The benefits of pedophilia: The biological advantage to pedophiles

Many parents hate pedophiles. Most people hate the concept of pedophilia, including a lot of pedophiles. Pedophile hatred is a common sentiment across modern cultures. The fact of the matter is that pedophilia has a biological advantage for men in one aspect of life, and it isn't the bedroom - that will always be off the table. Pedophilia, when centered correctly, is a male nurturing instinct. 

What is pedophilia? Pedophilia is a form of immature autism, where the age-oriented sexual preferences of the individual with autism corresponds with their immature developmental level. Most pedophiles have an autistic specialty in children, in terms of knowledge and social skills. Their whole worldview is centered around children as an individual with autism, and when you take a look under the surface, their sex drive corresponds with this. 

A pedophile is a parent, but a parallel parent, in policing format. A pedophile is strongarm for the children, and naturally is drawn to police the natural/legal parents. I myself profile for parents, as I was abused by parents. What would I do with that child? I would snuggle with her. I would bathe her (and look respectfully, of course). I would feed her and nourish her. I would comfort all her sorrows. I would follow my instincts in caring for her every vulnerable need. And her parents just order her around like some slave? But, since kidnapping is a moral crime even under the pure biblical tense, I hope one day the police can barge in and put the fear of God in those parents. I judge such parents righteously, and spy on parents in order to condemn them to Hell. I decide right there and then that I want nothing to do with such parents, and if they were to speak to me, it would end up as an abrupt stop on my part, as I shun such parents as a Christian. But I can tell you, no matter how much that child cried and screamed - perhaps in conjunction with the word "no" - I would never punish such a child, and neither would I get angry. I never have been angry with a child in my life.

What motivates my nurturing instinct? Sexual desire, at just the right level. That's how it was with the ancients in biblical times, some of whom fit the diagnostic criteria for pedophilia. If you were a pedophile in the Early Church, you were set aside as a special deacon to enforce the Law on entitled parents. The Apostle Paul was actually in charge of this special deaconship - the Apostle Paul was anti-spanking through and through. Usually, he was nervous, living his life in regret after a life of killing Christians. However, when a child was being offended, the old Paul came out, and Paul could be ruthless in using gaslighting to bring down the parents. When the parents were excommunicated from the church, the orphaned children ultimately went with pedophiles, and the pedophiles asked for no sexual favors in return. 

Any time you center a sexual desire, it comes back as a nurturing instinct. What ultimately centers sexual desires towards children, however, is the depravity route. A true pedophile, at some level, needs to be convicted of the fact that they are a depraved and decadent sinner, who is deserving of absolutely nothing, including nothing from any child. This leads to a sense of urgency where the pedophile seeks to earn his goodness by performing acts of good works for children. This belief system ultimately rewires the brain and centers the sex drive, which is further centered by the pedophile indulging in masturbatory fantasy to keep down the flames. This leads to a centered sex drive, where the pedophile can focus on nurturing a child, which is what parenting should be all about. They can then step in when some other parent can't take care of a child. Most pedophiles use depravity methods without being motivated by the existence of God or a set of gods, but some of us need God to motivate us with a Heaven and a Hell, because otherwise we would justify our desires instead of our nurturing instincts. 

Being a pedophile caring for a child has a certain feeling to it. It is totally being beholden to the needs of the child, without questioning the child's expressed needs. Usually, they cry, and you scramble to reassure their sorrows. You may be attracted to them, but only in the background, in a way that colors the child, and then you end up paying more attention to the child. This is how all fathers should feel about their child, and if they instead feel gruffly and want to police the child, maybe they aren't really parents in my book - they just are, in another tense. It is like the child rules over you, places chains and shackles on you, but you never would want anything else in the whole world. You are completely and totally enslaved to that child, and you defend your master vociferously. The child becomes like God to you, and you revere and fear that child, in a way that makes you melt nervously, in a shaking and quaking sort of way.

There is a proven theory in social work known as the Cinderella effect. This means that parents are, in fact, the best caregivers of children, by track record. Parents today are just brainwashed by false and abusive religious teachings and false context on parenting. Place a child with anyone else, and they might get worse treatment, however. An exception is pedophiles, who usually make a single parent who does it all, for a child that isn't even his. 

I propose a newly revamped foster care system, where you need a DSM-5 diagnosis of pedophilic disorder in order to be a foster parent. If you have a criminal history or are a sex offender, you will be excluded from the program. But, if you simply have an attraction to children, why not put it to good use? Pedophiles are the most qualified of foster parents out there, yet also are the most overlooked. In biblical times, it was no question - the pedophiles stepped in when nobody else could take care of the child. The pedophiles nurtured. The pedophiles protected. 

Pedophiles were designed by God and evolution to be an alternate caregiver to children, when the parents didn't meet the mark. This was demonstrated throughout ancient history, and throughout biblical history. In biblical times, the pedophiles were the child abuse division of the religious authorities, and the religious authorities beat parents to a pulp when they abused a child, in order to get them to submit and surrender the child to the authorities willfully. Then, one of the pedophiles took in the child, and nurtured the child like a mother would, snuggling with them and holding them reassuringly when they cried. Many of the pedophiles lactated and nourished the children when nobody else would. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The age of consent/marriage: Why sex with children should never be normalized

Many parents are concerned about the issue of the age of consent, and rightfully so. I am anti-parent to the core, but I support the God-given duty of parents to protect their children, and I judge parents accordingly. If you are a parent, and you promote your child, you are just as guilty as the sex offender you hand them to, regardless of ability or disability in the offender. The age of consent/marriage is too low here in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

There is an age of consent in the Bible, and it is found in two places. See 1 Corinthians 6:18-20 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. What? know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which is God's. 

See also Romans 13:1-2 KJV:

Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.

The Early Christians cooperated with the Roman authorities, and set the age of consent/marriage for the church at age 13. Under Jewish law, the age of consent/marriage for females was 12, but it was raised to 13 to honor Roman law. The age of consent was line with the age of majority in both cases. The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) lifts up all of the sex crime laws of Ancient Israel, including the moral statutes against any sex with a child, or sex involving a child. Even sex between children was considered fornication.

