Hebrews 12:5-6: Why this passage is not a pro-spanking passage

Many parents think that the Bible condones or even commands the corporal punishment of children. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most parents cite 5 passages in Proverbs and 1 passage in Hebrews as their "proof' that spanking children is biblical. However, the case involving biblical spanking ultimately sits on Heb. 12:5-6. However, the argument in Hebrews ultimately sits on shaky grounds. This passage in Hebrews refers to enduring hardship, not punishment coming from an earthly parent.

God's Word on enduring hardship is spelled out in Hebrews 12:5-6 KJV:

And ye have forgotten the exhortation that speaketh unto you as unto children. My son, despise not the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth.

The Greek root word translated "scourgeth" is μαστιγόω (Latin: mastigoó) and can have a figurative meaning to it, as is the case here. This form of metaphor is known as rod language. Whenever a Christian man got home from a long day at work, he instead said "God whipped me hard today". God obviously does not come down from the Heavens and whip His children. However, God punishes His children, like only He can, sending trials and tribulations the way of the children that He loves the most. However, God only punishes His children when it does not harm them. whereas earthy parents only punish their children when it does, in fact, harm them. This passage was seen as comfort for the Hebrew Christians in their persecution from Rome. 

The Bible does not legitimately support the use of corporal punishment in parenting. God does not want His Parenting methods being used by earthly parents, lest they get it wrong. However, the Bible does touch in on the spanking issue, and then some. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke;..to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo). This passage does not simply prohibit spanking children. It prohibits all entitlement in parents, leading to offense in children. Offense in children consists of hurt feelings in children where parents refuse to apologize to their child for hurting their feelings, at minimum. With that said, if you ever lose your cool with your child as a parent, including while setting limits, you definitely need to give a formal apology for hurting your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for hurting your feelings with my temper", and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards a child alone is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin term roughly translating to "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. However, this commandment ultimately was received by the parish at Colossae as prohibiting causing offenses in children as perceived by a child, at minimum. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men.

The staple punishment in the broader Greco-Roman world was an open-handed spanking to a bare bottom. This sort of punishment of children was seen by most Christians of the time as pagan in nature, this to be shunned as of this world. However, some Greek Christians brought into the church with them their pagan parenting customs in this regard. The Apostle Paul would have none of it, and convicted these scofflaw parents in his epistles to the parishes at Colossae and Ephesus. 

It is a myth that the Early Christians were well-integrated into broader Greco-Roman society. Instead, the Early Christians lived in urban enclaves in major Greco-Roman cities, shunning the outside world. These Early Christians had their own culture, and even their own court system, with this court system being binding until the end of the 1st Century. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Abortion: Why abortion is bad for women

Many people these days support abortion rights. Most conservatives believe that abortion is a modern concept that God hates. However, there existed abortions in the biblical context, and they were banned. Some women did drink abortifacient herbs in the Early Church, and they were excommunicated from the church for murder.

The Bible states in Revelation  21:8 KJV:

But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death. 

The Greek root word translated "murder" is φονος (Latin: phonos) and refers to any death apart from natural death. One form of unnatural death prohibited then was abortion. The Old Testament is silent on abortion only because abortifacient herbs were not native to Ancient Israel, and when people intended to smuggle them in, they were stopped at the border. Most abortions in the Early Church were due to incest or else were performed on a woman who was cold on the nurturing. Even in the case of rape, incest, or life of the mother, abortion was seen as murder in the Early Church. The Greek root word denoting intoxicants is μεθυσος (Latin: methusos) and refers here to abortifacient herbs. 

Most women who support abortions don't know what constitutes an abortion. An abortion consists of a medically induced miscarriage. In most all cases, women are traumatized themselves when they get an abortion. Women who defend abortion after getting one have a low nurturant drive. Most pro-abortion women only support abortions for other women, and not themselves. Abortion in and of itself is a rare procedure, so why not just get rid of it entirely?

I oppose abortions even in the case of rape, incest, or life of the mother. A rape victim can easily see her baby as her baby and not the rapist's baby. Even in the case of incest, the child should always be welcomed into this world. Even in the case of life of the mother, the father can simply raise the baby on his own. Most men are capable of nurturing, as men have nipples for a reason - they can lactate if they want to. Most men simply feel too insecure to nurture a child. 

