Original sin: How to bring up children in the doctrine of original sin (without punishment or shaming)

The doctrine of original sin is the most misused of Christian teachings. Yet, original sin is the backbone of Christianity. Without original sin, there would be no need for a Christ. The common way to teach original sin in America is whipping children in a way that is intended to "break their will". However, there are better ways to instruct your child in the doctrine of original sin.

God hates all mankind, apart from a few that He calls His children. By default, all human beings are a fallen species that has turned our backs on God. All of mankind is deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to God. God especially hates the one-sided incursion on child-kind by adult-kind. We as human beings have a peacekeeping past that we all have to atone for. I myself am a depraved and decadent pedophilic adult that is deserving of absolutely nothing from children or the God that protects them.

The doctrine of original sin is best taught in the context of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with parents bearing the burden of proof. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived b a child, including, but not limited to, offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers here, in this context, to modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their parents' footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught by fathers showing good traits - such as sharing, being patient, or showing self-control - they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught by fathers being good, whereas girls were given a kiss to the forehead when caught by fathers being good. Children also need religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Religious instruction started with fathers leaving out a Bible for children to discover and explore, with children learning to read with the Bible in most cases. When children were caught reading the Bible, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, based off of what children saw in the text. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers were quick to give pointers on the context.

Religious development is a part of child development, as religion is a human need for children and adults alike. Younger children - past age 6 - start out with simplistic religious beliefs non-conforming to any religious denomination or sect. However, as they get older, they start to grow towards a specific religious denomination or sect. It may not be the religion you would choose, but at least they have values.

Original sin is a Christian concept that should come up in religious instruction. Children who are learning the Christian faith are bound to ask the question "why did they need to kill Jesus?". The proper response from a parent is "we are all sinners as human beings, and so we needed a Christ to Sacrifice Himself so we could be forgiven". This should communicate to the child that we are sinful creatures as human beings. Most of the time, children run with those facts of life. Sometimes, it is a hard pill for a child to swallow, in which case parents were there to comfort and reassure the child. The doctrine of original sin can be taught without sin shaming, but that requires smoke signals on sin and atonement coming from parents, and only if the child broaches the topic.

What motivates children to hear out the instruction of their fathers? Why not start out with a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness with mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following her from room to room, not allowing their mothers out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever a child cried, mothers were quick to coo at her child before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need and met it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When mothers and children under age 6 were out and about in public, they were wrapped up next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin co-sleeping warmth happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which was when children wanted their own place to sleep. Children went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with children experiencing skin-on-skin sustaining warmth every time they were picked up.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why not to send your child to school: Protecting children from school abuse

Many parents think it is necessary to send their children to school, and don't think twice about it. Most American parents send their children to school thinking being drilled and graded is the only way that they will learn. However, only in recent history has school been mandatory for children to attend. Even then, most states allow for homeschooling.

The Bible calls on parents to protect their children from child abuse, including school abuse. Most adults who are teachers are abusive towards schoolchildren. The main indicator of an abuser amongst teachers is children calling said teacher a "mean teacher". My mother is a teacher, and if any student of hers called her "mean", I would gladly read her the riot act. Punishment of children is prohibited in the Bible, with instruction then being based off of the child's natural curiosity. See Ephesians 6:4 KJV:

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive measures in dealing with children, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. This commandment lifts up the Eighth and Tenth Commandments, and clarifies that the Ten Commandments are intended to protect children as well as adults.

The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Most children learned how to read and write in the Early Church using a Bible. Most children taught themselves how to read using the Bible that was afforded to them. The upper classes in Greco-Roman society did send their children to school. But, the Early Christians did not send their children to school, both because most Christians then were dirt poor, and because Christian parents then wanted to protect their children from being punished and abused by their teachers.

I myself am a survivor of both law-abiding parents and the adults that they extended to me by sending me to school. Most of my teachers I would rate as "mean". The few teachers that I would call "nice" turned out to be gentle parents in their personal lives. I learned very few things in school, and learned most of what I know through my own curiosity. I am hyperlexic, and taught myself how to read around age 2. I was repeatedly suspended from school for things that were clearly a manifestation of my bipolar disorder. 

There is no humane way to regulate the student body of a school. Most schools opt for punitive measures when seeking to regulate the school population of an individual school, such as detentions or suspensions, which violate a child's right to not be abused by adults. The best teachers that I had used discipline referrals only to cover their rear end.

What if you have to send your child to school? Not all parents can afford to homeschool their children. Talk to your child about their day at school, but ONLY if they want the topic brought up. If your child says a teacher is "mean", be there as the nice adult who reassures them. When a child has an IEP, fight for your child not to be suspended by the school authorities. Know that if you choose to send your child to school, you may have to clean up a mess later, meaning a child with a broken spirit who resents their mean teachers.

