Religious child abuse of pedophilic children: Understanding the roots of pedophile hysteria

Many people hate pedophiles. However, a growing crowd of people are siding with pedophiles. Most people who side with pedophiles, however, don't know what, or rather who, a pedophile is. Most people defend pedophiles as a form of criminal. However, we don't like to be lumped in with criminals. Most pedophiles are not the threat they are made out to be. Most people don't know what, or rather who, a pedophile is. Anyone who says something defamatory about pedophiles doesn't know what they are talking about.

What is a pedophile? Most people think a pedophile is something hidden, usually as a narcissist. However, pedophilia is a form of sexual immaturity associate usually with autism of some sort. Most pedophiles have age-oriented sexual preferences that correspond with their emotional immaturity. Anyone technically can be a pedophile, but the most common fit into the profile of "little tykes". Think a kid who is attracted to much younger children. The kid is really an adult, but they are like an overgrown child, and can be immature on the level of the child. A pedophile is a person with a developmental disability, in the sexual realm. Most of them, however, trust their paternal instincts, and don't seek out the children they want. The vast majority of pedophiles are anti-contact, which simply means that they oppose what they want, and usually are satisfied with being in the company of children.

Where does the hysteria start? Most people who support pedophiles blame the police for everything bad that happens to pedophiles. However, pedophiles have a collective trauma, and that trauma comes from sexually shaming parents. The most oppressed of pedophiles are still children, as they have two strikes against them - they are both a child and a pedophile. A child as young as age 16 is eligible for a diagnosis of pedophilia.

The core stigma that pedophilic children are up against is a religious one. Most people believe that lifelong celibacy is impossible, and that masturbation feeds sexual desire. The fact of the matter, however, is that righteous masturbation purges adults, as well as children, of unrequited sexual desire. But, most people buy into the notion that because pedophiles presumably can go nowhere in terms of sexual drive, that they somehow can't be trusted, not even to masturbate in peace. Most of this prejudice is experienced by minor children with the disorder, usually in religious homes.

What is pedophile hysteria like? It is like not being allowed to masturbate by parents, only without the promise of a wedding night. Most pedophiles are just fine being single and celibate. The worst thing you can do to a pedophile is punish them for their sexual fantasies, because that is their trauma.

All of the hatred of pedophiles stems from Roman Catholic teaching. When the Western Christian church was romanized in the 3rd Century, masturbation was prohibited due to mistranslations in the Bible in language concerning lust and desire. The Greek root word denoting lust and inordinate passion is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to a specific sort of sexual craving that is evidenced by the sex offender approaching their target/victim. That approach involves taking the first steps to go up to an attraction figure. Most people think that craving refers to masturbation. That would be false. 

Yet, most of the world's Christians believe in a teaching that the Bible itself does not teach. The belief among many Christians is that masturbation leads on the believer to sin, and thus leads to the act itself, and that is why God supposedly banned masturbation. Even in the days of the Holy Roman Empire, pedophiles were hated due to having no choice but to masturbate, which was believed to lead the believer to sexual sin. Masturbation can have an alternate meaning, meaning to discharge, and that is why pedophiles masturbate. It is all about one word in the Bible that says something differently than how it was translated. 

The police are not the core arm of oppression against pedophiles. It is a myth that the police hate pedophiles, apart from the fact that many sex offenders also use the word "pedophile" as a medical excuse for abuse, in projectory format. If all these sex offenders and their allies would just shut up, we could have the police investigating crimes against pedophiles. The problem is that the core "ally" of pedophiles actually lumps them in with criminals, and defend them under the banner of "defend the criminals". A pedophile is not a criminal, but instead suffers from a serious mental illness.

What most people don't know is the nuance behind pedophilia. Most actual pedophiles have a caregiver that manages their affairs. However, not all caregivers are kind or nice to the pedophiles in their care. Most shelter their pedophilic child, and make the topic of pedophilia a verbotten topic in the house. Pedophilic wards are often punished for masturbation. I am a care-dependent adult myself, and am grateful for being able to have the support I need. Most pedophiles simply want someone to talk to and lean on. That's all the pedophile needs - to be listened to and validated - and then they can do the rest on their own.

The depraved and entitled parents who punish their pedophilic children for their sexuality! Let them forever be cast into a Hell of fire and torrents! Repent!

Child abuse definition overhaul: Why the Bible calls for a ban on punitive parenting

Many adults believe the popular wisdom of "spare the rod, spoil the child". This is a common belief amongst American parents, no matter what their religious denomination they belong to. The fact of the matter, however, is that the Bible calls for punitive parenting, in all its forms, to be banned.

God cast a dominion over all of America, yet only a few will heed the warning. America is a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian family values. Those values have effect on what laws are passed. The secular law should reflect the Judeo-Christian values that this country was founded on. If Jews and Muslims can want their law, why can't Christians want their law as well?

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement in the New Testament, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés). Parental entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Once this imposed want led to offense perceived by the child, it was deemed child abuse. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of offensive touch or speech stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your children hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parent who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers brought out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

Modern Israel banned all forms of punishment, including corporal punishment, in 2000. However, even before then, punitive parenting was a reason for the state to come in and collect the children. Israel has sectarian family courts, with each religious denominations having their own courts. The reason for the court ruling that banned punitive parenting in Israel was that certain Christian communities and Muslim communities weren't removing children from abusive homes fast enough. Israel never had a "reasonable chastisement" written in their legal codes. After the court ruling in favor of children, the police gained the power of singlehandedly enforcing the corporal punishment ban by way of making a criminal arrest. Maybe the Muslim and Christian minority sects were ghettoized, but that is simply collateral damage for a greater good which is protecting children.