It is a myth that the age of consent/marriage in biblical times was low. Based on neighboring cultures, Ancient Jewish culture really took a stand against sex with children. Marriages were only permitted under customary law between same age peers, meaning a man could only marry a woman his age or older. Uncle/niece marriages were rare in the Old Testament, and non-existent in the Early Church. Cousin marriage was allowed in both the Old and New Testament. It wasn't like an older man could have a bride betrothed to him easily. The only time that actually happened was when the father was overwhelmed with sexual entitlement towards his virgin daughter, and knew he had to get himself out of the picture. 

There is a threat to our children today, and it isn't pedophiles as a whole population. The left itself, on every story except the children's rights story, comes from an elite group of biblical scholars called "exist", who seeks to spread false information about the Bible in order to erase the influence of the Bible and its context, erase God from society. When there is no God to dictate morality, you can do whatever you want, including have sex with children, right? That's the agenda of "exist". One half studies the Bible in order to disprove it, and the other half studies child sexuality. What they ultimately want is for society to go back to the days of peacekeeping, and they will note their actual agenda subtly when they point out that the human race wasn't religious for a certain period of time in the past. During that time, we communicated through rape and sexual assault, and parents kept down their children sexually. We really were born in original sin as a human race. We are glorified apes. We are a peacekeeping species. We must never go back to peacekeeping.

Sex with children will never be acceptable, even if it was for much of human history. The depraved and decadent, defiled sexual offenders of children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent! 

Righteous pampering: Why parents should pamper their children

Many parents think that pampering children is the wrong choice. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents think that children should have discipline imposed on them, instead of being pampered. However, the Bible commands that parents righteously pamper their children. Pampering children is something even God approves of! God wants parents to pamper children, not just once and a while, but as a habit. 

Righteous pampering is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission between parent and child. Children rest in the love and submission of parents, as parents hold children closer. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. 

Righteous pampering is what God wants parents to do with their children. Mothers, in biblical times, provided nourishment and sustenance to children, in the form of birth nudity. Both mother and child were naked next to each other, with the child being lathered up in skin-on-skin warmth and comfort by mothers. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, her young child went with her. Even when she was cooking dinner for the family, her little child was trailing right behind her, constantly crying in order to be held. The mother then picked up the child. Sometimes, when out and about, mothers swaddled children next to her bosom in swaddling blankets. 

Children in biblical times were treated like royalty, meaning they were literally seen as representative of God. Ancient Jewish society, including the Early Church, was a child worshipping society, not a child enslaving society. Children were worshipped as vulnerable extensions of God, called to judge righteously the charity and generosity of adult-kind. Parents could not issue lawful orders to their children, and so they pleaded with their children, expecting nothing in return, knowing they'd get nothing in return from their children, but they pleaded to their children anyway, in the form of prayer to the God up Above that appointed the child as lawful authority over them. Whenever children rejected their parents, which did happen quite often in sporadic format, parents pleaded to their children, on their knees, begging for acceptance. Children could issue orders towards their parents, and even sue their parents, and parents could not defend themselves with a countersuit in court. When parents sued children unilaterally, the church elders forced them to apologize to their child for speaking against them. Even speaking against the children was prohibited in biblical times, lest the parents perjur themselves in open court, as children could do no wrong in the eyes of the Law. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

 

 

The "electra" complex: Understanding the root causes of child sexual abuse

Most people blame pedophiles for the epidemic of child sexual abuse in America. This is a common hatred amongst parents. Most parents believe that child sexual abuse comes from external threats only, and not from internal threats like one's own sinful nature as a parent. The fact of the matter is that parents are culpable for most child sexual abuse. What drives them? The Freudian theory of the electra complex perfectly explains why most child sexual abuse occurs. 

Every single adult is capable of child sexual abuse, as every single adult is capable of sexual fantasy about their child. Parents are at heightened risk of sexually abusing a child due to having more contact with children. Most parents who abuse their children sexually are fathers or else father figures. Most of the time, the abuser has either repressed sexual thoughts about their child, or else did not know the boundaries between parents and children.

The electra complex starts at around age 3, where young girls start developing sexual feelings for their fathers. Fathers, at the same time, start developing sexual feelings for their children, usually girls. In the Early Church, this dynamic existed in Christian homes, and the dynamic was seen as mutually unrequited. Fathers masturbated to thoughts of sexual relations with their daughters, but didn't go further than that.

Mothers in biblical times dealt with the issue of parent attraction by sleeping next to their children for as long as she could, in order to guard the children from the father's sexual entitlement. Most child sexual abuse occurred by way of the daughter acting in a tempting way towards her father. Think the story of Lot and his daughters. 

If you are a father, you need to find that sweet spot for your daughter in masturbation. If you don't find that sweet spot, you may well be doomed to sexually abuse your child when you least expect it, when you are alone with your child. It is a matter of personal responsibility. If you find this topic to be upsetting, you might just be a rapist, and you eventually will rape or sexually assault your child if you don't stop yourself right now - follow those thoughts to the end through masturbatory fantasy. The Greek root word translated "lust" in the Bible is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, or even to parent attraction, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. The moment you take the first steps to approach your daughter for sexual or flirtatious purposes, you fall into sexual entitlement. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents who rape or sexually assault their children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Attention-seeking behavior: How to deal with attention-seeking behavior in children

Many parents have been there, where a child was begging for attention, perhaps crying out loud for attention. Most children, if not all, engage in attention-seeking behavior at one time or another. Most American parents punish behaviors in children that are attention-seeking in nature. However, the best thing to do concerning attention-seeking behavior is to give the child the attention he/she needs.

Giving children loving attention is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. 

