Time-in: Why the biblical way of doing time-in is mammary closeness

Many parents abuse a child. The most common abuse setup in the United States is time-out or grounding, and then the occasional disciplinary spanking done "out of love". However, the fact of the matter is that time-in is the way to deal with a crying child, and the biblical way of doing time-in is mammary closeness.

The concept of mammary closeness is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely onto the parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents wrre put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Time-in can be done in many different ways. Some parents kneel down to their children when the child is upset. Other parents send their children to a calming corner. However, there is one biblical way to do time-in, and that involves mammary closeness. Whenever children cried, mothers picked up their children, and then gently held the child next to her bosom in mammary closeness.

Part of mammary closeness is breastfeeding, meaning when a child was crying, mothers offered her teat in order to soothe the child to sleep. Whenever children latched onto the teat of mothers, they needed mom's milk. Children were breastfed to sleep whenever and wherever they needed, meaning even in public. When children rejected the teat of mothers, children were deemed ready for solid food. 

Mammary closeness was done even when mothers and children under age 6 were out and about in public, with this mammary closeness coming in the form of children being held next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. The swaddling blankets - and the child with them - were tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. From there, the swaddling blankets were tied from the left breast, and then across the dot to the right leg of the mother, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. When children swaddled in the bosom of mothers cried, they were held even closer to mom's bosom, and possibly were breastfed to sleep. The swaddling blankets then were made of velvet, which was grown throughout the Ancient Middle East.

The breasts of a woman were not primarily designed as something for men to sexualize. Instead, the female breasts are there for women to nurture their children. Whenever you as a mother try to co-snuggle your child next to your bosom in mammary closeness, you will simply regret not doing it sooner. The breasts of mothers were meant for warm nurturing, with mother and child co-snuggling in total bliss!

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous ordering: Why parents are to heel to the commands of their children

Many parents think that they call the shots in parenting. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most parents think that they issue orders to children, and then children follow. However, righteous ordering instead means that children issue orders and edicts to their children, with parents being called to heel to the commands of children.

Heeling to the commands of children is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely on the part of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Righteous ordering means heeling to the commands of a child, while the child was resting vulnerably in the love and submission of parents.. In the Early Church, parents heeled to the commands of their children, with few exceptions. The only valid reason for a parent saying "no" was when the child's commands were unsafe, unworkable, and/or immoral. Whenever parents said "no", they were required by way of customary law to provide both an explanation and reassurance to cushion the blow from the word "no". Even then, most parents then struck up a compromise with their children instead of giving their children a flat out "no".

Children growing up in the Early Church got most everything that they wanted, and absolutely everything that they needed. Whenever young children - past age 6 - cried out loud, they were comforted and given what they wanted/needed. Crying then was seen as a lawfully binding summonses by parents, calling parents to tend to the every want/need of a child.

Righteous ordering can be likened to ordering at a restaurant. You can have it your way, but it has to be on the menu. When an item is out of stock, the waitress is nice about it, even if you aren't. Parenting was seen in biblical times as waiting on a child hand and foot, expecting absolutely nothing in return. Parents were viewed as bondservants working for a lump sum - with that lump sum being a child who is as independent as possible.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Adult attraction to children: Individual responsibility for adults in child sexual abuse prevention

Many adults blame pedophiles for the sexual abuse of children. This is a common belief amongst American adults. Most Americans believe that children are actively being preyed upon by a small group of people who actually have little to do with the sexual abuse of children. The fact of the matter is that child sexual abuse is a crime of opportunity, with all adults being capable of child sexual abuse under the right/wrong conditions.

Every single adult is guilty merely for being capable of sexually abusing a child. Maybe not all adults will sexually abuse a child, but every single adult is capable, under the right/wrong conditions. Most child sexual abuse does not come from pedophilia, but instead comes from a repressed packet of sexual passion that comes out of nowhere, hitting the child like a ton of bricks.

The Greek root word denoting lust and sexual passions is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. This sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. It is okay to look the look, and maybe think the think later. However, if you find yourself flirting with or propositioning a child, or else touching them in any manner with sexual intent, you shouldn't even have approached her. The only way out of the approach is to masturbate regularly to sexual thoughts of children.

