot", which literally literally refers to the offenses under the legal context of the Bible, under the Eighth Commandment, referring to the assault and battery laws that protected children as well as adults under Jewish and Christian law. Basically, the slightest of offense perceived by the child, when coming from entitlement, is abuse. Anything perceived as entitlement by a child objectively is, until an apology is given, including by way of reflective listening and reassurance of the child's upset. 

Gratitude, on the part of children, involves indulgence in the providence of parents, meaning they keep asking and asking, in increasingly demanding ways, and this is because they feel safe around you as a parent, and want more and more because they feel safe with getting more and more, and then feel reassured in your limits, like just "going along with it", or having one's demands being nudged back into acceptable territory. Generally, children, as they get older in this setup, become less demanding, and more grateful in the sense that they are happy for everything their parents give them, and ask for nothing in return. Why? You are older, and don't want to burden your parents, merely out of courtesy and not out of fear of punishment, and that's when children start to love parents, which actually isn't a command anywhere.

Children in the biblical context were grateful in the sense that nearly everything they asked for, they got, to varying degrees of compromise, particularly with mothers. The relationship between parent and child then was selfless on the part of the parent, and pro-social selfish on the part of the child. The biblical idea of surrender to parents is children embracing their selfish nature to milk off of parents their every vulnerable need, and that was taken quite literally in ancient Israel and adjoining churches, meaning children were breastfed until age 3. Children almost never left their mother's line of eyesight, or earshot, and children in collective homeschools (which was the educational norm then - which I support now) literally jumped with joy when they were seen with their mother. Insults to one's mother was a peer insult of the worst degree, meaning it was taken personally in the exchange. The idea behind respecting parents is respecting them enough to criticize them, perhaps sharply, and then the parents respect the child later, regardless of age or level of criticism.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them rot and descent into everlasting Hell-fire, which is the lake of fire, which is the second death, which is Satan's final resting place! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why authoritative parenting can be as harmful as sexual abuse

I myself am a survivor of authoritative parenting. I share much of my trauma in the tabs above, but I will outline it to you. I am a survivor of childhood itself, AND I AM ANGRY at how children are treated in the United States.

I was first spanked starting at age 3 by my father. My father would follow a certain ritual by way of taking a deep breath, and then punishing me by way of a spanking "out of love". LET THE DEPRAVED PARENTS BURN in HELL-FIRE! LET THEM DIE and PERISH THE SECOND DEATH! LET THEM DIE A COLD, painful DEATH!!!!!

Yes, I was spanked. Yes, nobody believed me as a child. Yes, they all laughed at me. Yes, I was abused, and nobody recognized it, so F*CK parents and F*CK all the adults promoting them. F*CK them straight to HELL where they belong, in Satan's final resting place, as they all seem to work for himself. F*CK them by setting the law down, and hanging 'em bloody, then hanging 'em up on a cross until the third day. LET THEM BE PUNISHED FOR EVER AND EVER by God.

One of many traumatic statements to come...

What is parentification (my struggle as a gentle parent)?

What is parentification? My biggest struggle as a gentle parent. I am a more high-risk pedophile, and refuse the label "Virtuous Pedophile" because there is nothing virtuous about my disorder. "Trust me" is associated with a pedophile, whereas the ultimate pedophile narcissist is "I want to trust you". Most pedophiles want to trust others. 3 out of 4 pedophiles have not sexually abused a child, with pedophiles being more likely than most adults to support youth rights, making it a victim disorder primarily. However, even victims can become perpetrators, and that makes pedophilic adults on par with other adults in terms of risk - meaning risk is in every adult. My case of pedophile is a case one can contrast with. Most pedophiles may see children in a warm, cuddly way where they can't set limits, but I was insane. 

The idea is simple - I don't trust adults, so I put all my eggs in one basket with children, in terms of the dating scene. I see young girls like a surrogate mother to nurse me back to health, but like a spouse at the same time. Think "nursing to health" through a different route than breastfeeding, meaning "hospitality". Hospitable young girls who lay open the welcome mat.

Does this sound "benign" to you? I am grateful for the forgiveness that many of my victim have given me, because I am deserving of none of it, and am deserving of everything hateful and disrespectful. What I did was sexual harassment, in every single case.

Children are to trust me under my Christian beliefs, or else I be damned for discouraging their trust. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning providing for a child based on a form of love driven from outside the body, meaning αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and here refers to earning the trust of children by reorienting my perception of children from bigger people to run to and be a fly in the face to, and instead perceive as striking me with reverent fear, leading to surrendering to God through a child, with the child being a legal extension of God, reporting to God. It is being afraid of hurting children, struck into reverent terror by past experience and future fear of harming a child, in a way that jumps you into action. The Greek root word translated "provoke..to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to lost trust in the moment. The Greek root word αθυμέω (Latin: athumeo) and refers to losing a child trust, permanently, meaning they need to rely on you, not the other way around. 

The idea is allowing yourself to be convicted by God through a child, in terms of elevating children in the right way, meaning not as a mother-figure, but as a goddess of law and order, meaning she's the judge and jury over me. God works within your nature, and messes it around, in this case working against it by way of non-entitlement. I just found myself believing that I was worthless and deserving of nothing from children by default, and the more you focus on that non-entitlement, the more a young girl is like God to you, and so you should treat her with that much respect.

I am entitled to absolutely nothing from a child, meaning they don't have to trust me. But, if they did trust me, that would mean I was kind and trusted them, in the right way that a parent trusts a child to do the right thing - and I do trust them at a healthy level then. Before, I trusted IN them in an entitled way, which is also wanting things from them, which was "comfort" and "company". These days, however, I'm satisfied just being around children, perhaps in public places, and feel no tug to talk to them like I used to. I just walk by, notice, and they don't notice me. If they do, and give me a scathing gaze, I know I have abused them, and then must correct my gaze to correct the problem.

I am entitled to nothing from children, but grateful for everything in terms of undeserved forgiveness.

Why benign wants they are also needs (avoiding benign deprivation tactics)

Many parents believe in the concept of benign deprivation, meaning saying "no" when not necessary. Most parents do not see the value in benign wants for children, and why benign wants are also needs for children. There is usually no reason to use the word "no" at all in a properly set up household.

The doctrine of mutual submission is central to Christian parenting. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, as this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live along the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents, with children being able to be themselves in relation to parents, telling them everything, not fearing any punishment or reprisal from parents, with parents supplying needs demanded, bearing the brunt, and children owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, but nonetheless show gratitude and thanksgiving by emulating the example and teachings of parents, with parents being an extension of Christ, with children being legal extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the word "no" or its various variants, meaning all limits and boundaries with a child. In a good Christian household, the word "no" should be used rarely, and should not be backed up by any form of punishment. Otherwise, the admonition of the Lord involves God's loving compromise, meaning compromising with your child instead of getting into a power struggle, just giving them what they want if it isn't harmful or immoral, or else simply making a deal with them, and when they don't hold up to their end of the deal, cutting them a break, knowing they can't make that kind of a deal yet. The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, or a parent chastening themselves up in the Lord in relation to their crying or otherwise upset child, listening to the child, becoming more restraining in their physical or sexual response to the crying, with the child then afterwards growing in self-control themselves as they get older. This form of discipline is weighed by the Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath", which is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and literally translates to "bitter anger" and refers to punitive or negligent acts, but mainly punitive in this context, that embitter children. Ultimately, this, alongside all of Col. 3:21, refers to the offenses in the legal context of the Bible, meaning the torts and damages system under the Eighth commandment, namely assault and battery laws which prohibited striking a child as well as an adult. Basically, this commandment deemed the slightest of offense perceived by the child, when coming from entitlement, is child abuse, including any dereliction of parental duties nonetheless. 

