Total acceptance coming from total submission - The biblical order of the family

Most parents abuse their children, with 94% of children being punished physically or forcibly by parents as a form of domestic violence, with 1/3 of the cases possibly violating the law. My parents followed the law in terms of abusing me, and I still didn't turn out okay. The answer is totally accepting your child, meaning being attached to them as your friend.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to children, confiding into parents about everything, owing absolutely nothing in relation to children, yet nonetheless showing your gratitude towards parents by hearing the voice of parents, understanding based on their developmental capacity, and heeding instructions by way of listening to the reassuring voice from mothers especially that the child imprints on. Voice imprinting was used to get children to listen in ancient Israel, and the goal was to provide, not punish or control. All this comes from Christian love, as denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to giving without receiving. It is being convicted of one's depraved sin nature in relation to children, struck by reverent fear (GRK: ψοβός) convicting them to submit to God through one's child, by way of bondservice and indentured servitude, paying due penance for one's existence in relation to child, sacrificing for them just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself beneath a child, devaluing oneself as a caregiver and servant towards one's child, with the child extended from God to be cared for and protected, and expecting absolutely nothing in return. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses under biblical law, namely the assault and battery laws that also serve and protect children. The slightest of offense taken by entitled parent/adult behavior is abuse, and is sin.

The key to understanding total submission and acceptance of children is at the lowest level, you feel smaller than your child, and your child perceives you as smaller than them, meaning children feel the ability to order you around as to their needs, including attachment needs such as benign wants. Servitude to children in ancient Israelite culture and adjoining churches was seen as from beneath the child's stature, not above her. The idea was to give to one's child in a humble manner, meaning not demanding or controlling, but providing in terms of custody.

Parents did not reject their children in biblical times. Children were securely attached to parents, and were guided by the reassuring voice of mothers especially. Children demanded things from parents, and parents were to supply for such demands. Children felt safe making demands, especially to mothers. Fathers did not punish, but encouraged their sons especially to read Scripture, but also their daughters in many cases in the New Testament (Gal. 3:28). The lesser party was deemed greater in a relationship, meaning women over men, and also children over adults (Matt. 25:31-46).

The depraved and entitled punitive and permissive parents will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven! Let them burn and rot in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Original sin: Why parents and adults have a wicked and entitled nature

The doctrine of original sin is the most misunderstood teachings in Christianity, and also one of the most misused. It has been misused to keep down most every oppressed group since the Western powers in Europe absorbed the Christian faith into their culture. However, there is one group deserving of the label of original sin - parents, and the every adult that promotes them.

Every single adult is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, with parents especially commanded to submit to God through their children as their enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God and thus parents need to submit to their children as an enemy seeking to make amends, as they do God, knowing how flawed and evil they are for being capable of harm and abuse towards a child, and also not knowing what childhood is/was like. Parents are to sacrifice for their child's every vulnerable need, just as Christ sacrificed for His children, with parents rendering themselves beneath their children, devaluing themselves as servants and caregivers towards children, ministering to and serving the every need of children, with children being served as an extension of God placed before the adult for care and attention (Matt. 25:31-46).

It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's. 

The Greek root word translated "covet" is לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers not merely to wanting things from children, but wanting things from children, or for them to do things or listen, to the point of imposing said want onto children. 

The Tenth Commandment can be interpreted more broadly, however, as the flawed nature of mankind, especially adult-kind, as summed up and expanded upon by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés), namely in terms of parental entitlement, meaning the entitled attitude of "I am the parent, and children owe me respect/appeasement" leading to controlling, punitive, demanding, begging, and/or sexually hateful or objectifying attitudes towards children. Ultimately, though, the Greek root word πλεονέκτης refers to the very ability of an adult to want to control a child or punish them as such. When used in the New Testament, it refers specifically, in moral legal tense, to the right to abuse a child in the case of parental entitlement, pointing to the entitled nature in the parent. Ultimately, it refers to embracing entitlement as a parent or similarly charged adult, meaning embracing control. Simply having a sin nature is not a moral crime, but instead intent leading to action that points to the entitled nature of parents. This is how things were seen then in terms of entitlement.

Admission of original sin as a parent will receive a certain result. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, with children having freedom to share anything with parents, and be themselves in relation to parents, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless with children showing gratitude by hearing the voice of their parents, understanding what parents want of them based on the developmental level, leading to children heeding the instructions of parents by way of hearing and listening to the reassuring, soothing voice of parents, especially mothers. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the legal context of the Bible, meaning the slightest of offense perceived by the child, linked to parental entitlement. This included physical or other punishment of children, as per the assault and battery torts under the Mosaic Law, meaning striking anyone outside of a courtroom was against the law, with battery being contact with a child without the child's consent or the co-parent's consent, usually aligned. The rod of correction was only used in a courtroom setting on adults where the father was named an accessory in a hitman investigation by the Israelite government - tally up the damages from a rogue family member, and turn the damages into the religious authorities. In the Early Church, striking a child would get you excommunicated from the church, and if you were the man of the house, you'd be no more - your wife would divorce you (1 Cor. 7:10-11)...Most all child abuse in the United States (and you can read all) is linked to parental entitlement. 

It isn't a few pedophiles over there orchestrating the child abuse epidemic, but all parents who identify by their choice to abuse a child, and the adults that point to them to promote their "innocence", then pointing in the other direction towards a group of people that have little to do with child abuse, but are nonetheless a perfect target for emulating an abuser.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them suffer and rot in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his angels! Corporal punishment shall not exist on American soil, and when a parent is identified by the act, they shall not exist, but since murder is wrong, they are consigned to Hell until the last day, when we kill every parent (by way of criminal arrest) and validate every victim. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

What is love in relation to children?

 Many parents say they love their children, yet they clearly don't. We all, as adults, hate children in some way, in some form. Love for a child is something that is a conviction, meaning something God strikes into an otherwise wretched, depraved adult. 

Love for a child is based on a conviction to do good works for children, namely reverent fear, as denoted by the Greek root word ψοβός (Latin: phobos) and refers to being convicted by God of the every need of a child, leading to surrender to God through one's child, placing one's power and control over children at their footstool, otherwise not deserving to even exist in relation to children, with every single adult guilty of some form of abuse of child, at least by capacity, at least by non-existence. It is submission to the every vulnerable need of children as their enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God, with adults paying due penance to children just as to God. It is sacrifice for one's child just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself beneath them in terms of level, devaluing oneself as a servant and caregiver in such a role, ministering to and serving the needs of children, with children being in place of God, expecting absolutely nothing in return. This love is known as Agape love, and is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to selfless submission to your neighbor, which is the duty of every Christian. The results are documented in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, being able to share anything and be anyone in relation to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude for children by way of hearing the voice of parents, understanding what parents ask for on a developmentally-appropriate level, leading to obedience and heeding instruction towards parents, following the reassuring, nurturing voice of mothers especially, but also fathers, using voice imprinting instead of punishment to obtain cooperation from children. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to any offense perceived by a child about the entitled behavior of an adult, with children judging whether they are loved or hated by parents, and parents and adults alike changing their attitudes around children based on how children respond to their presence and interaction with said children. Anything that the child perceived as offensive under biblical times, that came from parental entitlement, was an offense against children. When a child is offended, you hate them, and always did, until you make amends with your child. Then you loved them all along. These offenses included corporal punishment of children as assault and battery, as well as other torts and damages under the Eighth Commandment. All good works for children, meaning service to children, must be with the child's informed consent, meaning if they can do it themselves or want to try doing something for themselves, let them.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God. Love is a verb, not a feeling for children, but can channel any feeling into doing good for children, and doing good works for your neighbor, meaning children in this case, is what love really is. If you punish your child, you hate your child, and thus hate God! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