I myself have an adult trauma, meaning I was abused by adults claiming authority over me as a child. Thus, as an adult myself, I know to atone for all of the ways I have wronged and abused a child. Most adults have something to atone for, including teachers. I myself would not choose to be a teacher as a career choice due to moral reasons pertaining to my Christian faith. I also know from trauma experience that any adult is capable of abusing a child, including even myself. I suspect all adults of abusing a child in any way possible, but only judge adults once I have every reason to believe, and no reason to doubt, the guilt and entitlement of an adult. If you call yourself an adult except to atone - in a way I can discern - you immediately are presumed guilty until proven innocent, beyond a reasonable doubt. My trauma is guided by my righteous judgment as a Christian. If a child calls an adult "mean", I count that as an offense against the adult that the child is judging. I am ANGRY at other adults for how they treat children, and I also atone for my own adult guilt based on my choice to abuse and wrong a child. But, I know to hold back my anger until I can prove guilt in an adult, beyond a reasonable doubt, with doubting suspicion. I am especially ANGRY at parents. My Hell statement is my trauma, and my trauma is my Hell statement.

The depraved and entitled adults who punish children within the context of a school will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Redefining child abuse: Why our Judeo-Christian values call for expanding child abuse definitions

Many parents think that the Bible does not have any answers on the issue of child abuse and children's rights. This is a common belief amongst American parents. Most American parents do not understand the spiritual dangers of punishing and being controlling with children. However, the fact of the matter is that the Bible has a definition of child abuse that overrules all worldly allowances for child abuse in the English common law.

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. In short, any forceful demand imposed on a child is parental entitlement, including any controlling demeanor towards children. All anger at a child on the part of an adult is unrighteous anger, and thus is entitlement, and thus is sin. When children take offense to imposed demands on them, it becomes child abuse. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of children in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon. 

The first country in modern history to pass a ban on punitive parenting was Sweden, which passed a ban on all punitive parenting in 1979, and repealed their "reasonable chastisement" defense in the 1966. Some ancient cultures came up with the idea earlier, including the Ancient Jewish culture. In the Early Church, parents who punished their children were excommunicated from the church if they defended their punishment habit.

Israel, contrary to popular legend, is a children's rights country, with Israel banning all punitive parenting since 2000. But, even before then, there was never a legal defense for striking or punishing a child. The problem was that the Christian and Muslim courts would not remove the child victim from custody due to their own religious bias, with family courts being sectarian in nature. It took a court ruling to allow for the police to step in and collect the child victim when nobody else would.

The definition of child abuse in Israel is based off of the criminal statutes under Israeli law. In all cases, punishing children is treated as domestic violence, or else domestic abuse. Israel has a statute against domestic battery, and it is applied whenever a child is physically or verbally reprimanded or punished. This is due to the Judeo-Christian parenting morals that prohibit any punishment or reprimand of a child. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" rarely (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" often. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents say "no" to children as an everyday event. However, the Bible, as understood in context, prohibits the use of the word "no" except under certain specific tenses of the word "no". Children need to hear your "yes" far more often than your "no".

Frequent use of the word "yes" is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" referring to the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Parents in biblical times heeled to the command of their children. Children issued orders and edicts from their place of rest in relation to parents. In almost all cases, customary law mandated that parents instead say "yes" to their child's commands. The only way a parent could say "no" to a child was if they were petitioning something unsafe, unworkable, and/or immoral. When parents then said "no", it was backed up by an explanation and reassurance. Even then, most Christian parents then sought to compromise with their children. Children issued commands, and parents heeled to those commands.

Children growing up in the Early Church got most everything that they wanted, and absolutely everything that they needed. Whenever a child wanted something when out and about at market, they could get the sweets they wanted off of the shelf, or even a pet lamb that was up for auction. In the case of the pet lamb, the mothers never slaughtered the lamb. The only thing children wanted that was banned was expensive, showy jewelry, as modesty then meant not making a fashion statement.

Children under age 6 were wrapped up next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Even then, young children in biblical times pointed to what they wanted, and then mothers got what the child wanted off of the shelf. Older children - past age 6 - carried their own money. All children had to do was ask fathers for money, and they usually got enough money to get what they wanted. They didn't even have to work to get the money.

It is okay to say "yes" to stuff. Whenever you say "yes" to the every command of a child, it helps gel a bond and form a secure attachment with children. When children can count on you like a gravy train, they trust you more, and feel safe around you more. They will see you as the bringer of good things, which helps form a secure attachment with children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Adult attraction to children: Individual responsibility for adults attracted to children

Child sexual abuse is a form of child abuse involving rape or sexual assault. 1 out of 10 children will suffer rape or sexual assault before their 18th birthdays. Most people are quick to blame pedophiles for the sexual abuse of children. However, all adults need to atone for being at risk for raping or sexually assaulting children under the right/wrong conditions. Enough of passing the blame onto one small group of people - all adults are capable of sexually abusing children under the right/wrong conditions.

Every single adult is capable of abusing a child in the worst of ways under the right/wrong conditions. That risk includes risk of sexually abusing a child. Every single adult is capable of child sexual abuse, with most adults harboring a risk that is quite high. Most all child sexual abuse is simply another way that adults oppress children.

What is the solution to child sexual abuse? The idea is for all adults to acknowledge their sexual side towards children, in just the right way. The two acronyms applying to most adults is righteous masturbation and righteous avoidance. The idea is for adults to rechannel their attractions to children to masturbation. From there, parents can char and tar the act of approaching a child with sexually motivated intent by knowing that they will burn in Hell just for doing the deed with a child.

