Time-in: Mammary closeness to soothe crying and upset in children

Many parents still support punishing children. One way to punish children is with a time-out, which sometimes comes with spanking or other forms of corporal punishment. Time-out and spanking usually go hand in hand in the modern home. Most parents use both, meaning time-out in conjunction with spanking and other forms of corporal punishment. The fact of the matter is that not only is punitive parenting harmful, but it is unlawful under the codified law that is the Bible.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: as this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like a gosling to a mother goose. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment or a child. 

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside of the home, and otherwise, went in the nude in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them both nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Mothers comforted their children using a special form of time-in known as mammary closeness, where mothers held their children close to their bare bosom, in skin-on-skin comfort. When out and about, mothers held their children against them using swaddling blankets, with children being in constant closeness with their mothers, comforting them when they did cry...This context is applicable today just as it was in the days of old, albeit with some tweaking.

How does a mother replicate the abovementioned context? The idea is that, when your child cries, then you disrobe, perhaps to the level of underwear, but preferably all the way, then inviting the crying or upset child to throw off the clothing. Then, hold your child next to your bosom. This should alleviate crying within 1-2 minutes, and then you can talk to your child about what went wrong. When out and about, you can find swaddling blankets for children up until age 6, and you can use these swaddling blankets to hold your child close to your bosom area. With older children, you can take them to the ladies' room, and slip them underneath your shirt, perhaps taking off your bra.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child punishment: Why God's Law prohibits all forms of punitive parenting

Many parents think that it is acceptable to punish a child. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents support the idea of striking or punishing a child, or else subjecting a child to other forms of punitive parenting. The fact of the matter is that God's Law is above the law of the land, and prohibits all forms of punitive parenting, including corporal punishment of children.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement, including parental entitlement, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. It is good not to want anything in life, including in relation to children. But, since we all want something from children, it is good to ask politely and appropriately for what you want from them, accepting when they can't or won't give you what you want them. Want is the core of our sinful nature, and wants from children is at the core of our wants. We all as adults, for wanting things from children, are depraved and decadent sinners, who are deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else. Deadly entitlement is want, imposed. Deadly parental entitlement is imposed want on children. Once this imposed want leads to offense taken by the child, it constitutes child abuse. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by the child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by the child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statue prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

The way the abovementioned moral statute was applied in the Early Church was that parents were liable for the slightest of personal offense perceived by their child. That meant things such as crying and upset, which had to be accompanied by the adult with comfort and sustenance, and possibly breastfeeding for very young children. Attachment parenting was the mode of parenting in biblical times for parents, meaning children received nourishment and sustenance from their mothers, meaning breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. All of this refers back to the commandment not to provoke your children to anger, meaning simply refusing to comfort your child, preferably with sustaining warmth, is a form of child abuse under Divine Codified Jurisprudence.

How does a parent or other adult stop themselves from punishing a child? Child punishment comes from parent anger. Parent anger comes from a deserving attitude towards children. The idea is to flip that attitude upside down, and come to the conviction that you are a depraved and decadent sinner/adult, who is deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else, thereby turning the parent anger in the parent inward facing. Taking this attitude makes you feel worthless, and so you earn your worth by being dutifully and selflessly submissive to your child, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

Here in Pennsylvania, child punishment is usually protected by way of the "reasonable chastisement" defense. An unjust law is no law at all. That law that allows for parents to strike and punish their children is offensive to me to the point of non-existence. I hate that sort of thing more than anything else, and I mean it. The child abuse definitions, as we have them today, are too complex. The secular law should simply criminalize anything that the child perceives as abuse. That would make parents treat children with the reverent respect that they deserve.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Original sin: Understanding parental entitlement (and how to avoid it)

The doctrine of original sin is the most misused and misunderstood teachings in the Bible. However, original sin is the backbone of Christianity. Without original sin, there would be no Christ. What is sin? Entitlement. What is the lowest level of entitlement in our entitlements? Parental entitlement. Any entitlement coming from an adult towards a child is parental entitlement.

It says in Romans 3:9-18 KJV:

What then? are we better than they? No, in no wise: for we have before proved both Jews and Gentiles, that they are all under sin; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one: There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. They are all gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is none that doeth good, no, not one. Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips: Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness: Their feet are swift to shed blood: Destruction and misery are in their ways: And the way of peace have they not known: There is no fear of God before their eyes.

This passage was written by the Apostle Paul to the Roman Christians in the 1st Century. The Roman Christians were becoming prideful and boastful in their practice of Christianity, and so Paul here was convicting them of their original sin. All of these enumerated qualities stated about the Roman pagans were also true about the Roman Christians. So the Roman Christians didn't fear God? Paul sure put the fear of God into them. Today, this passage can be understood as how God feels about humanity, as the insults in this passage refer to a man's sinful nature. God hates all mankind, as, by default, all of mankind is marked for deletion, with only a few of us - the elect - are marked for salvation. The rest will suffer the second death, which is the lake of fire and burning sulfur prepared for Satan and his accomplices. God hates mankind especially due to the one-sided incursion on child-kind by adult-kind. All adults are guilty in relation to children and the God that protects them, and are deserving of absolutely nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing as adults in relation to children. All adults are deserving of everything coming to them, bad or good, but especially bad, for adult-kind has turned their back against God for wronging child-kind. 

The Greek root word denoting entitlement in the New Testament, including parental entitlement, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, want, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, entitlement is the slightest of unattainable want. When this want is imposed on children by adults, it is parental entitlement. Parental entitlement stems from any wants or expectations imposed upon children, meaning in order to avoid parental entitlement, one needs to avoid wants and expectations from children.