Here in Pennsylvania, in recent years, the definitions of child abuse have been broadening. It used to be that only life-threatening injuries were cause for concern by the county Children and Youth service agency. Now, even "tanning their a**" is something that can be prosecuted if caught. Also, striking an infant under age 1 is illegal. Most injuries that constitute child abuse are on the buttocks, and thus are hidden except by way of exam. Most child abuse that is unlawful happens when lawful child abuse goes too far. But, why should any abuse of a child be lawful? 

I support a ban on corporal punishment similar to what is prescribed in the Bible. The Bible considers anything offensive or damaging to a child, stemming from entitlement, as child abuse. The Bible is the document that guides our way of life as a country, and is a founding document of this country, even more so than the Constitution itself. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child punishment: Why punishing or reprimanding your child is unbiblical

Many parents think that punitive parenting is the way to go. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents punish or reprimand their child, assuming that such is the way to go. However, the fact of the matter is that the Bible prohibits all punishments or reprimands of a child, including corporal punishment.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to, in this context, parental entitlement. Parental entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. When children as much as perceived offense due to this entitlement being imposed on them, it became child abuse under the Law. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians against them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Parents, in biblical times, did not get angry at their children. Parenting in biblical times was not motivated by anger, but instead was motivated by worry and concern for the child. Whenever a parent got angry at a child, the parent was seen as a viper and a monster. A set of parents who punished or even got angry at their children stuck out like ragweed, and they were subject to punishment for their choice to punish their children. In the Early Church, this came in the form of many rebukes leading to the council hearing the case, and then excommunicating the church interloper.

Punishment or reprimands in parenting were prohibited under the Law. This included any form of physical punishment of a dependent child. Sweden is the first country in modern times to ban corporal punishment. The Early Christians, as well as their Jewish predecessors, banned all punishment and reprimands against a child. Punishment by way of rape was actually prohibited under the Law as fornication as well. To put things into perspective, modern Israel banned corporal punishment in 2000 by way of court mandate. Israel has a very low rate of child abuse across the board. Israel, by banning corporal punishment, was simply nodding to their forefathers in the days of old.

The Latinate Bible was mistranslated. There are two root Bibles - the Byzantine Bible and the Latinate Bible. The Byzantine Bible was translated into many Eastern languages, including Aramaic. The Latinate Bible was mistranslated with Roman bias. To put things into nuance, there are multiple words for the word "child" in the Hebrew Bible, with the word in Proverbs denoting "child" is נעַר (Latin: na'ar) and refers to, in the Hebraic tense, a young man past his bar mitzvah.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Abortion: Why abortion benefits men (and harms women)

Abortion is a hot button issue now that Roe v. Wade was overturned. States are now scrambling to pass abortion ban. One notable law in Texas bans abortion and punishes the mother and her doctor for 99 years in prison. Most people in America think abortion benefits women. The fact of the matter is that abortion is bad for women. Most women don't know what an actual abortion procedure entails, otherwise they would not make that forlorn choice.

It says in Exodus 20:13 KJV:

Thou shalt not kill.

The Greek root word denoting murder in the New Testament is φονος (Latin: phonos) and refers to any death or murder, and was interpreted in the Early Church as prohibiting all taking of life, including in the womb. Murder was seen as a damage imposed on all those living. Thus, murder of the unborn child was a damages imposed upon all those anticipating the birth of the baby. The birth of an unborn child was seen then as a big event, usually with presents and gifts abound. But then, the woman got cold feet and got an abortion, and left all those people down. It is hard to imagine that such a seemingly minute damage would mean so much, but even the slightest of damages or offenses were valid then, and childbirth was a huge event that sometimes had to be shut down by the authorities for being too rowdy. The Early Christian culture took the side of children every time. Mothers who got abortions, therefore, were seen as cold and unfeeling.

Abortion is something that, at the end of the day, only benefits men. Take it from a man like me. What does a man want more than anything? Free sex with a woman, meaning sex without consequences. Women who get abortions take away the consequences for sexual relations with women, meaning a man can simply pressure her to get an abortion if he wants out of responsibility, such as fathering a child or paying child support.

When there is no access to abortion, there are consequences for men's promiscuity. The woman simply gets pregnant, and then ties down the man. The two then get married, and then the sexual relations evenly flow from both ends of the marriage.

Abortion harms women because of what it entails. It is a forced miscarriage, usually induced through an abortifacient. Abortifacients didn't grow in the Old Testament context. But, they grew in the New Testament, and were seen as contraband in the Early Christian churches. Most women who get abortions get what we call abortion trauma. Abortion trauma is like losing the child that you never had, and gives new meaning to the "fear of missing out".

I do my part to not lead a woman onto an abortion. It's called keeping it in my pants until my wedding night, when I would re-channel my sexuality from masturbation to sexual relations with my bride. I then would only trust her with my sexual choices, meaning she'd be my favorite fantasy. I probably would masturbate, but also would have a wife to meet my needs when I need her. But, chances are, her needs would be met before mine. I am not inclined to have any sexual relations with someone who is not my wife, as I know my fate for approaching a woman or girl for sexual relations outside of marriage.

The depraved and entitled parents who commit murder in the womb, as well as all who aid and abet, will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Child discipline: How to teach your children discipline (without punishment or force)

Most parents want their children to have discipline. This a common argument against attachment parenting. Christian attachment parenting is like other forms of attachment parenting, but with discipline that the secure attachment backs up.

Children need discipline. They just don't need punishment. There is a difference. Child discipline is summed up in the Bible in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your child to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offense, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted due to being "too soft" on their children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging good Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their footsteps. Children, in biblical times, were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits - such as waiting their turn, being patient, or showing self-control - they were lavishly praised and encouraged by fathers to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when fathers caught them being good, whereas girls were given snuggles and physical affection when fathers caught them being good. Children also needed religious instruction, meaning they needed to hear out their parents before being baptized as an adult. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Fathers left out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible, for children to discover and explore. When fathers caught their child reading and exploring the Bible, they were lavishly praised and encouraged by fathers with phrases such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, with children eager to learn the facts of life, and with fathers giving pointers on the context.

