Thanksgiving is here: Happy Thanksgiving!

 Happy Thanksgiving! Thank you Lord for everything that I have. Aman.

Happy Children's Day

I wish all children, current and former, a happy children's day. November 20 is Universal Children's Day. Children's rights has a while to go in this country. The United States of America, while being advanced in other ways, has a horrific human rights record regarding children.

Spend some quality time with your child. Give thanks to the Lord Above for your child, as thanksgiving is right around the corner from children's day

POSITION STATEMENT: Four-day school weeks

Quite a few school districts in the rural West as well as urban schools in Texas, Missouri, and other states, are going to a four day school week. I think that is smart on the part of these school districts, and I commend them for their sensitivity to children and child development.

The problem with our education system is that we are putting too much of a burden on children given their age and development, while at the same time giving them too little of a time to absorb what they need to learn. It is about time some local education agencies (LEAs) took the time to give children a break from learning. 

My ultimate stance on education is that we need homeschools more than ever, of the unschooling self-directed type. In the Early Church, children learned to read all on their own using the Bible left out by their parents. Written language is a human need, and thus most children can pick up written language real fast. This is just one concept relating to self-education.

POSITION STATEMENT: Shooting in a Christian school in Nashville, Tennessee

Many of my left-wing colleagues will continue to blame guns. I don't. I blame Audrey Hale, the shooter and murderer of CHILDREN. May her name be in infamy for all time. We hear the excuse for her from the left who wants to ban guns instead of pond scum like her - "she had a religious trauma". Then Hale shouldn't have dealt with her religious trauma in an encouraging way if she knew it would make her prone to violence.

Gun control just won't work. There are too many guns to control using the law. Banning even assault weapons could land them into the wrong hands, in which case it could contribute to gun crime of another sort. It is unfortunate that we have so many guns on the market, including the black market, but the genie is out of the bottle. We can't defeat guns, so lets focus on the gunman - and how to prevent one from being raised by entitled parents.

Most mass shootings are trauma-related, at least at some level, in the perpetrator. That is because most people have trauma, usually parent trauma like I have. Sometimes, the trauma comes from a church or religious school. But, you better be sure that religious trauma does not turn into a grudge. 

What would change things would be easing out punitive parenting and effecting a ban on all punitive patrenting. That sort of parenting models the sort of entitlement that breeds a school shooter. 

But, once you have that trauma, it is YOUR responsibility to take care of that trauma instead of seeth in anger over that trauma. I wasted years of my life engulfed in anger about my lawfully abusive upbringing. It made me defiant in my attitude. Now, I have put my trauma to bed. When your trauma leads you to shoot up a school, YOU alone are responsible.

This is a personal case of a mass shooting to my platform because children - the group of people I represent - were unfairly and unjustly targeted by an adult shooter, and had no way of defending themselves. May the name Aubrey Hale be in infamy forevermore.

POSITION STATEMENT: Why woke should stay out of the classroom

Many parents these days are outraged. Our schools are becoming stations for woke indoctrination. Where I draw the line as an advocate is when the concept of racial or gender privilege is brought into the classroom. 

I can think of children's rights concerns regarding woke indoctrination. Calling out the privilege of a large amount of students in a classroom is offensive to white male students who are accused of that privilege, and also prejudicial to such students. When you bring up privilege in the classroom, it creates division in the classroom.

Schools should remain politically neutral places of learning. The problem is that the left believes that they are OBJECTIVELY right, not subjectively, meaning they have no humility of opinion. Leave it to children to explore their political views on their own time. Not school time. School is for learning basic academic and life skills that will last them a lifetime, not useless social justice drivel. 

As an alternative to the education reform that we see from woke activists today, why not get rid of homework to start out with? Why not make ALL instruction in American public schools - PK-12 - play-based in terms of mode of instruction. There is such a thing as self-education under such a setup, and THAT is where children can learn about the history of social justice. Not on school time. 

On the issue of sex education in elementary schools, I do not support giving children sexual choices. Children shouldn't even be having sex. I support instead instilling messages of abstinence in young children from an early age. Yes, most parents don't want to talk about sex to children at a young age, but it has to be done somewhere, and children need to know the established sexual norms of society, as the God's Law instates. 