Attention-seeking behavior is a common behavior in children. Most parents deal with the issue by punishing the attention-seeking behavior, which can range from crying to mischief. This situation was not the case in biblical times. In biblical times, children weren't even scolded for attention-seeking behavior, but were given the attention that they needed.

During the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers. Wherever the mother went, so did her young child. Children followed their mother all throughout the house, even through the kitchen as she was cooking a meal for the family to eat. Whenever the child cried out for attention, the mother stopped what she was doing, and without complaining, picked up the child and held him/her while cooing. When children were out and about, they were swaddled to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with the top end of the blanket tied to one of the breasts, with the lower part of the velvet swaddling blankets tied across the dot to the leg of the mother. Older children would cause mischief in the home just for attention, and parents just laughed with the children. Parents knew that the children literally couldn't help themselves due to impulse control issues associated with their immaturity. Parents in biblical times didn't get angry, as that emotion was missing due to parent non-entitlement, and so parents found mischevious behavior to be cute and endearing, especially bold behavior. A common form of child abuse in biblical times was encouraging antisocial behavior in children. 

Attention-seeking behavior exists because attention is a core need of children. The needs of children fall into five main categories; food, water, shelter, transportation, and attachment - and the greatest of these needs is attachment! A core attachment need of children is attention. Depriving a child of loving attention is like depriving of them of oxygen - they just can't breathe without the loving attention of parents. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Religious child abuse against pedophilic children: Understanding the prejudicial hysteria against pedophiles

Many people hate pedophiles. However, there is a growing movement of people supporting pedophiles. When most people think of supporting pedophiles, they think of supporting sex offenders, and people who have committed crimes against children. However, most pedophiles are VICTIMS of crime and abuse, not perpetrators. 

What is pedophilia? A pedophile is not a narcissist. A pedophile is an individual with immature autism, where the age-oriented sexual preferences of the individual with autism correspond with the individual's immature developmental level. Pedophiles usually have an autistic specialty in children, in terms of knowledge and social skills. Pedophilia is the understory of child-centered autism, meaning that's where the pedophiles are. Most pedophiles take the role of a defense attorney for children, defending their every misdeed with complex explanations. Children's rights is a common core interest in pedophiles. 

What is at the core of the hatred and vitriol directed towards pedophiles? The word "cure" is at the center of the debate. Pedophile hatred, at the core, is a form of help abuse where an individual seeks to push cures onto a pedophile. Pedophilia is a disorder that cannot be cured, at all, as it is a genetic disorder. Yet, certain purity parents want to be a purity parent to pedophiles, in the form of false help. We as pedophiles don't want to be helped into finding a cure. We can deal with our desires on our own. We just may need someone to talk to from time to time in our lives. 

Where does this hatred come from? Most pro-pedophile advocates blame the children's rights movement for the proliferation of the hatred of pedophiles. The fact of the matter is that the hatred is a religious hatred that started with the Roman Catholic Church, and the latinate understanding of the Bible. The Roman Catholic faith prohibits masturbation and sexual fantasy, and the Catholic church was the first church to prohibit masturbation. Before Rome, masturbation to sexual thoughts of children was perfectly acceptable in the Early Church, and the pedophiles were hired as child protection officers for the church administration. A common Bible passage that has been used to oppress pedophiles is Matthew 5:27-28 KJV:

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath already committed adultery with her in his heart.

The Greek root word translated "lust" is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, or even sexual desire towards children, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Unless you are approaching a child for sexual or flirtatious purposes, you are not sinning. It is okay to feel sexual things for children, as we all have that tendency as adults.

Being hated as a pedophile is like someone trying to stop you from masturbating, or even more apt, someone punishing you for masturbating. Many pedophiles perceive "God" as punishing them for their sexual fantasies about children, and so they have to lose their religion due to severe religious trauma - most pedophiles that I have known through the Virtuous Pedophiles forum are either atheists or agnostics. Some of us pedophiles still believe in God, and that is because we are lucky that nobody punished us in the name of religion. I myself have people to talk to if I ever again become a danger to children. My belief in God sets boundaries for me around children, so I don't abuse them like I used to. I am an ex-atheist, as I misused atheism to sexually abuse children in the form of sexual harassment. I am not a virtuous pedophile myself, but I am a non-offending pedophile, since I have committed to not sexually offending a child, now and in the future

The depraved and decadent parents who punish their pedophilic children for masturbation and sexual fantasy will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

The benefits of mothers constantly holding their babies

Many parents isolate babies in cribs and strollers. In many places in modern America, you will see children being isolated in strollers in public, or else hi-chairs. Most American parents don't want to "spoil" their baby. The fact of the matter is that you cannot spoil a baby. A mother should constantly hold her baby, just as was the case in biblical times.

Mothers holding their babies is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. Children are to rest securely in the loving arms of mothers, and mothers are to hold space for their child to rest. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any forms of punishment and controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Parents, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any punishment of a child in his writings.

Mothers in biblical times did not isolate their babies in cribs or strollers, but constantly held them. Most of the time, the baby was held in the arms of the mother. Sometimes, the baby was placed on the back of the mother in a papoose bag. Children were placed in a papoose bag when mothers were busy, perhaps cooking a meal for the family. Mothers in biblical times went to sleep with their babies, with the baby laying on top of her, suckling her teat periodically through the night, being half awake in order to tend to the baby. Both mother and child were naked next to each other, as the Early Christians practiced birth nudity. 

This setup set the scene for a child who was glued to the hip of his/her mother. Up until age 6, wherever the mother went, the child went with her. The child followed the mother all through the house, even through the kitchen as she was trying to cook a meal for the family. Oftentimes, children cried in order to receive attention, in which case the mother stopped what she was doing, and picked up the child, holding him/her. When mothers were out and about, children were swaddled next to her bosom in swaddling blankets. 

Mothers in biblical times breastfed their children, including in public. Children usually were weaned by age 3, when they pushed away the nipple. Sometimes it was sooner, sometimes it was later. Sometimes, children weren't weaned until age 6, or even later. Adults in biblical times did not drink cow's milk, as they were lactose intolerant. Why were they lactose intolerant? Their mother fed them well as a child, in terms of breastfeeding.

