Saturday, May 28, 2022

The Second Amendment: Why we should ban spanking, not guns

Many people think we should ban guns, or at least heavily regulate them. This is a common stance among leftist SJWs who support parental rights. I work alongside the left to ban punitive parenting, but I am not a leftist myself, and instead am a children's rights Christian conservative. I hate guns, but if you want to own a gun, I'm not going to stop you.

We have too many guns in this country, and that is why gun control measures won't work. We have an amount of guns comparable to Russia. Russia actually did pass gun control laws, and it failed - people just bought guns off of the street. Once people start buying guns off of the street, we lose track of them, and then we can't regulate them. It would be nice if such laws would work in this country, but it would be nice if we all could grow wings and fly as well.

Corporal punishment is the leading cause of violence in this country, not guns. Guns are simply the tool used to commit mass shootings. Violence is bred, meaning we have the tendencies to be violent as depraved and entitled human beings, but we also need a violent role model to become violent. Most violence is linked to mental health issues that are further linked to early childhood trauma.

In the United Kingdom, punishment of a child, including corporal punishment, is legal. Yet, the UK has some of the strongest gun laws in the world. So, what do people resort to? Knife fighting. And then, the London city government has, in previous years, proposed restrictions on knives carried by individuals. 

In Iceland, however, those same gun laws exist, but a spanking ban also exists, with landmark cases of corporal punishment leading to criminal arrest to make an example out of the parents. Violent crime is pretty much non-existent. Domestic violence is the most common form of violence, but even those rates are lower than the U.S. - 17% of co-habiting or marital relationships lead to domestic violence in Iceland. You can't have it much better than that, given no country is perfect.

It says in Romans 13:1-4 KJV:
Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. Whosoever resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resisteth shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to the good works, but to the evil: Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same: for he is the minister of God to thee for good. But if thou do that which is evil, be afraid; for he beareth not the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, a revenger to execute wrath upon him that doeth evil.

The highest authority in the land is not a ruler in the United States of America - it is the United States Constitution. The Constitution comes with a Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights has a Second Amendment. I can't own a gun under my current religious restrictions, but at the same time, I have to accept that I live in a country where people can own guns and not have the government after them about it.

You can bet the shooter at Robb Elementary School in Ulvalde, Texas was punished as a child. We have no definitive evidence of that, but no child that grew up without punishment and in an attached home would ever shoot up a school like that. Punishment in childhood is known to trigger many mental illnesses, and many adults who have antisocial personalities grew up in horrific circumstances where violence was common, against them and against a mother figure

Let the depraved and entitled adults who commit gun violence be cast into everlasting Hell-fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent!

Skin-to-skin closeness: Why this is crucial for a secure parent-child bond

Many parents think that children should comply with orders from parents and other adults, meaning adults are made out to be authority figures instead of caregivers. However, the Bible commands that parents form a secure parent-child bond with their child, and skin-to-skin closeness and intimacy with a child is the best way to bond with your child, even if they are an older child and not an infant anymore.