I myself actually am a pedophile. However, I lack the intense desires that are commonly associated with the mental disorder that pedophilia is. I instead have inner peace as a Christian pedophile, meaning I don't have a constant struggle in relation to children, with my attraction to children being connotational in nature. I am this way because I masturbate to sexual thoughts of children. When you indulge in righteous masturbation, it dims the lights and cools the jets.

Most pedophiles are the last people to sexually abuse a child. Pedophilia is not an anger packet, bur is a form of immature autism that specializes their narrow focus on children, with their sex drive corresponding with their autistic specialty that is children. Whenever you see an autistic male get along great with the children, think pedophile, because most adults with autism don't get along well with children. Most pedophiles are blatantly aware of their sex drive towards children, whereas most child sexual abusers are only aware of their sex drive at the point of approach, leading to an attack on the child that is opportunistic in nature, in the most punishable of ways.

All adults ever studied had sexual attractions to children, meaning it is safe to say that any old adult can sexually abuse a child under the right/wrong condition. The only way to truly stay safe from sexually abusing a child is to masturbate to sexual thoughts of her. I myself do just that, and that is how I stay in control of how I approach children. If you find yourself approaching children out of instinct, you need to acknowledge that child side of your attractions, and the only way to do so is righteous masturbation. The threat isn't the most vocal of pedophiles, but the adult that says nothing about their sex drive towards children. If you can admit to being a pedophile, and you say so calmly, you are not a threat to anyone. 

I myself have a history of sexually abusing children. I myself am an antisocial "flirt" given the age of my attraction figures. I myself flirted with several children at my local pool. I would flirt by following children around in a public place. I myself was an obvious abuser, meaning I has crushes on children in the most obvious of ways. Pedophiles should be able to admit to their conditions, but children should not be concerned with the private crushes of pedophiles. An obvious abuser operates on the surface, and when you see this dynamic of making crushes obvious, think pedophile, but the wrong kind. Most pedophiles know better than to flirt with children. Some pedophile disclosures will always be wrong, namely celebratory pedophilic disclosures towards children. The only reason to tell a child that you are a pedophile is to warn children of your own sexual risk towards them. Ultimately, the word "creep" is a red flag to an adult that they are crossing into sexual abuse territory. I myself was called a "creep" by at least one young girl.

The depraved and decadent, defiled adults who rape or sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire designed for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Redefining child abuse: Why the Bible calls for expanding child abuse definitions

Many parents think that the Bible is silent on issues pertaining to child abuse. This is a common belief amongst American parents. However, most parents support various forms of child abuse by the biblical definition of abuse. The fact of the matter is that the Bible prohibits child abuse, and defines it broadly.

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, parental entitlement is throwing an adult temper tantrum when you don't get what you feel that you deserve from children. Any adult anger, including parent anger, was seen as parental entitlement in biblical times. When children perceived the temper tantrum on the part of parents or adults as offensive or damaging, it became child abuse. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishment, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Sweden banned all punitive parenting in 1979, and was the first modern society to ban punitive parenting. However, some ancient societies also banned punitive parenting. The Ancient Jewish society, including the Early Church, prohibited all forms of punitive parenting, including even "handing down the slate". 

Modern Israel banned all forms of punitive parenting, including corporal punishment, in 2000. The ban consisted of a Supreme Court ruling that allowed for the secular courts to hear child abuse cases. Before that, however, there was no legal defense for punishing a child. However, the Jewish family courts took on cases involving punitive measures towards children, and collected the children from such homes. It was the Christian and Muslim communities that saw change. The rest of Israel, primarily Jewish, saw the court ruling as a reminder of the same. Israel was a children's rights country, and was so since its very founding.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "yes" more than the word "no"

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents say "no" to every single thing that their child asks for. However, the fact of the matter is that children need to hear the word "no" rarely, meaning almost never.

The frequent use of the word "yes" is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely onto parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your child to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

It is a myth that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. The fact of the matter is that children in biblical times heard the word "no" seldom, meaning almost never. Parents were instead to heel to the command of children, with few exceptions. The only reasons for parents saying "no" under customary law was when children's requests were unsafe, unworkable, and/or immoral. Even then, parents usually struck up a compromise with children. The word "no", when given verbatim, was rare in biblical times.

