Original sin: How to bring up children with convicted attitudes (without punishment or force)

The doctrine of original sin is one of the most misunderstood and misused of all Christian teachings. Yet, original sin is the backbone of Christianity. Without original sin, there would be no need for a Savior. I myself hold Mennonite values, and the core of all Mennonite values is being convicted of your original sin.

I myself am a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of nothing but non-existence, and thus am grateful merely for being alive. God hates all mankind merely for existing, as we have turned our back to God. Many will be called to be Christians, yet only a few will be saved. The rest will be cast into everlasting fire and torment, suffering the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices. The main factor, I believe, will be how you treat children.

Part of imparting the Christian doctrine of original sin is in the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, in the form of Christian attachment parenting. Christian attachment parenting is summed up in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, any modeling or encouragement of Christian discipline. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in their footsteps. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits - such as waiting their turn, being patient, or showing self-control - they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when caught being good by fathers, whereas girls were given a side embrace when caught being good by fathers. Children also need a good religious education. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to a warning, namely in the form of religious instruction from fathers. This religious education started with fathers leaving out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible for children to discover and explore. When children were caught reading the Bible, they were praised and encouraged for their religious vocation with statements such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in the form of question and answer, with children from there being eager to learn the facts of life, and with fathers giving pointers on the context of the Bible.

Original sin is a topic that should come up early in the question and answer setup between parent and child. Children will ask "Why did Jesus have to die?". The appropriate answer is simply "we are all sinners in the world that we live in, and so is the world itself". From there, children will likely have a somber moment, in which case children would deserve comfort from mom in the form of skin-on-skin warmth and sustenance. Mothers were there to comfort, and fathers were there to teach, with both roles requiring nurturing of some sort.

What motivates a child to hear out the warning from fathers? Why not start out with treating young children to a secure attachment between mother and child? For the first 6 years of childhood, mothers were in constant closeness to mother, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children were constantly held by their mothers, either in her arms, or else on her back in papoose bag when her hands were full. When children were aged 2-6, they ranged next to mothers, following her from room to room, fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at their children before picking them up, then holding to their child to their bosom in skin-on-skin mammary closeness. When out and about in public, mothers swaddled their children to their bosom in swaddling blankets. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. This co-sleeping didn't stop until the child reached the onset of puberty. 

A convicted attitude is the attitude that you know that you are deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore being grateful for absolutely everything. The idea is to focus on your own sins, and then the rest will pan out on its own. But, when you see real progress in your child, it is good to give them lavish praise and encouragement. Children grow towards your example, and once you see that growth in children, it is good to lavishly praise and encourage such growth in children. All of the selfish, childish behaviors that children exhibit when they are younger are actually developmentally appropriate, and go away as the child matures. What attitudes replace the childish attitudes that children exhibit? Our own attitudes will become the attitudes of the next generation. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The age of consent/marriage: Why the age of consent needs to be raised to 18

A few weird pedophiles out there are loudly proclaiming the "sexual rights" of children towards them. This is a common attitude amongst pro-contact pedophiles. Most pedophiles, however, are anti-contact through and through, and are opposed to the sexual abuse of children. Most pedophiles are not pro-contact. The GirlChats of society are the only pedophiles who are pro-contact. Most pedophiles are anti-contact to the core.

The Greek root word denoting fornication and sexual immorality is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to anything outside of proper channels, as understood then. That means that the age of consent/marriage should be at the age of majority. Maybe the age of majority was different then, but those laws are nowhere repeated in the Bible. If God wanted those ages to be relevant, then He would have included them in the Bible.

Furthermore, the Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia) refers to the mandate that a marriage be between a man and a woman in the same place in life, meaning that a marriage should be between equals. In the Early Church, the marriages were between a man who was the same age of the woman, or else with an older woman. 

Fathers sometimes were overburdened with sexual attraction to their virgin daughters (1 Cor. 7:36). However, the virgin was married off only to a slightly older groom, and only the most polite of the young men to court the virgin. Fathers in biblical times were protective, but in a promoting way. In the Old Testament, there existed uncle/niece marriages, but even with those, the man had to wait until his bride was of age. In the New Testament, the concept of an uncle/niece marriage is prohibited.

It is a myth that the Bible, in context, condones child grooming. Virgins were not groomed by men, but rather were courted by men their own age. The father stood by his virgin, with the virgin being completely naked. The young man who treated her the finest and most polite got to be her husband.

Even marrying your daughter is prohibited under Christian law. It says in Leviticus 18:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son's daughter, or her daughter's daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness.

This moral statute is included in the meaning of the Greek root word πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to, in context, any sexual relations with one's daughter, whether it was within the presence of mothers, or when the daughter was alone and isolated. The courts then ruled that this passage refers to any sexual relations between a parent and their daughter. The Law in biblical times was applied flexibly, with the bias that all sexual relation outside of a marriage between equals being unlawful.

Church tradition is very clear as to where the age of consent/marriage should be - at the age of majority, wherever that age stands. The age of majority in most states is 18, so why not set the legal age to consent to a marriage at that age. Church tradition also holds that marriage be between individuals of the same age and place in life. Unequal marriages are invalid marriages. Also, a marriage has to be in obedience to the secular law, meaning all couples seeking marriage are to obtain a marriage license.

The ancients had an understanding of childhood, meaning that in the biblical context, adults and children were distinct roles. Marriage was seen as a duty that only an adult was capable of. Sexual relations, in particular, was seen as a privilege between adults. Children looked forward to sexual relations in marriage, and even role-played "marriage" between same-age peers. But, they couldn't have a wife or husband until they reached the legal age. The age of majority was different then, but those ages are not stated anywhere in the Bible. 

The biblical understanding of a marriage is not simply a sexual relationship. Marriage, even then, was a merger of assets, and the best way to reconstruct that context is to obey the marriage laws in your state. Here in Pennsylvania, all child marriages are banned, and I may have pulled a few lever and pushed a few buttons to get that law passed.