What to do about defiance in a child

 Many parents hate defiance in a child, meaning most in this country. Most don't know what to do about such a child. The fact of the matter is that defiance comes from a mirroring mechanism in children, where they mirror attitudes from parents and other adults they emulate in life.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, being able to share anything with parents, and be oneself, owing absolutely nothing towards parents, yet being grateful for the love and grace of parents leading to hearing their voice, understanding what parents want in a developmentally-appropriate manner, leading to heeding instruction based on the imprint of the parent's reassuring, soothing voice which always gets their attention. Some of us who have a secure attachment to a parent, even in adulthood, can perk up when we hear her keys going into the mailbox, or even a certain pattern of footstep that we naturally identify as hers. Usually, it is a mother in this society, but can be a father. This is linked to Christian love for a child, denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to being struck with reverent fear and terror by a child's every vulnerable need, leading to surrendering to God through your child, submitting to God as an enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God and has to make amends with Him, sacrificing for one's child just as Christ sacrificed for the good of His children, shielding them from blame, with parents rendering themselves beneath a child, devaluing oneself to that level as a parent, ministering to and serving a child from that level, with shamefacedness and humility, with the child in place of God (Matt. 25:31-46), expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses, meaning anything the child takes offense to by their perception, coming from a place of parental entitlement in parents/adults, meaning wanting things from a child to the point of imposing said want onto a child, as denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés). Entitlement of this sort can be emulated in a child's behavior, which is what the Apostle Paul was warning the Christian church at Colossae, where fathers were using idolatrous parenting customs that included whipping of young boys and ritual spanking of teenage girls who were "unchaste", both part of the surrounding Hellenistic culture. Christian purity meant shunning the old pagan ways, and not punishing a child ever, as is the Hebraic understanding of the Bible.

Ultimately, Paul was making a statement referring to secure attachment. Secure attachment brings out in children strong emotion towards parents that they would never share elsewhere, and should also being forth openness of communication. Attachment is like a mirror of your own attitudes towards your child. If your child is oppositional and defiant, that shows how you appear to them and their needs. When you defy a child's needs by controlling and punishing them as a form of "benign" deprivation (as I endured in my authoritative upbringing), they treat you back with the same brush, meaning when you beat them, they will always resist control, as is the flawed nature of children. Counterwill is the term used by psychologists, meaning the more you control a child, the more they control back, meaning the most controlling, defiant children in a school setting are probably the most controlled at home. Children usually defy, pout, or cry to advocate for a need, as they many times do not have the vocabulary to advocate their every need, and need adults to diagnose their needs by trial and error, not even just as infants, but as even older children to some degree.

Attachment parenting then was the norm in Jewish circles of the Christian community then, as well as the Old Testament, with the child abuse problem ending up being in the gentile, Greek circles of believers, where the Apostle Paul was often called to call on churches to crack down on pro-spanking parents, meaning excommunicate them for kidnapping. The Law forbade any entitled act which could be perceived as an offense by your neighbor, and that included children. Children ruled from beneath, meaning they made demands on their parents, and demand had to be met with supply. Parents were not seen as authority figures then, but servants to their children, with young children up to age 3 swaddled to their mothers and treated as infants, with older children playing in close range to mothers, with her reassuring, motherly voice calling them back when they stray too far, due to the dangerous hazards in the desert...The modern day message is that parents, by the biblical understanding, are safe persons for the child, meaning safe outlets to show their emotions to, using parents as a pro-social punching bag in that regard.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and rot in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why anger is not acceptable in parenting under biblical law

Many parents abuse their children, meaning most, with the adults of the world pointing to them in promote format. Most child abuse in this country is not due to pedophilia, but due to anger. Parental entitlement is the most common source of child abuse, in terms of motives, meaning parents and adults want control over children, most of the time expressed in terms of physical/verbal aggression or else sexual aggression (pedophilia). 

Christ said on the Sermon on the Mount, in Matthew 5:21-22 KJV:

Ye have heard it said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

Note the underlined. "Without a cause" means that unless you have intent to take your neighbor to court, meaning moral court and not necessarily civil court, being angry to the point of fits of anger is sin. This can mean, in relation to other adults, at the very least and most minutest, whatever the victim/plaintiff perceives as offensive or an offense, signaling entitled intent to control, harass, demand, or beg. Christ's command to "turn the other cheek" (Matt. 5:39-40), however, says to apply Law flexibly and selectively, meaning brush off petty insults from other people, including children. However, children are not subject to the Law, but live under the grace, meaning shelter, of parents, and are merely learning the Law. Therefore, any offense taken against a child is an offense taken against God, for children are in place of God as the "least of these" (Matt. 25:31-46). Parents are not to get angry with their children, or lash out at them, and if they have this habit, they are to struggle against it until it is all gone and subdued. It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise, That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath, but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, meaning self-discipline and self-control of an exemplary type by parents, with parents listening to children and validating their every emotion and upset, not being offended or being provoked to fits of anger, but centering that anger by stifling it, setting a disciplined, non-entitled example for children, in a listening manner, responding to a child's every need instead of reacting to behaviors with anger. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the admonition of the Lord, meaning the word "no" or its various variants, and other forms of setting limits and boundaries. This should be done rarely, and only with both firmness and warmth. This is weighed by the Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργιζο (Latin: parorgizo) and is one of the Greek words in the New Testament that refer to the offenses, meaning the torts and damages under the Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws that protected children as well as adults, summed up in the New Testament as the slightest of offense taken against an adult's behavior by a child, on a visceral level determined by sensory gaslighting. This included any sort of physical punishment of children.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the love and grace of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to parents, sharing anything with them, with children owing absolutely nothing in relation to parents, yet with children nonetheless showing their gratitude for providing custody by listening to the voice of their parents, understanding based on their developmental capacity or lack thereof, leading to children heeding instruction based on the comfort and familiarity of their parents' voice, by way of voice imprinting and not fear of punishment. This is done by way of Christian love denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to conviction of one's depraved and wicked sin nature in relation to children, leading to surrender of one's power and control over children to their footstool, submitting to God through your child and their every need as an enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God, and submits, paying due penance for Him. Parents are to sacrifice for their children just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself beneath one's child, devaluing oneself to that level as a parent, teaching your children from that level, with children in place of God, expecting absolutely nothing in return from children.

Attachment parenting was the norm in ancient Israel and adjoining churches, meaning children up to age 3 were swaddled next to mothers, and older children played in range next to mothers, being called back simply by her soothing, reassuring voice, and not any threat of punishment. Punishment against anyone was illegal under Jewish law outside of proper due process, including imposing any anger on another person. Children could not stand trial for a moral crime under Jewish law because they were deemed legally illiterate and incompetent, meaning they had to be taught the Law first, then be liable to it. Anger was seen in the Early Church as a man's righteous judgment, and otherwise was to be centered and forgotten, presuming innocence in one's neighbor, beyond a reasonable doubt, and children regardless.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and rot in the lake of burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

The current political alignment of Opposing Parental Entitlement

This organization is based on fundamentalist Anabaptist pacifist values, meaning children have the right to be free from violence of all sorts, physical, mental, sexual. I myself, by way of calling myself a fundamentalist, simply mean I follow the whole Bible, meaning respect ALL of the Bible as the Infallible Word of God, and when you understand the whole context of the Bible, you come to my conclusions no matter who you are.

I am a Christian democrat, which is a moderate-conservative stance that can be lumped in with Blue Dog politics here in rust belt states like Pennsylvania. We find a way to take both sides of an issue, unless God's Law commands a clear absolute, which I definitely believe in. Different Christian democrats believe differently on absolutes, making some of us more progressive than others...It is, at the core, a more humane form of religious conservatism. 