In the ancient Jewish culture, benign wants were seen as needs by parents. Children were allowed to demand anything from parents, and parents were to supply the every need of children, with benign wants that were attainable from the parent given, or else compromised by God's loving compromise. Rarely were children told "no", so that the word meant something, and then children listened to the voice of their parents if they understood what was asked of them. Or else, mothers supervised, and kept children away from risk of death or serious bodily injury. Simply saying "no" for the sake of saying "no" then was seen as benign deprivation, and a form of provoking a child to anger willfully, thus abuse. Children are to get everything they need, which includes a great deal of what they want. Yes, take them to the park every day after school. They are only little once.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss, and be tormented in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death, which is Satan's final resting place! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Sample

This sample post is to prove that I can go further than a stopped post, to show that our advocacy cannot be controlled by parent influences.

Regards,

Maxwell

Giving without receiving: Why this is what atttachment parenting is all about

What is giving without receiving? The nature of child surrender, in the reverse. Most parents expect certain respect from children. In gentle, attached parenting, that is not the case. Parents are to love their children, meaning give to them without receiving anything in return.

What kind of giving are we talking about. Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, with parents supplying the every demand of a parent, with children being able to share anything with parents, and be themselves with parents, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving for their parents, leading to emulating the loving and disciplined example of parents, 

Childhood bipolar disorder - What you need to know

Many people mix up behaviors of childhood bipolar disorder with that of autism and/or pedophilia in children. Autistic meltdowns are different from bipolar meltdowns, in that autistic meltdowns tend to be teary and due to external factors in the environment beyond the control of the child, so they just go on the floor and melt down. Bipolar rage attacks, as the proper name for the tantrums, are much more eerie in terms of expression, and usually in private, as a form of pro-social domestic violence.

We say "pro-social" here because they are kids, not adults, and shouldn't directly be lumped in with the type that batters wives, except for the fact that they might actually be headed in that direction. It is a self-harm reaction directed towards another person. I myself have bipolar disorder, and had it early as a child. It is like being stonewalled by adults. I hate EVER demanding a child even "ask appropriately" for anything, because sometimes they can't - or at least can't after they blow out due to excessive demands...That's what children with this disorder need - less structure, not more. 

The Parable of the Prodigal Son states in Luke 15:11-31: 

A certain man had two sons: And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the goods that falleth to me: And then divided unto them. And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, he went into a far country, and wasted his substance with riotous living. When he spent it all, a mighty famine rose in that land; and he began to be in want. And when he joined himself to be a citizen of that country, and he sent them into his fields to feed swine. And he would fain fill his belly with the husks. And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired servants of my father have bread enough to spare, and I perish in hunger! I will arise and go to my father, and say unto him, Father, I have sinned against Heaven, and before thee, And am no longer worthy to be called your son. make me as one of thy hired servants. And he arose, and came to his father, but when his father was a great way off, and had compassion, and ran, and fell on his neck, and kissed him. And the son said unto him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no longer worthy to be called thy son. But the father said to his servants, Bring back the best robe, and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his feet: And bring back the fatted calf, and kill it: and let is eat, drink, and be merry:

This is a parable, or an allegorical story that teaches a lesson. This refers to the common custom of avoiding the Law in regards to a stubborn and rebellious son, and just praying that he returns to the family, and comes home to the safety and security of parents. This ties into what to do concerning the behaviors of a child with bipolar disorder - give them their space, give them their rest. They won't rest, most likely, when allowed to rest, but the less demands you impose on them, the more manageable their behaviors are.

A rage attack is when you are so smothered by adult demands, and at the same time stonewalled by behavioral tactics from adults, that you just lunge at them, beating them usually on the back, and only stopping at a point where you feel mercy for the adult, usually a parent, usually a mother. 

The best way is pro-social punching bag. You begrudgingly accept that your child is aggressive and most always will be, so you take away all extracurricular activities, and seek not to overschedule them. The child should lave very lenient structure, meaning they should make the schedule for themselves, not have everything scheduled for them. It is a learning disability, in that you cannot stay on task for one second, perhaps, and then go pacing around the room. It is a state where you feel powerless when throwing a bipolar rage attack, and just want to bring everything to your control. Shut everything down. The idea is not to control the child, but to model self-control. That exemplary teaching likely won't kick in until the child is medicated.

Mutual submission between parents and children involve no control of a child, and instead trust. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, which involves children resting in the love and grace of parents, with children righteously demanding things from parents, and parents supplying said demands of children, with children being able to be themselves in relation to parents, being able to tell parents anything and not fear punishment or reprisal, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving for parents by emulating their loving, disciplined example, and listening to the voice of parents out of reassurance and familiarity. This means non-controlling custody of a child, where the child with bipolar disorder cannot be punished, including physically, but can only be restrained to the degree necessary to keep them safe from death and/or serious bodily harm. Other than that, children learn by way of taking up the example of parents, without any punishment or control.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up" anger or upset in children, namely "stirring the pot" with their emotions. This refers to the offenses in the Bible, namely the torts and damages under the Eighth Commandment, referring here to assault and battery laws. The main offense linked to all others was offense perceived, meaning the slightest of offense perceived by a child, due to the entitled attitudes and behaviors of adults. A form of offenses, or theft, was the slightest of unwanted touch, which was physical battery at the time. Most of the time, it was mothers perceiving the offense, but children crying during unnecessary physical contact such as striking and moving children around (when not endangered), was counted as an offense based on the child's reaction alone, when both parents had failed the child, and abused the child in some way, Acceptable physical contact is a form of pro-social help, which meant removing a child from an environmental hazard such as a campfire or busy city street, today perhaps a stove or busy street. It can also mean self-defense if the child has you barricaded into a room, and is pounding onto the door. Technically speaking, killing an adolescent child is legal if they are coming at you with a knife. 

However, I recommend the method of pro-social punching bag, which involves laying still, and letting the child pummel you while allowing you. while bringing yourself to vulnerable tears. Know and accept how desperate and helpless you are, and relish in it in tear format, perhaps charring oneself for any offenses that may have set off the child, which usually involves the word "no" - use it rarely with any child, but especially THIS type of child. Allow them to also go around the house, tearing up everything, poking holes in walls, flipping tables and chairs. But, babyproof everything to the level of suicide-proofing, meaning lock up all the knives and guns that could be used as a momentary attempt to commit suicide, and also plugging ALL of the outlets. 

Children with the disorder need LESS structure, not more. They have a lot of energy, so much that they literally cannot channel it into one basket, so to speak. So, let them run around the house, perhaps having little to nothing on (hypersexual behavior is common with these children), and have little structure. Call them to the table to eat, help them focus on homework, but otherwise let everything fall apart. If you are sexually attracted to any sort of wardrobe choice, or lack thereof, that is YOUR problem, not the child's, as they have the right to dress however they wish within a home setting. 