Parental entitlement can be understood under a neurological lens as well. A parent, in the brain, consists of a thread encased by an encasement. In any parent, the thread itself is the entitlement, and we all have threads in our parents that we hold. The goal is to depress the threads that we have in our parents entirely. This requires the parent, meaning the person, to find fault in that thread enough to turn it inwards. This can be done by declaring yourself a depraved and decadent sinner deserving of absolutely nothing, not even from your children. Most entitlement, period, comes from a deserving place, and so the idea is to flip that deserving attitude upside down, and so that your child is deserving of good things, and you are not. This attitude adjustment, alone, depresses the parental thread so that it does not come out to control the child.

Every parental thread is made up differently. Most of the time, parents have a complex of threads that all need to be depressed, no matter what. My parental thread is purely sexual, and only towards a certain age group - yes, I am a pedophile. I struggle with adult sexual entitlement, which is a sexual thread going towards the child. I depress the thread by reminding myself of the otherworldly consequences of approaching young girls for sexual or flirtatious purposes. Under my Christian beliefs, the moment you take the first steps to approach a young girl, the moment you condemn yourself to eternity in Hell. I am so afraid of burning in Hell that I just don't go there with them anymore. The most common entitlement problem in America is parent anger, which can be dealt with similarly - if you fear burning in Hell just for getting angry with your child, and also know that you are deserving of absolutely nothing from your child, you won't get angry with them. We call this aversion imagery.

Parental entitlement is the cause of 100% of all child abuse and neglect in America and worldwide. Thus, all child abuse comes from the same entitled place. We all as adults have that entitled place within us. Thus, we need to control ourselves by depressing that valve that causes us to want to control and dominate children. 

The parent entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Total submission to children: Why to submit to children as one would God

Many parents think they love their children, but seem to only mean in terms of affection. This is a common attitude towards children by American parents. Most American parents actually don't love their children, as per the Christian definition of love. Love is submission, and submission is love. We as adults are to fully and dutifully submit to children as we would God.

It says in Matthew 22:35-40 KJV:

Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and all thy soul, and all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

The Greek root word translated "love" in this passage is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to, in the context of parenting, prioritizing children first, and yourself last, to the point of dutiful and selfless submission to children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, valuing children as extensions of God. True Love does not come from pride or desire, but instead a place of fearful conviction, where parents come to the conviction that they are a depraved and decadent sinner, who is deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else. This leads to the sinner/parent being prompted to pay due penance, and then give to children without receiving anything in return.

Parents are to love their children. This means that parents are to be submissive to their children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, valuing children as extensions of God. Children in biblical times were seen as extensions of God, meaning instruments of God called to judge righteously the level of charity in any given adult, at any given time, in any given place, reporting straight to God. Children were seen as deities of their own, being representative of God. Children in biblical times were seen as little gods and goddesses reigning over their parents, striking reverent fear and terror into them, prompting parents to submit to children in order to win them over.

Parents in biblical times were submissive to children, bowing down before their deity, with that deity reigning over them, striking reverent fear and terror into adults. This created a mutual submission relationship where parents submitted to children, righteously enslaved as bondservants to their children, working with their children for a lump sum. This mutual submission relationship is further described in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishment or controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen then as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of children.

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing when outside the home, otherwise going in the nude, in order to serve their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. By day, children in biblical times ranged next to mothers, sometimes clinging to her. When children cried and got upset at home, mothers co-snuggled with children, placing children on their bare bosom in mammary closeness. When out and about, children up until age 6 were wrapped up next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, in mammary closeness. By night, mothers co-slept next to their children, guarding them from all predators external and domestic. Fathers also formed a secure attachment with children by way of witnessing mother-child closeness. Fathers usually developed a sexual attachment to their children, which they used to imprint on their children. Fathers were instructed by church authorities to follow their sexual thoughts about their children to the end using masturbatory fantasy. Actual child sexual abuse, in biblical times, was rare next to non-existent, but all sex with children was seen as deserving of death, even in the New Testament, where Christ abolished the death penalty.

Parents are to be fully submissive to children, just as they are to be fully submissive to God. Parents in biblical times loved their children, and did so by way of full and dutiful submission to children, just as you would God. Children were seen then as the neighbor of their parents, in a vulnerable yet convicting way. Submission, in the biblical context, means to serve children selflessly, giving without receiving. All those who submit to children become non-entitled at the lowest level, and only the fully non-entitled will inherit the Kingdom of God, as well as those who strive for that goal. Parental entitlement is the lowest level of entitlement in our entitlements - and love is the answer to that entitlement as well!

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Religious child abuse of pedophilic children: Understanding the source of the hysteria

Many people these days are supportive of pedophiles. The most vocal people in the pro-pedophile community focus on the rights of abusers with the pedophilia diagnosis. However, the most oppressed of all pedophiles are still children. The start of pedophile hysteria is not with children's rights, but specific religious teachings that are both false and abusive. 

What is pedophilia? It is a myth that all pedophiles are narcissists. Pedophilia is a form of immature autism, where the age-oriented sexual preferences of the individual with autism reflect their developmental level, meaning pedophilia is a form of sexual immaturity associated with developmental disorders such as autism. Most of the time, the pedophile has a form of autism that is child-centered in nature, with the pedophile having an autistic specialty in children in terms of knowledge and social skills. Most individuals with autism find children to be annoying. When someone with autism is absolutely content and happy around children, think pedophile. Most pedophiles have moderate-severe autism, and most have caregivers that keep them from representing themselves in pro-pedophile organizations. The disorder is most apparent, in most cases, in the pedophile's mid-teens. Most pedophiles are not people to be afraid of at all.

The prejudicial hysteria against pedophiles, contrary to popular belief, does not come from the children's rights movement. It comes from a group of abusive religious parents, and, at a lower level in the home, false and abusive religious doctrine that pedophilic children should not be sexually fantasizing about who they are attracted to. The main verse you can use to understand this hysteria is Matthew 5:27-28 KJV:  

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But, I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her already in his heart. 