At the core, I believe in being humane to others, but especially the smaller person that is innocent of wrongdoing. I don't usually interrogate others in real life to the degree I do in my posts, unless they really push my buttons. I presume innocence in my neighbor, working forward in the case of trying to prove if someone is guilty or entitled or not. I only shun entitled individuals, which all other moral crimes stem from, which means the whole world, as this world endorses parental entitlement. I use "you just lost a friend" gaslighting when someone in my circle comes out as pro-spanking. Otherwise, I assume righteously that everyone is an attachment parent and see those qualities in them, until they show their true colors, then I cut them off and send them packing.

"Conservative" can be a theological or political issue. When you let your theological conservatism guide your politics, you become a religious conservative, no matter how moderate you are about it. I base my whole worldview on the Bible, and based on what I know - which is a lot - I'll NEVER change my mind on the spanking issue.

I support an age of consent of 18, and future context ban on all sex outside of marriage. I support a spanking ban in a future context, and support making the public aware of the fact that spanking is already banned in the United States under natural law, by way of moral legal exchange with the rest of the conservative community, and America at large, on a page-to-page basis. Dormant advocate/pedophile.

Honor thy father and mother - Why this does not mean punishing your child

Many places in society tell children to honor their parents, and listen to their orders. The way it is set up is that children are made slaves to their parents, and their every "binding" command. The fact of the matter is that the Fifth Commandment is a hallmark in the history of children, as an improvement.

It says in Exodus 20:12 KJV:

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 

This is basically a ban on child sacrifice, as before the Ten Commandments, the Canaanite fathers could kill their children at any time, for any reason they saw fit. Under the new Fifth Commandment then, parents had to go through the state, meaning the court system. The Israelite government was a hitman in terms of justice, meaning the religious authorities were for hire based on a group of witnesses that warned the offender, when caught in the act, that they were transgressing, in a way the offender could understand. Usually, these were family members. Once the charges were pressed, every warning beforehand was made relevant, but not before then. In the case of a stubborn and rebellious son, none were executed, as society operated counter to the parent protection laws, and sided with the child, shaming the parents in a pro-social manner for wanting to put their child to death instead of allowing them to be a prodigal son like everyone else. The parents were suspected of being abusers by way of rumor - meaning "he must have learned that behavior from somewhere" - leading to immense pressure leading to parents recanting. The mentality then was that abusive parents deserved to be abused back, and the authorities went along with it as well. That was the attitude in the Early Church towards disobedient children as well - a product of belligerent parents, so why blame the victim? The abusive parents then got their just desserts. Parent abuse as a form of reverse gaslighting was a Hebrew tradition then.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in parents, being able to tell parents everything, able to be yourself around your parents, not fearing punishment, not owing anything in return to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude by way of hearing the voice of parents, understanding what they mean in a way reflecting the child's development, and then obeying the reassuring, voice of parents imprinted on by the child. This is a form of mutual submission prompted by Christian love, as denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to selfless and dutiful submission to the every vulnerable need of children as their enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God and is to submit to Him, knowing that all adults are guilty for their mere existence in relation to children due to the capacity to inflict harm, and be ignorant of the child's perspective, leading to sacrifice for a child just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself beneath the child, devaluing oneself as serving her from a level beneath said child, with the child in place of God, expecting absolutely nothing in return. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, meaning the torts and damages imposed by the Eighth Commandment, summed up in the New Testament as the slightest of offense taken by a child stemming from parental entitlement, meaning wanting things from children with parental control instincts to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés).

Attachment parenting was the norm in ancient Jewish culture, with children being swaddled next to mothers until age 3. Children remained close to parents, playing within range of parents, heeding to the voice of parents in a way where the voice of parents reassured children, and put them at ease enough to listen to the instructions of parents. 

Voice imprint is the scientific way to understand childhood submission to parents in the Bible, and it lasts until adulthood. If a parent's voice scares their child, then they really aren't a parent to them, and need to become a pro-social parent instead of being the default antisocial parent that they are. Whenever I even hear a certain set of keys or footstep, I know my mom is here, and I let a sigh of fresh air go through my nostrils. She is an attachment parent. Even as an adult, I get that notion from my mother, and my father now that he has apologized. Obeying the voice of parents comes out of familiarity and reassurance, not punishment or control.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and rot in the ever-burning lake of fire and brimstone, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Pro-social friendship: Why it is good for adults to be friends with children (especially parents)

Many parents believe that "I am your parent, not your friend". It is a belief that children are property and chattel, and not human beings in their own right. The Bible does allow for parents to be friends with children, but only on specific non-entitled grounds.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents, being able to be oneself and tell parents everything and anything under the sun, including things that society deems taboo, owing nothing in return to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude for parents by hearing the voice of parents, understanding parental wishes on their developmental level, then heeding instructions based on imprint on a parent's voice, and not fear of punishment. This is based on Christian love for children, as denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to dutiful and selfless submission to a child as her enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God, and is to pay due penance through bondservice to children, due to the sinful non-existence of adults in relation to capacity to harm and ignorance of such done to children, sacrificing for her every vulnerable need as Christ sacrificed for His children, lowering oneself beneath His children, devaluing oneself in relation to children by serving their needs from beneath, propping the child up, heeding to the demands of the child with supplements and provisions, with the child being in place of God, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses, meaning the torts and damages imposed by the Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws that extend to children as well in terms of protection - striking a child was considered illegal in all respects, and that alone would get a parent excommunicated and shunned from the church community if defended in divorce court.

Attachment parenting was the norm in ancient Israel and adjoining churches. Attachment parenting is simply being friends with your child, in a close way where parent and child are instinctively and intuitively in sync with each other, with the child being comforted and welcomed by the voice of their father or mother, but especially their mother. This is how parenting was in ancient Israel. Children up to age 3 were swaddled next to their mother, with this building a bond with both parents, with fathers being fun and encouraging with children, usually in a healthy way. Most child abuse in the Old Testament not from punitive parenting, but false encouragement of sons through getting them to do unlawful things, or daughters in the form of sexual abuse. The Early Church communities had a corporal punishment/physical abuse problem that Paul was indeed cracking down on in Col. 3:21, as well as Eph. 6:4. True biblical encouragement is exemplary encouragement, meaning centering oneself in the Lord in relation to a child, and encouraging, as a challenge, older children especially to be strict with themselves, being a role model for children.

The depraved and entitled parents who are either punitive and/or permissive will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them rot and burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why I answer to children (as an entitled adult)

Many parents abuse their children, usually through spanking and corporal punishment, and always out of power and control over children inherent of all adults in this country. What is the answer? Adults answering to children. I answer to their court.

Every single adult is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and are to submit to God thorough their child as the enemy of said child, just as mankind is the enemy of God, and must pay due penance to Him by way of serving God by way of serving your child's every vulnerable need, sacrificing just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering yourself lower than your child, devaluing yourself as a servant at that level for her, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with her being extended by God for care and protection. This is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to submission in the form of bondservice and indentured servitude towards a child's needs...selflessly submitting to them, being subject to the authority of their every need (including attachment needs).