Religious development is a part of the study of child development that deals with how children develop their religious beliefs. To start out, around age 6, children start out with simplistic religious beliefs that do not conform to any denominational belief system. But, as they get older, they grow more towards a specific denominational belief system. It may not be your own belief system, but at least they have values, which most children develop naturally. However, always be sure to praise and encourage the values they choose. If you did it right from day one, the belief should end up similar to yours.

What ultimately motivates children to take up the discipline and instruction of the Lord? The discipline and instruction of the Lord is ultimately motivated by a secure attachment between parent and child. Mothers, for the first 6 years of a child's life, were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning wherever the mother went, so did the child. For the first 2 years of a child's life, they were constantly held, either in mother's arms, or else in a papoose bag on mother's back when mom's hands were full. When children were aged 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, never allowing mothers out of their line of sight, even when mothers simply went to the other room. Whenever children cried, mothers picked them up and cradled them next to their bosom, perhaps breastfeeding children when milk-hungry. When children were out and about, they were swaddled next to mothers in swaddling blankets, with mothers holding their child closer when the child cried while swaddled next to her. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format. This skin-on-skin co-sleeping lasted until the onset of puberty in a child, which is when the child then wanted their own place to sleep. 

Children, for the last 7 years of childhood, went the way of their father for religious instruction. Both mothers and fathers nurtured children. Mothers nurtured from up close, and fathers nurtured from afar. Fathers nurtured from afar due to a parent attraction that they had, usually for daughters, but sometimes even for sons. Fatherly attraction to children usually starts when the child is aged 3, with the sexual attractions from there being mutually unrequited. Fathers usually kept their parent attractions to themselves using righteous masturbation, where the parent attraction was centered, then coming out as as a male nurturing instinct. Fathers were there simply to keep tabs on the religious instruction of their children, praising and encouraging milestones in a child's religious development. All of the close warmth in childhood came from mothers.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous ordering: Why children call the shots in Christian homes

Many parents believe that they have the right to order children around. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents punish their children for "talking back". The fact of the matter is that children have the right to call the shots in the family home.

Righteous ordering is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: as this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Children called the shots in Christian homes in the 1st Century. Children issued orders as to what they wanted from parents, and parents had to comply with the orders of children in almost all cases. Parents could only refuse to obey the orders of children when the orders were unworkable and/or immoral. When children felt they were told "no" wrongly, they could take their parents before the council, where 3 elders would decide the fate of the parents, who were excommunicated upon being found guilty. When parents were found innocent, the child was simply comforted by the court, not punished.

Young children under age 6 issued orders by crying. Children usually cried when they wanted something, and mothers had to provide what the child wanted. Most of the time, mothers found a way to make it work, even if the child wasn't entirely pleased. If the mother had to say "no", she was required to coo at the child and comfort the child, picking up the child before cradling the child in her bosom. Older children did not cry, as much as issue the morning breath treatment to their parents. Even older children were cradled when they had their moments.

Righteous ordering can be understood as like going to a restaurant. You can have it your way, but only as long as it is on the menu. Then, the waitress is nice to you about the discrepancy, even if you are not nice about it. The job of parenting should be as thankless as being a server in a restaurant. Parents are simply there to be righteously used by their children, with parents being like a sponge, or better yet, a milking-cow in the case of mothers. Children called the shots throughout biblical times, meaning as long as it was workable or moral, the parents had to obey.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Independence: Why healthy independence comes from healthy dependence

Many parents think that the goal of parenting is obedience. This is a common belief amongst American parents. However, isn't the goal of parenting instead independence? Indeed, most parents actually want their children to be as independent as possible. But, how do you get there? The idea is that healthy independence comes from healthy dependence.

The concept of healthy dependence is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women in the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Healthy independence comes from healthy dependence. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, meaning mother and child were quartered in the in the nude, in skin-on-skin format, in the family home. Children, for the first 2 years of childhood, were held constantly, either in mom's arms, or else in a papoose bag on her back if mom's hands were full. Children aged 2-6 ranged beside mothers, not allowing mothers out of their line of sight, even when mom was simply going to the next room. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at the child before rushing in to pick up the child, then cradling the child in her loving arms. When mothers were out and about in public, they swaddled their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets, tucked underneath her dress that resembled an apron. When swaddled children cried, mothers simply held the child closer to her bosom, while cooing at the child in the process. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with co-sleeping stopping once the child reached the onset of puberty, when children wanted a place of their own to sleep.

When children were around 6, they started to shake off the closeness with mothers. Children, around age 6, started to insist on doing things themselves. This started with children offering help with chores around the house. This led to more milestones in terms of independence, with the final assertion of independence being the end of co-sleeping. When children wanted to sleep on their own, that was the beginning of the end, with adulthood then nearing. 

Children sometimes do not assert their independence starting at age 6. Sometimes, it is later that children assert their independence. This may be a sign of autism spectrum disorder or another developmental disorder. Even with simple ADHD, there are developmental delays. But, "delays" implies that it is the autism or other developmental delays that are causing the child to be dependent beyond their years. They too will assert themselves, but give it time.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous pampering: Why God wants you to pamper your children

Many parents think that pampering your child is the irresponsible choice on the part of parents. Most American parents take up this attitude. However, the fact of the matter is that God wants you to pamper your children. There is a specific way of pampering children that shows in the biblical context.

