Thursday, February 9, 2023

POSITION STATEMENT: Proposed legislation barring minor children from access to drag shows

This platform was founded upon a set of Christian family values, with such values prohibiting same-sex sexual relations and outward behavior. It is the opinion of me, Maxwell Clark Scheibner, that presenting to a child in drag is just as inappropriate as masturbating in front of a child. 

Dressing in drag is a form of masturbatory desire known as autogynephilia, where a man wants to be admired in the sexual arena, and appear attractive, as a woman. Thus, due to the link to homosexuality, cross-dressing of this type is only acceptable when walking through the house, meaning only the privacy of your own home. Not in a club. Not in a library. Not in a school.

Fornication by way of obscenity is any public act coming from one's person with intent to arouse, alarm, or offend another, or else recklessly does the same. Usually, when you wear drag, you have the intent to arouse both others and yourself, so keep that tendency to yourself. Let's call it what it is - transvestitism. It is okay to be a transvestite, but do it privately, where you can imagine your own audience. Don't go to a book club with a bunch of innocent children in such a defiled state. 

It is one thing if you simply have same-sex attractions, which a lot of people do. But, to act on them in a way that involves minor children is another story. If you do something like dress in drag where children congregate, that is a form of child sexual abuse. I am okay with men dressing in drag in the privacy of their own homes, when nobody is looking, with an imaginary audience. But, doing it in front of children is simply obscene and should not exist. I am all for the right of someone with same-sex sexual attractions to indulge in masturbatory fantasy, but anything that involves other people should be prohibited under the law.

This platform supports child protection legislation limiting or prohibiting access of minor children to drag shows. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...