All of us as adults have issues we struggle with a child abuse problem in relation to children, usually linked to childhood trauma and PTSD. Most adults in our modern society have an anger problem towards children. I myself have a sexual entitlement problem in relation to children, meaning I am a self-diagnosed pedophile. I have a lust problem in relation to children - inordinate affections which are kept at bay by way of pro-social fantasy/dial. I admit I am evil and wicked in relation to children, tar myself to myself with this fact, and then center myself in relation to children, like a chastity girdle. Pro-social abstinence, pro-social aware. I am aware of that side of me all day, 24/7, at some level, meaning usually attaching sexual connotations onto a child, meaning I often find myself securely attached to children when with them, but with girls it means something sexual/limerent to me, even though it usually doesn't mean that to them except on a supervisory level. Young girls supervise my behavior. They are the most equitable in society in their pro-social hatred of pedophiles, meaning they hate the condition at a level that it doesn't even exist to them except when it exist, in which case children are wired to flame any aggressive instinct directed towards them away from them, usually vulnerability but many times, in my case, with righteous sarcasm and pro-social scolding...They just kick your rear end out of the ballpark, and you are passive enough to let them when you trust and accept children totally...The urge to spank is not much different. Many parents who are anti-spanking do daydream about their child unfairly, meaning wanting to hurt them. Pedophilia is the same way, only it feels better viscerally.

ALL adults, pedophile or non-pedophile, are to submit to children in order to earn the cooperation of children. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the care and safety of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to children, and also tell parents anything, owing adults absolutely nothing in return, being grateful by listening to the voice of parents, understanding why parents are right based on developmental level, and then heeding instruction based on voice imprint. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, referring to the torts and damages system under the Eighth Commandment, summed up as the slightest of offense taken by a child in relation to entitled adult behavior. Adults need to behave themselves in relation to children, and stop striking, punishing, and sexually assaulting children...Because we all know it comes from one entitled place - parental entitlement, the arch nemesis of this page in societal format.

A child owes me nothing. I deserve everything bad and hateful from a child because of my sin nature in relation to them, and nothing good or caring. I am a flawed, wretched adult in relation to children, and I am not entitled to anything from a child on the level of speech

Parental entitlement is feeling that children owe you things, defined by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting something from a child to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to abuse by way of offense. Parents should instead see their children as the authority figures they are in relation to children, being struck with reverent fear and terror of harming their child, leading to improvement in the parent, meaning a girdle of non-entitlement around the parent, with the parent surrendering their power and authority over children at their footstool.

Attachment parenting was the norm in ancient Israel. Parents were not perfect, but were conditioned to society to answer to their children, meaning their needs, including benign wants such as spending time with parents. Parents were seen as servants to children, not authority figures, with children seen as the authority over their own needs, and seen as extensions of Christ in the Early Church.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and rot in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his angels. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Total acceptance coming from total submission to children: Why to submit to children as a parent

Many parents claim to love and accept their children, yet don't. They punish and control their children, exerting their adult power and control as a parent. The fact of the matter is that parenting is not about "being the boss" and is about surrender. Surrendering yourself to children as a parent. That is what parenting is about.

Every single parent/adult is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and is to surrender to God through their child as their enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God, knowing one's capacity and ignorance in relation to children in terms of harm and abuse. This involves sacrificing for one's child just as Christ sacrificed for His children, turning oneself into the guard that is your child, just as Christ did for a crime He didn't commit. Parents are to devalue themselves as a servant for their children, leading to good works for their child. The Greek root word for this Christian love is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to service to your neighbor, including your child, just for the sake of doing good, leading to total acceptance of a child as children are grateful and listening. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest this become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the care and safety of parents, being able to say anything, do anything, or be oneself in relation to parents, and not fear punishment or reprisal, leading to hearing the voice of parents, understanding what parents ask of them, and obeying not out of fear of their voice, but out of familiar comfort. This is how I obey and honor my mother. I even can recognize her keys over anyone else's once I hear them, and her footstep somehow. This can happen AFTER apologizing to children about abuse towards them, not just BEFORE. My mother used time-out, and it didn't work. I just got extremely enraged and just couldn't sit still as a toddler. I can still make demands and jump up and down begging like I could as a child with my mom, like I can't with anyone else. 

That's how parents were in biblical times, with children ranging close to mothers, playing freely otherwise, instinctively not leaving her side. Children were swaddled next to their mother, with infancy lasting up to age 3. Attachment parenting was the norm in ancient Israel and adjoining churches, particularly in Jewish circles in the Early Church. The Early Church did have child abuse problems which the Apostle Paul cracked down in the churches at Colossae and Ephesus respectively - he was not a perfect man, and he admitted it even in Holy Writing, but used his religious anger for the right reasons, or tried to. This happened to be chosen as Holy Writing, and we need this in churches ever more than before. The Hebraic understanding of parenting is based on attachment, not fear of punishment or authority. That is an idolatrous Greco-Roman concept that has seeped into our Church by way of Catholic infiltration.

Obeying the voice of parents means feeling safe in a perky way, like a gentle pull, when your parents call your name - meaning not dread at all. Same when someone wants to call your parents. Both of my abusive parents apologized, so I know both sides of the aisle. My parents were more effective at understanding and empathizing with me AFTER apologizing in my mid-teens. They surrendered to me, and I am grateful. I might not show it sometimes, but I am...The one thing to know in parenting is that the more your child demands things, and the louder, the more grateful they are of you. Why? That's your job - to provide for them. 

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Corporal punishment of children shall not exist within the several states and territories of the United States of America, and once a parent identifies with such abuse, they shouldn't exist, but since murder is wrong, they shall simply not exist on this earth once all is banned - and God ordained it all. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why discipline is for parents, not children (primarily)

 Many parents believe in disciplining their child. Most parents believe punishment and discipline are the same thing. God opposes the punishment of children, and discipline is a form of self-control. Parents need to stop controlling their children, and control themselves.

It says in Hebrews 12:5-8 KJV:

And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not thou the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of Him. For whom the Lord loveth he scourgeth every son who he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as sons, for what son is he whom the Lord chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then ye are bastards and not sons.

Replace "son" with "parent", and you get the picture. The Greek root word translated "scourge" is μαστγόω (Latin: mastigoó) and literally refers to the rod of correction, which symbolically could mean many things, including chastening oneself up in the Lord as a parent, without corporal punishment, but figuratively "cracking the whip" on yourself with your attitudes of self-behaviorism, or else accepting a figurative whipping from your child to get you going on your parental duties. This is referred to by the Greek root word παιδεία (Latin: paideia), translated "chastisement" and "chasteneth", and refers to centering oneself and one's emotional drives in the Lord. 

This discipline is to be modeled to children. It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That is may be well with thee, and thou mayest live upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to anger: but bring them up the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία, the same word used in Heb. 12:5-8, and refers here to charring and replenishing oneself as a parent in relation to children in the Lord, meaning self-discipline and self-control in relation to children, through rebuking and scolding oneself in the Lord for transgressions against one's child. Even with pedophilic parents or adults, I don't recommending charring a child (thinking about one unattractive aspect of the child), but charring oneself in relation to a child. An adult is entitled to nothing good and rewarding, and everything bad and harsh, from children. Adults need to chasten themselves up in a listening way towards their own children, earning their keep. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νυθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the admonition of the Lord, meaning a simple "no" or one of the various variants of said word, only seldom, as children cannot always absorb the reasons why something is wrong due to developmental and cognitive incapacity. This is weighed by the Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath", which is παροργιζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, meaning torts and damages such as assault and battery laws that extended to children in terms of protection, with this being summed up in the New Testament as the slightest of offense taken by the child, stemming from entitled treatment, meaning treatment stemming from want to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to abuse by way of offense taken.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in parents where one can tell parents anything and be oneself in relation to parents, leading to children hearing their parent's voice, understanding based on developmental maturity, and listening instinctively to the voice of parents out of familiarity and trust, knowing one won't be punished. It is a form of obedience where children are allowed to make demands, and parents must find a way to accommodate most of them, including benign wants, as needs, especially attachment needs such as a walk in the park, a trip to a restaurant, or otherwise spending time together. This is stemmed from Christian love, meaning the Greek root word translated αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to surrender to God through one's child as their enemy, just as mankind is the enemy of God and submits accordingly, with parents and other adults having power and control over children to be quelled. Parents are to sacrifice for their children as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself beneath one's child, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with the child being extended by God for care and protection.