I also support paid parental leave for parents, as well as a safety net in and of itself. In the Early Church, no man went hungry/ Whenever a man fell into poverty, he was given free money so that he could eat. 1 Corinthians 16:2 sets up the framework for a safety net for all people. All Christian parishioners then paid a tithing on the first day of the week, and that money went to the poor in the parish who could not afford food on their own. Christ Himself also endorsed a safety net. See Matt. 25:31-46.

The depraved and entitled parents who murder their children in the womb, and all who aid and abet, will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment! Repent!

Honor thy parents: Understanding the Fifth Commandment in context

Many parents demand respect from their children. This is a common attitude amongst American parents.  Most American parents insist on respect and honor from their children. However, the fact of the matter is that honoring parents means something specific - caring for your parents as they age.

The Fifth Commandment is spelled out in Exodus 20:12 KJV:

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 

And is repeated in Ephesians 6:2-3 KJV:

Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth.

The Greek root word translated "honour" in Eph. 6:2 is τιμαω (Latin: timao) and refers here to being a caregiver to someone else, here namely an aging parent. The idea is to give aging parents the same tender loving care that they gave you. However, this only works if your parents indeed gave you nothing but warmth and love. If your parents were at all abusive towards you, you owe nothing to those parents. The reason for this commandment was that the Old Testament and the parish at Ephesus had an epidemic of elder abuse and neglect.

"Dishonoring" and "disrespecting" parents is a common reason for punishment of children. Some parents only punish their children for clear "disrespect" or "dishonor". However, any punitive sanctions on children whatsoever is prohibited in the Bible, including when parents feel "dishonored". See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to entitlement in parents, leading to offense in children. Offense in children includes any hurt feelings in children where parents refuse to apologize, at minimum. This includes while setting limits. With that said, if you ever lose your cool with your child, including while setting limits, you definitely need to give a formal apology for hurting your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for hurting your feelings with my temper", and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards a child alone is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias poteastas, which is roughly translated to "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. However, this commandment was ultimately received by the parish at Colossae as prohibiting causing offenses in children as perceived by the child, at minimum. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men.

Most parents in America demand respect from their children. However, the Bible clearly teaches that respect isn't given, with respect instead being earned. If you want respect from your child, you need to give respect to your child. The idea is to love your child as you would your neighbor, meaning give to them without receiving. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices. Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible calls for tougher laws against child abuse

Many parents believe that the Bible has no concept of child abuse apart from obeying the law of the land. Most American parents support the present-day child abuse definitions under state and federal law. However, God's Law is above the law of the land. The Bible has its own definition of child abuse - whatever the child victim perceives as abuse.

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, parental entitlement consists of a parent being sorely disappointed when they don't get the well-behaved child that they feel that they deserve. Even any parent anger directed towards a child is parental entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. Whenever this sense of entitlement in parents then was perceived by a child as offensive or damaging, it was deemed child abuse. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offense as perceived by the child, with this referring to child abuse. Offenses in children include any hurt feelings in children where parents refuse to apologize. Whenever you hurt your child's feelings, you should apologize to your child. This includes when setting limits. However, if you ever lose your cool with your child as a parent, including while setting limits, you definitely need to give a formal apology for hurting your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for hurting your feelings with my temper", and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards a child alone is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin term roughly translating to "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. But, this commandment was received by the parish at Colossae as prohibiting causing offenses in children, as perceived by the child, at minimum. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men.

The Greek root word translated "they be discouraged" is αθυμέω (Latin: athumeo) and refers here to long-term damages, namely childhood trauma. The ancients in the Bible had a basic understanding of childhood trauma. Whenever a child grew up to be atheist, shame fell onto the parents, not the atheist child. An atheist then was seen then as an abused child, not a "lost soul" to be :won over". 

The ancients in the Bible even had a concept of child sexual abuse. The Greek root word translated "fornication" in the New Testament is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers here to anything outside the sexual norm, as understood then. This can be further summed up as any sexual relations or advances outside of a Christian marriage between one adult man and one adult woman, with this marriage needing to be equal in terms of chronological age. A groom was only allowed a bride his age or up to 4 years older. Any intergenerational marriages or sexual relationships were banned in the Early Church. What was also banned in the Early Church was all pornography, including that which depicted a child. Most child sexual abuse then came in the form of father-child incest, with daughters being the usual victims. Most men then had parent attractions, and masturbated to thoughts of his child that he was attracted to. Child sexual abuse was rare in the Early Church, and when it happened, it was a huge moral outrage. Attraction to children then was on the surface, with men in particular disclosing their attraction to children out in the open, including even to their daughters when attracted to her. A father was a man of few words about his sexual fantasies of his daughter, and even disclosed to his daughter when she asked where he went in his fantasies. Whenever a father tried to hide his sexual desires for children, he was suspected of child sexual abuse. A sexually abused child knew then exactly what was happening to them, and self-reported the abuse that they were suffering.