The Greek root word denoting lust in the Bible is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) does not refer to ordinary sexual desire, but instead refers to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. It is okay to look the look, and think the think later. But, there is a big difference between thinking the think and doing the deed. If you find yourself flirting or propositioning a child, or else touching them on any part of their body with sexual intent, you should not approached the child. Even if the child is right there, it is a moral crime against children and the God that protects them to wave the "hey baby" wave. The only way out of the approach is to masturbate to sexual thoughts of children, at least until all of those thoughts are spent away.

I myself am deserving of absolutely nothing just for being the pedophilic adult that I am. I am a depraved and decadent sinner who has a long sin list in relation to children. My entitlement problem in relation to children - which we all have as adults - is sexual entitlement. As a pedophilic adult, I am guilty of acts of sexual harassment against children, which is a form of sexual assault. I was an antisocial "flirt" towards children, meaning I followed children around a public swimming area and waved at them.

Most pedophiles are the last people to sexually abuse a child. Most pedophiles have no choice but to acknowledge their sexual side towards children, because - unlike most adults - their adult attraction exists on the surface. Most pedophiles have not raped or sexually assaulted children at all. 1 in 4 pedophiles have sexually abused a child, with pedophiles making up only about 1-2% of the male population. Most pedophiles have a form of autism where their passion is children's rights, with their sexual desires reflecting that passion. I myself am a pedophile, and I can simply choose not to sexually abuse a child, and I do make that choice daily, with me masturbating righteously to sexual thoughts of children. I also know that approaching a young girl and/or flirting with her will land me in Hell for all eternity. Pedophilia is not synonymous with child sexual abuse. If you see someone with autism getting along with children naturally, think pedophile, as most individuals with autism find children annoying. I myself find myself doting on children in the store, and taking their side in parent-child disputes. I love all children just as if they were my own.

Most adults, meaning all, have a sexual attraction to children, meaning at least teenagers. Even adult women have a sexual side that should be acknowledged. 20% of men have a secondary sexual attraction to children, and most all of adults have a sexual attraction to teenagers. Most teenagers can easily be mistaken for adults, but that is no excuse for doing the deed with a child. The idea is to acknowledge this sexual side towards children as an adult. I myself have a sexual side towards children as a pedophilic adult, and I own up to it. I am deserving of absolutely nothing from a child, and don't deserve the grace and forgiveness that children regularly show me as an advocate for children.

The depraved and decadent, defiled adults who rape or sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to co-sleep next to their child

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice to make as a parent. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents isolate their child in a crib or bed from day one. However, the Bible, as understood in context, endorses co-sleeping. Co-sleeping can help prevent child sexual abuse from happening in the first place.

Righteous co-sleeping is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical tense as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

It is common knowledge that children under age 6 refuse to sleep on their own. This is a normal behavior in children that ends up with the child being punished. Most American parents punish their children when their child refuses to go to sleep. However, the fact of the matter is that children under age 6 are too young to sleep on their own. Most all, if not all, children under age 6 have a primal fear of being devoured by predators. Most parents think that predators are no longer a threat to children. However, most children are sexually abused as a bedtime ritual, meaning the perpetrator - usually their father - sneaks into the child's bedroom and rapes them. However, children in the Early Church co-slept next to their mother, in skin-on-skin format. When their father wanted to rape or sexually assault a child, he couldn't - mom was right there to put a stop to it. Mothers in biblical times usually used themselves as a human shield for if the father wanted to attack the children, and otherwise slept in between the children and their father, with the children staying on mom's side of the bed. 

The most common reason for parents avoiding co-sleeping is due to pediatricians or other mental health professionals serving children fearmongering about "sleep dependence". Most co-sleeping in biblical times had an end. Most co-sleeping in the Early Church ended at the onset of puberty, which was when most children wanted their own place to sleep. Until then, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin warmth every single night. Sometimes, children want to co-sleep until later, perhaps due to a developmental disorder such as autism, in which case parents should know also that there is always an end to co-sleeping. I didn't stop sleeping next to my mother until I was 16, when I wanted to prove my independence by sleeping on my own.

Co-sleeping is the ultimate way to bond with your child and form a secure attachment with them, and co-sleeping in the biblical context was intended primarily to gel the bond between parent and child, especially mother and child when in skin-on-skin format. The family bed was a concept in biblical times, in nude format - all parties laying in the family bed were completely in the nude. Children formed a bond with mothers through mothers skin-on-skin co-sleeping with their children. Fathers also imprinted on their children by watching children snuggle with their mother in the nude - fathers sexually imprinted on their child through righteous masturbation. Children always slept on the mother's side of the bed, and did so for good reason - the father might still be strongly attracted to his children at ages as young as 3. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

Why to catch children being good (as opposed to catching them being bad)

Many parents want their children to have discipline. This is a common wish for a parent. However, most parents think discipline means punishing or being controlling with a child. However, there are better ways to discipline a child. The actual biblical way of disciplining your child is catching them being good.