The Greek root word translated "lust" is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, or even to sexual desire towards children. The word instead refers to, in the case of pedophilia, adult sexual entitlement, which is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want from children, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Christ was talking about a specific type of like, meaning the "you're mine" look that leads to approaching a woman in order to take her, as was the problem them in terms of sex crimes.

The prejudicial hysteria against pedophiles comes from false and abusive religious doctrine passed as "Christian" that insists that pedophilia, in and of itself, is a sin to admit to. The prejudicial hysteria against pedophiles is a form of mental health stigma of the admit variety. In the old days, the first person to admit to being a pedophile in a conversation was the pedophile, and then they were a complete outcast. Admitting to pedophilia for mental health treatment purposes was out of the question then.

The hysteria actually creates the environment where false pedophiles can identify. Before the children's rights focus on pedophiles, the only people you saw identifying as pedophiles were criminals. The rest of the pedophiles were too afraid to admit their condition, to anyone. Thus, society long has had a skewed idea of what, or rather, who, a pedophile really is. Most people think pedophiles are narcissists, and that is because only narcissists are reckless enough to identify as pedophiles out in the open. However, most pedophiles simply have a form of immature autism that comes with sexual immaturity.

Most pedophiles internalize the mental health stigma against admitting to pedophilia as a religious stigma coming from the sexual shaming abuse committed by abusive parents. Most parents intuitively know that their child is predestined to become a pedophile, and then they double down and punish the child for engaging in masturbatory fantasy about children. Usually, this type of abuse of pedophiles comes in the form of corporal punishment of the child. In extreme cases, pedophilic children were sexually abused in the form of corrective rape to "cure the pedophile". Most pedophilic children fit a profile that attracts abusers of all kinds to exploit the pedophilic child. Thus, the prejudices against both children and pedophiles clearly intersect. Most pedophiles have "sexual shaming" trauma, usually alongside a "parent" trauma. Pedophiles deal with trauma in the form of low-level anger. More often than not, pedophilic children were abused just for being pedophiles.

Most pedophiles would be a lot more mentally healthy if they had someone to talk to. I myself am content as a pedophile with life, and that is because I have a support system to fall back on. I have a therapist that I can talk to, and I have a mother who I can talk to most any time of the day (except when she is at work). Most pedophiles don't have what I have. The sexual shaming trauma from being abused by parents, just because you are a pedophile, must be the most isolating of traumas to have. From what I understand, it is usually in the form of balled up anger.

The depraved and decadent, defiled sexual abusers of pedophilic children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Love children: Why to love your child

Many parents say that they love their children, but only when defending themselves from allegations of child abuse. Many parents claim to love their children, yet few in America actually do. Most parents, in practice, actually hate their children. Children are not deserving of simply a mixture of affection and punishment. Parents are to be submissive to children. Love is submission, and submission is love.

Love is a commandment for parents towards their children. It says in Matthew 22:35-40 KJV:

Then one of them, which was a lawyer, asked him a question, tempting him, and saying, Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus said unto him, Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and all thy soul, and all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.

The Greek root word translated "love" in this passage is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to, in the context of parenting, prioritizing children first, and yourself last, as a parent, to the point of dutiful and selfless submission, expecting absolutely nothing in return, valuing children as extensions of God. True Love for children does not come from pride or desire, but from fearful conviction, where parents are convicted of the fact that they are depraved and decadent sinners, who are deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else. This leads to the sinner/parent being prompted to pay due penance to their neighbor/child by way of serving them selflessly. Children were seen as your neighbor then, and an extension of God at that.

Parents are to be submissive to children, and are to surrender to them as they would God. In practice, this relationship works as a mutual submission relationship between parent-child. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating a child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Parents are to love their children. This means that parents are to be submissive to children, just as they are to God. Children were seen in biblical times as extensions of God, because of their vulnerability, not despite it. Children were seen as instruments of God, meaning sentries of God called to scope out which adults were charitable and which adults weren't, towards children, and towards everyone poor and vulnerable by extension. Children were believed to report straight to God about how they were treated. Children were treated as deities of their own, that were representative of God. Children were seen then as gods and goddesses reigning over parents, with parents seeking to win favor with them. Parents feared reverently the wrath of their children, tears and all, and sought to appease that wrath in children. 

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. By day, children ranged next to mothers, sometimes clinging to her. When out and about, children up until age 6 were wrapped up against the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. By night, children co-slept next to mothers, with mothers guarding them against all predators, both external and domestic. Fathers also formed a secure attachment to children, by way of witnessing mother-child bonding. Fatherly secure attachment comes in the form of sexual attachment, usually towards daughters, and usually in a connotational manner. Fathers then followed their sexual thoughts about their children to the end using masturbatory fantasy. Actual child sexual abuse, in biblical times, was rare next to non-existent. Any sex with children was seen in Ancient Jewish society, including the Early Church, as deserving of death.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Teaching children discipline: How to teach children how to be strict with themselves (without spanking or punishment)

Many people think that they need to teach children discipline, and that they need to do so by way of punishing children with things such as spanking, time-out, loss of privileges, or grounding. Most American parents think that you need to punish or be controlling with a child in order to discipline them. The fact of the matter is that children discipline themselves. They just need to be allowed to chasten themselves up in the Lord. 

It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with a promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in the Lord, following parents around like goslings to a mother goose. The Greek root word translated "honor" is τιμαό (Latin: timao) and refers to valuing at a price, meaning parents were bondservants to their children, to be valued at a price, and they had to earn their worth in terms of that price. Parents were seen in biblical times as bondservants working with their children for a lump sum, which was independence in their child.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children too many times. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen then as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents for bringing their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the Christian church. Paul, contrary to popular belief, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Discipline is necessary in parenting, but children can teach themselves discipline. But, they need the example of a parent. The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to non-entitlement to the level of undeservingness. The Christian standard of discipline and chastisement is coming to the conviction that you are a depraved and decadent sinner deserving of absolutely nothing, and thus should be grateful for absolutely everything, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Discipline didn't mean punishment then, but instead using a disciplined example in a parent to encourage self-discipline in children. Discipline, in terms of hard lessons, is for the parent, and then for the child to follow suit in the parent's footsteps.