There is little a parent can do until a child is properly medicated, meaning usually a mixture of mood stabilizers and antipsychotics, both of which are approved for children as young as 10, but usually are prescribed later by clinicians to rule out lesser remedies in terms of medication. Just because no medication hasn't worked doesn't mean none will. Lithium carbonate is the gold standard, and I support medication for children as opposed to assuming they are just "bad kids" that "need a good, old fashioned spanking". Most of us here at gentle parenting are not anti-medication. Pro-parent parents are, meaning they refuse to medicate either because "there's nothing wrong with my child except that they are a disrespectful brat" or, less commonly, for religious reasons. It is mandatory, under my Christian faith, to medicate a child where they would benefit from it, perhaps if only due to quality of life standards of medical judgment. I thank my parents and doctors for the medication I get, which helps me explore my own issues better.

Parents usually want control. Usually, in parenting, control is unnecessary, and the existence of bipolar disorder in children further proves that control is not a good fit for any parent, but especially these parents.

The depraved and entitled parents who are controlling with children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for the evil one and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Oppositional and defiant behavior - Why this mirrors a parent's attitudes towards their child

Many parents have issues with oppositional and defiant behavior in their children to varying degrees. The child is often blamed for the behavior, meaning usually through punishment and control techniques in order to impose force on the child in order to "behave".

Defiance in children is most always linked to the entitled attitudes towards children. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning children resting in the love and grace of parents, being able to demand needs, with parents supplying for those demands, and children being able to be themselves and tell parents anything, not fearing any punishment or reprisal, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless with children emulating the example of parents and listening to their reassuring, familiar voice. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the legal context of the Bible, meaning the torts and damages under the Eighth Commandment, such as, in this case, assault and battery under the Law that constitutes theft and kidnapping, and applies to protecting children as well as adults. Basically, the slightest of offense perceived by the child, coming from the entitled attitudes and behavior of adults, is child abuse, and is sin. Entitlement in the New Testament, repeating the Tenth Commandment, is denoted by the Greek root word translated πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting things from children, or wanting them to do things for you, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to abuse by way of offense perceived.

The Apostle Paul gave the command in vs. 21 for a reason. Corporal punishment was a form of dealing with oppositional and defiant behavior in Hellenistic and Roman circles, whereas Hebraic circles favored attachment parenting. Paul was commanded by God to set the law down. There would be no debate - Christians could fall into many camps on certain issues, but there was to be no violence committed at the hands of any Christian, including within the home. His whole message with the commandment was that if you are harsh and unforgiving with your child, your child will show the same attitude towards you, in various forms. 

Parenting in ancient Israel was very much attached in nature, with the surrender to parents being closeness in a pro-social mirror(ing) type of way, meaning the warmth in a child's embrace of their mother, and fondness in being swaddled to the mother's bosom or carried on her back. Children who are securely attached to parents usually listen and obey in a "go along with the flow" and "follow mom's lead", alternated with "lead mom to something we want/need" and usually getting it. "Mom" can be replaced with "dad" as well, for some of these, but not all, meaning it is the mothers that hold children close., and the fathers that encourage them from a distance, both on the child's level. Parents were immature then, meaning they delved down to that level and were best friends with their children from day one, meaning unconditional love, meaning being struck with fear by a child's petition of needs, leading to conviction to surrender to God through one's child, sacrificing for them just as Christ did, taking up the cross for one's children, rendering oneself beneath the child, devaluing oneself as caregiver and servant of the child, leading to good works and acts of service towards children, including by omission, perhaps the locational type.

Parents who treated children with warmth and fondness got the same response back from their children most times, and on a level equal to theirs. Any parent who was overly harsh ended up with children who had nasty, defiant attitudes, and thus the apple didn't fall far from the tree. 

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and rot in the ever-burning lake of fire and brimstone, forever descending into the abyss which is eternal Hell-fire, which is Satan's final resting place! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

Why I rarely bring up science

If you notice, I rarely bring up science involving corporal punishment. The reason is clear - everything has been heard out, and people have made up their minds on the science. Some have seen it, some tune it out and put their fingers in their ears.

I shed light on another realm of research that is more likely to change the mind of parents - biblical research. The modern biblical research, which accesses and quotes the Hebraic context from ancient times, clearly colors the biblical text as commanding against corporal punishment. Just see Col. 3:21. We at the American church have long been learning new things about the Bible to liberate oppressed minorities.

I support the science, but everyone had heard those arguments. We are a Christian nation, hence I use Christian arguments against spanking. 

The age of consent and the prevention of sex-positive sexual abuse - why it should be raised to 18 in PA

Age of consent reform is an upward battle, meaning the battle should always for it to be going up. The Virtuous Pedophiles organization supports age-of-consent preservation, explicitly, unlike most of our affiliates. There is a need for an age of consent.

Those who argue for "giving pedophiles what they want" are ignoring the rights of children in this regard. The Greek root word denoting entitlement in the New Testament is the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting something from a child to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child. Children have the ultimate right to overrule adults on an age of consent of 18, but so far, they haven't, except for children their own age, which was the reason for lowering the age of consent here in Pennsylvania from 18 to 16. I oppose this move, despite the child-led support, because it could open the floodgates to sex-positive abuse of children. Using children's rights resources to plan a way for the deserving pedophiles to "get what they want safely" reeks of entitlement, to say the very least, and since it would be forced down the throats of children (literally, perhaps?), it would be adult sexual entitlement, period. Most children, apart from those who have developmental disabilities, want sex with peers.

In Europe, the most common age of consent is 15, and there is a problem with sex-positive abusers. Think the tough guy riding a motorcycle through town, mounting a teenager girl on the back, and you just know there is more mounting between the two of them in bed, perhaps at a hotel somewhere. If she was just one year above 15, or maybe less, the police would have to treat any sexual assault or rape like they would an adult, meaning if she just got cold feet towards the end, there would be little the police could do about it. Same with parents with values like mine when an adult interloper just comes right in and snatches up your daughter.

The age of consent is a biblical concept. It says in 1 Corinthians 7:36 KJV:

But if any man think that he behaveth uncomely towards his virgin, if she pass the flower of her age, and need so require, let him do what he will: let them marry.