There are benefits to constantly holding your baby. First and foremost, it helps secure a bond between mother and child. Secondly, it brings out the separation anxiety that children need to feel - that feeling that your child is attached to you at the hip. It helps form a secure attachment with your child, so that your child will honor and admire you as an adult. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let the forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The Fifth Commandment: Understanding honoring parents in context

Many parents demand respect from their children. Most American parents think that they are entitled to respect from their children. Many parents enforce their want to be respected with punishment. The fact of the matter is that the Fifth Commandment means do not dishonor your parents, meaning do not commit clear and deliberate acts of elder abuse against them.

It says in Exodus 20:12 KJV:

Honour thy father and mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.

This commandment, in context, refers to clear and deliberate elder abuse. "Do not strike your parents" means do not repeatedly beat your parents (see Exod. 21:15). "Do not curse your parents" means do not impose airborne gaslighting onto your parents to send them places (see Lev. 20:9). The legal concept of a "stubborn and rebellious child" refers to dishonoring one's mother through criminal acts that reflect on her (see Deut. 21:18-21). In biblical times, these laws were necessary because elder abuse was rampant. Adult children living away from home would pay unwelcome visits to their parents, and abuse them, and before these laws were put into place, the excuse for elder abusers was "they must have learned that behavior somewhere". The parent protection laws protect parents from the worst of elder abuse. "Dishonoring parents" in both the Old and New Testaments refers to clear and deliberate acts of elder abuse, committed by an adult child living away from home. Otherwise, it simply refers to moral crimes committed as they reflect on an adult child's home. Apart from that, parents only have protection under the secular law, and children should observe the secular law in how they treat their parents.

The Fifth Commandment is repeated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punish their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of offensive touch or speech stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen then as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Children, in biblical times, held lawful authority over their parents. Children could legally sue their parents, even for the word "no" when the child deemed that word to be unfair. Parents, under the Law, could only use the word "no" when declining an order due to said order being unworkable or immoral. Otherwise, parents had to obey orders issued by their children. Parents could not issue orders of their own, and could not sue their own children. If a parent took their child to court in the Early Church, the church elders forced the parents, every time, to apologize to the child for speaking against them, and to the court for wasting its time. Parents pleaded with their children, asking for things from them politely, from the bottom of their hearts. Children usually followed the requests of parents, as they trusted in their parents.

Simply talking back to parents was not seen as dishonoring them. Dishonoring parents, as a term, refers to clear and deliberate elder abuse, meaning beating and gaslighting parents to get them to do things for you. The Fifth Commandment, apart from banning these things, appointed parents as the God-ordained head of children. Being the head of children means being charitable and generous as a parent, not punitive and dictatorial. 

Parents are mere caregivers of children, not lawgivers or lawmakers. Parent headship means taking care of a child, not being in charge of the child. The child is instead in charge of you, and holds you to account when you make a mistake as a caregiver. Children are to demand how they want to be raised, and then the parent caregiver righteously caves to the child's demands. Ordering things from your parent is like ordering at a restaurant - you should expect decent service from your parents.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Independence: Why independence should be the goal in parenting (not obedience)

Many parents think that obedience is the goal in parenting. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents think that obedience is the goal in parenting. This is often enforced using punishment and other controlling demeanor in parenting. The fact of the matter, is, however, that history proves that independence is the goal in parenting, as was the case in biblical times. However, in order to teach independence properly, a parent must allow for healthy dependence. 

Healthy dependence is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Independence was the goal of parenting in biblical times. But, parents offered healthy dependence first. Children, up until age 6, were in constant closeness to their mothers. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, and all the way up until age 6, mother and child were naked next to each other, with perhaps the mother breastfeeding the child. Mothers could take the closeness into public, and breastfeed in public, with the child wrapped up next to her bosom in swaddling blankets. This closeness prepared children for independence by providing for them healthy dependence. 

Around age 6, children started insisting on being on their own. They ventured places far away from home, playing outside with the neighborhood children, but then retreating to the sustaining warmth of mothers come nightfall. That sustaining warmth came in the form of co-sleeping, with children sleeping next to mothers in skin-on-skin format. Children started sleeping on their own around puberty, when children wanted their own place to sleep. When this happened, parents knew that their children were growing up, and the event of children moving out of the house was coming soon.

Usually, today, children are independent by the time they are teenagers, when raised right, meaning with attachment parenting. Most teenagers in modern attachment parenting homes are very strong and resilient, usually in a centered way, and can do things on their own that their peers in punitive parenting homes cannot. Imagine the proper stereotype of Generation Z as isolated from life, and then punished nonetheless, which is a toxic mixture of circumstances. Attachment parenting is totally different than this setup, as it encourages independence. In Christian attachment parenting, it is the role of the father to encourage independence and discipline in children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Co-sleeping: Why parents should co-sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice in parenting. Most American parents refuse to co-sleep next to their children, often citing their religious values as a reason for not co-sleeping next to their child. The fact of the matter, however, is that the Bible endorses co-sleeping, when understood in context, as a means for mother and child to bond. Plus, co-sleeping next to your child could prevent child sexual abuse from occurring in your home.

Co-sleeping is an expression of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. Children rest securely in the arms of mothers. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translating "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. 

It is common knowledge that children aged 2-6 often refuse to go to sleep. This is a common issue in many Christian homes, and most parents deal with the issue by punishing the child and letting the child cry themselves to sleep. There is a reason why children often refuse to go to sleep - they are not ready to sleep on their own yet, developmentally speaking. Most children ranging in age, up to age 6, have a fear of being isolated in a room alone, like they are about to be devoured by predators. Many parents might assume that no such predators exist, but there are predators today, and they could lurk in your own home. Usually, child sexual abuse is committed when the child is isolated in a room alone, by a parent living in the home. Usually, the sex offender that is sexually abusing the child is the father. Any father can commit acts of child sexual abuse under the right/wrong conditions, and so can some mothers who have male traits. Mothers in biblical times knew that the father of their children had a parent attraction to them, and slept next to the children in order to guard them from the sexual entitlement of their father. Fathers usually re-channeled their parent attraction into masturbation, but not always. Child sexual abuse was rare next to non-existent in biblical times, and this was largely because the mother was right there when the children slept next to her.

