I myself am a survivor of child abuse within the law. I was abused by parents and family, and the law excused it. Most of them have apologized, and so the law of "reasonable force" itself in Pennsylvania is my abuser. FOOK PARENTS! FOOK PARENTAL RIGHTS! Those ragweed have no rights as far as I can be concerned.
I am an Anti-Spanking Advocate, and I use my Christian faith to confront my abuser on screen. The idea is to sell my Anti-Spanking ideas to the public, winning over parents one by one, convicting the sinful hearts of parents one by one. The idea is to point out the sin of provoking children to anger to entitled parents, convicting them to turn themselves in to their child, wiping away sniffling tears, apologizing to their children for how punitive they were.
I have been successful at convincing both new parents and autism parents. The idea is to lay out your court-space with the parents...and scorn and burn them with your arguments. Break them down with irrefutable evidence, to the point where they have to change their ways. Again, sniffling tears - that's what I like to imagine in any parent.
Let the depraved parents who provoke their children to anger burn in Hell! Repent!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.