"Flower of her age" is translated by the Greek root word υπερακμος (Latin: huperakmos) and refers to the age of consent/marriage under Jewish law, which was 12 for females and 13 for boys. These ages don't matter, but instead the fact that they are aligned clearly with the ages of majority for their respective sexes, meaning the modern equivalent is an age of consent of precisely age 18 which I advocate for. The age of consent is further referenced by the Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to forming a false marriage with anyone but your wife as a man, meaning any sexually entitled intent perceived by another person from another person, starting from leering/menacing to rape/lust murder in terms of severity. Think perceiving eyes on you, if you are a woman, and then you understand what fornication is. The moral crime of fornication, however, covers ALL of the sex crime statutes and customary laws found in the Law, and uplifts them, summing it up as any sexual activity with another person outside of a licensed marriage, in the modern tense referring to state licensed marriages, with both officiants over age 18, as a marriage must be out of love, and true love is charity, not demanding such, in which case being a child bride in an intergenerational marriage is burdensome, hence why marriages must be between two spouses of the same age, or else the woman be older. You don't want your wife to be burdened too much, and if they are a child, they should remain such, and not have to worry about anything. An ordinary wife, in the biblical sense, should only have to worry about pleasing her husband in the bedroom and showing him earned respect for doing everything else. Wifely submission does not even necessitate love, but reverence in a way that promotes the goodness of a husband from aside, like she's his partner in crime, meaning helpmeet. Think how a teenage girl reveres her boyfriend and deifies him - it is a submission that deifies, and the husband does NOT exploit. HE is to be the provider, meaning breadwinner, and that is why we should ban all child marriages as well as loopholes for child predators.

The Greek root word translated "love" and "charity" in the Bible is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to Christian love, meaning unconditional love in the form of being convicted of one's depraved nature in relation to one's wife as a man, leading to providing for her in a sacrificial manner just as Christ sacrificed for His Church...and with a child, you might as well cancel the wedding with this sort of love. Think about it. Can a 9-year-old be organized enough to pay bills, perhaps hold down a job (not obligated, but kind of necessary today)? Heavens, no! She's a kid. Yet she is old enough to marry in Pennsylvania. Plus, the sex part, which is mandatory in a Christian marriage to sign the contract and keep it renewed, is likely to harm her, and in most cases of child marriage, the bride has no choice in the matter - a sham to cover one's tracks in terms of committing sexual abuse, thus sweeping abuse under the rug by accepting it in another lens. I support no wedding to begin with, and the pedophile and child just being good pals, meaning best friends. We are talking an attachment parenting friendship, in the case of a restraining pedophile who is selfless enough to be a pro-social ragdoll or vending machine for the child. The selfish, entitled pedophiles are the ones who are marrying young girls.

A wife owes things back to her husband, meaning respect where respect is due, and sex where they both need it (1 Cor. 7:1-5). Child marriage is wrong because a child should owe absolutely nothing to adults. It says in Ephesians 6:1-3 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, as this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest long upon the earth.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, or custody without returning responsibility, whereas punitive custody in marriage refers to willful submission out of reverence for a higher authority, which can be a husband. Child surrender refers to a child resting in the provisions of parents, meaning parents are safe people where children can demand their needs and benign wants, with parents then supplying the demands of a child, with children owing nothing in relation to a child, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving by listening and heeding the voice of parents, out of reassurance and familiarity and not fear of punishment, then emulating the good, loving, disciplined example of parents in the Lord. Children owe nothing in relation to parents, meaning nothing to parents, which cannot stand in a marriage, as a wife owes her husband sexual duties reciprocated from him, and respect as earned by the providence of the husband.

The concept of the age of majority is a power of attorney, meaning children, due to developmental immaturity, are deemed legally incompetent by default, until reaching a certain age where they can make legal decisions for themselves, and this includes everything that would make a child mobile. It is easy for a guardian to exploit their charge once they are in a sexual relationship with them - it's called quid pro quo. Also, there is a reason for even the laws we already have on child marriage (which aren't enough - it shouldn't exist), which is that adolescent children are extremely labile in terms of peer crushes, meaning in and out of relationships real fast, and this is due to the hormonal instability of puberty, which only settles down when individuals reach their early to mid-20s, according to brain research.

I strongly believe in banning sex outside of marriage because otherwise, some issues are hard to explain. What would happen if a completely non-entitled adult would have sex with a child? Scared on the first try, then stuck on her, and then she's tethered down. I just couldn't let go, even though I am supposed to demand nothing from children. She would want to let go, as she'd get tired of me. Rape would be when the hypothetical 16-17 year old child wanted found someone else, and I couldn't accept it. Sexuality is a powerful thing, and thus it should be relegated to a marriage between two peers. In the Early Church, fornication was seen as any sexual contact with another outside of marriage, and was prosecuted by way of pro-social rumor, meaning people slowly avoided the pervert, but at a rate that he'd confess and flee fornication early if he was repentant, but would throw a temper tantrum once he realized he was out of his church, in which case the excommunication would have been final, and the shun would deem him unclean until the even. Sexual relations with children of any age was seen as creating a child marriage where none exists, as none is acceptable with a child in the Bible. No child under the age of majority was allowed to marry, and marriage past the age of majority involved courtship traditions, but parents negotiating overhead, meaning the young man needed to get the father's blessing and get his parents involved, so that she could be handed over. Today, much of that doesn't apply, but maybe I'd prefer the father's blessing if I were a father, but I would listen to my daughter's wishes or else blame the boyfriend for being a loser and maybe a misogynistic abuser (we wouldn't like those for our daughter).

Things today are becoming too sex-positive. Just ask any social worker in Europe what a low age of consent is doing to them. I'm not afraid of pedophiles lowering the ages either, as the pedophile lobby has gained ground, and we pedophiles don't want to be patronized by false promises such as sex with children being legalized, when we care about children and want them to feel safe, and sex takes all that away. I am worried about people speaking on our behalf and speaking over us, thinking we are "ingrates" for "not wanting the solution they are given". Most pedophiles are getting more than what they want, in an insensitive wat to pedophiles - we just want to be listened to, and have our struggles validated. That's all we want, and any other legal proposals we make you don't have to support. We want compassionate empathy for our struggle.

We have too many things legal already, even for children with adults. It's time to purge the land. Yes, you can wait until marriage, as I can't even have who I want to marry, and I'm just fine with that. Men these days need to learn to keep it in their pants. You wonder why women feel pressured to have abortions - men create kids in women, and then feel too threatened to take care of them. I blame the man in these cases, and see the woman as the victim alongside her preborn child, as was the case in the Early Church. This is why we have age of consent laws, and we need more of them. Our sexual mores are falling apart, and the lines are getting blurred. Let's bring back sexual purity now!

What to do about tantrums and behaviors in public

Many parents do not like taking their children out and about, because they often "have to" punish their child for their behaviors in public. Most all children have some sort of behavior in public that the parents find embarrassing.

Some of the most traumatic of abuse I endured took place in a public place, including one incident at an Aldi store that is now closed here in Berks County, Pennsylvania, in which case everyone sided with my late grandmother, and none with me, as she victimized herself in that regard. She later changed her view on spanking, in a way that I admittedly was never fully grateful for until now. The idea of adults rushing to the assistance of a parent or similarly charged adult, punishing the child for being a child and defying things as kids do, is abuse, and this often happens in public. I don't care if a child is screaming or upset when they are tired or worn out - just one more thing, and it's the last straw for them. I take offense when a parent is clearly combative and disobedient towards the need of a child.

