Homosexuality in children and adolescents: Why not to throw away a good child

Many parents today who have my Christian fundamentalist values still disparage of their homosexual children. Most parents who find out that their child has same-sex attractions throw away their children, meaning kick them out on the street, usually after trying to "pray away the gay" and "purge the gay". Nowhere in the Bible does it say that same-sex attractions are sin or wrong to identify by. Nowhere in the Bible is the word "gay" banned. Only acting on those desires is condemned.

There are positive mentions of homosexuality in the Bible, but only where you wouldn't expect. See Matthew 19:12 KJV:

For there are some eunuchs, which were so born from their mother's womb: and there are some eunuchs, that were made eunuchs of men: and there be eunuchs, which have made themselves eunuchs for the kingdom of heaven's sake. He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.

This is an enumeration of different type of single celibacy in the Christian Church. Some people were born eunuchs, and we can fit homosexuals into this category, and most homosexuals fit into this caregory in biblical times. 

In the gay classifications, there is a category called celibate gay. Celibate gays remain in single celibacy in order to study Scripture. Some are capable of self-attraction, meaning they usually masturbate to fantasies of sex with themselves. 

Masturbation was a way of staying out of trouble in biblical times. The Greek root word denoting lust in biblical times is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement, which is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Approaching another man for sexual or flirtatious purposes is the moral crime of homosexual entitlement. Once that approach is perceived by the other man (or the other woman) it is sodomy.

What should parents do when they find out their child is homosexual? First, maybe try to instill in them that they are not "gay" but rather same-sex attracted, but that they are free to masturbate however they wish. Allow them to talk to you about their same-sex attractions, and be a listening ear for them. Chances are, the attractions will be benign and not predatory. Predatory homosexuality only happens when sexual desires for the same sex are repressed. When the desires are on the surface, they are benign. But, God does not want them acted upon, and any good Christian parent should instill that man shall not lay down with man. That's not the way to go.

I do not have same-sex attractions, and instead am a heterosexual pedophile. I myself am called to be single and celibate, and that calling makes sense to me. I cannot have what I want either, and I have come to a point where I don't want what I want. I can survive. So can someone with same-sex attractions. Just masturbate to the point where you don't need another man or another woman, and then you can't have one. That masturbation habit should be instilled from early on.

The depraved and decadent, defiled men who defile themselves next to other men will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the everlasting lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Oppositional-defiant disorder: Why children with ODD need less limits (not more)

Many parents think that oppositional-defiant disorder (ODD) is a manufactured disorder in children. This is a common myth about children with ODD. Most parents think that children with ODD need more limits, and then the disorder would go away instantly. Well, some children seem to have a mind of their own, and isn't that what we want? The acronym for how to deal with a child with ODD is righteous parent abuse. Some children are so strong-willed, that you need to take their abuse.

Righteous parent abuse is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, in the context of a child that is exceptionally defiant and oppositional. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be disorder. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punish their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Mothers in biblical times sometimes had "stand-beside-me" children. This category of child was a child that rejected the closeness of mothers from early on. And so, they walked beside parents. Usually, these children would be diagnosed today as having some sort of oppositional-defiant disorder. Children would hit, kick, and bite in order to get that they wanted and needed from their mothers, and mothers simply gave up any fight they had with their child, and gave in to the orders of their children. Children had lawful authority over their parents, and could issue lawful orders to parents. Usually, this came in the form of crying or whining. A child with ODD would bark orders at parents directly, and beat their parents if parents didn't obey, and parents knew they just had to put up with the abuse coming from their child. Children were seen in biblical times as vulnerable extensions of God, and parents were not to speak against their children. Children were held in high honor, and the highest honor went to stand-beside-me children.

Righteous parent abuse means that some children are abusers, but since you are their parent, you are still responsible to them. This means parents must take the abuse of their child with ODD. Usually, this means taking a good beating every now and then from your child, and maybe laughing about it later when the child isn't around. Know that you are a depraved and decadent sinner as a parent, and are deserving of absolutely nothing from your child.

ODD is a disorder secondary to another disorder, usually autism, ADHD, and/or bipolar disorder. Usually, relief of ODD symptoms comes from medication, but some cases are medication resistant. The central understanding of ODD is locus of control, meaning a child with ODD wants control over everyone and everything in their environment, and when they don't get control, they go off. The idea is to righteously cave to the control of your child with ODD. Once they have some control in their life, they will be better off, and you will be better able to form a secure attachment to them. The form of attachment that these children need is policing attachment, where they can bark orders whenever they need something. Reverse policing is where parents treat children like the police, meaning give up the fight with your child, and give in to their orders and demands. That's the only way to deal with such a child, at least until they can be stabilized with psychotropic medication.