Righteous pampering is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Children, when going strictly by the context, are to be pampered in a specific way. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever mothers went, so did their child. Children aged 0-2 were constantly held, either in mom's arms, or in a papoose bag when mothers were doing chores. When children were aged 2-6, they ranged next to mothers, not allowing mothers to as much as go in the other room without carrying a screaming fit. Children, when in the house, were comforted when they cried by mothers cooing at them before picking them up. Even older children, when they cried, were comforted by being held next to the mother's bosom. Children went naked wherever they went, and mothers went naked when at home, only wearing clothing when leaving the house. Mothers and children co-slept next to each other in skin-on-skin format, with this co-sleeping lasting until the onset of puberty, which was when children wanted their own place to sleep.

Cooing at children is a primal way of reassuring and validating a child's cries. This cooing made children feel heard, even if they couldn't have what they wanted. Mothers would always coo at their children before picking them up, and then cooed some more while cradling their child in her bosom. Most gentle parenting advice supports saying "I'm here". But, all you have to do is coo at your child, and pick them up like they are a baby.

When out and about in public, children were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. Children were tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress of mothers that resembled an apron. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet, which was grown throughout the Ancient Middle East. The swaddling blankets were tied to the left breast, then across the dot to the right leg, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. Children who were swaddled were held closer to the bosom of mothers when they cried. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Children calling the shots: Why children should call the shots in the family home

Many parents want to call the shots in the family home. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents see children calling the shots as talking back. However, the Bible commands that parents not talk back to their children, not vice versa.

Children calling the shots was part of the Christian standard of mutual submission, with parents bearing the burden of proof in the mutual submission relationship with children. Children issued the orders, and parents followed the orders. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in all things: as this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children in an adversarial way, just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishment, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Children in biblical times called the shots. Children, under the Law, could issue orders to parents, with parents being required, in most cases, to obey the orders of their children. The only time that parents were allowed to disobey the orders of children were when the children's wishes were unlawful and/or unworkable. When children felt, however, that they were given the word "no" unjustly, they could appeal to the council, and if the council agreed with the child, the parent was excommunicated from the Early Christian churches of God. Even when the court otherwise agreed with the parents, if the parents didn't comfort their children when declining a request, they could be excommunicated just for that.

In biblical times, young children gave orders by way of crying. Whenever children cried in the Early Church, mothers cooed at their children before rushing in, then picking up the child and cradling the child in her arms. Children were held constantly until age 2, either in mom's arms, or on mom's back in a papoose bag when mom's hands were full. When children were aged 2-6, they ranged next to mothers, demanding that mom stay within the child's line of sight, even if mom was simply going into another room. 

Older children literally ordered their parents around, giving parents the complete morning breath treatment. Children would literally shout and scream in their parents' face. Parents had no choice but to obey the orders of their children, with few exceptions. Children ordered around, and parents obeyed.

Children calling the shots is called righteous ordering. Think like ordering from a restaurant. You can have it your way, and the server works for you. But, whatever you order must be on the menu. When it is not on the menu, waitstaff are nice about it, even if you aren't.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke your children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

 

Original sin: How to bring up your child in the doctrine of original sin (without punishment or force)

The doctrine of original sin is the most misunderstood and misused teachings of the Christian faith. However, original sin is the backbone of Christianity. Without original sin, there would be no need for a Christ. However, children need not be reminded of their sinful nature. They will figure it all out on their own.

The depraved and entitled parent of the world are deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children. Only a few will be saved. The rest are marked for eternal torment, which is the ever-burning lake of fire and burning sulfur. Mankind has fallen from grace, and is deserving of punishment. The key is to turn yourself in merely for being the parent that you are, and atone for your parental entitlement. This will lead to a remorseful example for children to follow.

Children are best convicted of their original sin in the context of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents submit to children in an adversarial manner, as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offense, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents at the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers brought out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on your children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with their children following in their footsteps. Children, in biblical times, were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever a child was caught showing good traits - such as sharing, waiting their turn, or controlling themselves - fathers gave them lavish praise and encouragement to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught being good by fathers, whereas girls were given snuggles and physical affection when caught being good by fathers. Children need religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to religious instruction. All fathers had to do was leave out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible out for the child to read and explore. When the child was caught reading the Bible, they were lavishly praised and encouraged with phrases such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, with children being eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers giving pointers on the context. 

Children have a religious development of their own. Starting at age 6, they are ready to learn a religion. Starting out, their religious beliefs are simplistic, but as they grow older. they start to conform to a specific religious denomination. You can limit your child to some degree, by leaving out only a Christian Bible. But, they are going to pick the denomination they want, no matter how close or far away the child is to the religious beliefs of their parents. Most children who never have been punished choose the religion of their parents, without any struggle whatsoever. 

Original sin is a core teaching in Christianity, and so it is hard to avoid. When a child discovers the doctrine of original sin, either in the Bible or a Bible commentary. The key is not to argue with the child, but instead simply comfort them when they discover reality, which is that they are sinners. A good thing to say is "Aren't we all sinners as human beings? Nobody is perfect". 

What ultimately motivates children to keep down the high road? The key to gaining cooperation from children is a secure attachment with your child. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mother and child were quartered in the nude, in the family home, in skin-on-skin format - children went naked wherever they went, and mothers were naked in the family home. For the first 2 years of a child's life, they were constantly held by mothers, in her arms, or else in a papoose bag on mom's bag. Children aged 2-6 ranged next to mothers, demanding that mom remain in the line of sight of children, even when she simply was traveling to another room in the house. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at children, before picking them up and cradling them in her arms in order to comfort them. When out and about in public, children were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, then held closer when they cried. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers, in skin-on-skin format, with this lasting until the child reached the onset of puberty, when children wanted their own place to sleep.