Adults are usually caregivers to children, not equals to children. In a child's life, presumably all adults hold a role of caregiver. When someone is your caregiver, they have power over you, and it is not wise to have sexual relations with someone who has power over you. In the case of children, a parent can force a marriage to an adult that they like, and due to the custodial relationship with the child, the child won't have any say in the matter. It is best that child marriage be banned entirely, in all states.

Maybe sexual relations between teenagers would work, but I oppose even that, as the good book states that all sexual relations be within a marriage. Thus, the appropriate ventricle is to wait until marriage in order to have sexual relations with an adult of your age and place in life. I am okay with children having sex, but only with themselves. All sexual relations outside of marriage should be banned. I myself avoid even approaching women or girls for sexual or flirtatious reasons.

I myself am a pedophile. I myself struggle with adult sexual entitlement. My self-entitlement makes me want sex with teenagers of legal age, and if I were active in my pedophilia, I would look for sexual relations with a child of legal age. However, I believe in objective Truth, and that Truth prohibits sexual relations with children of any age, and further prohibits any sexual relations outside of marriage.

The depraved and decadent, defiled adults who rape or sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Redefining child abuse: Why the scope of child abuse definitions should be broadened

Many parents support parental rights. Part of the parent ideology is to support the current child abuse definitions. However, the Bible has its own definition of child abuse, and the scope of such a definition is broader than today's definitions under the secular law. 

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. When the child then perceives the entitlement of adults, it becomes child abuse. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women in the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

Sweden is the first country in modern society to ban all physical punishment of children. Before then, many other ancient societies were anti-spanking, and one of them was Ancient Jewish society. It is a myth that Ancient Jewish society was punitive towards children, with that society instead being an attachment parenting society. Even sexual correction - legal in most ancient societies - was unlawful in Ancient Israel and the Early Church.

Parent anger imposed on children was seen as akin to that of a viper or a monster. Parents in biblical times did not get angry, and neither do Jewish parents today towards a child. Most parents in the Early Church were instead motivated by worry or concern, meaning parents only got angry aside of the child, in order to protect their children.

Even in modern Israel, corporal punishment and other controlling demeanor towards a child was banned after a Supreme Court ruling in 2000. Before then, there was no legal defense in the Israeli penal code for "reasonable chastisement". What was blocking a full ban was sectarian courts that did not want to intervene with family affairs. The Supreme Court ruled that the police could unilaterally make arrests for punitive parenting, and also unilaterally collect the children in the process.

The way the law in Israel works is that the authorities find the charge that is most likely to stick, then sticking with that charge while putting the parents out on a rink. If the parent was simply yelling, they could be charged with harassment. If the child is struck, then the parent could be charged with battery. If the child was grounded or put in time-out, then the parent could be charged with.

The main Bible verses used to justify punitive parenting are in Proverbs. These verses are repealed verses, as they refer to a specific form of judicial corporal punishment, known as the 40 minus 1 lashes. The 40 minus 1 lashes were a final warning before putting an adult offender to death. If the rod wisdom wasn't in Proverbs, fathers would refuse to whip their children. Christ died to end the harsh punishments under the Law. Heb. 12:5-8 refers to a specific form of divine discipline where God sends trial and tribulations in order to toughen up His children, like only He can do - earthly parents are incapable of whipping their children without hurting them. Paul here was simply reassuring the Hebrew Christians in the midst of their persecution by the Romans. The main parenting passages in the Bible are Col. 3:20-21 and Eph. 6:1-4, with "provoke...to anger" and "provoke...to anger" referring to damages or offenses perceived by a child.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Christian attachment parenting: Why the Bible endorses attachment parenting

Many parents think that the Bible and its context calls for punitive parenting. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most parents are unaware that the Bible actually prescribes a distinct form of attachment parenting known as Christian attachment parenting. Christian attachment parenting is notable for its stress on discipline, and its stress on skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. It is attachment parenting aimed at passing down the Christian faith.

Christian attachment parenting is summed up in the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time as a deacon. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in the footsteps of parents. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits - such as taking turns, being patient, or showing self-control - children were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise when they were caught being good by their father, whereas girls were given a side embrace when they were caught being good by their fathers. Children also needed religious instruction from their fathers. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. This instruction starts with fathers leaving out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible for the child to discover and explore, usually with the child teaching themselves how to read on that very Bible. From there, when fathers caught their child reading the Bible, they were lavishly praise and encouraged with phrases such as "that book is good for you". Religious instruction came, from that point on, in the form of question and answer. Children were eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers giving pointers on the context. Children studied the Bible on their own, with the instruction of the Lord being directed by the praise and encouragement of fathers, with fathers giving children pointers on the context in the mean time. 

The religious development of children is a valid concept. Most religious development starts at age 6, when children usually discover the Bible. From there, the religious beliefs are usually are simplistic and non-conforming to any religious sect or denomination. As they got older, they usually grow towards a specific religious sect or denomination. They may not grow towards your values, but at least they have values. There is no need to beat a religious education into a child, as children's religious beliefs develop on their own. But, if you like their values, praise and encourage those values. If you do it right from day one, you can hope for children to grow towards your religious example.

What motivates children to hear out the warning of their father? What better way to motivate children to learn good values than a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. For the first 2 years of childhood, children are held constantly by mothers, either in her arms, or else on her back in a papoose bag when her hands were full. When children were aged between age 2-6, they ranged next to mothers, with children demanding that mothers not leave their line of sight. Even when mothers as much as went into the other room, children followed the mother, afraid of mom "going away and never coming back". When out and about, mothers swaddled their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy, with co-sleeping ending when children reached the onset of puberty, and wanted their own place to sleep. 