Discipline had to be backed up by something. Punitive parenting such as spanking and other forms of punishment only drive children away from discipline. Attachment parenting is the only way in backing up a chastened up example. Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, otherwise going in the nude, in order to serve their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. The core aspect of Christian attachment parenting in the 1st Century was skin-on-skin co-sleeping, with mother and child fast asleep next to each other in the nude, with children soaking up the rays of skin-to-skin. Fathers witnessed the skin-on-skin co-sleeping, and developed a secure attachment with their child. Most of the time, the secure attachment between father and child came in the form of a sexual attachment, with this sexual attachment usually being felt towards daughters, and in a connotational way. Fathers were instructed by church authorities to follow their sexual thoughts about their child to the end using masturbatory fantasy. Actual child sexual abuse was rare next to non-existent in biblical times, but when it did happen, it was seen as a crime deserving of death, even in the New Testament, where Christ abolished the death penalty.

Attachment parenting works in a special way to motivate children to learn discipline on their own, and chasten themselves up. Children, in an attachment parenting home, want to be like their parents. They then do the work in order to be like their parents, centering themselves using the exact same thought processes and convictions that their parents came to. Children then chasten themselves up in the example of their parents. There is no need to force children to be disciplined, because children naturally become chastened up and disciplined on their own, as long as their parents are chastened up and disciplined. Children naturally absorb the behaviors of their parents, and copy those behaviors, whatever they are, and if those behaviors are disciplined and chastened up in nature, they will copy those behaviors.

Children won't be disciplined right away, but by the time they are young adults, you can count on them being disciplined and chastened up. If they aren't, you can blame any developmental disorder or other mental health disorder that they might have, such as autism, ADHD, or bipolar disorder. In the case where they do have a mental health disorder of some kind, cut your child some slack, as they may never get to a level of discipline that you would like them to be at, and you just need to accept that.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

 

Judeo-Christian family values: How to teach them to your children (without spanking or punishment)

Many parents want to teach their children Judeo-Christian family values. The majority of American parents want to teach their children Judeo-Christian values. It is a myth that Judeo-Christian family values can only be taught using punitive parenting. The fact of the matter is that attachment parenting can be used to teach any values system, including the Judeo-Christian values system.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement in the New Testament, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, want, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, entitlement refers to the slightest of unattainable want. If you want anything that will lead to a temper tantrum upon hearing the word "no", don't want it, and avoid that want at all costs. Entitlement, in most all cases, comes from a deserving attitude, where you take the attitude that you deserve things in life, enough to make a demand. The idea is to flip over that attitude, and take an undeserving attitude towards everyone in life. An entitled person sets expectations for everyone and everything in their lives, and when things don't go their way, they are sorely disappointed and throw a hissy fit. Children are watching. Children learn from what they see in adults. So, curb that entitlement in relation to children. This also means avoid parental entitlement, meaning entitlement from children.

Children need a good Judeo-Christian example in their lives. However, an example alone is not going to cut it. Children need something to back up their parents' example, and it isn't punitive parenting. Punishment of any kind does not back up a non-entitled Christian example, but instead drives children far away from the faith. Attachment parenting is the only way to impart Judeo-Christian values to children. Attachment parenting gives children a safe place to absorb and internalize Judeo-Christian values. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishment or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, otherwise going in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. By day, children ranged next to mothers when in the home. When out and about, mothers wrapped up their young children (under age 6) to their bosom in swaddling blankets, perhaps allowing them to breastfeed. By night, mothers co-slept next to their children, in skin-on-skin format, allowing very young children to breastfeed throughout the night. Fathers also formed a secure attachment to children, by witnessing the mother-child bond. Most of the time, this secure attachment from fathers came in the form of a sexual attachment, where the father used connotational sexual attraction to imprint onto the child. Most fathers dealt with sexual self-entitlement by purging the unrequited lusts using masturbation. Actual child sexual abuse then was rare next to non-existent, but when it did happen, the offender was seen as deserving of death, even in the New Testament, where Christ abolished the death penalty. 

Attachment parenting helps win over children to the values of their parents. Punishment is clearly unnecessary to teach children good Judeo-Christian values. Attachment parenting gives children a safe place to absorb and internalize Judeo-Christian values at their own pace. When a parent raises children the attachment parenting way, children end up wanting to be like their parents. They then do the hard work necessary to follow in the footsteps of their parents. Most children will not fully master Judeo-Christian values until they are teenagers or young adults. Attachment parenting is the most time-honored and time-tested way of parenting, dating back to prehistoric times.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child punishment: Why punitive parenting violates the unwritten law of the land

Many parents think that it is acceptable to punish or be controlling with a child. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents support punishing or being controlling with children. This punitive parenting can come in many forms, including spanking, time-out, loss of privileges, grounding, or other forms of aversive, punitive treatment of children. The fact of the matter is that this form of treatment of children is considered child abuse under Christian law. Christian law should be the law of the land.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement, including parental entitlement, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, it refers to wanting things from children, period. It is good not to want anything in life, including from children. But, since we all want things from children as depraved and decadent adults, we need to ask politely and appropriately for what we want from children, and accept when children can't or won't give us what we want from them. Want is at the very core of our sinful nature, and wants from children is at the very core of our wants as depraved and decadent adults. Deadly entitlement is defined as want, imposed. When this imposed want leads to a child taking offense and/or suffering damages from the entitlement, it constitutes child abuse. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishment or controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time...

...Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. 