It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, namely listening to and validating a child's upset, being calm for them in a pro-social manner in a manner that involves reflective listening. Basically, this is centering oneself as a parent in a child's upset, doing the opposite of the entitled and violent means you want to do, while modeling the same self-control when a child is upset. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to limits and boundaries, namely the occasional word "no" and its various variants. Many times, especially with younger children, such as toddlers and preschoolers, the word "no" is pointless because they don't understand what is wrong even when explained, and so usually you let kids run around the house, and then hold their hand or put them in a papoose bag once they leave the house. This all is weighed out by the Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to "bitter anger" and refers specifically to the moral crime of provocation of your child to anger through parental entitlement, and this referred to the offenses in the legal context of the Bible, meaning the slightest of personal offense perceived by the child, including the slightest of personal touch unwanted by the child, meaning the Bible in two places, Eph. 6:4 and Col. 3:21, prohibits spanking and corporal punishment, including in a public place where 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody in relation to children, meaning parents provide for the every vulnerable need of a child, including attachment needs, with parents supplying the every demand of children, more or less, with children being able to be themselves and demand anything to parents, owing absolutely nothing in relation to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving by listening to parents due to trust in parent and not punishment, and also emulating their loving, chastened up example for children.

Children tantrum usually for one reason - to grieve what they can't have. Tantrums are not bad behavior, meaning it is normal childhood behavior, and doesn't involve children "willfully defying" or "willfully undermining" parents, or in the case of public venues, "trying to embarrass parents". All children, not just a few with special needs, when they are young, like to predict their environment, and when their environment changes suddenly, such as in terms of parent's wishes or instructions, the child becomes upset and cries, and the idea is to show children God's loving mercy, meaning listen to the cries of children, do not react, but respond with empathy, perhaps giving a gentle instruction AFTERWARDS as to why they couldn't get that toy bicycle, perhaps saying "I understand how much you want that bicycle, but you'd then have to ride it on the sidewalk, which is illegal" and if they went back to crying, or else whined, they won't get it until they are older. This is how both mothers and fathers did it in biblical times, with a mother often holding a screaming and crying 2-year-old to her bosom, breastfeeding the poor child. That is how God's loving mercy was implemented then, so that's how it should be now. If they are ever throwing tantrums, regardless of age, they have not grown out of the need to be soothed that we all by now know an infant has.

Picture the mother holding the upset child close, and the father giving encouragement too, from a distance usually, but still close enough to hold a child's hand and maybe read an older child some reassuring Scripture - that was the image in biblical times. Boys especially were naturally interested in theology, and fathers quenched this need in both sexes in the Early Church.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive or permissive treatment will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and rot in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for the evil one and his accomplices! The depraved and entitled parents shall descend endlessly into the abyss that is ever-lasting Hell-fire! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Original sin: Why parents and adults have a depraved and entitled adult nature

The teaching of original sin is among the most misused of teachings in the Bible, and has been misused to single out all minorities, and this includes children. Many people think children are born in original sin. Nope, adults were. 

Every single adult is guilty for their mere existence in relation to children, with parents being struck with reverent fear and terror, as denoted by the Greek root word ψοβός (Latin: phobos) and refers to conviction to surrender to God through one's child, giving up all adult power and control to the footstool of children, sacrificing for one's children, meaning taking up the cross for one's children, just as Christ took up the cross for His children, leading to good works for one's child, which is love, which is denoted by the biblical Greek word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao).

The Greek root word cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to parental entitlement, or wanting things from children, or wanting children to do things for you, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to an offense. This word also points to our fallen nature as adults, which is to want things from children, which is called parental entitlement. Parental entitlement is believing "I am a good, well-meaning parent, and so I have the right to respect from my child (and everyone else)" leading to demanding, controlling, punitive, or sexually hateful or objectifying behavior. Entitlement is the core of the sin of adulthood, meaning no adult truly means well around children. 

The concept of mutual submission is based off of a parent admitting his/her depraved sin nature. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root work translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to providing custody, meaning parents provide for children as caregivers and servants, with children resting in the love and grace of parent, being able to be oneself and say anything to parents, without fear of punishment or reprisal, owing nothing in relation to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving by both listening to the reassuring, familiar voice of parents and their loving, disciplined example, but more so the latter. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up" anger and upset in a child, using the Greek language idiom of "stirring the pot" and refers to the offenses in the Bible, meaning the torts and damages under Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws pertaining to children as well as adults. Basically, the slightest of offense perceived by the child, coming from parental entitlement, is abuse, and is sin. Abuse refers here not to the act, but the offenses, meaning any act that shows to offend a child, to the slightest degree, can be used in any way or all ways possible and necessary to convict a parent or other adult of the moral crime of dereliction of parental/custodial duties, meaning child abuse. Anything that offends the child, buy commission or omission, including physical or mental punishments such as spanking, time-out/false imprisonment, or loss of privileges/larceny. 

Parents in the biblical context weren't proud parents, but humble parents with a shamefaced, understated attitude towards their parenting. The word "parent" is found nowhere in the Old Testament, and is found only in the New Testament, in a way that means, in context, that children lead their parents to their needs and benign wants, with babies up to age 3 crying in order to petition the need to be swaddled in mother's bosom, engaging in skin-to-skin closeness with mother. The Greek root word for "parent" is γονεύς (Latin: goneus) and refers to a form of following, meaning children plow ahead and beg the following of their parents, as to what they need. Ancient Jewish culture was attachment parenting culture, meaning surrender to parents means deeming parents as safe people to run to regarding needs, and drag parents to their needs like a ragdoll. Parenting then was not a prideful profession, but a selfless one, where parents listening to reflectively and then validated their child's every need and benign want. Parents were seen as indentured servants to their children, meaning time-slaves, meaning they are paying due penance for their sin nature by giving back to their children, who were seen as vulnerable and kept down by society.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive and permissive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death, and is Satan's final resting place! Satan is the source of all abuse in this world! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Mutual submission in parenting - Why parents and children must respect each other (starting with parents)

Many parents demand respect from children, and few have earned it. Most American parents demand a reverent respect that is unbiblical in nature, while claiming to obey God's Law. God's Law is above the law of the land, and calls for the mutual submission of parents and children, with parents submitting first.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning parents providing for children's every need, including attachment needs, and children resting in such love and grace, with children being able to be themselves and tell parents everything, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving to parents by listening to their voice and following their exemplary teaching, with parents modeling good behavior instead of imposing rules and punishment. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses under biblical law, meaning the torts and damages under the Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws that also protected children, summed up as the slightest of offense perceived by a child. 

In biblical times, parents were close to their children, and earned respect for children growing up. Infants up to age 3 were swaddled in the bosom of their mothers, or else next to them, with older children playing freely in close range to mothers. Children were deified, with parents holding reverence to their children, being best friends with their child in the process.

Parents and children are to submit to each other, meaning respect each other, starting with respect from parents. Let the depraved and entitled parents burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death, and Satan's final resting place! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Formal vs. informal speech with children (speech as a guide to attachment)

Many parents insist on formalities in parenting with their children, while enforcing none on themselves. Think a fat woman in a wheelchair forcing a young girl to act prim and proper in Wal-Mart. Many parents are hypocrites in this regard, meaning most of them - accusing children of "having bad moods" and "not being positive". YOU avoid bad moods and be positive as a parent, then watch your child follow by.

The Tenth Commandment in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, not his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

The Greek root word translated למחוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to wanting something from a child to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child. The Greek root word cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment refers to the concept of entitlement, and is denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers here to the entitled attitude of "I am a/the parent, and I deserve respect from my child" leading to demanding, controlling, punitive, or sexually hateful/objectifying behavior impose on a child, leading to abuse by way of perceived offense. 