The abovementioned secure attachment with mothers led to a secure secondary attachment with fathers. Most secure attachment with mothers was based on close maternal warmth. However, fathers related to their children in the form of a sexual attachment. That sexual attachment favored daughters over sons, with daughters also having a sexual attachment to their fathers, in mutually unrequited format. Fathers then dealt with their sexual attachment to their child by way of righteous masturbation. It is a myth that fathers sexually corrected their children in biblical times. Fathers simply stole glances of their naked children - which all children were then - and then masturbated to sexual thoughts of their children. In most ancient cultures, fathers sexually corrected their children, but God chose Israel, a country that prohibited all sexual relations with a child, including the corrective type.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Birth nudity: Why God recommends birth nudity in the Bible

Most parents think that it is commonsense - children should wear clothing, in and outside of the home. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. However, Christian tradition calls for birth nudity as a means to win over children. 

Birth nudity is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely due to being "too soft" on their children.

Birth nudity is a Christian tradition predating the Early Church itself. Children went naked wherever they went, in biblical times. Mothers also were naked when in the family home. Mother and child were naked together in the family home, with children resting in the loving arms of mothers, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. The whole concept of birth nudity is to form a secure attachment between parent and child, from day one. 

Children then were naked everywhere that they went. Mothers, when out and about, wore a loose-fitting, revealing dress that resembled an apron. Children were naked in order to facilitate skin-on-skin warmth and nourishment, with mothers being completely naked at home. Giving skin-on-skin sustaining warmth to your child, in the family home, was as easy as picking up your child, and holding the child in your arms. Mothers breastfed the child until the child pushed away the nipple, which usually happened by age 2, but sometimes not until age 6, or even later in rare instances.

Come nightfall, children co-slept next to their mothers in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. This co-sleeping lasted until the onset of puberty, which was when most children wanted their own place to sleep. In some cases, co-sleeping lasted longer, that is, when the father had predatory desires for his own child, usually his daughter. The point of co-sleeping was partially ready the man of the house for the nudity of his children, with nudity being something that the more the man of the house sees of his daughter, the more he can handle her naked. The attraction becomes more connotational than driven, in due time.

Children in modern times have to wear clothing when in public, starting from day one. This leaves mothers quartered in the family home, naked alongside their child. The modern practice of birth nudity is letting the child choose when they want to wear clothing, and until then, finding time in that birth nudity to bond with your child. In the Early Church, children weren't given clothing until their baptism. This context is obsolete due to the law of the land, which requires that children wear clothing in public. "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and give into God what is God's" (Matt. 22:21; see also Rom. 13:1-4).

The Bible recommends birth nudity for children. The Bible is a founding document of this country, even above the Constitution itself. The Bible is written to its Audience, with the context as a guide as to how the Bible should be applied. Childhood was a concept in biblical times, contrary to popular belief, and was a time to be pampered and coddled, with the adults in the church welcoming the child into the world from day one. One way that children were welcomed was through birth nudity. Children only got their clothing after they were baptized, and were only required to wear the clothing if they were a man. Women only wore a loose-fitting, revealing dress that resembled an apron in order to honor their husband. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at hand!

Righteous masturbation: Dealing with parent attraction

Many parents have it, but none discuss it, to the point of isolation over something normal. Parent attraction to children is a common and normal form of sexual attraction to a child. Most parents get the idea that they need to "stay above" such attractions. However, parent attractions were not dealt with that way in biblical times.

Most fathers have a sexual attachment to their children, meaning the secure attachment to their children comes with sexual attraction. Most parents who have a sexual attachment to their children refuse to acknowledge that they have such attractions to their own children. The idea behind acknowledging any sexual thought is to face it head on, and masturbate to it until it is totally spent away. From there, you may have to revisit from time to time, but ultimately, the sexual attachment will show as a distant bond between father and child.

In biblical times, fathers served a limited role in the upbringing of their children. All fathers did was give praise and encouragement when children were caught being good. Apart from that, fathers kept their distance from their children. Mothers didn't usually have parent attraction, and thus could see the issue of child sexuality clearly, quickly guarding the child when the father wanted sexual relations with his daughter. Usually, mothers would redirect the father to masturbation.

The Greek root word denoting lust and inordinate passions is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but instead refers to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. That means that the sin line ultimately is at the slightest of sexually motivated approach, ultimately the first steps leading to approaching a child for sexual or flirtatious reasons. It is okay to look the look, and think the think. It is not okay to approach the approach, or else do the deed. If you are single and celibate, you can approach the approach, but only with intent to get married later. The ultimate crime against a child isn't sexual fantasy, but doing the deed with them, meaning raping or sexually assaulting a child is the ultimate crime against the child, as well as against God. Fornication by way of rape/sexual assault is a form of blasphemy, meaning it is worse than murder. Murder is a form of theft, by comparison to child sexual abuse.

Fathers in biblical times were very much aware of their sexual attachment to their child. They just were aware on the surface level, where it can easily be controlled and managed. All fathers struggle with this to some degree, as well as some mothers. The only way out is in. That means the only valid outlet for sexual attachment in a parent is masturbation. 

I myself do not have a child of my own, but I have adult attractions in the form of pedophilia. Pedophilia is different from ordinary parent attraction in that it comes in the form of a primary or exclusive sexual preference to children under age 14. I keep safe with a mixture of righteous avoidance and righteous masturbation. I first tar all sexual prospects with the threat of eternity in Hell. From there, I re-channel my desires into masturbation. I am now in total control of my sexual behavior, meaning not driven at all. It is a place of serene calm, where I don't have any sexual urges. I simply notice things usually, such as exposed skin. I have my preferences in terms of outfits for a young girl, in my case swimsuits or sports uniforms, or else any shorts of any kind. I can't go anywhere with it unless I want to, which I don't except with an adult woman who is a trauma survivor - I want a woman who is on the same page of parenting that I am on. I don't actively want a sexual relationship with a child. I just find older children and preteens especially attractive, in the most courteous of ways. I only feel intense passions when I masturbate, and that purges the sexual attraction of the day. Righteous masturbation is a tenet of my Christian faith, meaning solo masturbation to sexual thoughts of children is a practice of my Christian faith. 