Catching children being good is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offenses, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your children hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their parents' footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits by fathers, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught by fathers being good, whereas girls were given a kiss to the forehead when caught by fathers being good. Children also need religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Religious instruction started out with fathers leaving out a Bible for children to discover and explore. When children were caught by fathers reading the Bible, they were lavishly praised and encouraged with phrases such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, based off of what children saw in the text. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers were quick to give pointers as to the context. Religious development is a part of child development, as religion is a human need for children and adults alike. Younger children - past age 6 - start out developing simplistic religious beliefs non-conforming to any religious denomination or sect. However, as children get older, they start to grow towards a specific religious denomination or sect. It may not be the religion you would choose, but at least they have values.

What motivates a child to hear out the instruction of their fathers? Why not start out with a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness with mothers, meaning that wherever mothers went, so did their child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following her from room to room, not allowing mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at children before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need and met it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When mothers and children under age 6 were out and about, mom wrapped up the child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin warmth happening every single night, until the child reached the onset of puberty, which is when children wanted their own place to sleep. Children went naked naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with children experiencing skin-on-skin sustaining warmth every time they were even picked up.

Christian fathers in the Early Church sought to form a secondary attachment with their children, with mothers being the primary attachment figure. Fatherly attachment started with fathers forming a sexual imprint on their child through spending away parent attraction through righteous masturbation. Once the attraction was spent away, fathers sought to form a warm rapport with their children. Fathers also nurtured alongside mothers, but nurtured in a teaching way, catching children being good before giving them lavish praise and encouragement. This praise and encouragement motivated children to keep up the good work in terms of self-improvement. Children can find their own way of being disciplined, and when they find out how to be disciplined, lavishly praise and encourage them to keep up the good work. Children do not need to be hurt in order to grow up to be disciplined adults - all a father has to do is offer warm and loving praise that helps children know how to act.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous ordering: Why parents should heel to the command of their child

Many parents think that they should issue orders and edicts. This is a common view amongst American parents. Most American parents think that children should listen to them, and feel entitled to children listening to them. However, children in the biblical context instead issued orders and edicts, with parents heeling to their children.

Righteous ordering is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well being unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Righteous ordering means something very simple - parents are to heel to the command of their children. Most parents in the Early Church heeled to the command of their children as part of customary law, with children issuing orders and edicts from their place of rest in relation to their parents. Parents were required to heel to the command of their children in almost all cases. The only exception was if the commands of the child were unsafe, unworkable, or immoral. Even when children heard the word "no", an explanation and a reassurance was required. Most parents sought to compromise with their children, instead of giving children an all-out "no". 

Children growing up in the Early Church got most all of what they wanted, and absolutely all of what they needed. Most parents heeled to the command of their children. Even when children cried, mothers responded to the every vulnerable need of their child, heeling to the command that is the cry of their child, seeing the every cry of a child as a summonses calling parents to heel to the every need of a child.

Righteous ordering is like going to a restaurant. You can have it your way, but it has to be on the menu. If it isn't on the menu, the waitress is nice about it, even if you aren't. Parenting should be there for the righteous usage of their children, with parents waiting on their children hand and foot. Parents were not likened to God in the Early Church, but instead were likened to a bondservant earning a lump sum while working for God. Children were seen as a vulnerable appearance of God issuing commands for parents to heel to. The lump sum earned by parents was the child being as independent as possible. 

Parents in biblical times rarely set limits. Instead, Christian parents in the Early Church submitted and heeled to children setting limits. Most of the time, children were saying the word "no", and parents respected the orders of their child. Children asked for plenty, and got plenty. When children were out and about with mothers at market, they got the sweets that they asked for that was on the stand. Sometimes, the children pardoned a lamb from slaughter that the parents bought just for their children, even if they knew that they would be taking care of the lamb.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Hebrews 12:5-8: Why this passage is not a spanking passage

Many parents still punish their children. This is a common behavior on the part of parents. Most American parents justify their punishment habit using the Bible. There is one passage in particular that is used falsely advocate for corporal punishment in the New Testament. This passage is Heb. 12:5-8. 

God's Word states in Hebrews 12:5-8 KJV:

And ye have forgotten the exhortation which speaketh unto you as unto children, My son, despise not the chastening of the Lord, nor faint when thou art rebuked of him: For whom the Lord loveth he chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom he receiveth. If ye endure chastening, God dealeth with you as sons, for which son is he whom the father chasteneth not? But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards and not sons.

This verse, when interpreted correctly, gives me comfort. This passage was intended by the Apostle Paul as comfort for the Hebrew Christians who were being persecuted at the hands of Rome. The Greek root word translated "scourgeth" is μαστιγόω (Latin: mastigoó) and can have a figurative meaning to it, and did have a figurative meaning in this context. This passage is about enduring hardship, with the rod of correction being seen as a metaphor for God chastening up His children through trials and tribulations. The modern way to put this passage is "whatever doesn't kill you makes you stronger". 