Parent-child relationships, like all adult-child relationships, are based on the concept of mutual submission, which is stated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning children resting while parents are caregivers and servants to children, supplying the every demand of children. This can be understood in terms of speech. I am not deserving of anything but the worst of the brunt from children, meaning I am not even deserving of interaction with children to the level of speech. A child reels me in as to how much I can speak to them, and when they allow for casual conversation, stoop to their level, and be as immature as they are. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stirring up" anger and upset in children, referring to the Greek idiom "stirring the pot", and literally literally refers to the offenses in the Bible, meaning the torts and damages under the Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws, which also benefitted children as well as adults. Basically, the slightest of offense perceived by the child, coming from the entitled attitudes of adults, with this including physical battery, or the slightest of personal touch in relation to children.

Speak to children only on their terms, or not at all, meaning you as an adult are not even deserving of that. The formal position of an adult is the assumed position, meaning hands behind one's back, shamefaced, relishing in one's guilt merely for existing as an adult, knowing your individual collective crimes against children throughout history, and only having casual conversation with even your own child when invited. Otherwise, be in silence while children play amongst each other.

Children in the biblical context surrendered to parents in casual close format, with mothers especially martyring themselves for the good of children. Closeness meant chatting with children, and letting children lead parents to their interests and play, with parents, especially mothers, being immature alongside children, on their level. Children first, parents last - the motto of all good biblical parenting!

The depraved and entitled parent will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, languishing in the flames of Hell-fire, descending downward, with God turning His back on the evildoer towards children, then finally putting the evil one in his place! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why immature parents make the best parents (seeing children on their level)

What is an immature parent? An immature parent, according to parent research, is either naturally on the child's level, or manufactured to be such. I am the former. Think pedophile, and you might get the picture, when couple with autistic immaturity. Most people see me as wanting to be friends with preteen girls because I am at their level emotionally - and every parent should be that immature in relation to their child.

Attached, gentle parents to their children are generally immature, but in a box designed directly for each individual child they have. When you see children not as extensions of you, but as a best friend that is their own person, you end up being on their level when around them. In my case, they rise up to my level, and then I remember how complicated children are. I am trained by my Christian faith to assume nothing about a child, apart from the fact that they are guilty of nothing. You'll never convince me otherwise, since my anger is silenced towards children, righteously. I can get impatient, but only enough to set a boundary. Otherwise, I grow tired and weary. This is how most mothers instead feel about their infant, whereas they are like that up until age 18. Those of us who are gentle parenting pedophiles tend to be naturals, but still have to struggle like any other parent here by keeping back sexual entitlement directed towards children, meaning no parent is perfect, but I don't internalize societal norms of "pro-social" child hatred.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning being a caregiver or servant to a child. Most all of this, meaning all when Christian parents weren't abusive, was parents being on their child's level, in a convicting, passive way, where children give the orders, and parents either obey blindly, or talk out a compromise with children, rarely saying a flat out "no". It was an immature friendship, but a convicting one on the part of the parent, meaning parents saw children as equals with greater value than them, meaning extensions of God, and worshipped children as their own unique altars, meaning each and every child was an individual. Child surrender is rest in this sort of passive submission from parents. The submission is a striking one, out of reverent fear (GRK: ψοβός), meaning an undeserving attitude towards parents. You start from zero in terms of knowing what you deserve from a child, and let them elevate and decide for themselves what you deserve from them, ultimately leading to casual friendship with one's child once the ice is broken, preferably by age 5 through bonding techniques attachment parenting such as co-sleeping one's child and constantly holding them. The idea is that you see the child as a vulnerable human being, who is further put in a place of oppression in society. Child surrender refers to the friendship where the more mature, adult friend is trusted by the younger, inexperienced child friend, enough to heed the instruction of parents, and most of the time not think twice about it. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses under the Eighth Commandment, meaning taking something away from a child, which includes here safety, peace of mind, and quality-of-life, meaning even being a nuisance to a child out of entitlement is abuse.

Christian love for one's child is about being struck with reverent fear and terror for having a depraved sin nature deserving of everything bad and hateful from a child, and nothing good and pleasant, leading to reverent caution for the child's feelings, and only denying them privileges as an equal, and only when absolutely necessary in terms of total denial, usually coming to a compromise. The clear word "no" should be rare, in order to give it meaning, and should not ever have to be backed up by punishment. Never punish a child. Fear children, and fear their wrath of unmet needs, instead meeting their every need.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God, with them descending forever into the abyss of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan as his final resting place! God gave them a chance, then condemned them once they condemned their child! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

What Proverbs 13:24 means to me (as a children's rights adult)

Many pro-spanking parents will cite the Bible as a reason to say that spanking a child is sin. Others here ignore texts such as Prov. 13:24. Proverbs 13:24 has nothing to do with raising a child, hence why I rarely bring it up. There is a whole historical context behind the verse that most Christian parents are missing.

It says in Proverbs 13:24 KJV:

He that spareth the rod hates his son: but he who loveth his son chasteneth him betimes.

"Son" here refers to an adult son over the age of majority, which was 13 now, with 18 being the modern-day equivalent. The rod here is referred to the Hebrew word שםח (Latin: shebet) referring literally to the rod of correction for younger men who got caught up in the legal system in ancient Israel, in a way that would make Israelite national news, meaning a once-in-a-lifetime event in any Israelite settlement. Most of the time, the rod in these verses could be interpreted and applied in layers, meaning the rod of correction referred symbolically to living on the edge, and then perishing because of entitled recklessness and foolishness. We aren't talking about a rowdy young child, but a rowdy young man that frequents prostitutes, orgies, alcohol, unclean meats, and such.

In order for an adult son to be whipped by his father, there had to be extensive due process, meaning there had to be warnings, and the warnings had to be then when the individual was caught in the act. Living on the edge, literally, meant you were going places, meaning headed for destruction by the Israelite state, meaning you were warned by your father and mother repeatedly that you would have to endure judicial corporal punishment, with the father being the court-appointed accessory. The legal system operated as a hitman, meaning the parents were desperate, in a way that had them stigmatized in that society as snowflakes, to the point where every single parent recanted the allegations against their stubborn and rebellious son, deeming him a prodigal son, praying for him and keeping him in his heart, something most parents did in the first place and said "if you need to kill your child due to their rebellion, you must have modeled that behavior to them".

The rod of correction was a legal menace, much like the image of a mugshot. When you see a mugshot, does it make you that less likely to commit a crime? It does for me. Very few sons got the rod of correction, and most did because they killed their neighbor or abused their children, the latter meaning punishing or falsely encouraging their the grandchildren of their parents, meaning grandparents then were authoritarian in a different way - they stepped in usually to stop abuse and put the sick puppy down for kidnapping or incest, by their order of investigation in the family, to purge the family of all uncleanness, sexual impurity, and hatred of children. No adult son got the tail end of a switch just for disobedience.