POSITION STATEMENT: Proposed legislation barring minor children from access to drag shows

This platform was founded upon a set of Christian family values, with such values prohibiting same-sex sexual relations and outward behavior. It is the opinion of me, Maxwell Clark Scheibner, that presenting to a child in drag is just as inappropriate as masturbating in front of a child. 

Dressing in drag is a form of masturbatory desire known as autogynephilia, where a man wants to be admired in the sexual arena, and appear attractive, as a woman. Thus, due to the link to homosexuality, cross-dressing of this type is only acceptable when walking through the house, meaning only the privacy of your own home. Not in a club. Not in a library. Not in a school.

Fornication by way of obscenity is any public act coming from one's person with intent to arouse, alarm, or offend another, or else recklessly does the same. Usually, when you wear drag, you have the intent to arouse both others and yourself, so keep that tendency to yourself. Let's call it what it is - transvestitism. It is okay to be a transvestite, but do it privately, where you can imagine your own audience. Don't go to a book club with a bunch of innocent children in such a defiled state. 

It is one thing if you simply have same-sex attractions, which a lot of people do. But, to act on them in a way that involves minor children is another story. If you do something like dress in drag where children congregate, that is a form of child sexual abuse. I am okay with men dressing in drag in the privacy of their own homes, when nobody is looking, with an imaginary audience. But, doing it in front of children is simply obscene and should not exist. I am all for the right of someone with same-sex sexual attractions to indulge in masturbatory fantasy, but anything that involves other people should be prohibited under the law.

This platform supports child protection legislation limiting or prohibiting access of minor children to drag shows. 

Culmination of the investigation

The police are gone, and the gaslighting tape is on its way out. This platform, including the founder, Maxwell Clark Scheibner, was under investigation for child-on-child sexual abuse. What actually happened is more complex than what I was accused of. 

A report of possible future child-on-child rape against a cousin of mine was made to the City of Reading Police Department. Then, when the father of a cousin of mine, Gina Scheibner, attempted to make a report of sexual harassment against his daughter by me, which did happen, the police accused my cousin of denying the "fact" that she was "raped" by me. In reality, the secular statute in question was not rape, but summary harassment, but since summary harassment has a statute of limitations of 90 days, there was nothing to charge me with, and so the investigation ran out, and I was found not guilty.

However, I am guilty in terms of moral laws. Adult sexual entitlement is defined under Christian law as, officially speaking, sexual wants from children, to the point of sexually motivated approach. I did walk up to Gina. I did freshen her up on the sides of her budding breasts (she was 12), and try to hug her from behind. Because she perceived my entitled approach, it was fornication, making me a sex offender in the moral tense. If you have my values, the term "sexual offense" encompasses more than what is entailed under the secular law. Anyone who commits fornication in any of its forms is a sex offender, and once charged, is a sex offender for life, even if the offense is forgiven by God. Fornication is blasphemy, and is regarded by God as worse than murder.

What the police could have done differently was simply send a patrol officer to my door, and warn my mother about the concerns of Gina's father. The reason why the police overreacted was that a man in my family, Robert E. Hall, made a false and fraudulent report that crossed the instincts of the police, making me look like a credible target. Here in Berks County, we have predator police, and those police are promised a rape if they catch the right offender. Basically, the substance of the report, to my knowledge, made a small thing look capable of big things. 

The investigation is over, and Opposing Parental Entitlement is here to stay. I cooperated with the investigation. I encourage all parents and other adults being investigated by the authorities to cooperate and fork over the evidence, and then gauge the gratitude of the authorities for obtaining that evidence. Defending yourself makes it harder for the authorities to figure out if you are innocent or guilty. So, just fork over the evidence.

Happy Martin Luther King, Jr. day

As a policy, I do not discuss racial topics directly on my platform, to avoid the appearance of a racist. But, Dr. King's legacy transcends race. Children need a Dr. King of their own to afford them their civil rights. 

Happy Martin Luther King, Jr. day. Many people think of children's rights as a leftist human rights worldview. The fact of the matter is that children deserve not only human rights, but civil rights. My future context view as a child advocate involves eliminating the voting age, meaning deleting it from our Constitution.