The immediate line to avoid is pornography, meaning any depiction or robot intended for sexual use. Pornography is the invention of Satan himself. Child pornography is any image or robot intended for sexual use that depicts a child. The only masturbation that is acceptable is solo masturbation - just you and a mental fantasy. Just know that many adults end up in a child pornography habit that aren't pedophiles, and that is a nasty addiction to be caught up in. I support completely removing all pornographic material from cyberspace, including child pornography. Honeypots shouldn't exist, and the images depicted should be zapped. All pornography should be prohibited under the secular law. The only way around this divine prohibition of all pornography is to look at child modeling sites, meaning righteous misuse of an image. To me, an image intended as pedophilic pornography is easy to spot and avoid - the children are posed in a way that seems "just for me". I have the Dost Test memorized, so I know what to avoid.

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents who rape or sexually assault their children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Public meltdowns: How to deal with meltdowns in public (without punishment or force)

Many parents have had to deal with it. A child crying and carrying on in the middle of a store or restaurant. Most American parents punish public meltdowns in their children. The fact of the matter is that the Early Christians used swaddling blankets in order to soothe the child and keep them calm.

The use of swaddling blankets by mothers in particular is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with children surrendering into the loving arms of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their child as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Public meltdowns can be dealt with using the ancient method of swaddling children. When out and about in public, children age 6 and under were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers, in swaddling blankets. The child and the swaddling blankets that they wore, from there, were tucked underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress of mothers that resembled an apron. The swaddling blankets were, from there, tied to the left breast of mothers, then across the dot to the right leg of the mother, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet, which was grown throughout the Ancient Middle East. Children, in this setup, cried silent tears, with mom quickly attending to the child, right away.

Older children had the freedom to roam, but usually followed mothers around. Children that age rarely cried in public. But, sometimes they did, in which case picked up the child, cradling the child in her arms. However, most children did not cry at that, but instead ordered parents around using statements of "I want". Most children that age only cried when they heard the word "no", which was rare and in fact unlawful unless the child's orders were unlawful and/or unworkable. Even as parents said "no", they had to provide sustaining comfort in order to soothe their upset, and reassure the child, with mothers cooing at their child while cradling them in their arms. The key to avoiding future meltdowns is to say "yes" far more than saying "no".

In most cases, the meltdown is over a toy or other item that they want. Why not give it to them? But, if you can't afford the toy, maybe because you are trying to get food on the table, the order from the child is unworkable, which is grounds for the word "no". When times like this happen, you need to be there for your child, and give them sustaining comfort, meaning they need the warmth and sustenance of mothers in order to calm down. But, if at all possible, let them have what they want. They are only little once.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur. which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is he ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Crying: Why crying is not bad behavior (and what to do about it)

Many parents have to deal with it. A crying child. Most parents believe that children who cry should be punished. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents either ignore or punish a crying child, seeing such a child as manipulative. However, children cry for a simple reason - to advocate for vulnerable needs.

Providing for vulnerable needs is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the child. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women in the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted due to being "too soft" on their children.

Crying, in biblical times, was seen as an immature means of communication coming from a child. For the first 6 years of a child's life, mothers were in constant closeness with their children, meaning that wherever mothers went, so did her child. Whenever children cried in biblical times, mothers immediately cooed at their children, then picking up her child in skin-on-skin mammary closeness. When mothers went out and about in public, they swaddled their young children - age 6 and under - in swaddling blankets, holding their children closer to her bosom when the child cried, with the child hearing the heartbeat of their mother.

Mothers, in most cases, started out breastfeeding their children, with the breastfeeding stopping when the child refusing the nipple. Most children refused the nipple by age 2, and had to be soothed other ways beyond that point. Some children, however, didn't refuse the nipple until age 6, or in rare cases even later. 

Mammary closeness was the main method of reassuring children in biblical times. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children had a primal fear of mom "going away and never coming back". Children aged up to age 2 were constantly held by mothers, with mothers either cradling the child in their arms, or else wearing their child on their back in a papoose bag when mom's hands were full. Either way, children were given ample skin-on-skin time with mothers. Between ages 2 and 6, children ranged beside their mothers, only being held when crying, and then only in skin-on-skin mammary closeness. Children were held in constant mammary closeness when swaddled next to their mother's arms in public, with mothers holding their child even closer when they cried.

Crying is a developmentally appropriate behavior. The intent behind crying in a child is to communicate a need. Children have five basic categories of needs; food, water, shelter, transportation, and attachment - with the greatest of these needs being attachment! When a child cries, one of these needs is the reason for the crying. It is good to coo at your child to make them feel heard, and then give them nourishment and sustenance. When you can't think of any other reason for the crying, think attachment. Most children who cry out of nowhere want YOU, and that's all they want.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child discipline: How to discipline your child the right way (without punishment or force)

Many parents want children to have discipline. This is a common want for parents. Most American parents, however, think discipline involves punishment. The fact of the matter is that there are better ways to disciplining children besides harsh techniques such as punishments or reprimands. Most fathers in biblical times disciplined their children through praise and encouragement.

Praise and encouragement are part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: bit bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, modeling and encouraging Christian discipline. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children then following in the footsteps of parents. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits - such as taking turns, being patient, or showing self-control - they were lavishly praised by fathers to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise by their fathers when caught being good, whereas girls were given a side-embrace by their fathers when caught being good. Children also needed religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. This started out with fathers leaving out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible for the child to discover and explore. When children were caught reading the Bible, they were given lavish praise and encouragement with phrases like "that book is good for you". From there, children's religious instruction came in question and answer format, with children being eager to learn the facts of life, with fathers giving children pointers on the context.

The religious development of children is how children develop in terms of their religious views. Most religious development starts at age 6, and lasts until around age 13 in most cases. When children first develop religious views, they are simplistic and do not conform to the norm of any religious denomination. But, as children got older, they started to conform to the norm of a specific religious denomination. It may not be the denomination of your choosing, but at least they have some values. Once they show you that they are developing values of their own, be sure to praise and encourage those values.