The centerpiece of an attached Christian parenting relationship is Christian Agape love for children, as denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao), and refers to prioritizing children first, and yourself as a parent last, in a fearful and convicted way leading to dutiful and selfless submission to children and their every vulnerable need, expecting absolutely nothing in return from children and others, with children resting safely and securely in the good works of parents, not having a worry in the world. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. This form of respect for parents does not come from fearful compliance, but instead restful trust in parents, with children feeling safe confiding into parents anything and everything that is on their mind, including admissions of wrongdoing or non-conforming traits, expecting absolutely no punishment or reprisal in return. Attachment parenting was the Judeo-Christian tradition in the biblical context, and was customary law in both the Old and New Testaments. This Greek root word uplifts the attachment parenting context that commands a secure parent-child bond.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or abuse, namely child abuse in this context. Child abuse, as defined under biblical law, at minimum, is the slightest of personal offenses perceived by the child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by the child, coming from entitlement. This commandment, in context, was understood then as a command against all punitive parenting techniques, including any punishment or other controlling demeanor towards children. The Apostle Paul, here, was lifting up the Law for Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking children into the church. Greek Christian parents were misusing the book of Proverbs to justify their punishment habits even back then. Paul was explaining that every single verse in Proverbs that mentioned the rod of correction - all seven of them - are repealed verses, and refer to a legal practice within Judaism during the context of the Old Testament, where a father was court ordered (usually because he was a hostile witness against his own son) to whip his own ADULT son for committing a capital offense, with the whipping being a last warning before the errant son was put to death. That punishment was closely conflated with the death penalty in Ancient Israel, and thus does not apply today, as Christ abolished the harsh punishments of the Law, and arguably the death penalty as a whole, when He Himself suffered capital punishment on the cross. Any Christian who participated in a Roman whipping with the cat o' nine tails, even as part of the audience, was immediately excommunicated from the church. Same with Roman executions. The church itself did not allow for any corporal punishment apart from mutual accountability between spouses. Striking a child, however, was completely unlawful and sinful.

The goal for every biblical parent was a secure parent-child bond. Mothers and children bonded by way of skin-to-skin closeness and intimacy with children. Children went completely naked wherever they went, and women were traditionally naked in the confines of the family home in order to serve their husband and their children, separately. Mothers and children snuggled in the nude, with children soaking up the rays from the bosom of their mothers.

In biblical times, children were treated with a special type of attachment parenting that deified children, meaning they were idealized to the point of being called "gods" and "goddesses" in passing. Parents were devotees to their children's every vulnerable need, being beholden to their needs just as they would be to what God needed of them. Children were authority figures for parents, and could issue lawful and binding orders to decree their needs to their parents, and their every demand was seen as a statement of Law representing God. Childhood demands were summonses for parents to obey, and was not seen as "talking back" or "disrespect". Children were pampered, sitting on their throne, not having a worry in the world.

How should mothers apply the abovementioned context today? Mothers and children can snuggle once the mother gets out of the shower, with the mother inviting children to disrobe as well. According to the English common law, as long as there is no sexual intent behind the interaction on either end, it is not a sex crime to snuggle with your children while getting out of the shower. Mothers can also invite children to disrobe at any time, and give them the freedom to run around the house naked, and this brings down the level of attachment to equal level. This involves the mother guiding the child as an equal, in an encouraging and playful way.

When a child is upset, crying, or ramping up, instead of putting them in time-out, you can hold them to your bosom as a mother, head first. Some women wear plunging necklines to serve someone other than their husband or men in general, and instead wear such clothing to serve the needs of their children, making children feel safe while listening to the heartbeat of mothers. This was how mothers reassured their children in biblical times.

The Bible is an attachment parenting document, meaning attachment parenting was the established norm when the Bible was written. The people in the biblical context would have understood the parenting commands in both Colossians and Ephesians in that light, meaning it was believed then that God ordained the attachment parenting setup as a form of customary law. God writes to His Audience, and without His Audience, the Bible would have no objective meaning, and people could make of it whatever they wanted.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Friday, May 27, 2022

Pro-social masochism, pro-social formal/informal: Why to fear your child

Many parents think that they are the boss, and that they tell children what to do. This is a common stance among parents. Authoritarian parenting is when there is a strong authority figure in parenting. Pro-social masochism attachment parenting is when children are the boss in a parenting relationship.

I myself am a fearful and timid attached parent to children. Rarely do I get the chance to deal with children up close, but when I do, I am afraid of them, yet am not scared of them. I am struck with reverent fear and terror by their mere presence, in a shake and quake type of way, not questioning their needs as they demand them. I speak in formalities to children in public, perhaps thanking them when they hold the door, just as I would recognize good deeds in an adult. When a child invites me to casual conversation, and only then, I will let go of formalities and hang out with the child. That is my role as a man in gentle parenting. All of the snuggling and cuddling is for the womenfolk to relate to children with. I tend to let children order me around, with me being their trusty servant to boss me around, with me surrendering to their demands, rarely ever saying "no". It is scary to say "no" to a child, because then they melt down, and then I feel the need to reassure them.