I myself am being medicated for ODD that I had as a child. I just didn't want to be controlled by anyone, not even circumstances. So, when I felt like I was being controlled, I controlled back, and then I got into trouble. Lithium carbonate saved my life. I was hesitant to try it, but it worked, and I even felt better. But, I wish my parents weren't as controlling as they were. That way, I could have gotten along with them better.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Reverse aging: Why this is a trait of a rapist (not a pedophile)

Most people are afraid of pedophiles, and there is one reason why. Reverse aging. Most people believe that pedophiles can reverse age a woman, and see a woman as a child. This is a common myth about pedophiles. The fact of the matter is that most pedophiles cannot reverse age. Reverse aging is more a trait of a rapist than a pedophile.

What is a pedophile? A pedophile is an individual with a primary or exclusive sexual preference towards children under age 14. A pedophile is a person with a form of immature autism where their age-oriented sexual preferences correspond with the immature developmental level associated with autism. Most pedophiles have an autistic specialty in children in terms of special interests and social skills, meaning their whole world revolves around children. Anyone with autism who can nurture a child naturally is a pedophile, as pedophilia is a male nurturing instinct turned into a sexual preference. 

I myself am a pedophile. I don't reverse age. I see women as people, not sexual objects for the taking. Women are more like my mother, meaning I project my mother onto every female I meet. I have a good relationship with my mother, meaning a secure attachment, so I presume innocence easily in women. Women are harmless to me, like a mother, and they usually see me as harmless.

If I want to sexualize a woman in my mind, I look for youthful-looking parts of her body, and other immature traits in her, and favor younger women over older women. I prefer, in the context of women, college-age women, or else pedophilic women who have hormonal delays in pubertal development. Even then, it is only connotational attraction. 

The nature of ALL of my attractions is connotational, meaning my eyes color the exposed skin of women and girls, and the more youthful looking the skin I see, the better. The more child-like the body, the better. Usually, women are just mother-like figures, and they treat me like their own child as well. In order to have sex with a woman, I'd have to get out my autopedophile, which I do have around, and see myself as the more vulnerable one in the interaction. My fantasies can go either way, even with children. Sexual parent. Child. I ideally prefer young girls who are much younger than me chronologically, but a little bit older than me developmentally/emotionally.

Reverse aging comes from a repressed sexual mindset, where a man could go for anyone, and find a way to rape any woman, and with older women, rapists imagine them younger. A pedophile is a parent, not a sexual narcissist, and so they instead want to nurture children through sex. I myself might want to nurture a child through sex, and so attachment parenting teaches me how to nurture children in more appropriate ways. A pedophile can be a rapist, but most pedophiles are not rapists. Many pedophiles were raped as children, or were abused in other ways. 

The myth of pedophile reverse aging assumes all pedophiles see children as underlings. Most pedophiles are egalitarian parents, meaning they see themselves as on the child's level. I myself see children as authority figures to submit to, meaning I am afraid to offend them or get them mad. When they do get mad at me, I am afraid. I sure don't want to dominate children in any way. I want them to dominate me, and order me around. I actually cannot bring myself to feel anger or even frustration about a child or their behavior.

The depraved and decadent, defiled rapists and sexual assailants will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Antisocial parents: Understanding the Anti-Parent mindset

Many parents think they are good parents. It seems that every parent thinks that they are a good parent, and that they mean well. Most parents, when called a bad parent, get defensive and demand respect for their way of parenting their children. Antisocial parents is the guiding principle of Anti-Parent, a division of the children's rights movement. That means ALL parents are antisocial, by nature, and can only be saved through the saving grace of Jesus Christ. No parent or other adult truly means well in relation to children.

Anti-Parent is the study of parents, and is a branch of the anti-entitlement system of profiling. It is way of gauging entitlement in parents. This gauge is based off of the presumption of innocence, beyond a reasonable doubt, with doubting suspicion. Anti-Parent procedure calls to doubt the guilt of a perceived parent, and keep doubting, until you can doubt no more, then prounounce guilt against the parent. As a survivor of law-abiding parents, I presume innocence in all parents around me, beyond a reasonable doubt, and keep doubting, until I can doubt no more, and then I convict the parent on the anti-entitlement charge of parental entitlement.