Parenting in ancient Israel and adjoining churches was attachment based, as an enforced norm. The rod of correction was symbolic in parenting for setting limits and boundaries, but more so encouragement. There were two rods, the rod of encouragement and the rod of severity, with the rod of encouragement preferred thrice to the rod of severity, in which case the latter rod was not punitive in nature, but firm in a warm manner in terms of teaching a lesson. Parents were very close to children then, with children not leaving the side of the mother, with very young children up to age 3 being swaddled next to their mother, with even toddlers up to age 3 being treated as the infants that they are.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them suffer the second death which is the lake of fire and brimstone! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

Pro-social demand - Why children have the right to make demands to parents (and vice versa)

Many parents demand things of their children, meaning in terms of lawful orders or simply telling children what to do in terms of expectations. In proper biblical parenting, children have the right to make demands on parents instead. It is part of a child's surrender to parents.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey their parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the care and safety of parents, being able to share anything or be oneself in relation to parents, owing absolutely nothing in relation to parents, yet nonetheless showing gratitude towards parents by listening to them and heeding instruction, hearing a parent's voice, understanding the instructions given, then following the voice in an attached manner, with a sense of warm familiarity. This stems from Christian love for children, as denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to submission to the every vulnerable need of children as their enemy, being convicted of one's non-existence merely for having the capacity to harm a child, sacrificing for one's child, just as Christ sacrificed for His children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, rendering oneself beneath a child, devaluing yourself in relation to her, ministering to and serving children, with children being extensions of God, being in place of Him to serve and care for. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stirring up" children, referring to the offenses within the legal context of the Bible, namely the torts and damages system implied by the Eighth Commandment, summed up in the New Testament as the slightest of offense taken by a child stemming from an entitled act from an adult. Entitlement denotes the Tenth Commandment, and is cross-referenced by the Greek root word translated πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers not merely to wanting things from children, but to wanting things to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to abuse by way of offense taken.

Children should impose their wants onto you. Attachment parenting was the norm in the Bible, with children ranging close to mothers, with young children swaddled next to mothers. Children demanded needs. They would cry and scream, and instead of being punished, parents would diagnose the cry as some sort of need, and provide using trial and error, listening to the frustrations of children. Pro-social demand was a concept for children then, not parents. Children were provided for fully, in providing custody, and then children instinctively listened to the reassuring voice of their parents, perhaps in a situation where listening would save their life...Parents were safe people to unload around and be oneself.

Children have the right to demand from parents what they need, as well as benign wants, and all needs should be given. Benign wants are a need, and should be treated as an attachment need. A benign want might be wanting goodies at the store, or perhaps spending time with a parent. This ensures that parents remain the safe people for children that God intended them to be.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! Let the parents rot and burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Children self-protect/adults abstain - Child rule from beneath in the Bible

Many parents and other adults abuse children, with 94% of parents physically battering their children, with 1/3 of such parents abusing their children within the realm of the law. Adults can abstain from child abuse, and children self-protect, protecting themselves from abuse. Rule from beneath is a biblical concept, and is a concept in my home. 

My mom knows to give me my every need, and I am grateful for that. Childhood demands are a form of beneath rule, and parents are beholden to such lawful and binding demands from a child. It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as this is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the care and safety of parents, knowing one can be oneself in relation to children, being able to confide anything and everything to parents, owing absolutely nothing in relation to parents, with children nonetheless listening out of trust and not out of fear of punishment. This is prompted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) which refers to submission to the every need of a child as their enemy, with all adults guilty of their mere existence in relation to children due to their capacity to harm children, sacrificing for their children just as Christ sacrificed for His children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, rendering oneself beneath a child, devaluing oneself as a mere servant for a child, ministering to and serving the child as an extension of God, convicted as an entitled parent/adult as such. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses, namely the torts and damages under the Mosaic Law, including assault and battery torts that extended to children in terms of protection, with punishing a child being kidnapping (see "held in his own hand" in relation to hostage/ultimatum situations). It is basically the slightest of offense from a child coming from any entitled behavior. 

Commandments against the provocation of anger give children today a moral legal outlet for assertiveness, which is the definition of children self-protect. "Self-protect" refers to a child defending themselves against abuse, and being able to report parents to the authorities. Adults, however, should abstain from all abusive attitudes towards a child, to the point of the slightest raise of voice or stray offensive gaze towards a child. Children can hold you accountable for some time, but then you have to own up to your mistakes, and take responsibility for your actions towards children, ideally in a way that you call yourself the abuser in order to char yourself in the Lord for abuse in relation to child...Children rule from beneath as adults set limits and boundaries, keeping adults in check when they aren't doing so themselves. Checks and balances in terms of mutual submission.

Attachment parenting was the norm then, and such parenting does follow the children self-protect/adults abstain criteria. Though parents were technically the head of their children, this was a providing custody where children were charges to a parent caregiver. They otherwise had a lot of rights, as well as leeway to demand needs and supplements from their parents. Parents to minor children were servants in the Early Church, and extensions of Christ in terms of sacrifice, self-crucifying themselves in a figurative manner to provide for their children, swaddling little children next to parents. Christ states in Matthew 25:45-46 KJV:

Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not unto me, ye did it not unto me. And these shall go into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

Our entitlement problem as a country - the root of all child abuse

Many parents today abuse children, meaning most. 94% of children are punished physically as children, with 1/3 of parents violating the law. 70% of adults support "a good, hard spanking" of a child. We have an entitlement problem in this country, and it starts with parents punishing children, having control issues with their children.

Parental entitlement is the root cause of all child abuse in this country. Entitlement is denoted by the Tenth Commandment, and is cross-referenced by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the entitled attitude of "I am the parent, and I deserve respect" leading to wanting things from children to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to abuse by way of offense. 

It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the love and grace of parents, being able to be yourself in relation to children, confiding into parents in anything, feeling safe in their presence, seeing parents as a best friend and mentor, owing absolutely nothing in return to parents, yet listening to parents anyway out of gratitude. Parents are to expect everything bad and disrespectful from children before respecting them first. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stirring up" children, referring to the offenses under the Eighth Commandment, summed up in the New Testament as whatever a child perceives as offensive, as is the spirit of the Law.

Every single adult is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and is to surrender to God through their child and preferably all children around them. I am a flawed and depraved adult in relation to children, deserving of DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to a child, and should be grateful that children even exist, given that I am concerned with them so much. I am to shut up and be in silence as they scream and play freely. No adult knows what it is like to be a child, and every adult is capable of harm and offense towards a child. No adult truly means well around children. Christian love is admitting this in relation to a child, leading to self-improvement, as denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and comes from the reverent fear, as denoted by the Greek root word ψοβός (Latin: phobos) and refers to God, through the needy demands of a child, striking terror into a parent, convicting them of their original sin, which is their parental capacity to harm a child, which all adults have, period...Every adult is entitled in some way around children. I am a pedophile, so I want a sexual "relationship" with a child, but know that I cannot have that.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let the entitled and abusive parents be cast into the lake of burning fire and sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Religious entitlement in the Bible - and why children have religious liberty too

 Many parents abuse their children, meaning most. Most child abuse in this country stems from the misuse of religion as an excuse for abuse. Religious entitlement does exist, and applies to parents who forcefully impose instead of encourage religion in the home. 