I do not have an agenda as an advocate, but instead ideals. My ideal is for children to have the same political rights that an adult has. 

Dr. King was pro-child himself, meaning he opposed spanking and corporal punishment entirely. Dr. King was not always stoic and serious, but was the laid back type of guy that you might find shooting pool on a Friday or Saturday night. He didn't think within the box, but thought for himself, as a critical thinker. He was not a liberal either, but was a Christian conservative and Southern Baptist, and stressed individual responsibility with his constituents. He was a lot like I am now on the children's rights issue - I see something wrong, and want to do something about it. 

Also, just like Dr. King did, I do not want to be well-known. I want my work to be well-known, meaning I want to one day walk down the street, knowing that in the houses I pass, children are safe and empowered - and that *I* was part of the solution, not part of the problem.

To commemorate Dr. King's legacy, I will continue to oppose all forms of child punishment, as is something Dr. King would agree with. Children are the most oppressed of minorities, meaning society sees them as mere slaves or chattel to their parents. Children are the only group of people without political rights of any kind. Here in Pennsylvania, felons can vote, but children cannot vote. 

What is getting in the way? Punitive parenting, including all forms of corporal punishment. If we could just have corporal punishment, as well as other forms of punishment, criminalized, then children would be able to vote, because nobody would be stopping them from making that solemn and private choice. Voting is for everyone, especially since some children work, and thus are taxed without representation. The government should not have the right to tell people who can and cannot vote. The government should just issue the ballot box. Who gets to use that ballot box? That is for the child to decide, when he/she is individually ready. Usually, a child is ready to vote when they care about the issues, meaning when they start to inform themselves about the issues.

The (prolonged) Opposing Parental Entitlement investigation: What I did and did not do

I have been holding back for a long time on making a blog post about the investigation of me and my platform here at Children's Rights. It seems a suspicious character, Robert Hall, is spreading false news that I am hiding a rape incident that I allegedly committed against my cousin, Gina Scheibner.

I did do something to my cousin Gina, but it wasn't rape. I sexually harassed her by using antisocial "rough-play", meaning I got on top of her from behind, but did not touch her in a way that would constitute a sex crime under Chapter 31 of the Pennsylvania Crimes Code (relating to sexual offenses). 

I am deserving of nothing except hatred and resentment from my cousin, yet she is forgiving of me, which I do not deserve. 

I humbly ask that the investigation end. Instead of investigating a rape that didn't happen, the Berks County Detectives Child Abuse Division should not have gotten involved. A crime on the level of summary harassment - which was my actual crime - should have been dealt with by a patrol officer of the City of Reading Police Department.

I did do something. But, it wasn't rape. If anyone does not believe my testimony, they are free to speak to my cousin to corroborate what I have just said here.

Also, Maxwell Scheibner wrote this post, and there is only one "Max". Max is my nickname, and people are still free to call me that. There is a Facebook page attached to this blog, meaning I and my mother co-admin that page. Max Larson does not exist. I identify as a man, clearly, and if you feel the need to control me with epithets falsely accusing me of not being a man, YOU are not a man, but a little boy who always wants his way. A man controls himself, and is not out of control because he somehow can't move someone's location. If you have to control anyone, you are out of control, thus undisciplined, thus not a man.

Beyond this point, if anyone has a child welfare concern regarding my existence, contact PA ChildLine at 1-800-932-0313. I have not spoken to a child in a long while, and my Christian standards prohibit me from speaking to children, as a man, unless I am specifically addressed by the child. My Christian family values oppose rape in all situations, for any reason, as rape is a form of fornication, and defiles the rapist next to his/her victim.

Regards,

Maxwell  

EDIT: My name is banned from being used by anyone without my consent. Just take what you need from my posts, and run with it. I am deserving of nothing as a depraved and decadent sinner, including credit for my ideas.

ANNOUNCEMENT: In the wake of Robbyn Peters Bennett's departure

Robbyn Peters Bennett is now announcing that she is departing from the children's rights movement. She is appointing me as leader of the movement. 

I decline to take such a role, as a children's rights movement should have no leader. I am not the right person to lead a whole movement. I prefer to remain hidden, and to be a stumble upon page, meaning I want parents especially to stumble upon my page as a surprise, instead of me becoming famous by way of making the news.