Most of the concerns about co-sleeping center on the concept of self-soothing. Most parents and pediatricians often say that a child needs to be isolated in a crib or bed alone in order to self-soothe. The fact of the matter is that history proves that children learn to self-soothe on their own. In biblical times, most children co-slept next to their mother until puberty. When children hit puberty, they immediately insisted on their own place in the house to sleep, and parents took it as that their child was growing up. Children rarely became dependent on the warmth of parents past puberty, and when that happened, the child would have qualitied for a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder or a related developmental disorder today. Parents then weren't concerned, as they knew their children would shake them off eventually. 

Co-sleeping closeness between mothers and children happened in skin-on-skin fashion always in biblical times. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, with mothers and children both being naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness to each other. Co-sleeping was something that children looked forward to every night with their parents. It was the main bonding routine mothers had with their children. Skin-on-skin co-sleeping is at the core of Christian attachment parenting. This form of co-sleeping also brought out abusers in fathers, in which case mothers then knew that - at some point - they'd have to divorce their husband. Christian mothers in the Early Church followed their instincts when raising their children, and did what came naturally.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of time-in

Many parents these days still use punitive methods to deal with their children. Most American parents still use punitive measures to deal with their children. This is a common way of American parents dealing with their children. 37% of parents use corporal punishment, usually in the form of an occasional disciplinary spanking, and countless parents use false imprisonment tactics such as time-out. The best way to deal with a child's temper tantrums is time-in, and the best way to do time in is through mammary closeness. 

Time-in takes place within the context of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be an extension of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Time-in is best done the biblical way. When children were upset in biblical times, mothers picked them up and held them close to her bosom. Both mother and child were in the nude, as the Early Christians practiced birth nudity. Thus, even picking up a child gave the child skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Mammary closeness is when a child is held in skin-on-skin closeness and warmth next to the bosom of mothers. Children were allowed to breastfeed from the mother while the mother was in public even.

Children rarely had meltdowns in public in biblical times. That was because they were wrapped up next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. Mothers went naked in the family home, but wore a thin, revealing dress similar to an apron when out and about, and tucked their children underneath the dress, wrapping up children up until age 6 next to their bosom in swaddling blankets made of velvet grown in Israel. The swaddling blankets were tied around one of the mother's breasts, and across to one of the mother's legs. 

The abovementioned context is applicable today just as it was in the days of old. Maybe it could use some tweaking, for example if you can't find the resources to use mammary closeness as a tool the full way as recommended in the biblical context. Time-in has a proper biblical application, and it was spelled out in the previous two paragraphs. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Change of heart: How to bring forth a change of heart in your child (without spanking or punishment)

Many parents want their children to have a change of heart. The concept of a change of heart is something that we as a society value in parenting, and what the left wants to erase. Most parents want to bring a change of heart in their children, but most parents want to do so using punishments such as corporal punishment. Most parents try to break the will of their children through corporal punishment, then treat them differently once they submit to the will of their parents. This is the wrong way to bring a change of heart in children. A change of heart in children starts with a change of heart in parents, meaning parents need to model self-improvement to children.

The concept of a change of heart takes place within the context of the Christian teaching of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after parents punished their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians in the church at Ephesus for bringing their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to, in this context, modeling Christian discipline to children. The standard of Christian discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church worked to center their entitlement, and then children followed suit. When children were caught emulating the disciplined example of parents, children were praised and encouraged lavishly by fathers, being told "keep going down the right path". Children in biblical times were caught being good, meaning if they showed self-control or gave up something they really wanted, they were lavishly praised and encouraged to keep on doing things to center their entitlement. Sometimes, children needed direct parental instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to direct instruction from parents. Parental instruction was not legally binding, with children being the ones lawfully authorized to issue orders. Thus, parents made requests from children, from the bottom of their heart, hoping that children would listen to them based on the secure attachment that all parents in biblical times strove for. 

Children are, in fact, sinful human beings, and this is not up for debate. However, that sinful nature is for children to work on, and not for parents to punish. Children are capable of self-improvement, but the route of self-improvement has to be modeled to children. When children see you declare yourself a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, your children will notice you doing that good work, and do that work on themselves. They may not learn discipline right away, but they will learn eventually, usually by the time they become teenagers. Children do not need parents to be strict on them, but instead need to be given the space to be strict with themselves.

The key to motivating children in honoring your example is to form a secure attachment with your child. Children, for the first 6 years of children, were in constant closeness to mothers. Wherever the mother went, the child went, with young children being wrapped up in swaddling blankets next to the bosom of mothers when mothers were out and about, with mothers breastfeeding in public if the child was milk-hungry. About when the child turned age 6, they squirmed out of the arms of mothers, venturing places far from home, playing outside with neighborhood friends, then retreating to the sustaining warmth of mothers once more, in the form of co-sleeping. Co-sleeping took place until the child reached the onset of puberty, when the child wanted a place to sleep for themselves. 

The concept of a change of heart is necessary in life. However, punishment is the wrong way to bring forth a change of heart in their children. The idea is for YOU to have a change of heart by seeking to improve yourself, and then your children should want to follow your example, at least eventually. If they don't want to follow your example at all, and grow up rejecting you, fault is on you as a parent for not forming a secure attachment with your child. Children naturally copy their parents. When parents declare themselves sinners deserving of absolutely nothing, children copy that as well.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Parent anger: How parents can kick the anger habit once and for all

Many parents think that they have the right to get angry with their children. Most American parents think that anger should drive their parenting, including some gentle parents on the parental rights side of the children's rights debates. Anger is seen by many parents as their backbone, yet they use that backbone to defend rights that they don't have as parents. True parenting is not guided by anger, but by worry and concern. 