The abovementioned birth nudity is the optimal conditioning of childhood. This optimal conditioning prepares children for learning the facts of life later on in life. Most children are motivated to learn to learn the Christian facts of life when they have a secure attachment with their parents. Birth nudity is what forges this bond with children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Christian homeschooling: Why school is not necessary for optimal development

Many parents think it is necessary to send children to a school building. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents support sending their children to school. I oppose sending children to school, and instead support homeschooling. The form of Christian homeschooling I support is unschooling. Unschooling is encouraging the natural curiosity of children. 

In the Early Church, children in the church were unschooled entirely, with children first learning to decode words on an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible. Schools did exist in the broader Greco-Roman world, but school corporal punishment was a thing in Hellenistic schools. Schoolchildren in Ancient Greece and Rome were given the scourge of cords when they acted up.

The Bible, however, prohibits the punishment of children entirely, as well as anything that offends the child stemming from entitlement, endorsing homeschooling as a means of education instead of sending your child to school. See Ephesians 6:4 KJV:

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children in his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman teachers used the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but the Christians of the Greco-Roman world kept their children home to protect them from being whipped in school.

Children were not schooled in biblical times like they are today. School did exist, but only for the upper classes of Greco-Roman society, with even the upper classes of Christendom not sending their children to school, as school wasn't a mandate in biblical times. Christian parents homeschooled their children. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. Parents, when children were around age 6, left out a Bible for a child to page through and explore, with most children in the Early Church learning to read on that very Bible. Children can teach themselves how to read. I taught myself at an early age how to read. Most children learn how to read naturally at by age 6, though actual ages differ from child to child. Children, when finding the Bible, were praised and encouraged for studying the Bible. From there, educational topics came in question and answer format, with the natural curiosity of the child being encouraged instead of discouraged through grades and tests.

The main argument against homeschooling is that it gives parents immunity in child abuse cases. However, the police patrol even in the privacy of your own home - police do wiretap electronics in a given home, going from home to home. I support the police wiretapping my home, even if I wasn't under investigation (which I am under investigation as a victim). I support the right of the police to wiretap, as if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about.

As a child, I wanted to be homeschooled by my mother. I was the type of child to tell off the teachers, and even tell them "you're fired". Certain teachers were helpful, but even they failed to protect me from being suspended from school or being detained in the form of false imprisonment tactics. School protocol allows for the suspension or expulsion of any student, depending on the infraction. I was also, in an alternative school setting, was placed in an isolation room in a way that did violate the law, and was even deprived of lunch until I got all my work done. Some schoolchildren have it worse - they might be paddled by a school principal. I was never paddled at all by a school official, but paddling is only one form of school "discipline" that has got to go. 

Anything that offends or damages a child, stemming from entitlement, should be erased from codes of conduct in schools. Any time you try to control a schoolchild, that is entitlement, as control is a form of imposed want. And that's the problem with school - it is so steeped in controlling children. If you send your child to school, it is good idea to be a source of comfort and reassurance when children get home. Not everyone can unschool or homeschool their children, and that is a complete and total shame.

The depraved and entitled adults who provoke children to anger in a school setting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous respect: Why respect is earned in parenting

Many parents feel deserving of respect. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents demand respect. The fact of the matter, however, is that respect is earned in life, including in parenting. 

Righteous respect is the child's role in a mutual submission relationship between parent and child. However, the burden of proof falls squarely on the parents, in terms of winning over children. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word refers ultimately to a secure attachment between parent and child. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children in his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

Respect for parents was a thing in biblical times. However, respect for your parents came in the form of closeness to parents, not fear of parents. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, meaning mother and child were quartered in the nude in the family home, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. For the first 2 years of a child's life, they were constantly held, either in mother's arms, or on her back in a papoose bag if her hands were full. When children were aged 2-6, they had separation anxiety, with children fearing that mothers would "go away and never come back". Children aged 2-6 demanded that mothers stay in their line of sight, including if mom simply went into the other room. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at their children, before picking the child up and cradling the child in her bosom. When out and about in public, children under age 6 were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with children simply held closer to mom when they cried in public. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers, in skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. This co-sleeping, in most cases, lasted until the child reached the onset of puberty, when they wanted their own place to sleep.

The abovementioned context points to how parents can win over their children. Respect for parents will then come in the form of children electing to listen to parents, on their own. Respect for parents in the later ages is a thing, but in the form of a choice between children and God. When becoming adults, children thanked their parents for the warmth and sustenance of parents. It is a feeling that you come undone when you, even as an adult, travel back home. But, when away from parents, you are prepared for anything.

Parents are deserving of absolutely nothing in relation to children. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. Parents, therefore, have no place to demand respect from any child. Demanding anything in life comes from entitlement. Nothing in life comes for free, and that includes respect for your child. The idea is to submit to your child, especially during the first 6 years, and then your children will thank you later. Hard work pays off, even in parenting. 

Parents in biblical times were seen as bondservants to their children. Parents served their child in chains and shackles, working for a lump sum, which was for children to be as independent as possible. Parents were there to be used as a sponge, with the child milking what they need from their children, with parents being a milking-cow for the child's every vulnerable need.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan in his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Birth nudity: Why birth nudity is a Christian tradition predating Christianity itself

Many parents think that children should wear clothing, with this taken for granted. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. However, birth nudity is the main tradition of Christian parenting, with children being in constant closeness with mothers.

The concept of birth nudity predates Christianity itself, and is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children in his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers brought out the scourge of cords in order to punish them, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

Birth nudity was a common custom in the Early Church, as well as among their Ancient Jewish predecessors. Mother and child were quartered in the nude next to each other, in the family home, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. In biblical times, children went naked throughout the house, and wherever they went outside the house. Mothers also were naked, but only in the family home, with women being recommended to wear a loose-fitting, revealing dress that resembled an apron. Mothers were naked in the family home in order to serve both their children and their husbands, separately.