ANNOUNCEMENT: Motives for bringing up certain topics

Many seem concerned about me bringing up topics related to child nudity. I, as an advocate for children and a responsible adult, believe that especially in the case of children, there is a difference between nudity and sexuality. Maybe the two overlap somewhere if you are a pedophile like me, but nowhere on the screen do I sexualize children in the biblical context. 

Beyond this point, any sexually entitled remarks from adults regarding naked children in biblical times as sexual objects will be counted as fornication by way of obscenity. This limit is simply there to make clear that I do not like my work being sexualized. A naked child is not there for sexual objectification, meaning treating them like a sexual object in your speech or actions. A naked child is simply a naked child, and their body is simply the body. Any sexualization of the biblical context is irrelevant to anything. Only sexual morality is relevant for sexual reasons in the Bible.

You come to this view of naked or partially naked children by way of want avoidance, meaning the more you avoid wanting things from children, period, the more you don't want them even when they are naked. Their bodies might simply be pretty or beautiful, and only "sexy" later, with the doors closed and the shades down. That is a PRIVATE, solemn act to be done only with oneself, and never involving any child under age 18, or any adult that is not one's lawfully-wedded spouse. 

The body is the body, and if it sexually arouses or threatens you, that is your problem to work on. Same with references to nudity in a blog post about attachment parenting. Attachment parenting comes with a great deal of nudity, but children should not be treated as sexual objects in the speech, actions, or written word of anyone. If you need help with pedophilic desires, you should be able to disclose in a clinical or clinical celebratory manner, but sexuality should be on the back burner with people today.

Unfortunately, sexuality is not on the back burner with most adults today. Adults especially are having sex left and right, shacking up with no remorse. How much does it take to wait until marriage? If you are dedicated, not much. None of this pornography and obscenity in the media, especially the liberal media. However, if you are reading my posts, know that they are not intended to be sexualized at all, and my Christian senses are offended by anyone sexualizing the nudity of biblical children enough to point it out.

I do mention parent sexual attraction in my posts quite a bit, but one has to understand the level that these attractions were on. Men in the Bible, in both the Old and New Testament, took the attitude that they were entitled to nothing from their children. "Sun tan spray" means the attraction is merely a perceived "spray" on the child's bare skin, and not a driven attraction. You can be attracted to someone and have non-sexual reasons for interacting with them, and as long as your intent was not to sexually objectify and/or use a child, you were not sinning. Fathers were simply shy around their children, in a fearful and reverent way. If you were literally pining for your child, and want them for yourself, you had problems then. Churches did help to the best that they could, but only when the parent was willing to be helped - sexually abusive parents were excommunicated from the Early Christian church for life, and were put to death in the Old Testament. Even in the biblical context, they had a concept of child abuse and child sexual abuse, and the definitions in both instances were broader than today!

Everything I state about the history then is simply to point out historical facts. Not all of history is unicorns and rainbows. Not all of history is squeaky clean. Some of it is the dirty truth. It was acceptable to be a pedophile in biblical times, but ONLY in abstinent format, meaning the pedophile identifies by their abstinence and not their "prowess". 

Now, do I find my own historical knowledge "interesting" in another way? In another context, maybe, but that sort of thing is private. 

Regards, 

Maxwell

Taking a break

The Facebook page adjacent to this blog was hacked by corrupt higher powers claiming to be "police" when they are really thugs. 

They have a plan to get me to agree to pro-social rape. My view on rape is a constant anti-rape belief, with rape being any sexual activity without consent. 

Rape involves penetration, and sexual assault involves any other sexual contact that is without consent. Fornication is a moral crime under my beliefs that I hold to myself, and is denoted by the Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to any sexual intent leading to perception outside of marriage, with all marriages needing to be documented in Berks County with the Registrar of Wills. This is my religious beliefs.

Apparently some people are sore that the investigation into my past choices was over. It was ended last night when I clarified that no rape happened from me against Emily Shafer in the McDonald's at 400 Lancaster Avenue in the City of Reading, Pennsylvania.