There are certain enumerated offenses that a parent can be judged for. It says in 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with one an no not to eat. 

The Greek root word translated "covetous" sums up everything quoted, and is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleontektés) and refers to, in this context, parental entitlement, as defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. At minimum, any demands towards the child are entitlement, as parents should be asking politely and from the bottom of their heart what they want from their children. Parents should be grateful for what they receive from children. But, in reality, child abuse encompasses all of the enumerated offenses contained herein.

All parents, meaning the cords attached to adults, are antisocial in nature, and are not to be identified by. I am not a parent. I simply have a parent attached to me. The moment I say "I am a parent" I appear entitled. I instead say "I am a pedophile" to confess guilt to prove innocence. Parents should instead confess their struggles as a parent, including any mental health diagnoses that denote their struggles, and not insist that they are good people just for being parents themselves. 

I am a pedophile, and I struggle as a pedophilic adult against adult sexual entitlement. I am a depraved and decadent adult deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing as the pedophilic adult that I am. I struggle against my self-diagnosis of pedophilia. The first step in solving a problem is admitting you have one, and so I say today, my name is Maxwell Clark Scheibner, and I am a pedophile. All of us as adults have something to struggle against in relation to children, and it is about time we all admit how flawed and depraved our existence in relation to children is as adults.

The parent entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous cave: Why parents should cave to their children's demands

Many parents think that children should "cave to my authority". Most parents think they have authority over their children to order them around. Most parents don't want to cave to the authority of their children. But, the fact of the matter is that children do have real authority over their parents, and parents are to cave to the lawful orders of children.

Righteous cave is the parent's role in the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. The analogous acronym for child authority is righteous ordering. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers are to rest in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including punishments and controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Righteous cave has a proper meaning in parenting - parents cave to their child's lawful orders. In biblical times, children were a lawful authority over parents, and issued lawful orders to parents as to what they needed. Children kept issuing orders until their parents caved. The modern application of this context is reverse policing, where children are revered and feared in the way the police are, and then parents give up the fight with their child, and give in to the orders of children. This is how children broke down their parents in biblical times. Usually, siblings broke down parents and ordered for their needs in unison, so that parents surely could not argue with their needs.

In biblical times, crying and whining were interpreted by parents as lawful orders demanding vulnerable needs. The every cry and whine of children was law, and unless you had good reason, refusing the law of your child was seen as a provocation of anger against the child. When a child cried or whined, mothers cooed and held the child in their arms, in skin-on-skin format. Both mothers and children were naked in the family home then, with children going naked everywhere they went until adulthood. Christian attachment parenting is big on child nudity, meaning parents are encouraged to allow their children to go completely naked in the home, as this strengthens the secure attachment between parent and child. It is easier to cave to your child's demands when you are naked with your child at home. Mothers in the Early Church knew this intuitively.

Parents in biblical times could easily be manipulated by children, as they could only say "no" when the child ordered something immoral or unworkable. Parents gave up the fight with their children, and gave in to their orders and demands. Even speaking against children was a violation of Christian law in the Early Church, and would have been seen as a provocation to anger. No matter how exhausted parents were, they had to speak good of their children. If they needed to vent, it would show implicitly in their praise of their children. Children were always to be praised, and never punished, and were to be obeyed always, being revered and feared as vulnerable extensions of God. Children were put in the role of customer, with parents being in the role that waitstaff are in a restaurant.

The child's role in this context of parenting is righteous ordering. Think like ordering from a restaurant. You can order whatever you want from a waitress, as long as it is on the menu. Parenting, from a biblical perspective, is as servile as being waitstaff at a restaurant. Parents should always appear friendly and amicable towards their children, putting on a smile, waiting on their children hand and foot. Sometimes, you have to serve children in ways that make you uncomfortable, and that is righteous cave. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Co-sleeping: Why co-sleeping is endorsed by the Bible

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make in terms of bedtime arrangements. Most parents do not like the concept of a child sleeping in their own bed. Most parents, and also many pediatricians, cite that "children need to learn how to self-soothe". The fact of the matter is that not only is that children can't soothe themselves until puberty, but that co-sleeping can help prevent child sexual abuse.

