Thursday, July 22, 2021

BEHAVIOR PLAN FOR: Maxwell Clark Scheibner

 The first one was deleted, and I am having a showdown with "urgeless" of Google, Inc. of Australia, meaning he's just another aboriginal operator at customer service. Foursquare collectively made the abuse report, which self-abuse is not an offense under Google/Blogger rules.

Children's rights is my employer, at will, meaning any page can ban me, for any reason, or no reason, but namely due to any abuse perceived by the admin, which is any offense perceived by the admin linked to entitled intent, meaning wanting things to the point of seeking to impose things on others on a page or in a group. Offense taken can be clarified by a defendant by asking for the intent for verbal and other actions against survivors. The first person to attack is generally the abuser, until proven otherwise, meaning when the abuser leaves the area, stay put. The abuser will come back when he/she comes back, or else monitor with screenshots. Don't attack preemptively because that is against my religious beliefs.

I go by legal forgiveness, based on righteous judgment that presumes innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to offense, leading to shunning by either ban and/or block, and I generally only do this these days when someone is imposing their platform onto mine in some way, usually in terms of values. I often use a strikes system without stating the number of strikes planned, ad lib...I welcome the same judgment back, because I presume everyone around me is a gentle parent, or else nothing, narrowing down. I assume nothing about anyone apart from what they share, and I expect the same kind of respect.

This will be copy and pasted, since many at VirPed even underestimate a pedophile's ability to control themselves. I am responsible for attacking the community just like any advocate/survivor here.

EDIT: Had a good conversation with "urgeless" meaning I f*cking hate his parents.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible endorses stronger laws to protect children

Many American parents think that the child abuse definitions should stay the same. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most ...