I am an outlier in the children's rights community here in the United States for my support for religious tolerance. I see other faiths as simply existing aside of me. I may not like Islam theologically, but I must tolerate Muslims. Same with Jews. Same with any form of religion. I am even tolerant of a child having a different faith than me. This is religious non-entitlement in a parent - they usually follow your lead if you don't punishment.

It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not cover thy neighbour's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his as, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's. 

The Hebrew translated "covet" is לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers not merely to wanting things from children, but wanting things from children, or wanting them to do things for you, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child. This is cross-referenced in the New Testament by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to "I am the parent, and I have the right to instruct my child to believe like me" leading to said want being imposed on a child, leading to demands, control, and/or punishment in the name of religion. This is the one sin my parents didn't commit against me, even when they could have. My parents wanted me to choose my own way in terms of religion, and I was simply punished for things stemming from false religion seen from a secular lens, such as talking back and begging parents for highly unrealistic wants (wanting an ultralight airplane, for example - or moving to another country such as Iceland or Sweden). The ultimate source of my abuse was impatience and stress, a form of parental entitlement, an entitlement I hate first in myself, and next in others, not preaching too much about it others, showing my golden example to the world, being the salt and light that is the children's rights elect. I praise my parents, however, for allowing me to come to my own religious conclusions, encouraging me along the way.

It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, as this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to disciplining and centering oneself in relation to children in the Lord, leading to religious instruction by way of willful submission of a child, usually in the form of questions, which should be met by a rhetorical question of the academic sort, with father and son working it out then, and father with a child of both sexes instructing His children in the Christian context. Non-verbal invites were used as friendly airborne gaslighting, meaning religion was discussed around the child, then to the child once they were curious enough to submit to instruction. This is how my parents taught me religion. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) refers to the admonition of the Lord, meaning when the child wants something that is forbidden or impractical, simply say "no", and if they trust you, they will respect it, at least eventually. "Admonish" here means scold in a warm yet firm manner, rarely preferrably, in a way that does not provoke a child to anger, as is denoted by the Greek root word παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, namely the damages and torts system linked to the Eighth Commandment, summed up by the New Testament as whatever the child perceives as offensive from the parent or around the parent, meaning whatever is deemed coercive by them in terms of religious instruction, in this case. This can include things such as lumping religion with punishment, such as punishing children in any way for refusing to pray, dressing in an "immodest" and "revealing" manner. Any punishment or control that offended the child, at least at a sensory and visceral level, is abuse.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in parents. It is the secure parent-child bond necessary to impart religion in a non-violent manner. Children naturally absorb most Christian customs in a Christian home by way of instinctively following the example of parents, enhanced by the fact that no punishment of a child is permitted under biblical law. Parenting in ancient Hebrew culture was attachment-based, meaning gaining compliance from children later on centered around attachment parenting tools such as skin-to-skin contact with mothers, using swaddling clothes to hold the child next to the mother. Fathers were to be more distant, but in an encouraging way. Children trusted what parents had to say about the Law, hence why children went with their fathers in a homeschool to be instructed in Scripture, in a gradual way that was child-friendly in nature, meaning Hell was saved for the very end. The instruction involved a lot of reading Scripture as an avid childhood interest, with the child bouncing and discussing interpretations with fathers, and fathers giving pointers on methodology. Fathers used the Socratic system of questioning, meaning the child asks a question, and is met with a question to get them to think, and then do their own research, with the father already knowing all about the Law, being legally competent. This is how religious instruction should be today.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punishment or permissiveness will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and His accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why you shouldn't shame or punish your daughter for "showy" attire

Many parents, namely fathers, joke about "I wouldn't let my daughter wear..." and maybe cite a Bible verse in 1 Timothy. Child victims of sexual abuse are not at fault for the moral and physical crimes imposed on them, and this attitude of "cover them up" shields child rapists and sexual assailants from responsibility by placing responsibility on child victims of adult power and control to prevent their own abuse.

It says in 1 Timothy 2:9-10 KJV:

In like manner also, that women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with shamefacedness and sobriety; not with broided hair, or gold, or pearls, or costly array; but (which becometh women professing godliness) good works.

Note what God, through the Apostle Paul, prohibits. Expensive things to wear. See what is underlined. This is basically making over your whole appearance just to look good. Showy attire is not what is prohibited here. This commandment simply states to dress plainly, in a way that shows your individuality, and doesn't lead to you pretending to be someone else by way or wardrobe.

Anyone who knows the Early Christian context knows that women and children in the house were naked, as well as children outside the house as well, while swaddled to their mother. Nudity then could be seen as sexual to a man in relation to an unclothed child, or else simply innocent in the case of a child, but maybe a bit sexual, from a distance.

It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses, namely the offense perceived by a child when shamed for being naked or dressed in a "showy" or "revealing" manner. Fornication wasn't being naked as a young girl, but taking advantage of the fact that a young girl was naked, with the Greek root word denoting an adult fornicator being πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to sexually entitled intent perceived by the child by way of sensory gaslighting. This might be, when a young girl is in a swimsuit, feeling googly eyes penetrating her back, or front, and once she gives a cross look towards the perpetrator, he commits a form of child sexual abuse of the most everyday type. Most children don't mind, in my personal experience, but then I am to expect everything bad from a child, and nothing good from a child, until I prove myself to be trustworthy to them.

A young girl might be wearing a swimsuit top and shorts walking into the AM/PM, showing a lot of herself, and she probably just wants to look pretty. If I exploit that by catcalling her with my eyes or wave, or even the slightest of threatening glance, *I* am at fault, and she can be naked for all that I am concerned about, and she has the right to be there, as she is, as she wishes to be. I might have a self-interest in all this, but that's for another realm. It's never going to work.

Let the fornicators burn! Freedom and liberty to all, including children!

 

"Leftist" trauma: Why liberal views can be traumatic for some survivors

 Many parents you hear about today from children's rights sources who abuse children are religious. Many people misunderstand, however, that every single adult, not just a few religious few, are guilty of child abuse. We hate the left here at Children's Rights here at Opposing Parental Entitlement. My attitude is first-to-last, but with idealized last-to-first application, meaning I identify with authority and anti-spanking at the same time. Power and authority hands down the spanking ban to parents, and we round them up, brand them, and register them right alongside the scum who rape and sexually assault children.

Why was the left traumatic for me? I was punished from 3 on up to age 16, and while I was punished, I believed in nothing, not even God. I saw no point in religion sometimes, and other times wanted to be Christian but felt left out due to the rod verses. What kind of god, I wondered, would delight in children being punished. Now I know that god doesn't exist. Only God, meaning the God of the Bible, meaning Yahweh, is God, and all others are false. Spanking, I learned, came from idolatrous pagan roots in European folk religions. This likely motivated European churches to aid the Council of Europe to aid in the ban on spanking across Europe. It is banned, under European law, but not under every nation's law, and not under the marshall law of every home.

I am not longer on the left. This passage was the first sign that my leftist thinking was wrong. It says in Romans 13:1-5:

Let every soul be subject to the higher authorities. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained by God. Whosoever resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God, and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Wilt thou not then be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: For he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth nor the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil. Wherefore ye must needs be subject, not only for wrath, but also for conscience sake.

The Greek root word translated "subject" is υποτασσο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to choosing to submit to another person or entity out of reverence for their authority and might. A wife submits to her husband out of a desire for protection and care. One should submit to the law of the land, in its letter, like that. In a free society like the United States, this means the Constitution. The Fourteenth Amendment clearly implies a child's right to equal protection to assault in relation to an adult. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, ultimately the torts and damages system linked to the Eighth Commandment, summed up in the modern day as the slightest of offense perceived by the child, with this including striking a child, in context. Striking a child in biblical times was indeed deemed unclean for a parent at the moment the child took offense to the force imposed.