God whips His children, like only He can, sending trials and tribulations the way of His children. However, God only whips His children when it isn't harmful, whereas earthly parents only whip their children when it is harmful. Due to the flaws inherent of earthly parenting, parents are not to discipline their children as God does. Instead, earthly parents are to bring up their children as comes naturally. The passage here in Heb. 12:5-8 does not talk about an earthly father disciplining his child, but only talks about how God punishes His children, like only He can. However, some passages in the Bible are directed towards earthly parents. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was convicting a group of Greek Christians in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their parents' footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. When children were caught by fathers showing good traits, they were lavishly praised and encouraged with statements such as "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught by fathers being good, whereas girls were given a kiss to the forehead when caught by fathers being good. Children also need religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Religious instruction started out with fathers leaving out a Bible for children to discover and explore. When children were caught reading the Bible, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, based off of what children saw in the text. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, with fathers being quick to give pointers on the context. Religious development is a part of child development, as religion is a human need for children and adults alike. Younger children - starting around age 6 - start developing simplistic religious beliefs non-conforming to any religious denomination or sect. However, as children got older, they start growing towards a specific religious denomination or sect. It may not be the religion you would choose, but at least they have values.

What motivates children to hear out the instruction of their fathers? Why not start out with a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following mom from room to room, not allowing mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever children cried, mothers were quick to coo at their children before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need and met it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When mothers and children under age 6 were out and about in public, mothers wrapped up her child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin co-sleeping warmth happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which is when most children wanted their own place to sleep. Children in biblical times went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with children experiencing skin-on-skin friction every time that they were picked up. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child discipline: How to discipline your child properly (meaning without punishment or force)

Many parents want their children to have discipline. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents see discipline as holding a child in time-out or other false imprisonment, or else giving them the occasional disciplinary spanking. Most parents today punish their children in some way, and in some form. However, there is a proper way to discipline a child, and most parents aren't holding up to the bargain. The fact of the matter is that children don't need to be punished, but instead need praise and encouragement coming from fathers especially.

The proper way to discipline a child is spelled out in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their child just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages of offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon. 

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, to modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their parents' footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught by fathers showing good traits, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught being good by fathers, whereas girls were given a kiss on the forehead when caught being good by fathers. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Religious instruction started out with fathers leaving out a Bible for children to discover and explore. When children were caught reading the Bible, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, based off of what children saw in the text. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, with fathers being quick to give pointers on the context. Religious development is a part of child development, as religion is a human need for both children and adults alike. Younger children - around age 6 - start out with simplistic religious beliefs non-conforming to any religious denomination or sect. However, as children get older, they start to grow towards a specific religious denomination or sect. It may not be the religion you would choose, but at least they have values.

What motivates children to hear out the instruction of their fathers? Why not start out with a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever mothers went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or on her back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following her from room to room, not allowing mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever children cried, mothers were quick to coo at their children before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need and met it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When mothers and children under age 6 were out and about, mothers wrapped up their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin warmth happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which was when most children wanted their own place to sleep. Children in biblical times went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with skin-on-skin friction happening every time a child was picked up by mom. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Abortion: Why abortion is a trap for women

Many people today support abortions. This is a common attitude coming from the woke left. Abortion was long opposed by the Early Feminists. However, the women's movement has lost their credibility for supporting abortions, taking an about-face on the issue. Apart from the most Christian of feminists, most feminists are pro-choice. However, if women just knew what abortion was, they wouldn't be getting the procedure done.

The Sixth Commandment states in Exodus 20:13 KJV:

Thou shalt not kill.

This commandment was interpreted by the Early Church as that only God can take a life. This meant thar abortions were also banned in the Early Church. Abortion is a rare procedure, and was even rarer in the Early Church. In biblical times, abortions came in the form of abortifacient herbs, which were considered contraband in both the Old Testament and the Early Church. Abortifacient herbs were not native to the context of the Old Testament, but they were banned from being introduced. Abortifacients are a class of drugs that induce a miscarriage. When an abortion took place in the Early Church, the mother was excommunicated from the church on grounds of murder, even in the cases of rape, incest, or life of the mother.

Abortion, in all cases, is a forced miscarriage. Most abortion providers are dishonest about what the procedure is that is commonly called abortion. Most women who get abortions are pressured into the "choice" by a man who does not want to take responsibility for caring for a child. Abortion providers give the most simplistic instructions, usually along the lines of "take this pill and all your worries will go away". 

Most abortions are committed by doctors giving out an abortifacient pill that induces a miscarriage. In all cases, the corpse of the unborn child passes while stillborn. Once that passage of the stillborn child hits home, mothers vow to never again get an abortion.  

I myself am a feminist, but of the Christian variety. I do my part to prevent abortions by not having sexual relations outside of marriage, and not raping women or young girls. Most abortions are a reaction to an unplanned pregnancy. However, women soon learn that they made the wrong choice.

Roe v. Wade was a stretch of constitutional logic to say the least. The Fourth Amendment refers to a specific type of search and seizure - when the police come to raid your house. Apart from that, there is no clear-cut right to privacy in the Constitution. The framers never intended for a constitutional right to get an abortion. The decision of Roe was a clearly political decision that even many feminists oppose. 

The Early Feminists did not support abortion at all, but opposed it with a light touch. Empowered women used to educate their sisters about the dangers of abortion. This all ended with influence coming from eugenic sources that intend to wipe out disabilities instead of be sensitive to them. Most children with Down Syndrome never see the light of day, meaning most of them are murdered in the womb just for having a disability. Abortion is not a form of empowerment for women, as abortion leads to that stillborn baby passing through the birth canal. No woman wants a miscarriage, yet that is what abortion literally is.