Children, meaning minor children that were not of age, were not punished, but were raised in an attached manner. Ancient Jewish culture was attachment parenting culture, in the form of mutual submission and mutual respect between parents and children. This culture is uplifted in the New Testament, meaning Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning children resting while their every need is provided for by parents, with parents supplying the every demand of children in terms of needs, including attachment needs, with children being able to say or do anything in relation to parents, not fearing any sort of punishment or reprisal from parents, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving to non-abusive, non-violent parents by listening to their reassuring voice and taking up their example in terms of values. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up" anger or upset in children, in terms of "stirring the pot" in terms of negative and hurt emotions from children, referring to spanking and punishing children, which was a Hellenistic tradition which Paul was insisting had to die upon entry onto Church grounds. God used the Apostle Paul to officially, and explicitly, ban spanking throughout the world. Any commandment of God than can be applied today applies, as written to its original legal context, which is a Christian context here.

Attachment parenting was the norm in ancient Jewish culture, and Early Christian culture alike, with parents remaining close to their children, Mothers swaddled their infant children to their bosom until age 3, with breastfeeding allowed (or at least tolerated) everywhere in public. Skin-to-skin contact was also used to bond with children, with the bond to both parents lasting for a lifetime, meaning when children came home to parents, even the toughest of men, they regressed into a child-like state, meaning the culture was hospitable towards adult children - come on back home sometime, kick back your shoes, and maybe have something to drink. Adult children could always seek refuge with parents, and the door was always open. Usually, though, adult children were motivated to be independent as they ranged away from parents, experiencing the cushioning of attachment parenting enough to form the self-control and self-discipline to handle the real world.

The rod verses in Proverbs refer to judicial corporal punishment, not familial corporal punishment. Replace "rod of correction" with "Department of Corrections" and it means the same thing. You do the big boy crime, you do the big boy time.

The depraved and entitled parents will BURN! Let them descend forever into the abyss of Hell-fire, which is the lake of fire, meaning the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why getting angry with your child is a sin

Many parents feel like they have the right to be angry and resentful with their child. Do parents have the right to punish a child out of anger, even when taking "a deep breath" (like my ex-abusive father did)? Absolutely not. Getting angry with a child is sin.

It says in Matthew 5:21-22 KJV:

Ye have heard it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill, and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: but I say unto you, that whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause is in danger of judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of Hell-fire.

"whosoever is angry with his brother" referring to expressed anger and resentment. "without a cause" refers to the fact that the beforementioned anger is extrajudicial in nature, as the Greek root word translated "council" is συνέδριον (Latin: sunerdrion) and refers to the Sanhedrin, or a council of either 23 or 71 judges, and there had to be 2/3 agreement to condemn a defendant to a whipping before being executed - that same whipping is what is mentioned for ADULT children in Proverbs and Hebrews. In the Early Christian context, every man had his own courtroom, as is the case today with your neighbor. Any anger outside of court was considered sin then, meaning a reason to take the angry person to court. Anger basically meant, then, that you wanted to challenge your neighbor to a legal exchange, and otherwise Jews and Christians both were to keep their composure. 

The terms of righteous judgment in the biblical context decide whether children can stand trial or not. They couldn't then. It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

The Greek root words translated "judge" and "judgment" is κνιρο (Latin: krino) and refers to righteous judgment, meaning legal judgment, and this included legal defenses such as the defense of infancy. The defense of infancy applies to all children who are legally illiterate as to the Law, meaning they have not mastered the Law yet.

The Bible instead teaches mutual submission between parents and children. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning children rest as parents provide for their every need, with children being able to be themselves and demand needs, with parents supplying needs that the child demands, with children owing nothing in relation to children, but nonetheless listening to their voice out of reassurance, following their example. Parents are not to be angry at a child, lest they provoke anger in a child, as denoted by the Greek root word ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up", referring to "stirring the pot" in terms of your child's emotions, referring to the offenses under the Law, meaning under the Eighth Commandment precisely. This refers, by extension to, torts and damages such as assault and battery laws, meaning the slightest of offense perceived by the child is abuse, when coming from entitled intent to control, and that includes the slightest of physical touch that is unwanted by the child plaintiff. Signs of abuse include a cry that a mother would identify readily as coming from abuse, or a power struggle that might be defended by a parent. 

The Apostle Paul was referring to harsh punishment such as spanking imposed on children by Greek newcomer parents, setting the Law down, which didn't need to be clarified in the Old Testament due to strength of attachment parenting tradition, which involved swaddling infants to the bosom of their mother until age 3, and played freely in close range to mothers until then.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death where the evil one will be laid to rest! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Pro-social calm, pro-social ragdoll - My attitude around children

Many people think I must be tyrant in my personal life, given how authoritarian in nature the language I write in is very authoritarian. I am not who I present to be on the Internet, in a relieving way. I have no enemies in person, but am a very clannish and sheltered person. I keep to my own, and heed command to the lawful and binding command of children everywhere, stepping aside as if they are royalty.

I am a very calm person in my personal life, meaning reverent calm with abusers, and pro-social calm with children. It is a calm that nods, with children wanting to you to listen to their feelings, thus being validated, and then you stonewall abusers because they don't want to be listened to, but to offend you.

I am like a ragdoll with a child, meaning I use selfless gaslighting to get through to children, allowing them to render me to the lowest level of servitude imaginable. They usually elevate my status quickly, but I am a slave to children, and righteously so, just like every adult is in the eyes of God. I am an indentured servant - a time-slave - serving my sentence, paying due penance in relation to children, in the Lord, for existing as the entitled adult that I am.

This is what love is, as is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to being convicted of one's depraved sin nature as an adult out of reverent fear in relation to children, leading to surrender to God in relation to children, apologizing for how one has wronged children, having a change of heart, with adults being calm in a listening way towards children, being subdued to the force that is the demands of a child, shaking and quaking at the every petition of the needs of a child.

I am calm. You are not, around children. You yell, whereas I smile. How 'bout them apples, dear parents?

Child surrender - And why secure attachment is necessary to earn cooperation with children

Many people think parents in the biblical context were strict on their children, meaning punitive parents, thus children are to surrender once their will is broken. The reality is that child surrender is reliant on parent submission to the child.

Parents need to earn their cooperation with children, with parents being struck with reverent terror for the every need of their child, being convicted to surrender to God through one's child, giving up one's adult power and control to the footstool of children, sacrificing for one's child, taking up the cross just as Christ took up the cross for His children, rendering oneself beneath one's child, devaluing oneself as her caregiver and servant, leading to good works for the sake of good works, expecting absolutely nothing in return, but grateful for everything good done for children, and the fact that they exist as your child. This describes Christian love, as denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao).

Parents are to render themselves to a selfless level smaller than their children, for being bigger and more powerful, thereby selflessly degrading themselves righteously, shielding their child from guilt or shame, taking the blame and responsibility themselves, being struck with conviction of peaceable and orderly behavior towards a child, in a selfless manner that listens to and validates the every upset of a child, modeling selflessness and self-control to parents.

The mutual submission doctrine of parenting is stated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to providing custody, meaning rest in the providence of parents, with parents supplying the every demand of a child, with children being able to be oneself in relation to parents, owing absolutely nothing in relation to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude and thanksgiving by way of listening to the voice of parents, in a reassuring manner, like a gentle nudge. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up" a child's anger, namely "stirring the pot" in terms of child anger or upset, referring to the offenses under the Eighth Commandment, namely the slightest of offense perceived by a child, including corporal punishment, known as the slightest of unwanted touch perceived by a child from a parent. 