What can parents do in order to curb their parent anger, and not punish their children? The hourglass method works just fine. Simply find fault in your parent anger, knowing that it is immoral and perjorious to get angry with children - children could do no wrong, according to the righteous judgment of the Early Christian church communities. Then, declare yourself a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else. This turns the anger inwards. Without exception, parent anger comes from a deserving attitude towards children. The idea is to flip that attitude around and take an undeserving attitude towards children. You are not entitled to respect from anyone if you haven't earned it, and children are no different. Over time, the parent anger will percolate, and then dissolve, until you are left with no parent anger. You will still be able to set limits, but only out of genuine concern for the child. Anger is not genuine concern, but is a form of entitlement. Any time you try to control another human being, including a child, it becomes entitlement. Parents should only be angry when protecting their children from an interloper. 

When punitive parenting comes out as sexual punishment, know that you have unmet sexual needs. Simply turn the plank inwards, and follow that sexual thought to the end in masturbatory fantasy. Then, tar yourself as Hell-bound in the case that you approach that child for the same lascivious reason. I myself am a pedophile, and I keep safe by masturbating pretty much daily for health reasons, meaning mental health reasons pertaining to child safety. I am in total control of my sexual actions, and can simply choose not to sexually abuse a child. Lust in the Bible is denoted by the Greek root word επιθυμέω (Latin: epithmeo), and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement, meaning, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Thus, the actual moral crime in relation isn't looking out of sexual desire at a child, but looking with the gutteral desire to approach a child for sexual or flirtatious reasons. 

The depraved and decadent parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torrents, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Christian attachment parenting: Upholding the Christian tradition of attachment parenting

Many parents think that punitive parenting such as spanking and other forms of punishment are part of our traditions as a country. It is a common belief amongst American parents that punitive parenting is a tradition that needs to be preserved. The fact of the matter is that the Bible is America's book, and the Bible says, in context, that attachment parenting is the only way to raise children in a Christian manner.

Most anti-spanking advocates are for secularizing America, in order to universalize their religious traumas. I myself am a Christian dominionist. God cast a dominion over all of America, with the Bible as codified law issuing a warning to all evildoers, which is all of mankind. Only a few will heed the warning. Part of that warning, contrary to popular belief, is that attachment parenting should be the law and custom of the land. Attachment parenting was the parenting of the ancients, including the Ancient Jews and Early Christians. The Bible is America's book, with God being King of this country, and with the Bible being codified law. That codified law, in context, commands attachment parenting.

The concept of Christian attachment parenting is based on the doctrine of mutual submission. Parents are to dutifully and selflessly submit to children as they would God, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishment or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen then as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Parents were submissive to children in biblical times. Then, children were regarded as extensions of God, meaning installments of God called to judge righteously the level of charity that parents or adults have towards them and other vulnerable people. Children, as individuals, were seen as deities of of their own, being representative of God in part, and with children as a collective being seen as a collective Godhead. Children were seen as gods and goddesses reigning over their parents, with parents being submissive to them as they would be submissive to God, seeking to win over the deity that was their child. Children were prized for being bold and rebellious, not when they were being "nice". 

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing when outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. The core aspect of Christian attachment parenting, in the 1st Century, was skin-on-skin co-sleeping, with mother and child fast asleep in the nude, and with children soaking up skin-to-skin contact with mothers. By day, children ranged beside mothers, sometimes clinging to her. When out and about, and when children were age 6 and under, mothers wrapped up their children close to their bosom in swaddling blankets, keeping the child nice and cozy warm. Children went naked in biblical times for a specific reason - so that mothers could scoop them up and snuggle them, maybe allowing them to breastfeed, when they were upset. Fathers also formed a secure attachment to children, and did so by witnessing mother-child closeness. Usually, fathers form a sexual attachment to their children, usually daughters, with fathers using connotational sexual attraction to his own children in order to imprint on them. Fathers dealt with these unrequited lusts by purging them in masturbatory fantasy. Actual child sexual abuse was rare next to non-existent in biblical times, but when it did happen, it was seen as deserving of death, even in the New Testament, where the death penalty was abolished by Jesus Christ.

Attachment parenting has been the default choice of parenting for mothers especially since time immemorial. Attachment parenting, including of the Christian sort, is the most time-honored and time-tested of parenting systems, starting in the very beginning of our evolutionary history. Since time immemorial, mothers have been allowing even older children to breastfeed, holding naked children against their bare skin as a form of closeness and bonding. Attachment parenting is strongly engrained into our evolutionary nature, and in the case of skin-to-skin contact, there are nerve endings on both the body of the child and the mother coming together and creating traction and comfort. Children's bodies are designed to be scooped up and held to the warmth and comfort of their mother's bosom.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Honor your parents: Understanding the Fifth Commandment in context

Many parents think they are entitled to being honored and respected. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents demand their respect from their parents. However, parents aren't deserving of blind obedience or respect. The fact of the matter is that the Fifth Commandment refers to specific moral offenses committed by ADULT children.

It says in Exodus 20:12 KJV:

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 

This commandment was understood in context not as prohibiting small moral offenses such as talking back, but prohibiting a specific set of moral crimes in what is known as the parent protection laws. "Do not strike your parents" meant do not repeatedly beat them. "Do not curse your parents" meant do not administer a gaslighting curse onto them, meaning do not subject your parents to airborne gaslighting. Elder abuse was a problem in Ancient Israel, and one that broader Jewish society blamed the victim for, asking intrusive questions such as "Where did they learn that behavior from?". God took the side of the parents, no matter how abusive, in those instances. Simply opposing parents was understandable, but one had to do it through the Law, meaning moral shunning. Simply getting revenge at abusive parents was not a plausible excuse for committing honor offenses against parents. Honor offenses included anything that dishonors the person, including counts such as striking and injuring your enemy, which was actually illegal under the Law. It was a civil offense in most cases, but in the case of parents, it was criminal. Dishonoring parents, in biblical times, wasn't "talking back" to parents or even unforgiveness towards parents, but was visualized as a young adult beating up on their aging parents. Minor children and adult children living with parents were seen by the Law as being incapable of committing any moral crime against parents, even if they literally committed acts against parents that were defined as unlawful. 

