Many people think I must be tyrant in my personal life, given how authoritarian in nature the language I write in is very authoritarian. I am not who I present to be on the Internet, in a relieving way. I have no enemies in person, but am a very clannish and sheltered person. I keep to my own, and heed command to the lawful and binding command of children everywhere, stepping aside as if they are royalty.
I am a very calm person in my personal life, meaning reverent calm with abusers, and pro-social calm with children. It is a calm that nods, with children wanting to you to listen to their feelings, thus being validated, and then you stonewall abusers because they don't want to be listened to, but to offend you.
I am like a ragdoll with a child, meaning I use selfless gaslighting to get through to children, allowing them to render me to the lowest level of servitude imaginable. They usually elevate my status quickly, but I am a slave to children, and righteously so, just like every adult is in the eyes of God. I am an indentured servant - a time-slave - serving my sentence, paying due penance in relation to children, in the Lord, for existing as the entitled adult that I am.
This is what love is, as is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to being convicted of one's depraved sin nature as an adult out of reverent fear in relation to children, leading to surrender to God in relation to children, apologizing for how one has wronged children, having a change of heart, with adults being calm in a listening way towards children, being subdued to the force that is the demands of a child, shaking and quaking at the every petition of the needs of a child.
I am calm. You are not, around children. You yell, whereas I smile. How 'bout them apples, dear parents?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.