Righteous parent abuse: How to deal with oppositional-defiant disorder in children

Oppositional-defiant disorder (ODD) is a mental health disorder in children where children behave in an oppositional and defiant way towards adults. In almost every case of ODD, children have a primary mental health diagnosis that leads to them being diagnosed with ODD as a secondary or tertiary disorder, with the primary disorder, in most cases, being autism, ADHD, and/or bipolar disorder. 

I myself could have fit the diagnostic criteria of ODD to a T, but my developmental pediatrician did not diagnose me due to the stigma of the label. Lithium treatment for bipolar disorder is ultimately put an end to my ODD symptoms. But, before then, there was no getting through to me at all, over any behavior I exhibited. Everyone blamed the autism, when in fact the behaviors were manifestations of ODD associated with childhood bipolar disorder. 

The way to deal with ODD in children is righteous parent abuse. Sometimes, in the context of mutual submission, a parent has to take abuse from their child, and that's an order coming from the child. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Indeed, the scourge of cords was used on children by Greco-Roman parents, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians shunned the use of the scourge of cords in its entirety. 

The key to dealing with ODD in children involves giving up the fight, then giving in to the demands of children. A demand, coming from a child, is a righteous demand. Parents, in the Early Christian context, had to obey orders from their child, with few exceptions. The only time parents could righteously disobey their child was when the orders given were either unlawful and/or unworkable. 

Older children sometimes struck their parents out of anger and frustration, and sometimes even beat up their parents entirely. The only way parents were allowed to defend themselves was with tears or shrieks of vulnerability. It was feigned tears usually, with the parent saying in a shrieking voice "you hurt me, you hurt me" or a similar statement of vulnerability. This vulnerable reaction on the part of a parent deterred future striking out on the part of the child. When a child is striking out, they just want to be heard. Feigned crying helps model to children better ways of being listened to, meaning the lesson that hitting parents won't get you the reaction you want.

Young children under age 6 sometimes refused closeness with mothers. These children were referred to as stand-beside-me children. Such children rebelled from early on, starting with squirming away from the embrace of mothers, and showing aggression towards parents. The only limit of mothers was to stay beside her. Most of these children had ODD. Stand-beside-me children were seen as the most honorable of all children.

Most children in biblical times had at least traits of ODD. In most cases, the ODD rebellion came out once the child attained the age of 6, and wanted to shake free from their parents a bit, in a way that prepared the child for adulthood. It was during this time period that children would strike out against parents, and the parent would show vulnerability to deter future violent outbursts. Children would issue righteous demands on their parents, and their parents sometimes struggled to compromise in a way that would make things work and please the child. If there was any room for compromise, parents were commanded under customary law to go on that compromise.  

Today, ODD is usually secondary to another disorder. Most of the time, the primary diagnosis is autism, bipolar disorder, and/or ADHD. In most cases, medication of the right type and dosage takes away the ODD symptoms. Some cases are medication resistant, however, and thus the child chronically cannot learn from their mistakes. ODD involves a child feeling controlled by adults, and usually, there are plenty of adults in their lives trying to control them. If you just give up the fight, and give into the demands of the child, you may find that the child isn't asking for much - you could become the safe person of a troubled child!

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Terrible twos": Why the twos don't have to be so terrible

Many parents have to deal with it. A 2-year-old kicking and screaming. Most American parents punish temper tantrums in toddlers. Most toddlers in America are punished for their temper tantrums. The fact of the matter, however, is that toddlers are still babies. The big feelings in toddlers are there because they aren't being treated as the babies that they are.

Treating toddlers as babies is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Indeed, the scourge of cords was used by Greco-Roman parents, but NOT the Christians among them - the scourge of cords was shunned by the Early Christians.

Children under age 6 were treated as babies in the Early Christian context. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, son did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mother and child were in the nude next to each other in the family home, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. When toddlers in particular cried, they were held closer to the mother's bosom, in mammary closeness.

Mothers constantly held children under age 3, with most children being weaned by age 3, when toddlers pushed away the nipple. Thus, when children needed their mother, which was the most common reason why children cried, the mother was right there, ready to hold their children closer to their bosoms in mammary closeness. 

A 2-year-old, in the eyes of the Early Christians, was simply a baby, and was, in most cases, still breastfeeding. Breastfeeding, in some cases, lasted until the child reached the age of 6. It is a myth that a toddler should be a stationery child. A toddler should still be breastfeeding. When children are comforted with this sort of sustaining warmth as toddlers, they don't throw massive tantrums like many toddlers do today. 

If a 2-year-old were to cry in biblical times, they would cry silently, in the arms of mothers. The mother would cradle the 2-year-old lovingly, breastfeeding the 2-year-old to sleep. That is the place God wants for a 2-year-old. Breastfeeding was done everywhere that the mother was summoned to, even in public.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Honor thy parents": Understanding the Fifth Commandment in context

Most parents want to be honored. Most American parents feel entitled of honor from their children. This leads to parents demanding that they get respect from their children in an entitled way. The fact of the matter is that the Fifth Commandment is clarified by the subsequent parent protection laws in the Bible that protect parents from elder abuse.