For the first 2 years of a child's life, they were constantly held, either in mother's arms, or on mom's back in a papoose bag if mom's hands were full. From age 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, righteously demanding that mothers stay in the line of sight of the child, following mom from room to room, fearing that mothers would "go away and never come back". Both mother and child were in the nude at home.

Children were breastfed in biblical times. Most of the time, the child was weaned by age 2. However, n many cases, children were breastfed all the way up until age 6, or even older in extreme cases. When children were ready for solid foods, they pushed away the nipple. Before then, the child will always latch on to the nipple, and so it is good to breastfeed a crying child to sleep.

Children usually choose to wear clothing at some point. In most cases, today, children are given their clothing when they ask for it, with them previously running around the house naked. This nudity serves a purpose - to make mother and child affection closer. It is recommended that mothers stay home for the first 6 years and tend to their children warmly and tenderly. 

Birth nudity is a Christian tradition predating Christianity itself. Even in the Old Testament, dependent children were treated with warmth and love, with both mother and child naked in the family home. The rod of correction was only used in the 40 minus 1 lashes, and only once the child became an adult. Actual whippings were rare. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child punishment: Why punishing or reprimanding your child is sin

Many parents believe that child punishment is biblical. Most American parents cite the Bible in punishing their children. However, not only does the Bible prohibit the punishment of children, but instead, the idea is to never get angry at your child, at all.

The Greek root word translated "covetous" is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and cross-references the Tenth Commandment. In this context, the word refers to parental entitlement, which is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. When children perceived this entitlement imposed on a them, it became child abuse under the Law. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking or punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children in his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

The way the abovementioned verse is to be interpreted as, ideally, not getting angry at children. The Early Christians did not get angry with their children, with that feeling being absent in the emotional complexes of parents. Anger at a child, in biblical times, was seen as becoming of a viper or a monster. 

Many parents who switch to gentle parenting report their anger going away. It first starts with parents showing their canines to their children, in traumatic format. If you find yourself showing your canines to your child, as opposed to yelling at them, you are actually a step in the right direction.

Controlling anger and controlling entitlement go hand in hand. The idea behind controlling your anger is to deprive yourself of all deservances. Entitled anger comes from feeling deserving of things in life. When you feel that you are deserving of something in life, and you don't get it, that leads to a temper tantrum, and that temper tantrum is the moral crime of entitlement. When you feel that you are deserving of respect from your child, and your child doesn't give you what you want in that regard, what are you going to do? If you throw an adult temper tantrum for not getting the respect that you feel that you deserve, that alone is entitlement. 

Most entitlement towards children come in the form of entitled demands. Usually, the parent imposes a deservance onto the child. Then, when the child doesn't give parents the deservances that they feel deserving of, the parent throws a temper tantrum, usually in the form of entitled demands. Child abuse is when the child, at minimum, takes personal offense when entitlement is imposed on them. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Children self-protect: Why child self-reporting should replace mandated reporting

Many adults in the United States take on the role of mandated reporter. Most people think a mandated reporter is harmless. However, one mental health minority has its main mental health stigma enforced by mandatory reporting laws. I oppose laws mandating certain professionals from reporting clients by suspicion alone to the authorities. I support children self-protect, and that includes children self-report. Under my dream system, the defiled perpetrators would have their child victims to fear. It's called child empowerment. As a pedophile myself, I trust a child's judgment as to whether I am a risk, over that of a mandated reporter.

Children are not sitting ducks like the parent lobby would have you believe. They can be empowered to make their own child abuse reports, against their own abuser, if we trust them with their own intuition. A child who is afraid of an adult, for example, will refuse to go with them. If the offender is at school, the child will refuse to go to school.

Children can be instructed in self-reporting by having a caseworker or police officer give children instructions as to how to report the abuse that they are experiencing. Think an assembly at school educating children as to their rights, and saying that it is for the modern context, not a future one.

Children should also be benefitted with stricter child abuse definitions, where child abuse becomes a perceived crime, not a constructed offense. Most of our laws are based off of the Bible, and Col. 3:21 states, in context, not to offend children or impose damages out of entitlement. 

I myself, if reported by a mandatory reporter, would simply answer to the court, and plea directly "yea" or "nay" in the court of the police, with an evidenciary statement. I am currently under investigation after a child-on-child sexual incident. I didn't commit the rape I was accused of, but I did commit a moral offense, which sexual harassment is in the United States. I engaged in antisocial "rough-play" with one of my cousins in the attic of my grandparents' former house. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to worry about. But, why have such a deterrent to mental health services? Nobody wants to fear the police being called just because of a mental health disclosure - and that lack of admission is what keeps most pedophiles silent instead of admitting their condition to a therapist or psychology. Any hinderance to mental health treatment counts as contributing to the stigma behind admitting to pedophilia anywhere. It simply drives the issue underground, to the level where we can't find it.

I support a world where children who are experiencing abuse could simply dial 9-1-1 and have a police officer dispatched to the house, where the police will settle the dispute with their parents, taking the child's side in everything. We already have a system of parent detectives ready to take on any parent, including lawfully abusive parents. 

One key to ensuring the safety of children is known to law enforcement as pro-social wiretap. Sometimes, the children are kept home for abusive reasons, or else are not ready for school. The answer is pro-social wiretap, where the police wiretap various locations, looking for a crime. It is the new-fangled way of patrolling. I am being monitored, and I don't care that the police are wiretapping my home. I have nothing to hide, therefore nothing to worry about. Everything wrong with me is to show, once made relevant. 