The Fifth Commandment is repeated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest safely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Parents were submissive to children in biblical times. Then, children were seen as extensions of God to submit to, meaning installments of God that grade parents and other adults on how charitable they were towards children and other vulnerable members of society. Children, as individuals, in biblical times, were seen as deities of their own, that were representative of God in some way, with children as a collective being a collective Godhead, in a way that was seen as sobering and convicting. Children were pampered as little gods and goddesses that reigned over their parents, with parents being submissive to them, seeking to win over the deity that was their child. Children were prized when they were bold and rebellious, not when they were "nice" to everyone. Fathers, of course, worshipped their daughters (usually, but with sons sometimes being picked instead) as goddesses of sexuality, by having masturbatory fantasies about them. Parent attraction was common for fathers then, due to the egalitarian nature of the parenting then.

Ultimately, Ancient Jewish culture, including the Early Church, was an attachment parenting society. Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served their children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. The core aspect of Christian attachment parenting, in the 1st Century, was skin-on-skin co-sleeping, with mother and child fast asleep in the nude, and with children soaking up the rays of skin-to-skin contact with mothers. This intense physical closeness to mothers helps build a secure attachment, where children will respect you, and come to you about all their problems, instead of running to their friends. Fathers who stand by and calmly witness this mother-child bonding also bond with their children. Usually, this bonding comes in the form of sexual attachment, in which case the father should follow the sexual thoughts to the end through masturbatory fantasy, as was the recommendation in the Early Church.

The Fifth Commandment, in reality, only sets up parent headship. The conditions of parental headship is that parents be caregivers to their children, and provide for them their every vulnerable need, being submissive to them as they would God. Children are extensions of God, and parents serve that extension. Mothers are to nurture their children up close, and fathers from afar. Children in biblical times were feared and revered for their vulnerability, not despite it, and so parents gave up when their children demanded things from them, and gave in to those demands. Children were never forced into unquestioning obedience in biblical times.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"You will eat everything on your plate": Why never to make a child eat everything on their plate

Many parents will, throughout their Christmas Day festivities, come to the same combination of words - "You will eat everything on your plate". This is a common attitude parents take towards their children. They are expecting gratitude from their children in what was put in front of them, and they want their children to show them that gratitude. However, it is a very harmful lesson to ram into your child.

First, the health warning to making your child eat everything on their plate. If you force a child to eat everything on their plate, they will grow up to be an overeater. When a child pushes away their plate, just like with an adult, that means they are full, and their little bodies can't handle any more food. This is basic health science here. The more you eat, the more you get used to eating, and the less you listen to your instincts that tell you that you are full. I am glad my parents never did this to me. I can easily tell when I am full - it is when I lose interest in the food. 

What is gratitude? In order to understand what true gratitude is, you need to know and experience Christian love. The Greek root word denoting Christian love in the New Testament is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to, in the context of parenting, prioritizing children first, and yourself as a parent last, to the point of dutiful and selfless submission to children as one would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return. True Love does not come from pride or desire, but instead a place of fearful conviction, where parents are convicted that they are a depraved and decadent sinner, who is deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else. This leads to parents/sinners paying due penance for their wicked sin nature by way of serving the every vulnerable need of their children. 

"Expecting absolutely nothing in return" implies expecting absolutely nothing at all, from anyone. Gratitude comes from lack of expectations due to being in love (the right way). It is not a teaching that can easily be beaten into children. Children need to internalize through the atmosphere what gratitude is, by way of watching the grateful example of their parents and other children.

A grateful example, however, has to be backed up by something. Punitive parenting only leads to resentment of parents, even if they do go the way you want them to. Attachment parenting is the only way. Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. The core aspect of Christian attachment parenting in the 1st Century was skin-on-skin co-sleeping, with mother and child sleeping next to each other in the nude, and with children soaking up the rays of skin-to-skin contact with mothers. Fathers also form a secure attachment by witnessing mother-child bonding. Fathers usually had a sexual attachment to their children, usually with daughters. Fathers usually dealt with these unrequited lusts by purging them with masturbatory fantasy.

When children are given an attachment parenting upbringing, they want to be like parents. Thus, it is the responsibility of the parent to discipline themselves and chasten themselves up in the Lord. This can be done using the hourglass method, meaning finding fault in one part of your parenting - a good place to start is either parent anger or parent attraction. Then, declare yourself a depraved and decadent sinner based on this realization, knowing that you are deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else, due to this realization. At first, you feel awful, but then you understand why you feel awful - you need to earn your worth, as worth does not come for free. You then find yourself giving to your children, without expecting or demanding anything in return. As soon as you start helping and serving others, you start to feel good about yourself. You, at the same time, start to notice everything around you, and give thanks to the Lord for everything around you, as you surely know God could roll everything back if He wanted to.