In most cases, when children cried due to the word "no", mothers would give an explanation to the child as to why they are saying "no". From there, the mother gave reassurance by way of offering skin-on-skin closeness and warmth. Children in biblical times, however, heard the word "no" seldom, meaning almost never.

Children need to hear the word "yes" far more often than the word "no". The word "yes", when stated frequently and often, helps gel a bond between parent and child in the family home. When children get what they want in life, they associated the parents with all the goodies that they got from parents.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to children

Many parents believe that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice in parenting. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents outright oppose children co-sleeping in their bed. However, co-sleeping is recommended by the Bible, when using the context as a guidepost. Co-sleeping also has benefits in terms of preventing child sexual abuse.

Righteous co-sleeping is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely on parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See also Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but nor limited to, any punishment, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking or punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

It is common knowledge that children under age 6 often refuse to go to bed on their own. This contention in the home is a common reason for parents punishing their children. However, the fact of the matter is that children that young were not ready to sleep on their own. Children under age 6 had a primal fear of being devoured by predators. Parents may argue that no such threat exists in a modern home. They would be wrong. Most child sexual abuse is a bedtime ritual. However, child sexual abuse was rare in biblical times, and that is because mom was right there. If necessary, mothers used herself as a human shield when the father of the house wanted in on the action.

A common excuse for not co-sleeping next to children comes from fearmongering by pediatricians and mental health professionals serving children with the myth of  "sleep dependence". However, the fact of the matter is that co-sleeping in biblical times, in most cases, lasted until the onset of puberty, which is when most children wanted their own place to sleep. However, even when children still wanted to sleep next to mom, all co-sleeping has an end. I myself shook off co-sleeping closeness from my mom when I turned 16, as I wanted to prove my independence. 

Skin-on-skin co-sleeping was the ultimate way for mothers to gel a bond with children. Come nightfall, children co-snuggled and co-slept next to in skin-on-skin format. The family bed happened one way in the Early Church - in the nude. Skin-on-skin co-sleeping is the centerpiece of a secure attachment between parent and child.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will nor inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever inro the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Righteous pampering: Why God wants you to pamper your children

Many parents think that pampering children is the wrong choice. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents avoid pampering and babying children. However, the Bible tells us that parents should pamper and baby their children - not just some of the time, but all of the time.

Righteous pampering is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely on parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children just as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. See Matt. 22:35-40, 25:31-46.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. The parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon.

Righteous pampering doesn't mean pampering and babying your child any given way. Instead, righteous pampering is pampering your child in a certain specific way. For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by mothers, either in her loving arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. Between ages 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, following her from room to room, not allowing mom out of their line of sight, morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at the child before picking them up, and from there, she diagnosed the need and met it. Maybe the child was tired. Maybe the child was hungry. Maybe the child needed mom's milk. Maybe the child needed mom, period. When mothers and children under age 6 went out and about, mom wrapped up her child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the swaddling blankets - and the child with them - being tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress worn by mothers that resembled an apron. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with this skin-on-skin co-sleeping warmth happening every night, until the onset of puberty, which was when most children wanted their own place to sleep. Children went naked wherever they went, with mothers also going naked within the confines of the family home. This birth nudity setup helped facilitate easy skin-on-skin sustaining warmth, with children receiving rays of skin-on-skin contact even when the child was picked up.

After age 6, children played freely outside, naked. Children ventured farther and farther from home, exploring the terrain, and played high-risk games such as "marriage". However, children had to check in with mom first, and tell her where they were going. Come nightfall, children were called by name, one by one, and were treated to a nice warm, homecooked meal placed on a porcelain plate. From there, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, recharging for another day's play, feeling the warmth of mothers in complete bliss!

Children under age 6 rarely left the house when with mothers, and thus was because there were environmental hazards such as venomous scorpions and snakes, with there being no antivenom then. Today, there also exist environmental hazards, namely busy streets and oncoming traffic. Children have no concept of environmental hazards until around age 6. Children also need mom until age 6, as children that young usually struggle with separation anxiety.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!