My Facebook account is deactivated. Markie should be ashamed of himself, making a deal with the devil like that. The Berks County law enforcement community is very corrupt when it comes to enforcing child abuse laws under the secular law, meaning here in Berks County we do entitled policing for anything related to abuse. I am pro-criminal justice, yet I do not support what these so called "officers" did. The Pennsylvania State Police seems more professional. 

"Now I don't get it, why is he a pedophile if he is a victim and all pedophiles are narcissists" All FORENSIC pedophiles are narcissists. Most CLINICAL pedophiles are not narcissists, but angry or depressed victims of the fullest. If you are wondering why a clinical pedophile can't be charged while a forensic one can only as a narcissist, maybe you think like me, for once. Now, would I be guilty under the secular law if I held this view? Use your common sense "But we want to rape you" Yep, entitlement right there, but you admit to entitlement - your profession is going to send you to Hell, and that is your worst fear, so I wield it to you in order to get an entitled reaction, and I know that I am doing that, and I don't care about your feelings, because *I* am an ANTI-entitlement Christian and you are simply jealous.

Forensic pedophiles don't exist, as that label simply enables the abusers to have a medical excuse. Use it where it is relevant - with non-abusers simply wanting to choose not to abuse. But, we all know police don't abuse their children, right, because all police are good people, right? "We do" Admission right there, and now to defame you with your own words, like the viper that I am towards abusers.

A brief history of my advocacy

I started advocating for children's rights when I was 17, and my therapist recommended to start a children's rights blog in order to journal my lawful trauma from authoritative parents. A police investigation started surrounding a post I made documenting a family dispute, with the anti-CR giving controlling doomsday forecasts of me "turning on his family" and prompting family members that I might hurt them. My grandfather, I think, saw it for what it was - a scam.

This brief history is necessary so that the police can't claim that they installed me. *I* installed me. I put myself out there, and children's rights found me and took me under her wing. She turned out to know everything about me while waiting for me to make the first move, seeing if she could tolerate my pedophile self or not. 

If the police didn't install me, they shouldn't be getting involved in the free exchange of ideas. The anti-spanking cause will win over this country - and nothing much else is going to be different. America will remain America, but with a new law added, and more of her population included in the free exchange of ideas.

Why I am guilty - for being the entitled adult that I am

I started all this, and it ended with a stressed out grandfather passing away from us. I did it. I did it all.

I have no rights as an adult in relation to children, including former children such as my cousin Gina. What did I do? Antisocial "rough-play", meaning antisocial "flirt". If I just didn't do anything like that, my cousin wouldn't have all that crap to deal with on her plate.

I am a depraved and entitled adult deserving of DEATH and DESTRUCTION merely for existing in relation to any child, including especially my cousin. I am a wicked and depraved adult deserving of God's DEATH and PUNISHMENT towards me. No child owes me anything. No cousin of mine owes me anything.

Now my grandfather is dead - probably stressed out due to having to harbor so much information that he couldn't tell someone...all because *I* couldn't keep my hands to myself enough for there to be a police report.

Usually, the adjoining Facebook page to this blog has only blog posts. You can tell police lines run right through here, and you know who is to blame for that? Me. I am undeservingly grateful for the grace my cousin and others have shown me. She does not have to be this understanding.

How we Oppose Parental Entitlement

I myself am a survivor of child abuse within the law. I was abused by parents and family, and the law excused it. Most of them have apologized, and so the law of "reasonable force" itself in Pennsylvania is my abuser. FOOK PARENTS! FOOK PARENTAL RIGHTS! Those ragweed have no rights as far as I can be concerned.

I am an Anti-Spanking Advocate, and I use my Christian faith to confront my abuser on screen. The idea is to sell my Anti-Spanking ideas to the public, winning over parents one by one, convicting the sinful hearts of parents one by one. The idea is to point out the sin of provoking children to anger to entitled parents, convicting them to turn themselves in to their child, wiping away sniffling tears, apologizing to their children for how punitive they were.

I have been successful at convincing both new parents and autism parents. The idea is to lay out your court-space with the parents...and scorn and burn them with your arguments. Break them down with irrefutable evidence, to the point where they have to change their ways. Again, sniffling tears - that's what I like to imagine in any parent.

Let the depraved parents who provoke their children to anger burn in Hell! Repent! 