What motivates children to hear out the warning of their fathers? Why not with a secure attachment to their mother? For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. During the first 2 years of a child's life, mothers held their child constantly, either in mom's loving arms, or in a papoose bag when mom's hands were full. Children aged 2-6 ranged next to their mothers, never leaving mom out of their line of sight, even if mom just went into the other room. Children up until age 6 had a constant fear of mothers "going away and never coming back", and needed mom's reassurance that she wasn't going anywhere. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at their child before picking them up, then holding the child close to her bosom in skin-on-skin mammary closeness. When out and about in public, mothers swaddled their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy, with this co-sleeping lasting, in most cases, until the child reached the onset of puberty, which was when children wanted their own place to sleep.

The abovementioned warmth and sustenance is what readied children for the more distant nurturing of fathers. Mothers nurtured up close, and fathers nurtured from afar. Fathers were distant from their children, only being there to give lavish praise and encouragement. This was because of the sexual attachment between fathers and children, usually father and daughter, with the daughter also having a sexual attachment to her father that was mutually unrequited. Fathers dealt with their sexual attachments to their children by way of righteous masturbation, meaning they masturbated in order to purge unrequited lusts and passions. Fathers in the Early Church, as well as their Jewish predecessors, did not have any custom of sexual correction, unlike other ancient cultures.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why parents should catch their children being good (as opposed to them being bad)

Many parents think proper discipline is catching the child in the act, then punishing them. This is a common method of discipline in American homes. Most parents punish their children when they act up. However, this method of child discipline is not biblical. Most Christian fathers in the Early Church instead praised and encouraged good behavior in children, and this method of discipline applies today.

Parents catching children being good is part of the mutual submission between parents and children. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their child one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians in the parish at Ephesus who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, to modeling and encouraging Christian discipline in children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children following in the footsteps of parents. Children in biblical times were caught being good, as opposed to being caught being bad. Whenever children were caught showing good traits - such as taking turns, being patient, or showing self-control - children were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep headed down the straight path". Boys were given manly praise by fathers when caught being good, whereas girls were given a side embrace by fathers when caught being good. Children also needed religious instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the instruction of the Lord. This started out with fathers leaving out an Aramaic copy of the Hebrew Bible out for a child to discover and explore. When children were caught reading and studying the Bible, they were lavishly praised and encouraged with phrases such as "that book is good for you". From there, religious instruction came in question and answer format, with children being eager to learn the facts of life, and fathers giving pointers on the context. 

Religious development is natural course of development that children go through on their own. Most children start their religious journey around age 6. Children's religious beliefs start out simplistic and non-conforming to any denomination. However, by the time they were 13, they naturally conformed to a specific religious denomination, usually by then electing to that denomination. Maybe it wasn't what you had hoped for, but at least they have values. Once you see a child emulating these good values, praise and encourage them to "keep up the good work". 

What motivates children to hear out the warning of their fathers? What better way than children forming a secure attachment with mothers? For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness with mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did her child. For the first 2 years of a child's life, children were constantly held, either in mom's arms, or on mom's back in a papoose bag when mom's hands were busy. When children were aged 2-6, children ranged next to mothers, with children not letting their mothers outside their line of sight, not even to go to the other room. When the mother left the line of sight of a child, the child cried a deathly, high-pitch cry. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at them before picking them up, then holding the child in her bosom in skin-on-skin mammary closeness. When mothers were out and about with children, they swaddled their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy, with co-sleeping ending, in most cases, when the child reached the onset of puberty, when they wanted their own place to sleep.

Mothers nurtured from up close, whereas fathers nurtured from afar. But, both parents nurtured in some way. Mothers were a provider of unconditional love, meaning maternal warmth and sustenance. The affection of fathers was more distant, in a teaching sort of manner, but even they found a way to dote on their children. It is a myth that fathers in biblical times sexually corrected children for crying too much. Most fathers had a child crush going, but kept it at the fantasy level, with fathers instead masturbating to sexual fantasies of their daughters especially, but sometimes their sons as well. Mothers did not have any sexual attachment to their children, and thus ended up in the protective role towards children much of the time. Most of the time, fathers were redirected towards masturbation by the woman of the house, with Christian women in the Early Church threatening divorce in many warnings format.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Defend the criminals": The protectors of pedophile hysteria

Pedophiles have many enemies. Most pedophiles think children's rights movements are the enemy. Most pedophiles are pro-child in their stance, but don't trust children's rights movements. However, many people defend pedophiles falsely. These are a group of civil libertarian lawyers known as "defend the criminals". By criminals, they mean "pedophiles", but not the type worth defending.

The core of pedophile hysteria is not the age of consent, which belongs higher than it is now, in my humble opinion. The core of pedophile hysteria is the conflation between pedophilia and criminality. No pedophile deserves defense for past criminal actions, as most with the condition have done nothing wrong to children. This compared to most adults who have to atone for things they did to wrong or abuse a child. Some of us as pedophiles also offended in the form of sexual harassment, but we sure don't want those prior offenses defended. 

"Defend the criminals" is a self-entitlement lobby focusing on adult's rights, claiming that anyone with a narcissist is an adult in the fullest tense, meaning that if you don't have a narcissist attached to you, then you are not really a human being. Most pedophiles test as non-entitled victims, and choose to take the route of non-entitlement by using imagery and smells to avoid children, by tarring the possibility of sex with children with things almost no pedophile finds attractive, such as a child urinating in the bed. I myself use images of Hell to deter me from approaching a young girl for sexual reasons, meaning if I as much as approach a child for sexual or flirtatious reasons, I condemn myself to Hell. From there, the only way out is to about-face in my approach, or seriously atone if I have defiled myself next to a child. I have defiled myself in the past next to a child, with children perceiving my advances and calling me a "creep". God does forgive, but only if you are apologetic in your heart of hearts, which God knows personally. Most pedophiles are not narcissists.

"Defend the criminals" ultimately proposes a "solution" to the sexual abuse epidemic facing this country. Their idea of a "solution" is decriminalizing child sexual abuse, basically making it a fine, meaning minimizing the pain of innocent children to a mere traffic ticket. I don't need that kind of help as a pedophile. All I need is what I already have, which is an in-person support system to talk to. Most pedophiles just need a safe person to get the burden of their intrusive thoughts out onto, with reflective listening done by the other party. What better place to disclose pedophilia than with a therapist.