It says in Matthew 5:21-22 KJV:

Ye have heard that it was said of them of old time, Thou shalt not kill; and whiosoever shall kill shall be in danger of the judgment: But I say unto you, That whosoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment: and whosoever shall say to his brother, Raca, shall be in danger of the council: but whosoever say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

Christ here is comparing anger to the murder that comes of it, condemning unrighteous anger itself. The phrase "without a cause" refers to anger outside of righteous judgment. Children were deemed sacrosanct in terms of righteous judgment, meaning children could do no wrong in the eyes of the Law, even if children did do things that were considered wrong. A child could not be judged for anything, at least not while they were children. Children were seen as vulnerable extensions of God, called to judge righteously the charity and generosity of adult-kind. Children could not be prosecuted by parents or other adults. Children could sue parents, or issue lawful orders towards parents. Ancient Jewish society, including the Early Church, was a child worshipping society, not a child enslaving society. 

Parent anger comes from a deserving place in the sinful nature of parents, where you as a parent feel deserving of things from your children. Parents need to take up the declaration that they are a depraved and entitled sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, merely for existing in relation to children. When you have an attitude adjustment, and take up the attitude that you are a sinner and that you are deserving of absolutely nothing from your child, you will demand nothing from your child, and you will be grateful for the every joy that your child brings you. Most of the time, we get angry when we feel that we deserve things from others. When you lose that deserving attitude, you lose the anger, including parent anger in relation to your children. This elimination of parent anger centers your whole entitlement. 

Parenting, in the biblical tense, should not be guided by anger. Christian parents in the 1st Century were not guided by anger, but by worry and concern for their children. They still could get angry at other adults, but not children. Most parents in biblical times were devoid of parent anger, in any form or expression. Even fathers were devoid of parent anger towards their children. Parents worried a lot about their children, and felt concern for them, and that worry and concern guided their parenting decisions. 

Imposing parent anger, at all, on a child, was seen as parental entitlement. Parental entitlement is denoted in the Bible by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés), with this word being defined as in the context of parental entitlement, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Once that imposition of want, usually in the form of parent anger, leads to offense, it becomes child abuse under God's Law. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any and all punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holdng your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Parent anger, in and of itself, is a moral crime against children. Any time you offend your child with your anger, either by punishing them or trying to control them, you are entitled, and thus are guilty of sin. Sometimes, parents downright punish their children, and that is just wrong. Any time you impose your wants onto a child, you are committing the moral crime of parental entitlement. Most of the time, parental entitlement comes out in the form of anger. Parenting shouldn't be motivated by anger, but by worry and concern.

The core of parent anger is deservances, meaning the parent feels that they deserve things from their children, when they deserve absolutely nothing from their children. Children aren't always going to give you, say, the "respect" you feel you deserve, and then what? Do you throw a temper tantrum? Parents in this nation need an attitude adjustment, and need to lose the attitude that they deserve things from their children just for birthing them. Things like respect are earned from children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Preventing public meltdowns: How the Early Christians prevented public meltdowns in children

Many parents have to deal with it in their younger children. Most parents have had to deal with a child throwing a public temper tantrum. Most parents think the answer to public meltdowns is punishment of some sort. The fact of the matter is that public meltdowns were next to non-existent among children in the Early Church. Parents in biblical times used swaddling blankets to keep children close and avoid power struggles.

The use of swaddling blankets is part of the Christian doctine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Public meltdowns seem to be common today among children. Most parents have to deal with a child throwing a temper tantrum in public. Most parents are embarrassed by these behaviors, and seek to punish the child throwing the temper tantrum for embarrassing them. But, these types of situations with young children are completely avoidable. The key is for mothers to swaddle their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets.

Married and betrothed women in biblical times, when out and about, wore a thin, revealing dress similar to an apron, that only covered up the basics. Women did not have to wear clothing at all, and didn't when in the family home, but wore a thin dress to honor their husbands or fiancees. Women in the Corinthian church in particular wore bonnets to honor their husbands. Young children, up until age 6, went wherever the mother did, and when out and about, the child was slipped under the mother's dress, and was supported by swaddling blankets tied to one of her breasts from the top, and maybe to her leg from the bottom. The child was breastfed in public, if the child was milk-hungry, and otherwise simply received skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance from mothers.

Whenver a child cried, it was a silent cry, as they in constant closeness with their mother. Mothers then would coo and hold the child closer, perhaps breastfeeding the child in the process if the child was milk-hungry. Children up until age 6 were treated like babies. Thus, the kind of public meltdowns you see today in children were next to non-existent in biblical times. 

Women in biblical times rarely left the house, but they were allowed to, meaning husbands did not quarter their wives in biblical times. Usually, women walked to the nearest town to go to market, and by meats and vegetables to cook for the family, or for the husband to cook - in some Christian homes in the 1st Century, the man of the house cooked for his wife. She usually took the children along, and usually, one of the children was too young to walk on his/her own, so the mother swaddled the child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child authority: Why children are authority figures over all adults (especially parents)

Many parents think that they are the one in charge in the family home, and that children are to listen to them. Most parents see themselves as authority figures in relation to children, and feel entitled to giving orders to children. However, this is not how it was seen in biblical times. In biblical times, children called the shots, and issued orders to their parents. Parents obeyed the lawful orders of children.

The concept of child authority is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selfessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, inclduing any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offense stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who broughtt their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Children, in biblical times, held lawful authority over their parents. Children could issue lawful orders to parents, and parents usually had to obey their children, except when the order was unworkable or in violation of existing Law. Parents could not issue orders or take their child to court, as when a Christian parent in the 1st Century took their child to court, the church elders took the side of the child, and forced the parents to apologize to both the child, as well as the court for wasting the time of the church elders. Even when children were beating or exploiting their parents, the courts sided with the child. The parent protection laws only applied to adults outside the home, with the term "dishonoring parents" meaning beating parents and cursing them with airborne gaslighting, as well as committing moral crimes that reflect on the adult descendant's mother. Children were seen by the Law, in practice, as sacrosanct, and thus a child could not be charged with a moral crime, at all.