It is a myth that the Early Christians were well-integrated into Rome. Instead, the Early Christians lived in urban enclaves in major Greco-Roman cities, shunning the broader Greco-Roman world, and also the world at large. The Early Christians even had their own court system, with these courts being binding into the end of the 1st Century.

Child abuse in the Early Church was prosecuted by  way of internal church investigation. This investigation usually started with a child confiding into a clergyperson about their home life. From there, the parents were summoned to appear before a council of 3 elders, who would preside over the investigation. If the parents at all got defensive, as opposed to answering directly to the court, they were excommunicated from the Early Christian Churches of God, alongside all witnesses who testified on behalf of the parents. 

The Bible is an anti-spanking document. All 88 books of the Bible - from Genesis to Revelation - were written by anti-spanking Jews, with spanking then and now being a violation of Jewish law. All of the biblical writers also wrote parenting manuals that advocated attachment parenting. Even King Solomon wrote an attachment parenting manual, with the rod in Proverbs instead referring to the 40 minus 1 lashes. It just so happens that these parenting manuals were only translated into English in the 1960s. Before then, this level of parenting knowledge was only known to the Jewish world.

The Bible is America's book. America is a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian values. We as a society glean from the Bible as to how to live and treat each other with respect. Even our legal codes, under the English common law, are based off of biblical teaching. However, the criminal defense of "reasonable chastisement" is based off of dated biblical teaching. It is about time that we abolish the :reasonable chastisement" defense, and redefine child abuse as anything perceived by the child victim as abuse. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torrents, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Benign" deprivation: Why children don't need to hear the word "no" from parents "frequent and often"

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" from them "frequent and often". This is a common attitude amongst American parents, called "benign" deprivation. Most American parents buy into this idea to some degree. However, children need to hear your "yes" more than your "no".

God's Law against "benign" deprivation is spelled out in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offenses, namely the slightest of hurt feelings in children where parents refuse to apologize. Perhaps the most common thing that hurts a child's feelings is the word "no". The word "no" should be saved for when children want something unsafe, or else are getting into something unsafe. If a child is playing ball in the house, or else is about to touch a hot stove, they need to hear the word "no". Apart from safety's sake, children do not need to hear the word "no". Whenever you tell your child "no", you need to apologize in the case of hurt feelings in children. However, if you ever lose your cool with your child, including while setting limits, you definitely need to give a formal apology whenever you hurt your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for hurting your feelings with my temper", and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards children alone is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. No anger at children was ever seen as a valid offense in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan parenting customs, which were punitive in nature. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men.

The idea as a parent is to give children almost everything that they want, and absolutely everything that they need. Children are counting on YOU to give them good things. The idea is to say "yes" even to benign wants in children, and a guaranteed "yes" to what the child needs. In most cases, benign wants count as an attachment need. The word "no" IS the end of the world for a child, as they lack emotional self-control until age 8. What is simply disappointing for adults is downright earth-shattering for a young child. If you do have to say "no", you should comfort your child with an apology. 

One place for contention in parenting is in the store. Usually, the child wants candy in the checkout line, and usually, parents demand that the child "put that back". However, in the Early Church, children wanted licorice from the candy stand in the market. So, parents let their children get a piece of licorice off of the shelf, with parents paying for it. Children rarely ask for much in the store. Sometimes, they want the bicycle off of the rack, in which case parents themselves should save just for their child's wishes, or else wait until payday. Children were not forced to work for money at all, and neither should children be forced to work at all in the modern context. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

Defiance: How to deal with defiance in children without punitive measures

Many parents have been there. A child defying the limits of parents. This is a common occurrence in American hones. Most parents think that their defiant child is out to "undermine parents". However, children do not defy parents for "undermining parents". They simply cannot accept a set limit.