The centerpiece of an attached Christian parenting relationship is Christian Agape love for children, as denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao), which is prioritizing children first, and yourself as a parent last, in a fearful and convicted way leading to dutiful and selfless submission to children and their every vulnerable need, expecting absolutely nothing in return from children or others, with children resting safely and securely in the good works of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. This is secure rest of children in the submission of parents, meaning their good works. In biblical times, this was seen as the parents were servants of God, with children being extensions of God. Children were authority figures in the home, demanding their every need, knowing they would get most of what they wanted, and all of what they needed.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or abuse, namely child abuse in this context. Child abuse, as defined under biblical law, at minimum, is the slightest of personal offense perceived by the child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by the child, coming from entitlement. This commandment, in context, was understood as prohibiting punitive parenting measures such as any punishment or controlling demeanor towards children, regardless. Paul here was lifting up the Law on theft and kidnapping in particular - but especially kidnapping - and rebuking Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking children into the church, with the Greek Christian parents misusing the book of Proverbs to justify their punishment habits. Paul was explaining, from prison, that all seven of the rod verses in Proverbs are repealed verses, as they refer chiefly to legal practices conducted within Judaism in the form of judicial corporal punishment, with fathers acting in a legal capacity when issuing 40 minus 1 lashes with the rod of correction. Such was only for ADULT children. MINOR children could not be punished for anything, as they could not stand trial, and thus could not be charged with any criminal offense or civil wrong. They could only stand trial as the plaintiff in a child abuse case.

Children are the boss, in terms of biblical parenting. Children are to call the shots, in terms of what happens at home. Children know what they need, even if they have trouble expressing it. Parents should tend to their children, and should be motivated on the level of reverent fear. Reverent fear is denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word ψοβός (Latin: phobos) and refers to a certain spark that prompts the Christian into action, and in the realm of parenting, it is a specific charge that prompts the parent to conviction, in which case conviction leads to things such as reassuring upsets and obeying the needs of the child.

Adult men are prone to sexual entitlement in relation to children, as a whole. Thus, fathers in Christian attachment parenting homes should use the pro-social formal/informal mode of communication with children. The idea is to take up the conviction that you are not even entitled to speech with your child, and keep all speech to what is necessary. Then, when the child says it is okay to interact in a casual manner, then, and only then, should formalities be dropped. A father is not to touch his son or daughter without the child's permission, and even then, the mother can overrule the child if she sees danger in the interaction, perhaps shielding the child from parent sexual entitlement. All of this is motivated by reverent fear of children.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The age of consent: Why Pennsylvania should raise it to 18

Many adults support a lower age of consent, as a youth rights stance. There is a fine line between youth rights support for lowering the age of consent and pro-contact pedophile activism. I myself am a pedophile, but the anti-contact, VirPed type. Just a special little snowflake being a pedophile, but I know it is a self-interest that could lead to adult sexual entitlement if not kept in check. This platform is situated in Pennsylvania, and thus I support a Pennsylvania age of consent of 18. The current age of consent is 16, and that needs to change. 

A 16-year-old can possibly support a relationship with a non-entitled, children's rights adult that is of a sexual nature, but society puts a meaning on sexual relations between others. Sexual relations are a marriage, of sorts, meaning they are the contract that binds a marriage between a man and a woman. Those are the Judeo-Christian values that this country was founded on, and those values will withstand all leftist scrutiny until the end of time, and will never cease to guide our great nation.

One reason preventing adult sexual relations with children today is entitlement, meaning adults want things from children, and they impose those wants on children. That is the definition of deadly entitlement, and entitlement affects one's sexual expression as an adult. With the average man, a 16-year-old girl could break a bone, perhaps a rib in her chest. Usually, adult sexual relations with children comes out in a punitive, correcting manner.