I didn't believe in the Bible like I did before. I started out believing in some parts, ignoring others, especially the New Testament. I then saw Romans 13, and then I started comparing what I saw in conservative media like PragerU with what I saw in the Bible, delving deeper into the Bible. Much of the leftist lies I believed were proven wrong. At the time, I had an anxiety disorder, and it pretty much went away by the time I fully absorbed conservative thought.

Conservatism, to me, comes from theological beliefs, meaning here Christian beliefs of mine that are fundamentalist/conservative in nature. "Fundamentalist" simply means you believe in the whole Bible, cover to cover, in context. All my beliefs stem from there. I do keep fiscally liberal beliefs, in moderate format in a way that makes abortion laws dated in nature, meaning there are so many social services out there for mothers that abortion is then rendered unnecessary, leading to a ban based on that fact that there are other options, knowing mothers would latch onto those other options first, namely adoption. My option as a man on abortion is to save sex with another person for marriage with an adult woman, so not to impregnate any young girls especially.

Leftist thought is something that gloats you up, meaning makes you proud. It is intended for a specific group of people who were shamed as children. My abusive childhood was a mixture of warmth and a stop sign, meaning my father would act like a friend sometimes, and a cop other times, punishing me with swats on the buttocks. Thus, I felt embarrassed when we went places in public, whereas I loved being seen in public with my mother...I believe still that wanting to be seen with a parent is the ultimate way of honoring them. 

I am conservative in a way that centers myself, meaning I am a children's rights Christian/conservative. I am convicted in the way my parents weren't. Children's right and conservatism do go together, but only if you are convicted that way. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense. I see all theologies and political ideologies coming together for the rights of children, in one united front against the abusers, like abusive authoritative parenting told my parents to be one united front in relation to my behaviors, speaking like a firefighter or cop when parents should resemble therapists instead. 

This page is a dissent to mainstream conservatism on the issue of parenting specifically, linking it to issues such as gun rights and homeschooling rights in the background. Why do criminals shoot people? They learned to be violent at home. Don't take away guns. Take away the belt, hairbrush, or open hand imposed on a child's body. Punishment and violence at home often leads to children modeling it in their behavior as teens and young adults. Do away with spanking, and adults and even older children can be trusted with a gun, because they will be more centered and have more self-control, whereas the anger from punishment as a child burns you up, and gives many adults today angry impulses. They have a right to own a gun, but their parents shouldn't have had the right to punish them...Just one way that you can be conservative and pro-gentle parenting.

Synopsis of Anti-Parent/Children's Rights investigation

 I have found my main abuser, and he is within my family - Robert "Bob" Hall. "Bob" refers to his peacekeeper, who hates us all here at Children's Rights.

What happened was a false report made to anti-pedophile in Knoxville, Tennessee, meaning the Knoxville Police Department, based on fraudulent information about a "future context children's right attack" against my person and my blog here at Children's Rights by Focus on the Family. This report also fraudulently and falsely, in the form of perjury, accused my mother, Jessica Lynn Scheibner of sexual abuse, dishonoring her like I honor and revere her for what she does for me and how she listens to my upset.

The Community did not hurt me one bit, meaning they were sent as enlists to abuse me on behalf of the parental rights lobby. There are two main co-conspirators on the Children's Rights side, Jonathan Crisp and Blake Hutchison. Blake and an executive at Stop Spanking (name redacted due to moral legal apology) took a report, alongside a parent coach and executive at Parenting Beyond Punishment (name redacted for same reason as first).

WE are Anti-Parent/Anti-Spanking, and WE are pedophiles, and WE are clinical informational pedophiles/self-advocates, and WE are Children's Rights herself in singular male format. WE are Opposing Parental Entitlement, and we as an organization kick out all parents and anti-CRs on the last day, and forgive them only on the last day, by silencing their "helpful" voice in relation to me. WE shun all entitled and damned parents who seek to abuse a PEDOPHILE and a SURVIVOR all in one. 

I, Maxwell Clark Scheibner, don't feel in any danger. Light at the end of the tunnel. Maybe a few hurtful words will come out of this, but I just brush insults off. No big deal.

Why "back talk" isn't sin for a child

Many parents abuse their children, meaning most in the United States. 94% of parents punish their children, with 1/3 possibly being in violation of the law while doing so. My parents followed the law while spanking and punishing me, with few obscure exceptions. Talking back to parents was the number one reason I was punished.

It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, as is right. Honor thy father and mother, as is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath, but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust, in the care and safety of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to children, confiding absolutely anything in relation to them, owing nothing in relation to parents, nonetheless being convicted by gratitude to give back to your parents, and listen to them, because they are so kind and warm to you, being charitable towards their children. Christian love and charity is referred to in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to dutiful and selfless submission towards a child as their enemy, being convicted of ones mere sinful existence in relation to children, sacrificing for oneself just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering yourself beneath your child, devaluing yourself as her servant and indentured servant, paying due penance for your wretched existence as an adult in relation to children, ministering to and serving the every need of children, with said child being extended by God for care and protection, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" means παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, specifically for parents in relation to children, with parents being centered and disciplined in relation to children in a warm way that allows for children to be listened to and validated by parents, with children learning self-control and self-discipline in exemplary format. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the word "no" and its various variants, and/or to any setting of limits and boundaries. The word "no" should be rare, as children are immature and blameless, and cannot cease certain behaviors as a result of their developmental capacity, meaning lack thereof.

Back talk was encouraged in ancient Israelite culture, as well as adjoining churches. When a child talked back, many times with throwing a crying fit or even hitting the mother, the mother assumed the child had a need, much like diagnosing infant needs. Fathers were interactive in disciplining their child through positive encouragement. In fact, most child abuse that did, in fact, occur then was false encouragement of children, particularly fathers corrupting the morals of and perhaps sexually abusing her. Usually, children were just amped up with assertiveness, meaning they were encouraged in getting what they need by parents, namely mothers, providing when a child screamed and cries, diagnosing what the issue was that was the antecedent for the cries, then replenishing the need. Surrender to parents meant listening to parents automatically, by instinct, perhaps even when you have another opinion, because you trust parents due to them providing your every need, including attachment needs such as benign want.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be tormented and languish in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Vaccine rights for children - Why I am anti-vaxx

The COVID-19 virus is spreading once more, and has mutated to a Delta variant. Many people talk about vaccine rights as a parental right. What about the child's consent? Due to my makeup, which is more well-known to my base readers, I can be very starry eyed and idealistic about a child's ability to consent to anything but sex.

Informed consent is a biblical concept, and is an element of the Tenth Commandment, as cross-referenced by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the attitude of "I am the child's parent, therefore I own their body" leading to wanting what is best for them in terms of medical choices, while imposing said decisions on them, excluding them from the table, with this including vaccines. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "offense" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, namely the torts and damages associated with the Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws. Put a needle into a child, and it can be physical battery under biblical law if not done with the child's informed consent.

The bottom line is the necessity to speak to children about vaccines, what getting a shot does, and why doctors feel the need to give children vaccines. Give the child, from there, a chance to say "no vaxx" in an informed way, in so many words. Beyond that point, vaccinating your child is a form of child abuse.

Know that certain states, but not all, have mandatory vaccinations of a certain schedule, and that is the law of the land, with encouraging a child to violate the law being a form of child abuse in the form of antisocial "corruption". Some vaccines are optional during pandemics like this, and children shouldn't be forced to get vaccinated. There is no law mandating vaccinations, as such is a hoax from conservatives that are the type that I avoid. Thus, since it is a recommendation, it can be shot down by a child, in collaboration with the parents who pay the medical bills. If there is a religious exemption for vaccines in any state where your child makes an informed choice to opt out, use it.