Pro-social PTSD, pro-social pedophile admission (in frequent open format)

I am a vigilante, for the rights of children, especially children lawfully battered by their parents. As a child protection officer, I use my reverent trauma. I admit both my pedophilia and trauma, with the trauma overshading the pedophilia, and the pedophilia being the entitled thread of my childhood trauma (antisocial traumatic dissociation). 

I admit pedophilia to the Whole Wide World out of pro-social honesty, to the point of public self-humiliation. Thinking of yourself as a good adult to children often makes you want things from them "because I am a good person, and I deserve things from children". So, I count myself as an entitled, wicked adult and strive to be perfect as a parent towards children, fighting parental entitlement within me, knowing I will never reach perfection in this lifetime, but the next for sure if I keep serving God through children. I use the medical label "pedophile" as a introspective device so that I know what I am, so I can tackle it and center it by presuming guilt in my wants in relation to children. No adult truly means well, but I admit that I don't mean well, because a part of me wants to have sex with a child, with other adults not meaning well by wanting to physically punish and control a child at some level. Look at our history before Moses - our nature as adults is not good in relation to children. We all as adults want to control children with one vehicle or another.

I observe parents, and nod to their fate, as if you are an entitled parent who spanks and punishes children, you are headed nowhere but "down". Pro-social reverse window, pro-social judgment. I act like God as I judge, taking note of what needs taking note of, and avoiding confrontation with the world, for I am not of this world, but of the next. God wants children's improvement, so he wants me here, for some reason or another.

World Children's Day

November 20 is World Children's Day. Be thankful a day early for your child. I am thankful and grateful for the children who read my blog, as they don't have to read anything I write, and I am not entitled to trust from any of them. 

Children's day is about gratitude for one's children, meaning be grateful for your child, and curb the complaints for at least one day, honoring the child for being the extensions of God that they are.

As the Apostle Paul said to parents everywhere in Colossians 3:21:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

Do not offend your child, meaning in terms of moral offenses against children. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) refers to entitled offenses perceived by children, with parental entitlement being denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and referring to wanting things from children or of children to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child. Paul meant this as an anti-punishment command towards parents, but the meaning is lost to most Americans, who are Christians and do otherwise support Judeo-Christian family values.

Spend some time with your child. Walk in the neighborhood. Visit a favorite place of theirs. Be content in the room with them as they play on their phone. Be kind and charitable to your child every day, but especially this children's day.

ANNOUNCEMENT: Why the children's rights movement supports VirPed

There are three VirPeds - VirPed the support group, VirPed the greater movement, and VirPed the value system. I support all three, but not all of the goodies the second one wants, as I am an anti-pornography pedophile, as I hate pornography. I won't advocate for "loli" or "shota" but don't think they should be illegal. 

I believe VirPed can be merged with children's rights. The core of children's rights is not policing, but primary prevention of child abuse. We do it well in the United States with physical abuse, but have been punitive on pedophiles because until now, pedophiles did not come up with a good answer as to how they would help themselves.

VirPed is all about the choice not to abuse a child, much like gentle parenting, and the two many times are exactly the same, but with different names. Most here seem to agree with me, at least in that pedophiles can choose not to abuse children, but are afraid to say it openly. I write about the topic occasionally to sort of encourage trauma survivors to speak out in their personal lives, and tell others about non-offending pedophiles.

It seems like we at VirPed have a lot of low level support among educated Americans, from a distance. We are seen at VP as a strange group of people that "I don't know how they do it". We aren't entitled at the lowest level, meaning the parental level, and I worry about those that are pro-spanking in terms of offending, but I am not a mandated reporter, and I presume innocence beyond a reasonable doubt in all suspicion of child sexual abuse.

Do I support sex offender rights? I support a sex crimes registry similar to that of Iceland, where the deal is "you keep quiet, we keep quiet" and your home is bugged and monitored, and if you make plans to sexually abuse a child, the authorities will know it, and will warn the relevant parties so it can't happen, with CPS overseeing the list and not the police. CPS will do it better than the police, as the police are a bunch of drunken sailors during search party times. Sex offenders should only be afforded therapy if they want it, or else simply wait for them to re-offend, and catch them in the act. Most sex offenders who have served their time want help, because by then they have lost everything, and losing everything is a good motivator for change, isn't it?