However, some of us are not entitled fully in relation to children. I am not sexually threatened by a 16-year-old girl, but simply reverently afraid of the mechanics - it would be all too sudden for me if I did it with a child, to the point where I would just be shocked and affronted by such a proposal from an older teenager. A 16-year-old girl likely would come on stronger to me than I would to them, due to my lack of entitlement towards children as a pedophile. I might well be the victim in that case, judging solely by harm, but I would be at fault under God's Law because I am the adult in that situation, and the Bible teaches that all sexual relations with children by adults are sinful and unlawful.

It says in 1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV:
Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body, but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to, at the core of its definition, the slightest of sexual contact perceived by the child, coming from adult sexual entitlement. The Greek root word translated "lust" in the New Testament is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers to desire for sex with children to the point of taking the first steps to approach a child sexually, with fornication being when such entitlement is perceived by the child.

"Fornication" is the word enumeration of all of the sex crime statutes under the Law of Moses, which basically prohibits all sex outside of marriage, with sex being the marriage contract itself, signed on the dotted line. A child may be able to withstand sex from someone who is older, but can they serve their spouse in a marriage? A 16-year-old is not ready for marriage, and that is why, under biblical law, nobody under the age of majority in a given state can marry. That Christian standard is implied in the Greek root word πορνεία.

The Bible, in short, prohibits all sex with anyone under the age of majority, meaning any sexual contact perceived by the child, including even any coarse jesting or overtures perceived as offensive by the child or others. All adults were seen in biblical times as caregivers of children, including extended family when parents weren't around. Children were allowed to masturbate and indulge in sexual fantasy, but were kept away from sexual relations even with same-age peers. 

Marriage in biblical times was between same-age peers or else a younger man to an older woman. When an older man married a younger woman, it was a shame on his part, and on the part of her father. NEVER were children under the age of majority married off for any reason. Only young men and women above the age of majority were married off.

Sexual purity is now a controversial issue. It wasn't in the old days, when we stuck to our values as a nation. This is America, and we are a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian family values. Those values include sexual purity. A child should stay a virgin until he or she is married, and when that healthy balance is upset, blame the boy's parents first, or in the case of child sexual abuse, ALWAYS blame the adult or adult-figure.

Let the depraved and decadent, defiled adult fornicators of children who sexually harass, assault, and rape children BURN in everlasting Hell-fire and torrents! Repent! 



Time-out and grounding: Why this is not a good alternative to spanking (why time-in is better)

Many parents today are ditching spanking. In the 1990s, over 90% of parents punished their children physically. Now, that number is around 60%, thanks to better education and awareness among pediatric and mental health professionals. But, many parents are holding onto punitive elements of parents that they find out don't work. This includer time-out and grounding.

The story usually goes that parents who wanted to go the anti-spanking way started with time-out and grounding, but ended up just being friends with a child. That is a change of heart that is welcome, but you should be friends with your child from the very beginning, so not to impose undue trauma onto them.