What, or rather who, is a pedophile? Pedophilia is a primary or exclusive sexual preference for children, usually reflective of autistic immaturity. Pedophilia is a form of sexual immaturity that is age-oriented in nature. Most pedophiles have an autistic specialty in children and children's issue. Most people are generalizers in their approach towards life. An individual with autism specializes in a certain topic, and a pedophile is an individual with autism who specializes in children's issues. A pedophile might memorize facts about children, and would get right along with children. Most individuals with autism do not get along with children, and find them annoying. If someone with autism just "gets along" with children, and it seems to come naturally to them, think pedophile. Most pedophiles with autism have a "rule boy" autistic profile, meaning they live by a set of rules. If they, however, see the rules as not applying to children, think pedophile. Some pedophiles have ADHD or bipolar disorder, and that is what might make a pedophile more high-risk. Most pedophiles are male, with female pedophiles being rare. Most children's rights girls have autopedodphilia, or attraction to pedophiles. 

The argument of "defend the criminals" is that child sexual abuse is an "unavoidable crime". I can avoid it just fine, just by masturbating to sexual thoughts of children. The whole notion of masturbation being this big sin is what is driving the sexual abuse problem in our country. If adults simply sat down - or laid down - and masturbated to sexual thoughts of children, the sexual desires for children would not come out as a narcissist. The more you refuse to masturbate, the further down the belch the sexual desires sit, until they come out onto the child in a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity. I masturbate to sexual thoughts of children, and focus on those fantasies in fact, in order to avoid carrying a narcissist everywhere I go. 

The Greek root word denoting lust and inordinate affections is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. The key to avoiding approaching a child for sexual or flirtatious reasons is to turn the other way, and masturbate once you get home. Most repressed fantasies are animalistic, but once it gets to the surface, the attraction should be easily noticeable, in a connotational manner. 

There is always something you can do to stay out of trouble, and righteous masturbation is the way of using masturbation in order to stay out of trouble, namely by discharging a fantasy about a child. With a child, you have no other choice. "Staying above" simply makes you an even higher risk to children, and yet most men today follow that model.

Nobody "becomes" a pedophile by fantasizing about children. A pedophile is an individual with a form of sexual immaturity, in most cases associated with autism. If you were a pedophile, you'd know it, as most pedophiles are aware of their condition by the time they are around age 16. The realization is one that you are growing up, but your attraction figures aren't growing up with you. Most adults are attracted to a wide range of attraction figure, with the core of their attractions being same-age attractions. A pedophile is stuck in a certain age range/

The camp the children's rights community is currently in is not "defend the criminals". We instead take the stance of "no medical excuse" in pro-pedophile stance. This stance firmly opposes pedophiles using their psychiatric condition as a medical excuse for abuse. If you are simply using the label to self-diagnose or self-advocate, we are here to listen as a community. A pedophile does not need praise or accolades constantly. All a pedophile needs is a listening ear to lean on. A pedophile self-diagnosis is, however, not valid as a defense in a court of law. Even if you go by the insanity definition here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, you have to, at the time of the crime, not know LEGAL right or wrong - not moral right from wrong, but legal. In this state, there is no legal defense for child sexual abuse, and that is a good thing. Because of the limited scope of application of the insanity defense, the legal defense of insanity is rarely tried, and even more rarely is successful. 

Pedophilia is not a medical excuse for abuse. Just look at all the pedophiles who never, throughout their lives, have done nothing sexual towards a child. 3 out of 4 pedophiles have done nothing sexual towards a child. Most pedophiles who do have sexual contact with a child do it as a form of sexual harassment, based off of a fixation on a child. I myself am part of the 1 in 4 that has had sexual contact with a child in the form of flirting, usually following children around like a lost puppy. The police here want such situations resolved civilly, and so I basically imposed lawful abuse on a child, while being the victim of lawful child abuse myself. I do not want what I did to be defended, and I deserve prison for what I did. In most countries, sexual harassment is a criminal offense, and I support sexual harassment being treated as a criminal matter here. Here in Pennsylvania, the police will not arrest you for sexual abuse until you have intent to do harm, with the narcissist being on the screen in ALL CAPS or all lower case.

Most pedophiles do not have a narcissist attached to them. If you have to dig in your belch in order to find a sexual attraction to children, you simply are a flawed human being. A pedophile simply has intrusive thoughts about children. 1-2% of the male population has pedophilia as their disorder of sexual preference, and they, in most cases, pose minimal threat to children. All adults pose some risk to children, but most pedophiles are the last people to hurt children. They usually feel an affinity for children, meaning they are one with children in their identity. A pedophile is marked by making children and children's issues the core of their identity. A pedophile who has the most risk to children is one that insists "I'm cured". That means they are running away from their sexual fantasies about children.

The stigma itself is being perpetuated by criminals, in fact. Most sexual abusers are anti-pedophiles, not pedophiles. An anti-pedophile usually is a parent that accuses other parents of being "pedophiles" in an overzealous and projectory way. Think a strongman for the children, but in a way that opposes all pedophiles everywhere. Usually, someone that calls every parent they see a "pedophile" is the one sexually abusing children. Most anti-pedophile "creep catchers" sit on an ongoing offense towards their "dog daughter". Same with anyone who is actively anti-pedophile. Most people aren't thinking of pedophiles all the time, including most trauma survivors. It is an unpleasant issue. When you yourself are primarily an anti-pedophile outlet here in this movement, we think you have something to hide, and start an investigation from there. An actual pedophile would not operate at such a low level, and instead has an autistic fixation about a specific child, with the fixations coming like train cars, leading to others around them hoping for the caboose. In my case, I think the caboose came, but I am not sure yet. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled adults who sexually abuse children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous respect: Why respect is earned in parenting

Many parents feel deserving of respect. This is a common attitude that parents take up in this country. Most American parents take up the attitude that they are entitled to respect from their children. The fact of the matter is that parents need to earn respect in parenting.