It says in Exodus 20:12 KJV:

Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee. 

This commandment only applies to young adults living away from home, with the honor for parents being thanksgiving for all of the warm memories of being pampered and coddled by parents. Some children were abused by their parents, in which case they could shun their parents. Adult children had a bare minimum in terms of respect for parents - don't gaslight them to send them places (see Lev 20:9), don't beat them up (see Exod. 21:15), and don't commit crimes in their name (see Deut. 21:18-21). "Don't commit crimes in their name" refers to a crime spree that reflects on parents. As long as you didn't exact vengeance on parents in these three ways, you were not dishonoring your parents just by disagreeing with them on how they raised you. 

The Fifth Commandment is repeated in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking or punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child. Indeed, Greco-Roman parents used the scourge of cords on their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians shunned the scourge of cords.

Respect for parents was a concept in parenting. However, parents had to earn everything except the most basic types of respect. Children respected their parents by way of closeness with parents. For the first 6 years of a child's life, the child was in constant closeness with mothers, meaning wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mother and child were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. When children cried, mothers cooed and picked up their children, then holding the child close to her bosom in mammary closeness. This closeness with mothers in children's formative years prepared children, in later years, to respect both their father and their mother.

Honoring parents is a place a child comes to once they live away from parents as a young adult. When children were baptized in the Early Church as adults, they bowed down to their parents, giving them reverence and thanks for all the fond memories of being pampered. Some young adults who were abused instead shunned their parents, and even sought to have them excommunicated for their abusive acts, and that was okay as well, as long as they didn't gaslight their parents to send them places, beat their parents, or commit crimes in their name. Most children in the Early Church grew up to revere and honor their parents. However, dependent children did not have to honor their parents at all, but they often related to their parents in a state of sustaining closeness. This sustaining closeness with mothers is how children came to honor and revere their parents. 

I do honor my parents, but with strings attached. I forgive my parents for abusing me, but I never will forget how I was harmed by their entitled outbursts towards me. I am ANGRY at parents due to the fact that I was abused by parents. I honor my own parents who are the implied type. My parents had a change of heart around my 16th birthday. I was abused by way of forced time-out, with an occasional disciplinary spanking of a few swats to a clothed bottom. That was enough to make me ANGRY at parents for life.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Separation anxiety: Why children cry out of nowhere (and what to do about it)

Many parents punish children when they cry out of nowhere. This is a common action parents take when their children cry out of nowhere. The argument is that children are "manipulating" or "undermining" parents. The fact of the matter is that there is always a need behind a child crying, and usually, that need is attachment-based in nature. Most children under age 6 suffer from separation anxiety.

Separation anxiety can be dealt with using the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, where children surrender into the loving arms of mothers, and mothers provide nourishment and sustenance to children. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to. any punishments, reprimands, or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined as under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Indeed, many Greco-Roman parents used the scourge of cords to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the Early Christians collectively shunned the use of the scourge of cords.

For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mother and child were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. This birth nudity setup brought out raw separation anxiety in children, with children morbidly fearing that mom would "go away and never come back". Mothers accommodated this fear in children by cooing while picking them up, reassuring and validating their cries with skin-on-skin mammary closeness. This all was meant to reassure the child that mom isn't going anywhere.

Children cry out of nowhere for a reason - they are deathly afraid of your demise. They need YOU to comfort and reassure them in their separation anxiety. Separation anxiety is a normal developmental stage for children under age 6. When infants cry to be held, they are expressing separation anxiety. Never ignore a crying child, of any age. Whenever a child cries, coo before picking them up, then placing the child on your bosom in mammary closeness, perhaps breastfeeding the child to sleep if the child was milk-hungry.

When children cry on their own accord, out of separation anxiety, their cry is high-pitch and deathly in nature, in a way no good mother can ignore. The idea is to reassure the child that you are going nowhere, and then keep that promise. Cooing plays a special role in helping your child feel heard and reassured. The moment you coo in front of your child, the more likely they are to fall into silent tears, where they can easily be scooped up and held in mammary closeness. This is how Early Christian mothers dealt with the cries of their children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous ordering: Why children call the shots in Christian homes

Many parents think that they call the shots, and give orders to children. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents believe they are authority figures over their children, even their young children. However, the Bible teaches otherwise, when understood in context, that children call the shots in the family home. Whatever they want/need from YOU as a parent is a lawfully binding summonses. 

The acronym of righteous ordering is the child's role in the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV: 

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all form of punitive parenting, including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Indeed, Greco-Roman fathers used the scourge of cords to punish their children, but NOT the Christians among them - the scourge of cords was shunned by the Early Church.

Parents, in the biblical context, were under the divine and lawful authority of children. Children could issue lawfully binding orders on their parents, and parents, in most cases, had to comply with those orders. The only reasons that a parent could disobey righteously the orders of their children was if the orders were unworkable and/or unlawful. Otherwise, even uttering the word "no" could lead to the parent being excommunicated. When children were righteously disobeyed, it was required that the parent reassure and comfort the child, preferably with skin-on-skin mammary closeness. If parents took their children to court, they were forced to apologize in court to their child, as children could do no wrong in the eyes of the Law. 