Children naturally come to the same thought patterns as their parents. Punishment of any kind breaks this bond that allows children to follow the example of their parents. Thus, children can be disciplined by allowing them to discipline themselves. In an attachment parenting environment, this happens on its own, and children absorb and internalize the values system of their parents, and this values system can be Judeo-Christian values. See Ephesians 6:4 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to Christian discipline, or non-entitlement to the level of undeservingness. In the original context of this verse, this would have been surely understood as being a chastened up example for your children. The chastening of the Lord is the Christian attitude that one is a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, and thus is to be grateful for absolutely everything, leading to the parent being a chastened up example for their children. This example was to be backed up by attachment parenting.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by the child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and was understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

The best way you can teach your child to clean their plate is to clean your plate yourself, and be grateful in doing so. When you acquire Christian gratitude, you naturally want to eat as much as you can, in order to impress your host. I myself was before an undereater due to my autism, meaning I stopped eating before I was fully nourished. Now, I have an initiative to eat - the other person. Children will pick up this attitude from you naturally, through the atmosphere. Gratitude is not a lesson to beat into children, as when you are in fear of punishment, you aren't really showing gratitude, but instead are playing show and tell. In order to be truly grateful, you need to take an undeserving attitude towards life, including towards children. When you aren't imposing expectations on others, you turn out naturally grateful. When you are naturally grateful, you want to please others, and part of this is wanting to clean your plate on your own, without having anyone tell you to clean your plate.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Merry Christmas

Have a Merry Christmas, from my family to yours. Christ is born on this day. Happy birthday Jesus!

Autism and attachment parenting: Why autism parenting meets the needs of all children

Many parents these days are finding out that at least one of their children have a diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder. Autism spectrum disorder comes from an extreme male brain, even in females, where normal human traits come in extremes. Autism is a cluster of genetic traits that can be arranged in any combination, and in any order. Most parents are easy on their autistic children because they think their autistic child "needs a break". The fact of the matter is that the parenting children with autism need is not radically different than typically developing children. Christian attachment parenting is what ALL children need. 

Autistic children and care-dependent adults, like all other children without autism, need a mutual submission setup, where the parent bears the burden of proof and submits to the needs of children as they would God, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of such submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers are to rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments and controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

A common trait of autism is staggered development, meaning this is the central trait of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Most children at their developmental level, therefore, need the same kind of treatment. It is common knowledge that a child with autism needs a stable relationship with their parents or else a competent caregiver. However, this is the same thing as what we call a secure attachment in attachment parenting. It is especially crucial for autistic children to have a secure attachment with at least one parent, usually the mother (as mothers are primary caregivers of children).

Throughout history, attachment parenting was used as a means of winning children over to parents. In biblical times, this was no different. Mothers especially in biblical times provided for their children nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin closeness. Some children in biblical times did not like physical closeness with their parents. They were regarded as stand-beside-me children, and were regarded as the highest of the high in the Kingdom of God. Most children were deified to a certain level in biblical times, with children being seen as little gods and goddesses reigning over their parents, and with parents trying to win favor over them all. This is a common attachment parenting experience. It is just that when the child has autism, everyone agrees with it. In biblical times, children with sensory difficulties that didn't like touch from parents were respected in that choice, and parents didn't take it personally at all.

Children with autism are like a mirror. Whatever your negative attitude is, it becomes theirs, right away, and they spit it out right back at you. When you take an entitled and aggressive approach to parenting, they do as well. Most children work the same way, but are less apt to self-advocate their needs. Most children need a good example, alongside attachment parenting to back it up. ALL children need a secure attachment with their parents, autism or no autism. ALL parents need to focus on winning over the deity of their children, instead of winning power struggles with their children.

Individuals with autism are often singled out for attachment parenting because they are known to have a strong counterwill. A counterwill is a survival instinct where the individual controls back whenever controlled. Someone with autism usually has this to the extreme, but so do most very young children. Most 2-3 year olds are not designed to be controlled. What do you do with a 2-year-old who is crying and throwing a fit? Why not scoop them up and hold them in your bosom if you are their mother, perhaps giving them skin-on-skin comfort and letting them breastfeed? And children with autism need the same things usually, and they usually end up being stuck in an immature phase, and so they may need closeness even longer - perhaps into the teen years, including things such as co-sleeping. Most children, period, have a strong counterwill. Children don't need controlling treatment, autism or no autism. Children need comfort and nourishment, meaning they need to be nurtured by their parents so they can absorb on their own the values of our society, and learn to control and discipline themselves.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Ungrateful child syndrome": How to impart gratitude to children (the right way)

It is Christmas Eve. In a few hours, children will be receiving their gifts. Some children will be grateful for everything they received, and some won't. Many parents think there is something wrong with their child when this happens. The fact of the matter is that children pushing away presents is developmentally appropriate behavior given their age and developmental level. Children aren't exactly the most non-entitled and disciplined of people out there, right? The best a parent can do to prevent this is to model non-entitlement and discipline, and back it up with attachment parenting.

Gratitude is the absence of entitlement, in any parent. The Greek root word denoting entitlement in the New Testament, and cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to, officially speaking, want, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, entitlement refers to the slightest of unattainable want. When what you want will lead you to a temper tantrum, don't want it, and avoid that want at all costs. Entitlement usually involves imposing expectations on others, which leads to ingratitude when those high, lofty standards imposed on others aren't met. Children are watching your every move. When YOU as a parent are avoiding imposing expectations on others, and are avoiding expecting anything in return for doing good to others, you are on your way to being grateful. One way to show gratitude in relation to children is to avoid wanting things from children, and avoid parental entitlement. Entitled anger and other forms of entitlement, including towards your child, comes from a deserving attitude towards life, when you are deserving of absolutely nothing due to your depraved and decadent sin nature, in relation to children or anyone else.

Modeling gratitude, as with modeling any good value, needs to be backed up by something. Punitive parenting does not win over children to the Christian family values of parents, and instead, it drives children away from the good values of parents. Attachment parenting is the only way to reach children, and win them over to Judeo-Christan family values. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like goslings to a mother goose.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishment or controlling demeanor towards a child. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents, who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. 