Righteous respect is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission of mutual submission, with the burden of proof falling squarely on the parent. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for thus is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brough their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women in the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were persecuted largely for being "too soft" on their children.

Respect for parents was a thing in biblical times, but came in the form of closeness to parents, not fear of parents. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. For the first 2 years of a child's life, they were constantly held, either in mother's arms, or else on mom's back in a papoose bag when mom's hands were full. When children were aged 2-6, they never left their mother out of their line of sight, demanding that mom stay in the child's line of sight, fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Even if mom was simply in another room, the child would cry for mom to come back. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at the child before picking up the child, then holding the child close to her bosom in skin-on-skin mammary closeness, perhaps breastfeeding the child if they were milk-hungry. When out and about, mothers swaddled their children next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with the child resting in the constant warmth and sustenance of mothers.

The secondary attachment with children was with their fathers. Fathers had a sexual attachment to their children, namely his daughters. It is a myth that fathers in the biblical context used sexual correction to get children to stop crying. Fathers instead dealt with their unrequited lusts towards their child by way of righteous masturbation, meaning he used masturbation to spend away their attraction to their children. A secure attachment to mother lead to a secure secondary attachment to fathers, but with the attachment being more distant with fathers. Fathers took a more teaching role, from afar, with mothers nurturing unconditionally from up close.

Respect from children is earned in life. Parents are deserving of absolutely nothing from their children. Not even respect. Not even forgiveness. Not even apology. Nothing. Nada. Zilch. There is no free lunch in life. Even in parenting, respect from children does not come for free. Respect from children is to be earned, not handed out for free on a silver platter.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Abortion: Why abortion benefits men (and harms women)

Many mothers have went through the agony, not expecting the agony they faced. Abortion is a rare procedure, and most mothers will never go through an abortion. However, some mothers will be ensnared by the abortion industry, which is a trap that is also traumatic for the woman.

Most women who support abortion don't know what the procedure entails, or else they wouldn't get an abortion. In short, abortion is an induced miscarriage. It happens several ways, some physically painful, some aren't. The most common way to get an abortion is through taking abortifacient pills. In every case, the baby passes through the birth canal anyway, but with the baby being stillborn.

The Sixth Commandment states in Exodus 20:13 KJV:

Thou shalt not kill.

This commandment is repeated in the Bible as the Greek root word φονός (Latin: phonos) and refers to death or murder. The Greek root word linked to that original Greek word is κλέπτο and refers to damages or offenses of any degree. Childbirth was a huge celebration, so when word spread that the mother got an abortion, it disappointed others in the church to the point where the mother was forced to apologize, or else face excommunication from the church body. A woman who got an abortion was seen as cold and unfeeling, as most Christian mothers loved even unplanned children in the womb.

Abortion benefits men more so than women. Without abortion, there is consequences for men in terms of promiscuity. A child might be born, in which case the father would have to pay child support, which most men don't want to pay. With abortion as a fail-safe, men can pillage with impunity, with men having no consequences for their sexual actions. 

Abortion is often used to cover up sexual situations that are embarrassing and shameful, such as an extramarital affair or even rape. In the case of either forcible rape or statutory rape, abortion covers up the evidence. A pregnant belly seen out of place raises suspicion, and is evidence for impropriety of some sort. Teenagers who get pregnant, many times, are not promiscuous themselves - they might be a victim of rape, either statutory and/or forcible.

Abortion is also harmful for women. Most all women who ger an abortion regret that choice. The most haunting part of an abortion for a woman is giving birth to a stillborn baby, with the mother usually crying when the stillborn baby passes through the birth canal.

I am opposed to abortion, but still see it as a choice. That choice just happens to be the wrong choice, because it is harmful to the mother and the unborn child. Also, it is good to know that an unborn child has half the DNA of their father, and half the DNA of their mother, making him/her a human life in and of his/herself. Most women, when educated about what abortion actually entails, would likely elect not to get an abortion.

The depraved and entitled mothers who murder their children in the womb, and all those who aid and abet, will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into everlasting torment prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that punishing children is acceptable parenting. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most parents punish or else ignore their child when they cry. The fact of the matter is that time-in is better than time-out, but should be done a specific way to be more effective.

Time-in is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, where children surrender into the arms of mothers. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child. This secure attachment ultimately comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents whi punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords in order to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christian were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Time-in is not a modern parenting technique. Time-in was done in biblical times, and it was done in a specific manner, with that method being mammary closeness. Whenever children cried, mothers cooed at their children before picking them up, then holding the child to their bosom in mammary closeness. This mammary closeness was done by way of skin-on-skin warmth and sustenance, holding the child to the bosom area. Mammary closeness was further enabled by the fact that mothers were naked in the family home, and children were naked wherever they went. This setup was intended to make skin-on-skin mammary closeness easier, with mothers holding children and co-snuggling with children in the nude with her child.

When out and about in public, mothers swaddled their children - under age 6 - next to their bosom in swaddling blanket. Mothers, from there, tucked the swaddled up child underneath the loose-fitting, revealing dress of mothers that looked like an apron. The swaddling blankets were tied to the left breast of the mother, then across the dot to the right leg of mothers, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. These swaddling blankets were made of velvet, which was grown throughout the Ancient Middle East. When children cried in public, the comfort of the swaddling blanket made the cries come out silent, with mothers cooing at children before holding the children closer to their bosom in constant mammary closeness.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous pampering: Wy parents should pamper their children

Many parents want to appear tough and strict on their children. Most American parents take "mean" as a complement when children call them "mean". The fact of the matter is that the Bible, as understood in context, says to pamper your children. Baby your children, and coddle them with your love and submission.

Righteous pampering is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, when children surrender into the loving arms of mothers. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. This word ultimately refers to a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their child as they would to God, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parent were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating a child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Paul may not have gotten along with the women of the church, but he sure loved children, and even took in a few orphaned children during his time. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers got out the scourge of cords, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians were largely persecuted for being "too soft" on their children.