Abortion can also benefit men in a way many women don't want. If abortion is made widely available, men will have an excuse to have sexual relations with women without facing the consequences of their sexual behavior. Most abortions happen because a man does not want to take responsibility for fathering a child. That is why women should never get an abortion. 

Abortion is a rare procedure. It is a myth that women are getting abortions "left and right". Most women know based on their maternal intuition to stay away from the abortion clinic and put the child up for adoption anyway. If such a procedure is truly that rare, what is the need for it to begin with? Most women believe personally that abortion is wrong, but "don't judge" a woman for getting an abortion. The next step in a post-Roe America is for women to judge based off of their intuition, not based off of leftist politics. Most women already know that it is wrong at some level, and so I trust women to know the truth about abortion even as a man. 

A man is to take responsibility for any child that they father. That means don't pressure your mistress that you were messing around with to get an abortion. Men can prevent abortions by not having sexual relations with women outside of marriage, and not committing rape at all. The unborn child has half the father's DNA anyway.

It is a myth that abortion is a right a woman has over her body. It is instead an incursion on a body within her body. Most women in biblical times knew this as a fact, with only the very coldest of mothers getting abortions. An unborn child has both the father's DNA as well as the mother's. 

As a Christian myself, I support banning abortion in all cases. However, I also support a safety net for the extra children that would be born, including foster care if the child had no suitable father to care for them. I support the universal healthcare coming from the Affordable Care Act, and support vouchers for college and daycare. However, whenever a woman can, she should quit her job and be the mother that she was meant to be, because young children need their mothers above all else. Being a mother is a woman's highest calling. I support also banning the death penalty and suicide attempts. I am even opposed to war due to my views on human life. I try to be consistent on my views on human life. 

The depraved and entitled women who murder in the womb, and all that aid and abet, will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent!

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that children deserve time-out or spanking when they cry. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents punish children. However, more and more parents are opting for time-in. There are many ways that time-in is done, but only one pertaining to the Bible and its context - mammary closeness.

Mammary closeness is the ultimate expression of mutual submission between parent and children. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

There are many ways of doing time-in, including things such as kneeling down to the child or sending the child to a calming corner. However, there is one biblical way to do time-in - mammary closeness. Whenever a child cried in the Early Church, mothers were quick to coo at their children and then pick them up. From there, she diagnosed the need and met it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. Whatever the need was, mothers knew how to meet the child's need. When children were picked up, they were held close to the mother's bosom in mammary closeness.

Part of mammary closeness is breastfeeding. A child needs to be breastfed until they refuse to latch onto the teat of mothers. In most cases, around age 2, children refused the teat of mothers. However, sometimes, the refusal didn't happen until age 6, or even older in remote cases. When your child cries, it is good to offer the child the teat, and if they take you up on the offer, breastfeed your child to sleep. In biblical times, mothers breastfed their children in public, without any fear of scandal from breastfeeding in public.

Mammary closeness happened in public as well as in private. Children under age 6 were wrapped up by mothers next to their bosom in swaddling blankets when in public. From there, swaddling blankets - and the child with them - were tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. The swaddling blankets were tied to the left breast, and then across the dot to the right leg, or else vice versa, or else both in the case of twins. When children cried, mothers held them closer to her bosom, breastfeeding the child if milk-hungry. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet, with velvet growing throughout the Ancient Middle East.

Cooing coming from mothers is a primal vocalization intended to put children at ease. When mothers cooed at their children, the loud tears turned to silent tears, with children feeling heard by their mothers. Cooing at children, in most cases, came with picking up the child, and offering them the teat if they are still milk-dependent.

The breasts of women were not intended primarily as a means of sexualizing women. Mothers have breasts in order to nurture their children. Once a mother does this once, she will then know that she should have bonded with her child like that sooner. Mammary closeness is the deepest form of intimacy between mothers and children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous pampering: Why God wants you to pamper your children

Many parents think that pampering children is the irresponsible choice to make. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents punish and reprimand their children, usually based on the false notion that children need harsh discipline. Religion is a common excuse for child abuse such as punishments and reprimands. However, the fact of the matter is that God wants parents to pamper and baby their children, using the context as a guidepost.

Righteous pampering is how parents brought up their children in biblical times. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they got wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Righteous pampering is not just any pampering, but pampering coming from a specific historical context. For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to their mothers, meaning that wherever mothers went, so did their child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following mom from room to room, not allowing mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever a child cried, mothers were quick to coo at their children before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed and met the need. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When mothers and children under age 6 were out and about, mom wrapped up her child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child in them - tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin co-sleeping happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which is when children wanted their own place to sleep. Children went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with children experiencing skin-on-skin friction every time they were picked up. 

Past age 6, children were allowed to play freely outside, naked. Children ventured farther and farther from home, exploring the terrain, playing high-risk games such as "marriage". Children, however, had to check in with mom first, and tell her where they were going. Come nightfall, children were called one by one, to be treated to a nice, warm dinner cooked by mom. From there, children co-slept next to mothers in order to recharge for a next day of free play. Children did not go to school in biblical times, and instead learned through free play and natural curiosity.