Children, in biblical times, wore absolutely no clothing, at all, until they became adults. Women only wore clothing outside of the home, and otherwise went in the nude, in order to serve both their husbands and their children, separately. Mothers served children by way of providing for them nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies. When children were having a meltdown at home, mothers co-snuggled with children in skin-on-skin format. When mothers were out and about with their children, and children had a meltdown, mothers made sure children up until age 6 were wrapped up in swaddling blankets next to the bosom of the mother. By night, mothers slept next to their children in skin-on-skin format, soaking up the rays of skin-to-skin contact. Fathers also formed a secure attachment to children, by way of witnessing the children bond closely with their mother. However, with fathers, the secure attachment came in the form of a sexual attachment to the child, with the father imprinting on his children by their sexual attributes. Fathers purged the unrequited lusts towards their own children by way of following the sexual thoughts about their child to the end using masturbatory fantasy. Pro-social fantasy helped fathers form a closer bond with their children.

It is this secure bond that wins children over to the Judeo-Christian family values that their parents hold, and that this country was founded on. Most children, when parented naturally with secure attachment, want to be like their parents. Thus, if parents show gratitude for everything they receive, so will their children, unless there is a break in the bond due to child abuse. There is no need to punish children for being ungrateful, or demand that they be grateful. Gratitude is a place you come to naturally, by avoiding all entitlement, meaning expecting absolutely nothing from anyone. Parents should lead the way by expecting absolutely nothing in return for what they do for their children, and expecting absolutely nothing from anyone. If you truly feel unappreciated by your child, know there is a polite way to say anything, and if you lack entitlement for your child, you will know what I am talking about. Even when dealing with children, asking politely can take you a long way.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Giving without receiving: How you should give to your child in terms of presents

Many parents make gifts and presents for children a reward. Christmas Eve starts tonight at 12:00 AM, and most parents will give children their gifts anyway. So, why make "coal for Christmas" or "a whipping for Christmas" a threat and menace to children. The fact of the matter is that children are deserving of charitable gifts from parents, just for being themselves.

Punishing children with gifts, meaning lack thereof, or the threat thereof, is a violation of Christian law. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including punishments and controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Giving comes without receiving anything in return. Christian love for children is denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to, in the context of parenting, prioritizing children first, and yourself last, to the point of dutiful and selfless submission, expecting absolutely nothing in return. True Love does not come from pride or desire, but from a place of fearful conviction, where parents come to the conviction that they are depraved and decadent sinners/parents who are deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or others. A parent is a worthless sinner with a depraved and decadent sin nature. This realization leads to the sinner/parent being prompted to do good works for their child, thereby earning their worth. "Expecting absolutely nothing in return" implies expecting absolutely nothing, at all, from anyone. It sure does mean that parents are to give without receiving on Christmas morning.

Sometimes, children are going to be ungrateful for what they got. However, parents are deserving of absolutely nothing, and thus are deserving of absolutely no praise or accolades for their good works for their children, including the gifts they give. Parents are to give to their children without receiving, just for the sake of giving, because children deserve charity. Threatening to send the gift back is a threat that comes from entitlement, no matter how empty the threat is. Entitlement is want, to the point of imposition. When you want your child to behave to THAT degree, that you threaten them, then you are mighty entitled as a parent.

Children are extensions of God, meaning instruments of God called to judge righteously their parents and other adults as to how charitable they are. If you don't fit the mold, you burn in Hell. This is how children were seen in biblical times, and this is how children are to be seen today. Parents are to be submissive to their children, just as they are to God.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why adult authority does not exist - and why parents are supposed to be caregivers (not lawgivers/lawmakers)

Many parents and adults think they hold authority over children. This is a common belief amongst American parents and adults. Most American parents still see themselves as in charge of their children. This is a common view for parents - that the parent is in charge of the child, as opposed to taking care of the child. Adult authority is a concept built up by the Bible, and so it can be destroyed by the Bible as well, when the Bible is interpreted the correct way.

The Fifth Commandment is repeated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Children are to rest safely and securely in the presence of parents, trusting parents in all things, following mothers around especially like a gosling to a mother goose. The Greek root word translated "parents" is γονεύς (Latin: goneus) compares parents to bondservants, as parents were seen as bondservants working with their children for a lump sum - independence and self-reliance.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a slave for things they did wrong. Paul here was lifting up this legal context in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Parents, in biblical times, were to be submissive to their children, just as they would be to God. Parents were to be bondservants to their children, just as mankind is called to be a bondservant to God. Children were seen in biblical times as extensions of God, meaning installments of God called to be righteous judges of how charitable parents and adults are to children. Children were seen as deities of their own, with parents wanting to be on the good side of that deity which was their child. Parents completely avoided provoking the wrath of their children by giving them everything they need and almost everything that they wanted. This ultimately translated to providing for children nourishment and sustenance, namely attachment parenting items such as breastfeeding and skin-on-skin comforting strategies.

Parents and other adults in biblical times were not lawgivers or lawmakers in the family home. Parents were not seen as "in charge" of children. Parents and similarly charged adults were seen as caregivers of children, not authority figures that were "in charge" of children. Children were, in secular terms, seen as young people who were in need of constant care around the clock, and this care often came in the form of skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance, as well as nourishment such as breastfeeding and also feeding children as much food as the parents could afford. Children in biblical times were allowed to demand their needs, and once those orders were put in, parents and similarly charged adults had to provide for children. Children were in the providing custody of parents while still living under their parents' roof, meaning parents were charged by the religious authorities to provide for a child's every vulnerable need, including benign wants that count as attachment needs.

Adult anger at children was next to non-existent in biblical times, meaning adults didn't get angry at all with children, apart from a few who were seen as deserving of death for daring to subject a child to anger and rage. Parents did this by declaring themselves a depraved and decadent sinner, deserving of absolutely nothing, from children or anyone else. Adult anger towards children usually comes from a deserving place, and so the idea is to take an undeserving attitude towards all children. Once you come to the knowledge that you deserve absolutely nothing from children, you will start to feel better about them, and your parent anger will, in fact, be eliminated over time, until it is all gone. It will also prompt you to do good works for your child, and make their day!

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast in to the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend in to the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!