No disciplinary measure should come from entitlement. Parental entitlement is denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers officially to wanting things from or of children, to the point of imposition, and unofficially, to any wants from a child. Ultimately, it is deadly entitlement when you throw a temper tantrum when your child isn't giving you what you want. Isn't that what time-out is? You throwing a fit, so you send them to their room? Children should be expected to throw fits, as they are emotionally labile and dysregulated - children have trouble with emotional regulation, and so they throw a fit. They need someone who is calm to not throw a fit. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV
Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. The good works of parents are denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to prioritizing children first, and yourself as a parent last, in a fearful and convicted way leading to dutiful and selfless submission to children and their every need. That submission is from above, and children rest beneath without a worry in the world. This rest is an active rest, much like a "god" or "goddess" sitting on his or her throne, giving orders and decrees, and parents and other adults scrambling to obey. Apart from the Law, Jews and Christians in biblical times lived under customary law, which the Greek root word υπακουο makes relevant in regard to attachment parenting traditions. Attachment parenting was the traditional parenting of Ancient Israel, and this was spread forth by the death and Resurrection of Christ, and the expansion of the Christian church. The Jewish attachment parenting customs are relevant to Christians today.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or abuse, namely child abuse in this context. Child abuse, as defined under biblical law, at minimum, is the slightest of personal offense perceived by the child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by the child, coming from entitlement. This commandment was intended to prohibit all punishment, and can be applied in the modern context to false imprisonment of any kind of a child, such as time-out. This passage was intended to prohibit spanking and corporal punishment of children, when understood in context, but any hostage-taking action, including false imprisonment, was considered kidnapping, and was a church-wide offense leading to excommunication. In the Old Testament, kidnapping against children lead to the death penalty by way of bloodletting, and courts were quick to convict parents. What do you think time-out is? Locking a child forcibly into a room.

Time-out has no biblical basis as an alternative for spanking. Instead, time-in has biblical basis. Time-in, as done in the Bible, involves skin-to-skin closeness and intimacy with an upset, crying, or ramping up child. This involves mothers holding their children to their bosom, head first, with the child hearing their mother's heartbeat, resting safely and securely in the comforting bosom of mother, surrendering their every worry to their mother.

Time-in can come in many forms, usually with a parent kneeling to the level of the child. That is what parents in biblical times did, except women and children both went naked then in the home (children went naked everywhere they went), and thus, when a child was crying, the mother would pick up the child or kneel down to his/her level, and then hold the child to her bosom. Within 1 to 2 minutes, the child quieted down and was able to be reasoned with.

Time-in is now the recommended antidote to a meltdown. Time-out was recommended in the 1990s-early 2000s as a means to "teach children self-control". The fact of the matter is that children can't control themselves - that's why we consider them children and not little adults. The idea is to excuse the immaturity and let children grow up at their own pace. Time-in is also recommended in the Bible by way of word-window to the context.

The depraved and entitled parents that provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Pro-social deification, pro-social child worship: Why biblical culture was child worshipping culture

Many parents think that biblical times were harsh for children. This is a common belief among American parents, who have heard a false rendition of the biblical context from pastors and clergy. The rumors are that children were put into child labor and whipped in that capacity. The fact of the matter is that biblical times were child worshipping times, as Ancient Jewish culture, including the Early Church, was a child worshipping culture. 

Jesus Christ was recorded to have said in Matthew 25:45-46 KJV:

Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

This commandment denotes the concept of pro-social child worship. The "least of these" refers to the fact that vulnerable groups are signs of God, and that God appears in the faces of people who belong to a vulnerable group. Jesus only mentioned the categories that Jewish society then was getting wrong. Jewish society then already recognized clearly that children were among the "least of these", as children were deified figures in Jewish society, including Early Christian society. Whatever you did for a child, you did for God. Whatever you refused to do for a child as an adult, you refused to do for God. 

The centerpiece of an attached Christian parenting relationship is Christian Agape love for children, as denoted in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao), and refers to prioritizing children first, and yourself as a parent last, in a fearful and convicted way leading to dutiful and selfless submission to children and their every vulnerable need, expecting absolutely nothing in return from children or others, with children resting safely and securely in the good works of parents, with children being in place of God. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. This form of respect for parents does not refer to fearful compliance, but instead restful trust in parents, with children feeling safe confiding into parents anything and everything that is on their minds, including admissions of wrongdoing or non-conforming traits, expecting absolutely no punishment or reprisal in return. Customary law in Ancient Jewish society, including the Early Church, commanded that parents have a secure parent-child bond, and be attachment parents in a special way that deifies the child, holding them high in reverent fear as a deity, obeying them as such.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or abuse, namely child abuse in this context. Child abuse, as defined under biblical law, at minimum, as the slightest of personal offense perceived by the child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by the child, coming from entitlement. This was interpreted, in context, as prohibiting all forms of punishment and controlling demeanor towards children, with the Apostle Paul rebuking Greek Christian parents for bringing their pagan spanking custom into the church. Greek Christian parents were misusing the book of Proverbs even then to justify their punishment habits. Paul would have none of it in the churches he oversaw, and sent a warning to all of the churches that had scofflaw parents who supported spanking and punishing children. The rod verses are repealed verses that don't actually refer to raising children at all, but instead to a form of judicial corporal punishment within Judaism where a father was court ordered to issue 40 minus 1 lashes with the rod of correction against an ADULT child (usually fathers were hostile witnesses when testifying against their own child), usually for crimes against the state or child abuse offenses. None of this sort of punishment existed in the New Testament, with instead Law being enforced by pro-social non-association.