POSITION STATEMENT: The Virtuous Pedophiles forum

This page supports Virtuous Pedophiles as a support group for non-offending anti-contact pedophiles, and refers pedophiles reading this blog to the VP forums. We need more boards like VirPed. I myself am a non-offending pedophile, and support VirPed and associated organizations such as the Association for Sexual Abuse Prevention (ASAP). We support pedophiles here, meaning the kind of pedophile that self-diagnose and commit to staying offense-free in relation to children.

Pedophiles are vulnerable adults here. I see them as the little guy that is not very sociable around adults, but opens up with wide eyes when a child is present.

My recommendations towards the board is to appreciate their new installment within my page, meaning many gave an ungrateful appearance to my help, while not forbidding it. I sought to give in secret, meaning not brag, and quietly provide information so that survivors can better understand non-offending pedophiles - that's what you have to do in order to change minds. 

This page respects VirPed values, which are 1) The age of consent stays forever and 2) Pedophiles can simply choose not to abuse. I attach this framework to the children's rights framework of my Christian faith, which states that all adults are wicked and entitled in nature, but can choose to be good and virtuous if they work on their flaws. Pedophilia is not a good thing, as it can lead to entitlement, but mere thoughts are not entitlement, but are simply a self-interest that can be directed elsewhere. Entitlement can mean any want imposed on a child, or sought to be imposed on a child. Pedophiles who are worried about their risk to the point of suicidal ideation are not a risk to children. If you are worried about hurting a child, and know that it is harmful, you're not going to do it with a real child. A predatory pedophile does not know right from wrong, and insists that what they are doing to a child is a good thing. They aren't self-conscious like a struggling non-offending pedophile is. 

We want pedophilia to be an open struggle, and that is what VirPed wants as well. I was there for 7 years as a member and now am a member on a new account. Pedophiles should be able to talk about their disorder on the level that anyone else can talk about their struggles in relation to children. But, first you  have to realize that parenting is a struggle and not a free-for-all, and that's what a lot of adults don't get, but something that pedophiles tend to agree with us on. Pedophile rights will be an accepted mental health cause, but alongside the rights of children, as both are interconnected.

ANNOUNCEMENT: The intent behind this blog

This blog has a specific intent - to catapult the correct religious information taught to me by Christian leaders such as Rev. Crystal Lutton and Samuel Martin, and put it into words that a fellow conservative would understand, in a convicting tone that strikes terror into the heart of the evildoer towards children.

I believe in love as a gentle parent too, but for a parent, love sometimes has to mean tough love, meaning shunning until they hit rock bottom, and setting up a system where pro-spanking parents especially are shunned for their abuse after the majority of parents, whom the majority are Christian, are convicted of the abolition of all corporal punishment of children in the Bible. The Bible is very clear about that, especially in Col. 3:21 as understood in context.

Let's make it clear - no child was legally spanked in the Bible, under the Judaic legal traditions furthered around the world by the spread of Christianity. Corporal punishment in the Bible meant death, but only for an adult who committed a crime, with their father being appointed as an accessory to the state to punish his son to forewarn his death if he reoffends. Child abusers got the rod of correction far more than errant adult children. The rod of correction was simply a symbol of the law in poetic books such as Proverbs. In the New Testament, the biblical spanking ban is uplifted in both Eph. 6:4 and Col. 3:21. Christ abolished all capital and corporal punishment on the cross. 

Religion isn't merely comfort or validation (though it surely can be) here at Maxwell, but law and jurisprudence. My Christianity is a legal tradition, not just a spiritual tradition, where you are the judge and jury, and the world is your courtroom. Spanking is banned under my law, and I am the judge, and if I see you even be entitled and harsh with a child here in Berks County, PA, I am observing and judging you from afar, and you won't even see me because I mask my presence real well. If you seek to punish or control a child, I judge you.

There is only one right answer to the Bible, and if you ignore the right answer without providing evidence, I don't have to take you seriously. Nobody has been able to refute my Christian evidence against spanking, and none ever will. The facts are the facts. Give it up, or face the fire of Hell, for that is the fate of the child abuser.