Ancient Israel, as well as the Early Church, were child worshipping societies, not child enslaving societies. Children were seen as vulnerable appearances of God, discerning and judging righteously the charity and good will of adult-kind, reporting straight to God as to their findings. Children were seen as representatives of God, with parents struck with reverent fear and terror of their child, awe-struck by the child's vulnerability. This led to children bringing their parents to full and dutiful submission to children, with parents expecting absolutely nothing in return. Children issued the lawful orders, and parents obeyed them. Parents could not issue orders to their children, and instead pleaded with their children, asking them favors from the bottom of their heart, hoping children would listen to them based on a secure attachment that all parents in biblical times strove for.

Young children usually issued orders by crying. The every cry of a child was seen as law then for a mother to follow, under customary law then. Mothers responded to the every cry of children, cooing and reassuring children with skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance, perhaps swaddling the young child with swaddling blankets next to her bosom when out and about. Older children demanded things from parents, and they weren't always polite about it. Children gave orders for parents to give them what they wanted, and parents had to obey, not questioning the tone of the order. Parents could be put in vulnerable positions due to the authority of their children. One biblical example of the pressure of child authority in Genesis is the story of Lot. Lot was afraid to say "no" to his daughters, and was slain by God for not setting a limit with his daughters (most child sexual abuse in biblical times happened this way).

Customary law in the Early Church involved a parenting manual where parents were convicted into obeying the lawful orders of their children. Among many things, the parenting manual said that parents were worthless unless they served the needs of their children. Only then did parents earn their worth. The point of a parenting manual was to make the parents feel parched and worthless, so that they would serve their children more efficiently to earn their worth.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Terrible twos": How to prevent toddler meltdowns

Many parents have to deal with it, or had to deal with it. Many conventional parents call it the "terrible twos". The legend is that once a child turns age 2, their behavior becomes more and more unhinged. Many times, these "terrible twos" last longer than age 2, until age 6. In biblical times, behaviors such as kicking and screaming on the ground were next to non-existent. Children usually just cried. The difference is due to children getting their attachment needs met from day one.

Part of the solution to the "terrible twos" takes place within the context of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of puntiive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment wss seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Today, you may see it from time to time in the store or the supermarket - a toddler on the ground kicking and screaming. Most parents take this behavior for granted, in a punitive way. Many toddlers are punished for having meltdowns, usually by way of false imprisonment through time-out. This type of behavior in children in biblical times was unheard of. There is a reason why children in Christian homes in the 1st Century did not kick and scream on the ground - mother was always close-by, and was most always naked, allowing for skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Toddlers weren't intended by God to be free range.

Toddlers, in biblical times, were lumped in with babies and were treated as babies. In fact, children were treated as babies up until the age of 6. A 2-year-old in biblical times was glued to the hip of mothers, not kicking and screaming apart from the mother. Sometimes, the child would cry, and usually, that child just wanted to be held, and so mothers would pick up the child. Otherwise, the child instinctively followed mothers wherever she went, feeling safe with her in his/her line of sight. When out and about, mothers swaddled children next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, with mothers breastfeeding in public if the child was milk-hungry. Most children were not weaned until age 3.

The key to toddler success is the mother staying home, and quitting her job, to bond with her child. Women in the Early Church were allowed to work, but they usually didn't. The reason Christian women in the 1st Century did not work was because their children needed them, and they knew it. Usually, the man of the house was the breadwinner, and the woman rested in the care of her husband. Today, it takes two jobs to make ends meet, but the husband could work two jobs. If this is absolutely not feasible, heal the attachment injury from premature separation by engaging in skin-on-skin closeness and warmth immediately when you get home.

The other key to toddler success is treating the toddler like a baby. This means instead of the toddler existing separate from the mother, the toddler should be frequently in the arms of mothers, and breastfed. In biblical times, including the Early Church, children were treated as babies until age 6, with constant closeness to, and sustaining warmth with, mothers. A toddler was given immediate comfort in skin-on-skin format if they started crying, and possibly was offered to suckle the teat of the mother. The average child in biblical times was weaned at age 3, when they pushed away the nipple of the mother. Some children weren't weaned until age 6. 

Due to the close proximity of children in relation to mothers, children didn't have a chance to devolve into kicking and screaming, which is a behavior that shows a lack of attachment. The mother was right there to soothe the child through skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. This meant children got all their attachment needs met, and were at peace with the world. Usually, a 2-year-old would be frequently held in biblical times, like a baby, so they wouldn't have a chance to throw themselves on the ground and kick and scream. Mothers picked up the child right away when the child started to cry. Children up until age 6 were constantly held in swaddling blankets when out and about. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Birth nudity: Why birth nudity is part of the American Christian tradtition

Many parents think that children should wear clothing when in tbe home. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents think that the concept of birth nudity is immodest. The fact of the matter is that the Early Christians practiced birth nudity. Birth nudity, therefore, is a Christian tradition in this country.

The concept of birth nudity exists within the context of the Christian teaching of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Birth nudity is an integral part of Christian attachment parenting. Christian attachment parening is attachment parenting based off of the Early Christian context. Christian mothers in the Early Church, in most all cases, used birth nudity to bond with their children. Mothers went naked in the family home, with children going naked wherever they went. This birth nudity was in place in order to ease the ability of mothers to give children skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Children received skin-on-skin comfort just by being picked up when they cried. 

Mothers, when children cried, cooed and picked up their children, giving them instant skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Children were also allowed to suckle the teat of the mother if milk-hungry. This pacified the crying of the young child to the point of silent crying, and after that, complete calm. The kinds of temper tantrums children have today were next to non-existent in biblical times, and that is because children received the closeness and attachment that they needed from their mothers. Mothers constantly held their babies, and thus young children up until age 6 often needed to be held by their mothers. Children then, sometime after age 6, shook off the closeness of mothers, and played freely on their own.