Children in biblical society were clearly deified, with children being seen as next to God on earth. The pecking order was first-to-last in nature, with children having the authority to issue lawful and binding orders to advocate their needs. Children could order parents around, and unless it was absolutely necessary for parents to say "no", parents had to comply with the orders given by children. 

Parents revered and feared their children, in a way that prompted parents to idealize their children as "gods" and "goddesses". Children sat in their throne, and were pampered, not having to worry about anything, vesting all their trust in parents in terms of being cared for. Children were lawful extensions of God in the family home that parents respected with reverent fear, prioritizing children above themselves, leading to submission to children, and then, acceptance of children in a deified way. 

Parents were devotees to the deity of their children, and devoted their whole life to their children. Nothing in the world meant quite as much as a child. Parents who lost a child along the way were trauma-stricken by the loss, and believed their little "god" or "goddess" was one with God Himself, for Christ said several times that children were the greatest in the Kingdom of Heaven.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand.

Wednesday, May 25, 2022

The difference between authoritative and gentle parenting

Many adults out there seem to think that gentle parenting is the same as authoritative parenting, and seek to undermine gentle parents by lumping them in with my abusive parents. Oh, how things have changed in the U.S. children's rights movement since the 1990s-early 2000s. A lot has changed since then.

I am a survivor of authoritative parenting, and I can tell you that the difference between my abuse and the parenting here is like night and day. Authoritative parenting focuses on the "democratic" aspects of parenting, while being anything but. My parents were lukewarm. My parents were punitive. And, they were all for the parents, especially my fathers.

I was spanked as a child, but never beaten. "Beaten" to me means injuries such as welts and bruises. I never suffered any injury due to being spanked as a child. I knew it was coming. My father would "cool down" at the bottom of the stairs, then come up and ambush me with physical punishment. Nowhere was that advocated here.

I suffered anxiety for a long time, and still jump when a child cries in public. I worry, now at a submerged level, that a child might end up punished by the end of the excursion that the parents took the children on. I AM ALSO ANGRY AT ADULTS! It is a silent anger, meaning I have put my abuser to bed, but I am still very angry at parents and adults in general for punishing me when I was a child. Only, I am the adult now, so I have to be conscious about my own choices towards children, especially given that I am a pedophile.

Gentle parenting today is a spin off from authoritative parenting, meaning authoritative parenting today has moved to the parental rights side of things, whereas gentle parenting today is pretty much the same as attachment parenting. Attachment parenting is about the secure parent-child bond, also known as a secure attachment. It is being best friends with your child, with children being in the receiving role in terms of care. 

I associate the authoritative parenting of my childhood with parental rights. I associate parental rights with the "me, me, and my rights" attitude of parental entitlement, which is at the core of our entitlement problem as a country. The worst thing my parents, and all adults around me, ever did was demand respect. Respect is earned according to my Judeo-Christian family values, and that means parents need to earn their respect from children.

Let the entitled parents and adults BURN in everlasting Hell-fire! Repent!

Honor thy parents: Understanding the Fifth Commandment in context

Many parents feel entitled to respect and honor from their children. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American paren...