I support the mental health rights of pedophiles. Pedophiles don't all come to therapy just to turn themselves in. A sexual narcissist towards children would come out to a therapist as whisper-speak, where you have to learn to read lips in order to understand them. If anyone comes to you like that, you have met the devil himself. This is an excerpt from the Pennsylvania training sessions for mandatory reporters. Most mandatory reporters are told "if in doubt, report" about an admission of pedophilia. Basically, it becomes illegal to treat a condition that is arguably the easiest of mental health disorders to treat.

Our mandatory reporting system simply is there because children are too disempowered and disadvantaged to report their own abuse. However, I support getting rid of mandated reporting once we empower children to report their own abuse. All it should take is a child with a phone dialing 9-1-1, and then the abusers will be placed in reverent fear of their child victims. 

The depraved and entitled adults who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Righteous masturbation: How to deal with adult attraction to children

Many parents believe that pedophiles are the reason for all child abuse, and that threats only exist "over there". Most people do not believe the truth about child sexual abuse. Child sexual abuse happens to, on average, 1 in 10 children. It is the most preventable form of child abuse imaginable. Just take away one variable either way, and it can't happen. The way to prevent child sexual abuse is righteous masturbation.

Most child sexual abuse is not due to the existence of pedophiles, but due to a societal lack of personal responsibility. Every single adult is capable of committing child sexual abuse, under the right/wrong conditions. This renders all adults as culpable for the sexual abuse epidemic enflaming this country right now. Most adults do post a high risk to children, but simply haven't had the opportunity to commit crimes of opportunity against children. Child sexual abuse is a crime of opportunity, and is a crime against God as well as the child him/herself. 

Righteous masturbation is masturbation for sexual abuse prevention purposes. The Greek root word denoting "lust" and "inordinate affections" in the Bible is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers to, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Whenever a child is raped or sexually assaulted, God backtracks and counts the every step of the offender leading up to the scene of the crime. Righteous masturbation is masturbation to stay out of trouble. 

Part of righteous masturbation is imagining possibilities with young children, indulging in them through masturbatory fantasy, but then discarding of your fantasy for the child once all is purged. Righteous masturbation is intended to purge all unrequited lusts, including unrequited lusts for children. The more your sexual needs are met as an adult, the less likely you are to impose your sexual needs onto a child.

Most adults deny their attraction to children, usually saying "no lower than 18". But, the best way to masturbate is to children, since children aren't a valid sexual prospect. The "righteous" in "righteous masturbation" implies the purpose for masturbatory fantasy of children - to purge unrequited lusts towards children. 

Most child sexual abuse occurs in a father-daughter "relationship", where the father denies his inborn sexual attraction to his daughter, to the point where he exploits his daughter's sexual desires for him. Parent attraction, with fathers, should be mutually unrequited. The idea is to masturbate righteously instead of find a way to get your daughter alone. If every father owned up to their sexual thoughts about children, it wouldn't come out like a ton of bricks onto the child. In fact, it wouldn't come out at all.

Some child sexual abuse occurs across family lines. Usually, the abuser has multiple victims, and usually, they are clinically a pedophile, but deny their status as a pedophile. They have a sex addiction, with their preferred means being rape. Usually, they are policing some sort of immodesty...and so does a rapist of adult women. How about cut the crap and call them out for what they are - rapists. Maybe "child" rapist is a better term than a celebratory clinical term such as pedophilia. 

Other pedophilic offenders do what I did, which was sexual harassment. I, as a child as an adult, followed young girls around in public places, and then waved to them in a flirtatious way. I am what they call a "zig zag" groomer, meaning I wanted to get around the parents by asking the child for personally identifying information. All you have to do to stop an abuser like I was is tell your child how to set boundaries, meaning tell them not to give personal information to strangers. I am actually incapable of anger, and fear a child who is mad at me. For a zig-zag offender, crushes on children come one-by-one in then form of train cars.

"Parents protect" is an honorific lie, because parents have a poor track record at protecting children from abuse, with most parents instead abusing children. Most sexual abusers of children are parents, usually fathers. Children are our best bet in child protection, but we need adults to properly abstain from sexual abuse. Even most abusers want the abuse to stop, and if they just buckled down and masturbated, the abuse would stop immediately. Children self-protect. Adults abstain.

Adults abstain means that whenever you get a crush on a child, that you don't even approach the child. The idea behind righteous masturbation is to follow the sexual thoughts to the end through indulging in masturbatory fantasy. If those desires are spent away, they don't then need to be revisited until later, when the need pops up, with you being aware of your sexual side by then. If those desires don't go away after a certain point, you might be a pedophile, but most pedophiles are aware of their condition, in a searing, intrusive type of way.

As I said, child sexual abuse is the easiest form of child abuse to prevent, and it starts with acknowledging your own risk towards children, which all adults have, to varying degrees. I gauge my risk by knowing the risk factors for committing child sexual abuse. Most sexual abuse of children is committed by sex-starved offenders, usually when the adult in question is alone with the child. I know my risk is low simply because I have no access to spending time with children - and I do want, more than anything, to spend time with children. In the past, however, I appointed children to the role of caregiver and spouse, approaching them in the form of antisocial "flirt".

The depraved and decadent, defiled sex offenders who rape and sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Child discipline: How to discipline your child (without punishment or force)

Many parents know the truth - children need discipline. Children indeed do need discipline. However, many parents mix up punishment and discipline. Proper Christian discipline, however, involves due praise and encouragement, as opposed to punishment and harshness. Parents are not to be strict with their children, but instead should encourage children to be strict with themselves.

Actual Christian parenting is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, and is summed up in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, meaning parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law to a group of Greek Christian parents in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women in the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children in his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers brought out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian form of discipline is deserving of nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits - such as sharing, patience, or self-control - they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught being good by fathers, whereas girls were given snuggles and physical affection when caught being good by fathers. Children also need religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to religious instruction. Fathers, when the child was around age 6, left out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible. When fathers caught their children paging through and exploring the Bible, they were lavishly praised and encouraged with statements such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers gave pointers on the context.