Whenever children cried, mothers were there to respond to the every cry of their child, understanding the every cry and upset of their child as lawfully binding summonses. Mothers reassured the cries of their child by cooing while picking up the child, then treating them to skin-on-skin mammary closeness, perhaps breastfeeding the child to sleep if milk-hungry. Older children cried too, and they were picked up and cradled next to the bosom of their mothers. However, most of the time, older children issued lawfully binding summonses to their parents of the verbal type, barking orders in the face of parents, with parents, in most cases, having no choice but to make the child's orders work somehow.

Child abuse, in the Bible, was seen as a provocation to anger. Children were taught in Sunday school on what to do if their parents abused them, meaning children were encouraged in Sunday school to automatically become offended if a parent as much as imposed their entitlement on them. Children were taught to show their anger or upset as soon as an adult punished or reprimanded them, thus discouraging abusive conduct from happening in the first place.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Birth nudity: Why birth nudity is a Christian tradition in America

Many parents think that it is commonsense that children keep the clothing on. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents insist on children wearing clothing. However, the fact of the matter is that childhood in biblical times was completely clothing-less. This was because birth nudity was a tradition in biblical times.

Birth nudity is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment between parents and children in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, where parents are to submit to their children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting. including, but not limited to, any punishments, reprimands, or other controlling demeanor. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his secular writings. Indeed, the scourge of cords was used by Greco-Roman parents, but NOT the Christians among them  - the scourge of cords was shunned by the Early Church.

Birth nudity is an old tradition, dating back to the founding of the Early Christian churches. As practiced in biblical times, birth nudity was where mother and child were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. The mother was quartered in the family home by the needs of her child, fully devoted to the sustaining needs of children. When children cried, the mother was right there in order to comfort and reassure their child, cooing and then picking up the child, before holding the child close to her bosom in mammary closeness, perhaps breastfeeding the child to sleep if milk-hungry. Come nightfall, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. This skin-on-skin co-sleeping lasted until the child reached the onset of puberty, and then wanted to sleep on their own.

Mothers went naked in the family home only, in order to serve both her husband and her children, separately. Mothers, when out and about in public, wore a loose-fitting, revealing dress, with children tucked underneath the mother, swaddled to her bosom in swaddling blankets. Children always went naked, wherever they went, and it was seen as normal by adults then.

Today, birth nudity can be practiced by mothers being with their child in the family home, with both parties nude next to each other, with children being able to choose when they get to wear their clothing. Until they are ready for their clothing, they can range beside their mother in the nude, with the mother also naked. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Anti-Adult: Why I am to blame for our child abuse epidemic

Many people think that pedophiles alone are the cause of the child abuse epidemic. This is a common projectory belief amongst American adults. The fact of the matter, however, is that I am the culprit for our child abuse epidemic, meaning me and my adult self. Every single abuser of a child is an adult, or at least offends in the context of being an adult.

I myself am an abuser of children, by way of track record. I was an obvious abuser of children, meaning I was obvious about my sexual harassment problem towards children. I am a depraved and decadent pedophilic adult who is deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children and the God that protects them.

Every single adult has abused a child, in some way, in some form. If they haven't done that, they are surely capable of child abuse of the worst kind under the right/wrong conditions. I myself have a whole track record of abusing children, usually as a form of antisocial "flirt". I am currently being investigated by the police for a form of sexual assault known as antisocial "rough-play", which is a form of sexual harassment, with all sexual harassment being a form of sexual assault once perceived by the child at all, either in the form of offense or procurement.

I did not use the word "adult" as an excuse for abuse. I used my autism as an excuse to myself for abuse, and I was using my vulnerable autistic appearance as a means of winning over access to children from parents. I wanted a "friendship" that used the child and put them in the role of a parentified spouse. I was a vulnerability abuser of the negligent kind, and in the case that I was a parent, I would have neglected my children. 

Thankfully, today, I do see children as authority figures to answer to. They are smaller yet larger than me, meaning I see children in a first-to-last manner, and heed their warning accordingly. I used to see children in an abusive first-to-last way, where they were a caregiver to me, and I wanted them to take care of me. I didn't see anything wrong with it until I came to children's rights. 

I am a specific form of autistic abuser known as an "I am a good person" abuser. I believed that, because of my autism, that I was "a good person", and thus deserved everything becoming of a good person, as the atheist that I was. I now know, as a Christian, that I am a depraved and decadent sinner deserving of absolutely nothing, and knowing that holds me accountable. I misused being an atheist, so now I need to get some religion. I am an ex-atheist, terrified of beliefs of nothingness.

The doctrine of adult guilt holds that we all as adults have something to atone for. I am guilty for how I treated children in the past. I am deserving of absolutely nothing from children, and therefore I am grateful for all of the trust I received from children, as I am deserving of absolutely none of it. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents and adults who rape or sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire, suffering God's Wrath for all eternity! Repent!