God's Law on dealing with defiance in children is spelled out in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offenses or damages, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. It is one thing to stop spanking your child, including for defiance. However, it is not enough to simply stop spanking your child, or even stop punishing them altogether for that matter. You need to avoid offense in children. If you hurt someone else's feelings, you need to apologize. It is no different when dealing with children. One thing that hurts children's feelings is not being able to accept a set limit. One expression of childhood displeasure for set limits is by defiance, usually coming in the form of forceful tears when the child hears the word "no". However, your children aren't out to get you. They simply cannot accept a set limit, with this due to children having poor control over their emotions. Whatever is simply disappointing to adults is earth-shattering to children. Thus, in order to avoid offenses in children, you need to apologize for hurting your child's feelings, ideally in the face of their defiance. One thing that hurts children's feelings the most is limits set out of anger. If you ever lose your cool with your child as a parent, including while setting limits, you definitely need to give a formal apology for hurting your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for hurting your feelings with my temper", and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards a child alone is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin term roughly translating as "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. However, this commandment was ultimately received by the parish at Colossae as prohibiting causing offenses in children as perceived by a child, at minimum. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men.

Defiance is a normal and developmentally appropriate behavior in children. Children lack emotional self-control, and this is the case until the age of 8. What is simply disappointing to adults is earth-shattering to young children. The idea is to give an apology in the face of the child's defiance. However, if you ever set limits out of anger, you need to apologize for hurting your child's feelings with your anger. 

Children never intend defiance as a means of "undermining parents". Instead, they simply cannot accept set limits. Most children go through moments where they are acting defiant. The key is to give an apology for having to set limits that the child does not like.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Biblical spanking": Why the rod verses in the book of Proverbs are repealed verses

Many parents believe that spanking children is condoned or even commanded in the Bible. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. A common excuse for spanking a child is found in 5 verses in the book of Proverbs. However, the teaching of "biblical spanking" is a man-made teaching. 

One commonly cited rod verse is Proverbs 13:24 KJV:

He that spareth the rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes.

The Hebrew root word translated "son" is ben and refers to a mature adult son. The Hebrew root word translated "rod" is shebet and refers here to the rod of correction, namely a switch. Ultimately, this passage refers to the 40 minus 1 lashes, administered to the bare back, in a courtroom setting, as a sentence for a crime. The 40 minus 1 lashes was a final warning before an errant son was put to death. In the biblical context, it was unlawful to strike a fellow adult Jew outside of the context of a courtroom. It was unlawful to strike a minor child in all settings. The reason for this commandment is that, otherwise, fathers of adult sons would shield their children from blame, and would refuse to whip their sons.

Christ died and Rose on the Third Day in order to put an end to the harsh punishments of the Old Testament. Christ did this by enduring corporal punishment unjustly before being placed on the cross. The Early Christians did not use capital or corporal punishment as a form of church discipline. The Old Testament punishments were seen as God's flawed punishment, with Hell being the perfect punishment for sin. Christ opened up the gates of Heaven and Hell for motivation as to how to behave as a Christian, replacing the flawed Old Testament punishments.

The teaching of "biblical spanking" is a man-made teaching. The Bible nowhere legitimately calls for the corporal punishment of children, or any punishment of children for that matter. However, the Bible does touch on the spanking issue, and then some. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and here refers to offenses or damages, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. it is one thing to stop spanking your child. However, it is not enough to stop spanking your child, or even stop punishing your child altogether for that matter. You need to avoid offense in children. If you hurt someone else's feelings, you need to apologize. It works the same way when dealing with children. Thus in order to avoid offense in children, you need to be willing to apologize to your child for hurting their feelings. One thing that surely hurts a child's feelings is parent anger directed towards children. If you ever lose your cool with your child as a parent, including while setting limits, you definitely need to apologize for hurting your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for hurting your feelings with my temper" and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards children alone is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin term roughly translating to "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. However, this commandment was intended as prohibiting causing offenses in children as perceived by the child, at minimum. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men. 

Contrary to popular belief, the parents in the biblical context did not enslave their children. Instead, attachment parenting was the norm in both the Old and the New Testament. All of the biblical writers also wrote parenting manuals that advocated attachment parenting. For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, with children following mothers around wherever she went. For the latter years of childhood, children played freely outside, with thus play often being wet and messy in nature. Whenever children got into mischief, parents laughed with their child. When children lashed out at parents , parents cried with their children. The Early Christian context is an attachment parenting context, and is the perfect context for attachment parenting inspiration. 

The Early Christians, contrary to popular belief, were not well-integrated into Rome. Instead, the Early Christians shunned the broader Greco-Roman world, and the world at large. The Early Christians even had their own court system that was binding into the end of the 1st Century. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!