Children develop religion on their own, with leaving out a Bible being the start of their religious journey. Religious views in younger children are more simplistic and non-conforming. From there, children's religious development unfolded, with children usually eventually conforming to a religious denomination. Whenever you see your child take up religious practice, they deserve lavish praise and encouragement. Same whenever children show good traits, in any sense of the term.

What motivates children in their religious education? Children are largely motivated to both follow the example and instruction of the Lord by way of secure attachment. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mother and child were quartered in the nude in the family home, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. Children aged 0-2 were constantly held by mothers, in her arms most of the time, and in a papoose bag when mom's hands were busy. Children aged 3-6 ranged next to mothers, righteously demanding that mothers stay in their line of sight when mothers went into the other room, with children having separation anxiety about mothers "going away and never coming back". Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at their children, before picking up the child, perhaps breastfeeding the child to sleep if milk-hungry. When mothers were out and about in public, they swaddled their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets, holding children who cried closer to her bosom. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers, in skin-on-skin format. This co-sleeping occurred until the child reached the onset of puberty, which was when they wanted their own place to sleep.

Fathers nurtured too, but from afar. The idea is to impart a disciplined Christian example by knowing that you are a depraved and entitled sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, and be convicted of that mantra. Some of us adults have gotten to the point where we know that were are deserving of nothing but non-existence. When children showed signs of Christian discipline - such as sharing, waiting their turn, and showing self-control - such good traits in children were lavishly praised and encouraged by fathers. The main way that children used their father was a source of wisdom. Children were disciplined in the Early Church, but in the form of nurturing a child with loving praise and encouragement. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur which is prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Adult attraction to children: Personal responsibility for adults with attractions to children

Many adults have to deal with it, and are deathly afraid of becoming a pedophile. All adults presumably have sexual attraction in relation to children - and it is perfectly normal. Most people think that the way to deal with adult attraction to children is to repress it. However, the answer is a mixture of righteous avoidance and righteous masturbation. Children self-protect. Adults abstain. Children naturally know how to profile adults, and seek naturally to avoid adults that pose a threat to them. The rest about preventing child sexual abuse is up to individual adults to abstain from sexual abuse, the right way. 

Adult attraction to children comes on a spectrum of severity, but we all have attraction to children as adults, and it is about time we acknowledge that we as adults are born in original sin, and part of that sinful nature is attraction to children. 

Most men are attracted to their own children, as well as other children. 20% of all men are attracted to prepubescent children as a secondary attraction. 1-2% of men are attracted to children primarily, meaning pedophilia. Women can be attracted to children as well, usually teenage boys when they are afraid of adult men due to trauma. Most all women can find teenage boys attractive, whether they acknowledge it or not. 

Don't we all as adults have the responsibility to gauge our own entitlement in relation to children, and acknowledge it by facing our fears, and masturbate to sexual thoughts of their children. If you happen to spend away the attraction, you are not a pedophile. Pedophilia is a condition that is blatantly obvious for the sufferer, in the form of searing, intrusive thoughts that exist on the surface level.

Most child sexual abuse has nothing to do with pedophilia, with pedophiles actually being among the least likely to abuse a child overall. Most child sexual abuse involves secondary sexual needs that went unmet. The child rapist represses their sexual desires, to the point where the sexual desires come out sideways onto the child, like a ton of bricks. 

It is a myth that masturbation to sexual thoughts of children is forbidden in the Bible. The Greek root word translated "lust" or "inordinate affections" is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. When first masturbating, expect the searing sexual thoughts to purge, and then be centered. If you are fortunate enough not to be a pedophile, masturbation should eventually spend away the child side of your attractions. But, whenever the feelings resurface, try it again until it is spent away again. Think like a cycle. The idea is to make sure ALL of your sexual needs are met, because otherwise, it might come out sideways.

Search parties are common in child sexual abuse investigations. When that happens, a father thinks the only option for an uncovered attraction is to rape his daughter, using search party juices. The idea is to instead masturbate to sexual thoughts of your daughter, and spend that sexual desire away. It is normal for fathers in particular to see sexual attraction in their daughters especially. This does not give him the right to use his daughter sexually. 

Pedophilia is not what you think it is. Most ordinary adults with attractions to children somewhere down their belt are not pedophiles. A pedophile, by the clinical definition, have "recurrent, intense" sexual desires for children under age 14, amounting to a primary or exclusive sexual preference for younger children. Only a few of us are pedophiles, and I include myself in that pot. A pedophile usually has co-morbid autism or other developmental disorders. Usually, they are the type of individual to have a brain specializing in children. Most pedophiles who have a mental disorder experience their condition not as a narcissist, but as intrusive sexual thoughts. But, since the desires won't go away, the pedophile can simply accept the fact that they will always be attracted to children.

All adults are guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and have committed their share of abuse towards children, and if they haven't, they sure are capable of child abuse. I myself was an obvious abuser, meaning I made my sexual attractions to children obvious, bragging about crushes, and fixating on specific young girls, with the crushes coming like train cars. Everyone must have been waiting for the caboose. The police deem what I did to be lawful abuse, but in my view, I repeated the cycle, which now I am interested in breaking by learning how to deal with children the right way.

Adults all can do their part to end child sexual abuse. All adults are capable of sexual fantasy about children, and have that sexual attraction somewhere down their belt. Adults have an individual responsibility to purge themselves of sexual lusts towards children, meaning that solo masturbation to sexual thoughts of children is normal. There is no moral reason why an adult cannot enjoy sexual fantasy about a child. So, why not indulge in such sexual thoughts. The more you indulge in such fantasies, the easier it gets to deal with them...and then they are all gone, unless you are a pedophile. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled sex offenders who rape and sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!