Co-sleeping is a form of mutual submission between mother and child, with mothers holding children in their loving arms. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, inclduing any punishments or controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

It is common knowledge that children aged 2-6 refuse to go to sleep many times. Most parents chalk it up to defiance, and punish children for refusing to go to sleep. The fact of the matter is that children of the beforementioned age group are not ready to sleep on their own. Most children in that age bracket have a primal fear of being devoured by predators. Parents may say that the days of snakes and scorpions biting children in their sleep are gone, but predators that devour children exist today, in the form of child rapists and sexual assailants. Usually, the rape or sexual assault of children is committed by a father figure, and usually when the child is isolated in their own room. Mothers in biblical times knew this intuitively, and co-slept next to their children in skin-on-skin format, in order to guard their children from rape or sexual assault. Fathers had an active sexual drive towards their own children, usually their own daughters, and children could sense it, thus sleeping next to mothers for safety's sake. The mother was right there, so nothing could happen.

Many parents think that babies need to learn how to self-soothe. The fact of the matter, however, is that children do not learn how to self-soothe until puberty. Most children in biblical times co-slept next to mothers up until puberty. When they hit puberty, children usually insisted on a bed or other place to sleep of their own, and they were given space by their parents then. Children cannot self-soothe until they are soothed by their mothers, and even then, they need to be soothed until they are ready for their own sleeping arrangements, on their own.

An integral part of Christian attachment parenting is child nudity. In the Early Church, both mothers and children were completely naked in the family home, with children being naked all of the time until adulthood. This child nudity, as well as the nudity on the part of mothers, made it easier for children to receive the skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance that they need. Most ancient parenting contexts don't stress skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance much like the Early Christian context does. Mothers kept their children close during the first 6 years of the child's life, constantly holding children, and wrapping them up next to her bosom in swaddling blankets when out and about. Around age 6, children insisted on independence, and were lavishly praised and encouraged in bold feats of independence by fathers.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why to catch children being good (instead of children being bad)

Many parents think that you should catch children being bad, and punish them. Most parents argue that punishment is good for children. This is a common attitude for American parents to have. Most American parents think discipline is something to impose on children. The fact of the matter is that children are capable of self-discipline, and thus should be encouraged to discipline themselves. This is what we mean by catching children being good.

Catching children being good is part of the broader Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; May it be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, inclduing any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to, in this context, modeling Christian discipline to children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. In the 1st Century, Christian parents worked on centering their entitlement, and their children followed suit. When children were caught emulating the disciplined example of their parents, they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep going down the right path". Children were caught being good, and this good behavior was learned through the atmosphere through the disciplined example of parents. Children absorbed the values of parents, and when they showed the Christian discipline of their parents, they were rewarded with lavish praise and encouragement. Sometimes, parents had to give explicit instructions. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to parental instruction. Parents could not issue lawful orders to minor children, and so they made requests from the bottom of their heart, hoping children would listen out of trust and fondness that parents sought to earn from children.

In order for your disciplined example to have worth to your child, you have to form a secure attachment with your child, which starts with mothers and ends up with fathers. Mothers in biblical times, during the first 6 years of their children's lives, were in constant closeness with their children, with children being held in skin-to-skin comfort and sustenance by mothers in the home, and wrapped up next to her bosom in swaddling blankets when outside the home. Both mother and child were naked when in the home, and children were always naked until adulthood. Child nudity was a key part of the Early Christian parenting context, and made it easier for mothers to bond with, and co-sleep next to, their children in skin-on-skin format, with mothers being naked as well. This closeness impacted how children approached their fathers. Fathers made themselves at home with their children through masturbatory fantasy about their children, which made for a close bond between father and child, usually father and daughter. 

When parents engaged in the abovementioned parenting, children automatically emulated the disciplined example of their parents. Then, parents could praise and encourage children when they followed the example of their parents. When parents form a secure attachment with their children, their children want to follow in their parents' footsteps. This transformation in a child doesn't happen overnight, but it surely happens on its own. Children grow up entirely on their own, guided by the disciplined example of their parents.

Contrary to popular belief, children are capable of self-discipline. Children just need a rational, disciplined adult in order to grow up to be rational and disciplined adults themselves. Children usually model themselves after adults that they like. The idea is to win children over so they like you, and like you enough to follow in your footsteps. This means that if you want a disciplined child, YOU need to be disciplined yourself. 

In most cases, children start to emulate a parent's disciplined example sometime after age 6. Children usually, from there, revert to a more infantile state when mothers are around. But, as they get older, they gradually need mothers less and less, being convicted of the discipline of their parents. By the time they are adolescents, they are ready to take on the world, but have to wait until age 18 in order to have the rights of an adult. A teenager raised in an attachment parenting home is, on average, more independent than a punitively parenting teenager, and is also more tough and resilient than a punitively parented teenager. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!