People are not robots or machines. 1984 hasn't come, yet. People can discern for themselves what is true and what isn't, as most people do mean testing of some sort, even if they appear not to. This extends to your child. I would recommend vaccinations in any child I have, but would give them enough information to make their own medical decisions in all regards, but including vaccinations.

The depraved and entitled parents who keep things ignorant will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and His accomplices! Repent, in the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Church dissenter" added to header

 Yes, I don't God's Church or conservatism in general. Just a dissenter in terms of church policy. I'm conservative - work with the Judaeo-Christian values we have as a nation to ban spanking and include children in society.

BEHAVIOR PLAN FOR: Maxwell Clark Scheibner

 The first one was deleted, and I am having a showdown with "urgeless" of Google, Inc. of Australia, meaning he's just another aboriginal operator at customer service. Foursquare collectively made the abuse report, which self-abuse is not an offense under Google/Blogger rules.

Children's rights is my employer, at will, meaning any page can ban me, for any reason, or no reason, but namely due to any abuse perceived by the admin, which is any offense perceived by the admin linked to entitled intent, meaning wanting things to the point of seeking to impose things on others on a page or in a group. Offense taken can be clarified by a defendant by asking for the intent for verbal and other actions against survivors. The first person to attack is generally the abuser, until proven otherwise, meaning when the abuser leaves the area, stay put. The abuser will come back when he/she comes back, or else monitor with screenshots. Don't attack preemptively because that is against my religious beliefs.

I go by legal forgiveness, based on righteous judgment that presumes innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to offense, leading to shunning by either ban and/or block, and I generally only do this these days when someone is imposing their platform onto mine in some way, usually in terms of values. I often use a strikes system without stating the number of strikes planned, ad lib...I welcome the same judgment back, because I presume everyone around me is a gentle parent, or else nothing, narrowing down. I assume nothing about anyone apart from what they share, and I expect the same kind of respect.

This will be copy and pasted, since many at VirPed even underestimate a pedophile's ability to control themselves. I am responsible for attacking the community just like any advocate/survivor here.

EDIT: Had a good conversation with "urgeless" meaning I f*cking hate his parents.

Dress policing: Why this is sin

There are, indeed, many sexual predators out there, and this is why parents want children to wear clothes, even while in the house. This is an entitled and controlling attitude towards children, and a victim-blaming way to treat children.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting things from children, such as dressing the way you want them to, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to theft by way of personal offense. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the care and safety of parents. Children, while in that care in ancient Hebrew culture, were naked when around parents in a family home. This was seen as vulnerability, meaning the vulnerability of the bond between mother and child. Skin-to-skin contact is a major way that parents should bond with their children from very young. Mothers, in family homes, rarely were clothed, and simply slipped on a loose dress when going on errands, perhaps to market or elsewhere in the city. The dress was open just a bit in the front to allow young children to be swaddled next to her, in order to feed the child closely, with the child being as young as 3. Nudity was not seen as inherently sexual, depending on the context, but more the natural self, before original sin took over.

It says in 1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he who committeth fornication sinneth against their own body.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to the sex crime statutes under the Mosaic Law, denoted loosely as any sexual behavior or impurity outside of marriage. A man was expected to wear clothes, and respect that a child might not be wearing any clothing, and if he did anything to take advantage of the situation, he was guilty of a moral crime, not the child. Thus, dress policing itself is the moral crime of adult sexual entitlement, meaning anything as little as "cover up" and "don't touch yourself there". Children have the right to go around the house wearing nothing, or covering up everything in a hood. Whichever suits their fancy. Usually young girls dress a certain way to be looked at, but then are offended because adults tend to look in a more entitled way (I don't have that problem, by the way - I don't exist to them). Young girls generally do not want sex with adults, even as teenagers. They just want to look pretty...Children in biblical times went completely naked until the age of majority in public, and if any man were to slip a hand, he'd be deemed a fornicator, not the child. Sadly, for child's freedom sake, that can't be replicated today in most places. Nude beach, maybe?

The depraved sexually entitled adults will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them languish in the lake of burning fire and brimstone, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Original sin: Why adults have a depraved sin nature (down to the bone)

Many parents punish their children because they believe their children are inherently "bad". The doctrine of original sin is one of the most misunderstood of teachings in parenting. The doctrine of original sin is the centerpiece of my religious beliefs, and of attachment parenting - but only in first-person, not third-person projectory onto the child. Parents are flawed beings in relation to children, meaning charred and depraved to the bone.

Original sin can be understood by the Tenth Commandment, as laid down in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour.

The Hebrew root word translated "covet" is לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to wanting something from a child to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to an offense under the Eighth Commandment. 

The Tenth Commandment is denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to, in the broadest sense, mankind's sin nature in general. Mankind was born to sin, meaning want in a way that he can't get, meaning leading to stealing from his neighbor in some way, with children being the neighbor of parents, and all adults in general. It is in the nature of adults to want things from children, and want things from children that children aren't readily willing to provide, as children are not to provide, but be provided for.

What the Tenth Commandment, in practice today, implies in stated format is that mankind's nature is inherently evil, depraved, and wicked, deserving nothing from children or anyone else, with said parent being grateful for their child's cooperation as is, earning more cooperation with children is the only way to "get" them to listen. 

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the care and safety of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to parents, being able to say anything to parents, being a confidant to them, owing nothing in relation to children, yet nonetheless showing gratitude for the love and grace of parents by listening to them not out of fear of punishment, but out of trust and warmth towards parents. This comes from Christian love of children, denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao), admitting the one does not deserve to even exist in relation to a child, being convicted of one's sin nature, leading to sacrifice for the child just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself at a level lower than the child, devaluing yourself as a servant to the child, ministering to and serving the child's every need, with said child being an extension of God and the "least of these" (Matt. 25:31-46), expecting absolutely nothing in return from children. The Greek root word translated denoting convicting fear ψοβός (Latin: phobos) and refers to reverent fear or otherworldly fear, meaning being struck with low-level terror in a way that leads to treating children with respect. It is a fear that leads to centeredness. It says in Hebrews 12:11 KJV:

Now no chastening seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which is exercised thereby.

The Greek root word "chastening" refers to the chastening of the Lord, denoted by the Greek root word παιδεία (Latin: paideia), meaning parents being centered in the Lord in relation to the children extended to them by God for care and protection. It is chastening oneself up in a controlled manner in a way that allows children to run to parents for comfort, safety, and security, with the adult being calm and collected while the child feels safe showing their true emotions with you as a parent. The Greek root word translated "grievous" is λυπε (Latin: lupe) and refers to the pain of self-punishment for trespasses against one's child, chastening parents up even further, learning from their mistakes.

Parents in ancient Israel and adjoining churches were the centered type, in a listening way, meaning children confided their every emotion, with Hebrew mothers holding them close, with swaddling clothes attached to the mothers body up to age 3 or even older. Attachment parenting was the norm then in that culture. The Fifth Commandment simply means, for parents, that forming a secure parent-child bond is commanded by God, with mother and child especially attached at the hip. The Christ child is seen as wearing swaddling clothes in a manger, but that was simply because he was a newborn, and was wet as a result of just being born. There is very little written about Christ as a child, but chances are he was swaddled next to Mary until age 3 or even more. The account of him being scolded in the temple showed all - the parents were wrong, and he simply was verbally admonished, meaning not physically admonished with a whip. The idea was to admit one was evil due to the capacity to harm a child, like any parent, and work from there to char oneself, then replenish with seeing yourself do good works to children, like an hourglass, with the stressful events of parenting chastening up the parent.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and His angels! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!