Children were seen as autonomous in ancient Israel, meaning not extensions of their parents. Parents simply had an affinity with their children, in the form of pro-social child worship, meaning seeing children in relation to their needs as legal extensions of God, striking terror in parents. Mothers especially were beholden to children, with infants up to age 3 swaddled next to mothers, with children older than that playing in close range to mother, with father standing by in a protective manner, with the staff he held meant to show headship, and also beat any intruders with it. Children were allowed to demand their needs as loudly or pushy as they wished, with parents supplying the every demand of their child, selflessly, with children then surrendering out of gratitude and thanksgiving for the selfless care.

Parents then were securely attached to their children, and vice versa, meaning parent and child were attached at the hip, and pals in the case of fathers. Secure attachment is the healthiest form of attachment possible in parenting, meaning the closest. It refers to children listening with compliance not out of fear, but out of fondness and affection in one's parents, seeing them as safe people to deposit emotions onto, with parents simply being selfless in that regard. Attached activities might just be going places, going out to eat, and so forth in a way that builds a secure bond between parent and child.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God, and will descend forever into the abyss that is eternal Hell-fire! They will be cast away into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for the evil one and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The goal of Opposing Parental Entitlement - parent-to-parent judgment

Many parents in this country abuse children, meaning most, with 70% of adults supporting a "good, hard spanking". Many here at children's rights do not understand my goals on that subject. I don't want parents to cover for each other, but to judge each other, using the Christian family values that this country was founded upon.

It says in 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with one an no not to eat.

The key word here is "covetous", meaning here parental entitlement, denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the entitled attitude of "I am the parent, and I deserve respect from my children (and everyone else as well)" leading to seeking to impose said attitude onto a child, through demanding, controlling, punitive, or sexually hateful/objectifying behaviors, leading to offense perceived by a child (Col. 3:21; Eph. 6:4). Part of admission of adult power and control is parent power and control, meaning parent privilege over children, which all parents have. Every single adult has such entitlement in relation to children, pointing to parents, and must surrender their power and control to the footstool of children, treating them as royalty.

How should a parent judge? It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

The Greek root word translated "judge" and "judgment" is κρινο (Latin: krinó) and refers to the Law summed up in terms of righteous judgment, including factoring in the legal defenses, with core of righteous judgment being the presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, but with due suspicion "beyond what the eye can see", with the latter tenet denoted by the Greek root word οψις (Latin: opsis). True righteous judgment is materialistic and scientific in nature, and is based by the concept of "no evidence, no crime". Evidence can be your eyewitness, or the eyewitness of a credible eyewitness, namely a child in this case. Parents are to monitor each other, presuming innocence beyond a reasonable while residing side by side from each other, whilst at the same time being discerning. 

True parent judgment is righteously testing parents with questions that are intended to disprove their guilt, until their guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Doubt until you have no reason to doubt, when hearing from anyone other than the child, because that adult sounding the alarm might have a beef with the adult being called out, meaning the report might be bogus. Children never lie about abuse, even when they get the wrong adult. Doubt hysterical therapists, but trust children with their own testimony, as children are the best judges against abuser of all kinds, when they are allowed to be.

Think me as a pedophile judging you as a parent, but at the same time accepting judgment from you in return, answering the question "are you a f*cking pedophile" with a nod or "yep, I am". A children's rights adult focuses on their issues first, but then ministers to other adults in exemplary format, and then instructional once asked. I AM a pedophile, and struggle with sexual/behavioral negligence, and so I have to know not to virtue-signal to children, meaning give them whatever they want and then feel piously guilty when I have to set a limit,. I just wanted to please children, and wanted them to care for me, so I flipped the scripts and now I am to be the provider, under my Christian beliefs. These days, I just like being around children, and don't want anything else from them, because I am grateful that they exist. An adult can get to that point, even if they are physically aggressive...I like meeting them in public places such as stores, meaning their very presence is something I enjoy.

I am entitled to nothing from a child, but am grateful for any respect given by children. I am entitled to nothing but disrespect, and nothing but hate, from a child, until decided otherwise by the child. I have a depraved, entitled nature in relation to children that is deserving of DEATH and DESTRUCTION merely for existing as an adult, for everything that adults have done to children through time immemorial. Let the entitled parents BURN!

 

Parental entitlement: A good framework to redefine child abuse

Many parents think they aren't abusers, and many adults get defensive when seen as the abuser. Whole groups of people are falsely blamed for "orchestrating the child abuse epidemic". There is an epidemic, but it is in fact grander than most people think. Most child abuse evades state or U.S. law.

Parental entitlement is parental control, meaning the intent of a parent to control their own children, with pedophilia being the mental health label for just one of many variants of parental entitlement, from a medical standpoint, and a label insignificant, in fact, in locating abusers of children. The Greek root word denoting entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the attitude of "I am the parent, and I deserve respect from my child (and everyone else)" leading to seeking to impose said want onto a child though demanding, controlling, punitive, or sexually hateful or objectifying behavior, leading to offense perceived by the child. Offenses are defined in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to "stirring up" anger in a child, in terms of "stirring the pot" in terms of their upset or frustrated emotions, by way of willful or reckless selfish intent. Basically, it is the slightest of offense perceived by a child, to the level of din. This commandment refers specifically to harsh punishments transported into the Christian church at Colossae by Greek and Roman converts, meaning the Apostle Paul gave this command to crack down on pro-spanking parents emigrating from the surrounding Hellenistic culture, tainting the child-friendliness of the Church. This law today, however, can be used any way or all ways to shut down an abusive parent, as long as the child visibly is at least annoyed by the parents, and their intent appears entitled, at least to the level of want.

America is a Christian nation, and was founded on Judaeo-Christian family values, including non-entitlement as a parent. Parental entitlement is the number one threat to children, as well as the parents who identify by it in its various forms. According to the children's rights definition of child abuse, anything that is offensive to the child, by their own perception, is abuse, and this is backed up by America's law book, the Bible, and so this should be the law everywhere.

Most countries where spanking is banned still have it where adults identify child abuse, not the children themselves. America might be the first major country where children are taught in school how to identify their own abuse, particularly at an older age, and be able to turn in their parents, with the child protection system convicting parents to turn themselves into their children, and be struck with terror by their lawful and binding orders to cease and desist abuse and entitlement imposed.

There are two sides to children's rights, children and their adults, especially their parents, and the parent/adult side is, from a bird's eye view, guilty as charged, meaning guilty of their depraved sin nature, deserving of punishment merely for existing in relation to children, given the moral crimes adults have committed against children since time immemorial. All adults are guilty, and are to give up their power and control over children, turning themselves into their children, with children being engaged in reverent rebellion that righteously takes advantage of the pro-social submission of righteous adults towards children.

The depraved and entitled parents and adults who defend parental entitlement will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be tormented, and let them languish, in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let the offenders against children descent forever into the abyss of Hell, being tormented for their sins for ever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!