Righteous pampering refers to pampering your children, but in just the right way. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness with mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. For the first 2 years of a child's life, they were constantly held, either in mom's arms, or else in a papoose bag on mom's back when her hands were full. When children were aged 2-6, they ranged next to mothers, not leaving mom out of their line of sight, fearing that mothers would "go away and never come back". Whenever a child cried, mothers cooed at the child before picking the child up and cradling the child in her bosom, in skin-on-skin mammary closeness. When mothers were out and about, young children under age 6 were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers, with this co-sleeping ending, in most cases, when the child reached the onset of puberty. Mothers breastfed their children to sleep every night when milk-hungry, with this breastfeeding ending when the child pushed away the nipple.

Cooing is a primal way for mothers to reassure children, and make sure that they feel heard. Whenever mothers (and fathers) coo at their children, the child's loud tears immediately turn silent. This prepared children for being picked up and held by mothers. Mothers then held their children until they were calm. Sometimes, the child needed a nap, in which case mothers co-snuggled with their child to ease them to sleep, after cooing at them.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Adult attraction to children: Individual responsibility for adults attracted to children

Many parents and other adults think the solution to child sexual abuse is simply to name and shame "pedophiles". Those who perpetrate child sexual abuse are deserving of swift punishment. But, the reason they are deserving of punishment is that they actually can help their behavior, and thus they are individually responsible for the harm they inflict onto children. 

Every single adult is guilty in relation to children and the God that protects them. That is because all of us as adults have some risk of committing child sexual abuse against a child. Any old adult could rape or sexually assault a child. Child sexual abuse is a crime of opportunity, usually a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity that they weren't prepared for.

How does child sexual abuse occur? It starts with a secondary sexual attraction to children, usually to teenagers, and sometimes to older prepubescent children. The adult in question usually does not want to acknowledge their sexual side towards children, usually following false "Christian" advice to stay above their desires for children, and not "give in" to masturbation. But, masturbation is exactly what an adult needs to avoid acting on their desires. When you don't masturbate to that side of your sex drive, you are not acknowledging your sexual desires towards children, thus repressing them. When in the right/wrong situation with a child, these repressed desires can come out sideways onto the child, like a ton of bricks.

Contrary to popular belief about the Bible, masturbation is not sin, and nowhere in the Bible is masturbation even mentioned. Onan's sin was coitus interruptus, meaning God slew Onan for failing to own up to family responsibilities. The Greek root word denoting lust and inordinate passions in the Bible is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Masturbation was a common way that the Early Christians avoided approaching unlawful targets, including children. Fathers in biblical times masturbated to sexual thoughts of their daughters. Sexual correction was used in other ancient cultures as a form of punishment, but not Ancient Jewish culture. Most of the Early Christians in particular, but also their Jewish predecessors, instead masturbated to sexual thoughts of their children, and played an encouraging role in the child's religious education.

Most sexual offenders are not pedophiles, but are instead opportunistic offenders. Most pedophilic offenses exist on the surface, not hidden like other forms of child sexual abuse. Most pedophilic offenders are parents, but the negligent type, usually with the child taking up adult roles in the house such as caregiver or spouse. Actual pedophilia is associated with autism or ADHD, but usually autism of the moderate-severe type. They are usually too immature to be a parent, and thus the county Children and Youth services (as they are called here in Pennsylvania) remove children from such homes. Most adults who sexually abuse children act on normal feelings, in a way that shouldn't be acted upon.

Most all fathers are sexually attracted to their children, usually their daughters, like a criss-cross. Daughters are naturally attracted to their fathers, but usually hide it due to being punished for dressing "immodestly". Most daughters show their attraction to their fathers simply by dressing in order to impress their fathers. In biblical times, daughters and sons would go naked wherever they went. Sexual attraction to one's own children is normal. Actually raping or sexually assaulting a child will never be normal. 

Most adults get side attractions to children, meaning they might find their daughter attractive as she comes out of the shower, or find a child they work with attractive if they work with children. The idea is to face those attractions head on, and masturbate in order to spend away the attraction. If the attraction doesn't go away after a few sessions, you might be a pedophile, in which case you need to own up to that fact. 

The Greek root word denoting fornication and sexual immorality is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to anything outside of proper channels, as understood then. Church tradition clarifies that any sexual relations with someone under the age of majority is unlawful. But, the word does not prohibit masturbation to sexual thoughts of children, and the Early Church clearly recommended masturbation in order to stay out of trouble. The age of majority was the age of consent/marriage in the Bible, but God omitted the ages then for a reason - today's ages work best, but maybe a bit higher. The word also implies that marriage is to be between people in equal standing in life. All sexual relations outside of a lawfully-ordained marriage between one adult man and one adult woman is sin. Simple attractions, however, are not covered by this word.

Women also are capable of child sexual abuse. Usually, the woman is attracted to a teenage boy, usually in a school setting. It is rare for a mother to be sexually attracted to her own children, but might be attracted to her teenage son's friends. Women should masturbate whenever they have a sexual attraction to children. Women are more likely to physically abuse children, whereas men are more likely to sexually abuse children. But, all women have a risk of becoming opportunistic sexual offenders, if they find themselves in the right/wrong situation with a child. Women, not just men, need to identify by their risk to children, and be convicted of everything they did to wrong or abuse a child.

I myself am a depraved and decadent pedophilic adult who is deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children as the adult that I am. I myself committed a moral crime against children and the God that protects them, namely sexual harassment. All of us as adults need to be convicted of our adult guilt, which is everything that we have done to abuse children, like a sin count. Maybe I have earned my rights in relation to children, but I will let the children decide that. I am grateful for the undeserved praise and accolades given to me by children in the children's rights complex. I am willing to answer to the child's court of law, and if a child finds me to be a threat, I deserve her hatred. No child seems to think I'm scary, and I don't know why. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents and other adults who rape and sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!