Children under age 6 were kept from playing freely because they did not understand the dangers that they might encounter. A common threat to children in biblical times was venomous snakes and scorpions. Even today, there are threats to children that they wouldn't recognize - namely busy streets and oncoming traffic. Most children under age 6 are too young to understand the threats that the outside world poses to them. Christian parents in the Early Church protected their children in a sheltering way, holding their children close and babying them for the first 6 years of childhood.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Christian attachment parenting: Why the Early Christians practiced attachment parenting

Many parents base their view on parenting based off of what they see in their Bibles. Most parents use the Bible as a justification for child abuse such as corporal punishment and false imprisonment tactics such as time-out and grounding. However, the Bible, when understood correctly in context, endorses attachment parenting.

Christian attachment parenting is attachment parenting based off of the Early Christian context. America was founded on Judeo-Christian values, with the Bible and its context being something for us as a society to glean from. The Bible is a founding document of this nation, even above the Constitution itself. Nowhere in the Bible does it legitimately endorse the punishment of children. Even in Proverbs, King Solomon was referring to the 40 minus 1 lashes, with that punishment happening to young adults in the context of a courtroom setting, not a home setting. Striking a minor child was prohibited entirely, even in a courtroom setting. It was unlawful to strike another Jew outside of a courtroom setting. 

Christian attachment parenting is spelled out in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-40.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, to modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their parents' footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught by fathers showing good traits - such as sharing, being patient, or showing self-control - they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught by fathers being good, whereas girls were given a kiss to the forehead when caught by fathers being good. Children also need religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Religious instruction started out with fathers leaving out a copy of the Bible for children to discover and explore. When children were caught reading the Bible, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with statements such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, based off of what children saw in the text. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers were quick to give pointers on the context. Religious development is a part of child development, as religion is a human need for children and adults alike. Younger children - past age 6 - develop simplistic religious beliefs non-conforming to any religious denomination or sect. However, as children get older, they start to grow towards a specific religious denomination or sect. It may not be the religion you would choose, but at least they have values.

What motivates children to hear out the instruction of their fathers? Why not start with a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness with mothers, meaning wherever the mother went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following mom from room to room, not allowing mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at their children before picking them up, and from there, diagnosed the need and then met that need. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When children under age 6 were out and about with mothers, children were wrapped up next to mom's bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress that mothers wore that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin co-sleeping warmth happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which was when most children wanted their own place to sleep. Children went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin contact, with skin-on-skin friction happening every time a child was picked up. 

Mothers nurture from up close, whereas fathers nurture from afar. Fathers largely kept their distance from young children under age 6. This distance was due to fathers having a sexual attachment to their children, especially his daughters. However, even in the Early Church, fathers could not have their "icing on the cake". The most a Christian father could hope for from his daughters was that they would enjoy being naked for him, as they were otherwise well taken care of. The Greek root word denoting lust in the Bible is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to mere sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. It is okay to look the look at your daughter, and even think the think later. But, if you want to do the deed with her, don't approach her. "Do the deed" refers to flirting with or propositioning a minor, at minimum, or else touching a child on any part of their body for sexual or flirtatious reasons. All Christ was saying on the Sermon on the Mount was that if you find yourself approaching a woman for sexual favors, you shouldn't have even looked at her. Masturbation was seen as a way to stay out of trouble in the Early Church, and was not prohibited even when the fantasy was about a child. Most fathers masturbated to sexual thoughts of their children in biblical times, as that was the only way he could go with parent attraction.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Parent attraction: Why the "electra" complex is the root of most child sexual abuse

Child sexual abuse is a form of child abuse affecting 1 out of 10 children. Most people blame pedophiles for the sexual abuse of children. This is a common way for parents who sexually abuse their children to project onto pedophiles. However, pedophiles are the least likely to sexually abuse a child. Most child sexual abuse is committed by parents, not pedophiles.

Every single parent and every single adult are guilty merely for existing in relation to children. This is because any old adult could sexually abuse a child. Most child sexual abuse is a crime of opportunity, meaning most parents who sexually abuse children get into a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity where the parent is ensnared into sexually abusing a child.

The sexual dynamics of any given household comes in the form of a criss-cross. Fathers and daughters are mutually unrequited in their sexual attraction towards each other. Sons reach a dead end in their attractions towards their mothers. In biblical times, these attractions were not to be acted on at all, apart from righteous masturbation. 

The "electra" complex means that fathers and daughters are mutually attracted to each other. In a sexually abusive household, the parent in question exploits the sexual attraction coming from his daughter. Most daughters in the "electra" complex do not want to go all the way, but may want to spend time with their fathers as they get older. 

Righteous masturbation is allowed in the Bible. The Greek root word denoting lust in the Bible is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. It is okay to look the look at your daughter, and maybe think the think about her later. But, if your intent is to do the deed with her, don't approach your daughter. "Do the deed" means flirting or propositioning a child, or else touching a child on any part of the child's body with sexual intent. Righteous masturbation is an amendment to my Christian beliefs, and was an amendment to the theologies of most men in biblical times. 