Birth nudity is the secure rest commanded of parents for children in the New Testament. Mothers never wore any clothing in the family home, and neither did the children, and that setup hastened the bonding process between mother and child. Mothers, when outside of the house, wore a thin, revealing dress similar to an apron, and when going out and about with her children, she tucked the young child underneath her dress, and swaddled the child next to her bosom in swaddling blankets. The Bible is the highest founding document in the land, above even the Constitution itself, and thus Christian attachment parenting, including birth nudity, are part of our Christian tradition as a nation.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Adult attraction to children: Personal responsibility for adults attracted to children

Most of American society wants to prevent child sexual abuse. 1 in 4 girls and 1 in 6 boys will be raped or sexually assaulted before their 18th birthday. Most people blindly blame pedophiles for the sexual abuse of children. The fact of the matter is that every single adult is guilty for the child sexual abuse epidemic, as any adult is capable of sexually abusing a child under the right/wrong conditions.

Every single adult is guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and is deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children and the God that protects them. An adult is deserving of absolutely nothing from children, for every single adult has a depraved and decadent sin nature in relation to children. All adults are capable of the moral crime of child sexual abuse, under the right/wrong conditions. Adults need to gauge under which conditions will they abuse children sexually, and avoid those conditions using righteous avoidance.

In order to become aware of your risk towards children, you need to indulge in masturbatory fantasy about children. If you are averse to finding children attractive, then you are at-risk for sexually abusing a child, and you will do that under the right/wrong conditions, which you are unaware of due to your unwillingness to explore your child fantasies. 

Most child sexual abuse occurs in sexually repressed environments, where the adult perpetrator of sexual abuse is him/herself sexually repressed in relation to children. They were unwilling to explore their child fantasies. When someone like that imprints on a child sexually, they fight back their sexual drives, and keep fighting them back, until they spill over onto the child. If the sex offender chose to masturbate instead of repressing their sexual desires, they wouldn't be in that mess.

Whenever you as an adult get a crush on a child, which could happen, the idea is to face those sexual thoughts about your child crush head on, following those sexual thoughts to end through masturbatory fantasy. Unless you are a pedophile, you should hit a dead end, where the fantasy ceases to be interesting. You'd know if you were a pedophile because adults wouldn't interest you sexually much, as a pedophile is an individual with a primary or exclusive sexual preference for children. Pedophiles are at very low risk for sexually abusing a child because they are constantly reminded of their desires. Therefore, the word "pedophile" is a misnomer that needs to go. The words "pedophile" and "pedophilia" are not medical excuses for abuse of any kind.

The Greek root word denoting lust and inordinate affections in the Bible is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement, and in the case of child sexual abuse, adult sexual entitlement. Adult sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want towards children, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Regarding lust, the sin line isn't at masturbation, but at taking the first steps to approach an attraction figure for sexual or flirtatious reasons. It is a complete myth that masturbation is a sin, and that belief has both kept down pedophiles and enabled child sexual abuse.

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents/adults who defiled themselves next to children through rape or sexual assault will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Separation anxiety: Why this is healthy for children (in the proper age group)

This topic of children's rights is personal to me. Most parents think separation anxiety is a disorder, and is unhealthy in children. I have suppressed traits of a new diagnosis known as adult separation anxiety disorder (ASAD). I am securely attached to my mother now, but have a history of insecure anxious attachment towards my mother, even as an adult. I blame the toxic mixture of attachment parenting and punitive parenting for my clingy attitude towards my mother - I was raised in a punitive authoritative home, meaning a mixture of warm and cold memories. Today, I simply am motivated to plan for being independent from my mother, which is a trait of secure attachment. Separation anxiety is a healthy aspect of child development, but only during a certain window in terms of age. 

Separation anxiety is part of the process of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of the submission of children. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemmng from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Separation anxiety was something commonplace in the Early Christian church communities, among children aged up until age 6. This is why children up until age 6 were usually either glued to the hip of their mothers, or else swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mothers and children were naked next to each other, with this making it easier for mothers to give their children skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. All of this sustaining closeness and warmth brought out the separation anxiety in children. When mothers walked out of sight of the child in the family home, she'd immediately regret it, because her child would be crying. 

Separation anxiety is what causes closeness between mothers and children in children under age 6. When the child cries out for his/her mother, that child is expressing a fear of harm befalling their mother, and so the mother has to reassure her presence by picking up the child. Birth nudity is recommeded for this process of bonding, as it allows raw bonding between mother and child. 

Separation anxiety actually motivates independence in older children. In biblical times, children older than age 6 usually shook off the sustaining warmth of mothers, and played freely outside, venturing farther and farther from home. This is because separation anxiety is preparing them for a critical turning point in their life - the death of a parent caregiver. Separation anxiety, for an older child or teenager, should be that voice in their head saying "mom and dad won't be around forever, so prepare for them being gone and plan to move out". 

Separation anxiety only leads to independence in older children, teens, and young adults when it is suppressed, usually by a non-entitled conditioning. When you mix attachment parenting warmth with pro-spanking coldness, you get a clingy, wimpy Millennial who won't leave their parents' roof. That, in and of itself, is a form of adult separation anxiety.

I myself have a long history of separation anxiety, which wasn't officially diagnosed because it could be lumped into my autism. Currently, it is suppressed as a reminder that my mother won't always be around, and so I have to work on independence skills. Currently, I live with my mother, but if I had to live somewhere else, I'd manage, perhaps by trial and error, to fend for myself. It would just be lonely. This attachment that I describe is a secure attachment. My attachment to my mother before that was an insecure anxious attachment, which is a sign of parent trauma in an individual with autism. I didn't even sleep in my own bed until I was 16. If I wasn't punished, my development wouldn't have been so stunted. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!