Alongside righteous masturbation is righteous avoidance. I myself am a pedophile. I therefore tar and char the prospects I might have with children by way of imagining burning in Hell for all eternity just for approaching a young girl with sexually motivated intent. I instead explore all the possibilities in masturbation, and every single time, I end up wanting none of those possibilities.

The most a Christian father can hope for in terms of the "icing on the cake" is their daughter dressing in revealing clothing in order to impress her father. Children in biblical times went naked wherever they went, and part of that was going naked for their father. Children then didn't care, as they were otherwise well taken care of. 

The "electra" complex ceases to exist come the onset of puberty. When children reach the onset of puberty, they want children their own age as sexual partners. Even then, children have to wait until they are an adult in order to have sexual relations, and even then, only within a marriage. Most men want sexual favors from their teenage daughters. However, she wants children her own age. If I were a father of a young teenage daughter, I would only give my blessing to the man willing to make her wait until marriage to have sexual relations. I would supervise all dates until then, and not allow any sex for her.

Most girls become sexually attracted to their fathers starting at age 3. In biblical times, children up until age 6 were kept away from fathers, and were kept close to mothers. Children were sheltered in biblical times, in a protective manner. Fathers couldn't educate their children until age 6, which is when most children became curious about religion. 

Righteous masturbation in the context of parenting has many benefits. For one, when fathers masturbate to sexual thoughts of their daughters, they feel closer to their daughter, imprinting on her in the context of masturbation. Most men who indulge in righteous masturbation find they can build a rapport with their children. Fathers in biblical times were warm, in an encouraging way. This praise and encouragement coming from fathers was due to fathers masturbating to sexual thoughts of their children.

Most child sexual abuse is committed by fathers, with the victims usually being girls. Most child sexual abuse happens when the "electra" complex is entirely repressed by both the father and his daughter, with the repressed sexual desires of fathers come out sideways like a ton of bricks. The daughter usually just wants to spend time with fathers as part of her attraction to her father. Fathers can avoid approaching their daughters for sexual favor by way of righteous masturbation.

Child sexual abuse was rare in biblical times, next to non-existent. In the Old Testament, having sexual relations with a young girl at all resulted in the adult being burnt at the stake. Adults who sexually abused young boys were put to death by way of stoning for sodomy. The Law then took a preventative stance towards child sexual abuse, with all cases of sexual relations outside of marriage being punished under the Law. All fornication and sexual entitlement, including sodomite relationships on an equal basis, was seen as a mortal sin in the Early Church. No sexual relations outside of marriage was tolerated in the Early Church, and this was intended to make sure the sin line was not blurred. Most child sexual abuse in biblical times came from daughters getting their fathers drunk and then seducing him while they were also in a drunken stupor. But, even then, the father was blamed for not saying "no". 

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents who rape or sexually assault their children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of everlasting Hell-fire prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents say "no" to their child frequently, and then punish their child after they throw a temper tantrum. However, children, in all actuality, need to hear the word "no" seldom, meaning almost never. Children should hear the word "yes" far more often than the word "no".

Frequent use of the word "yes" is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke their children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40; 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

The word "no" was used by Christian parents in the Early Church seldom, meaning almost never. Instead, parents heeled to the command of their children. In most cases, parents were required by customary law to say "yes" to the every petitioned request from children. The child's wish was the command for parents. The only time parents could use the word "no" was when the command of a child was completely unsafe, unworkable, and/or immoral. Even then, parents usually found a way to compromise with their children. The word "no" was a last resort, after all attempts to compromise were exhausted. Even then, parents were required to reassure their children when the child could not accept the word "no". Children could say "no" to parents whenever they saw fit, commanding the parents to heel to the word "no" commanded by the child.

The word "no" should be used almost never with children. Even when the child wants the expensive bicycle at Wal-Mart, there is usually no reason to say a flat out "no". Instead, a parent can say "we'll come back come payday". Some parents may not make enough, in which case the word "no" should be used. 

When out and about, parents often feel the need to say "no" to everything that the child wants. In the Early Church, when mothers went shopping with their children, the child got most all of what they want, and absolutely all of what they needed. Usually, the child wanted candy, in which case the mother obliged. The only time mothers said "no" was when they couldn't afford the item or if the item was off-limits. Children were not allowed to pick out sophisticated jewelry, as this was seen as immodesty. 

Children in biblical times often got into mischief, such as drawing on the wall or breaking an expensive vase. Parents, when they found out, laughed off the incident, and then cleaned up the mess that the child made. Righteous laughter should replace the word "no" when a child seems to be into absolutely everything. 

Children do not have an innate need to hear the word "no". When children frequently hear the word "yes" from parents, they start to form a secure bond with parents. The word "no" should be used rarely, meaning almost never. Children should count on you to pamper and baby them with the word "yes". If you can't say a flat out "yes", try to find a way for it to work out before using the word "no". 

The word "no" is often rooted in parent anger. The idea is to lose that parent anger, by knowing that you are a depraved and entitled sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing from your child. Most anger in parents comes from sore disappointment for not having the well-behaved child that they feel they deserve. Once you lose that parent anger, you should find less reason to use the word "no" with your child, and more reason to heel to the command of your child.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!