Anti-Parent: Why parents are the biggest abusers in America

Many adults think that pedophiles are the cause of all child abuse. This is a common sentiment that many adults hold. However, accurate case study research on pedophiles finds that pedophilia has very little to do with incidence of child sexual abuse. Who is committing the bulk of child abuse in this country? Parents. Therefore, it is proposed that the abuser locator be placed at parents, and if you say you are a pedophile, you are automatically marked as not a threat to children. 

A collective ban has been placed on all parents, and all adults extended into children's lives by parents, meaning all who identify, meaning all who identify in a certain way discernable by a survivor. All adults are guilty in relation to children, as no adult truly means well in relation to children. All adults are capable of the worst forms of child abuse, and are deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT for that entitlement. The worst offenders against children, by track record, are parents. 

Profiling of parents goes by righteous judgment, meaning the presumption that any given parent is innocent until proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, with doubting suspicion. This means that when you suspect a parent to be guilty of parental entitlement, doubt the suspicion, and then keep doubting the suspicion until you run out of doubts, and then convict the parent based on all of the evidence accrued. The categories that a parent can be brought up on are neatly spelled out in 1 Corinthians 5:11 KJV:

But now I have written unto you not to keep company, if any man that is called a brother be a fornicator, or covetous, or an idolator, or a railer, or a drunkard, or an extortioner; with such an one no not to eat. 

Entitlement is the main item banned in this passage. The Greek root word translated "covetous" is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektes), and this also refers to parental entitlement, when this passage is understood in context. Parental entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Any want imposed upon a child is parental entitlement, and once it leads to offense perceived by the child, the offense becomes child abuse (see Col. 3:21; Eph. 6:4).

Parental entitlement comes from a deserving attitude towards children, where you feel that you deserve things from children, such as respect, honor, and reverence. You, dear parents, are depraved and decadent sinners who are deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT merely for existing in relation to children and the God that protects them. You are deserving of absolutely nothing from a child, not even basic respect. Everything you get from your child is earned, and if it isn't, it comes from entitlement. 

Why should parents hide their identities? For one, that word is commonly used by child abusers as an excuse for abuse, in the form of a glorified title that makes them, in their eyes, as above all law and morality. Also, Christ teaches to give to children in secret. See Matthew 6:4 KJV:

That thine alms may be in secret: and thy Father which seeth in secret himself shall reward thee openly. 

This passage basically means don't brag or boast about ventures of charity, and parenting is a venture of charity. Children were seen in biblical times as the salt and light of the world, high above a hill, casting high judgment upon all adults, discerning the sheep and the goats in terms of charity. Parenting was never intended by God to be a prideful endeavor, as pride, in and of itself, is sin. This doesn't mean do everything for your child in secret. Breastfeeding in public was very much allowed in biblical times, as was swaddling young children under age 6.  

How did the Early Christians parent their children? They brought up their children based on the Christian doctrine of mutual submission (see Col. 3:20-21). The Greek root word translated "obey" in Col. 3:21 is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo), and in context, refers to secure attachment. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, with mothers and children in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. Mothers responded to the every cry of their children with sustaining warmth, cooing and picking up the child, giving the child skin-on-skin warmth by holding the child against her bosom in mammary closeness. In public, young children were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets made of velvet, and so all mothers had to do was hold the child closer to her bosom and possibly breastfeed the child. Again, breastfeeding in public was not at all frowned upon in biblical times, and in fact, it was encouraged so that others knew that the mother would do anything for her child. Older children played freely outside, venturing farther and farther from home, but then retreating to the sustaining warmth of mothers, in the form of skin-on-skin co-sleeping. Any offense or damages perceived by a child, coming from entitlement, was seen as child abuse in biblical times...These parents are parents in future-tense, with past-tense precedent. Until we get to that point, all parents are banned.

My agenda as a child advocate is to restore the actual Judeo-Christian norms that this country was founded upon, as understood by modern biblical research. America is a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian family values. The true understanding of Judeo-Christian values is the biblical context lifted up by the text of the Bible, as understood in the original Hebrew and Greek Scriptures written to God's Audience. When you do your homework on that front, you find that God intended America to be an attachment parenting society. Parents cannot pridefully identify in this kind of environment. Parents should take a selfless attitude, in a shamefaced way, just as the Early Christian parents surely did. Hopefully, someday, the law reflects these aims as well. Ultimately, though, my future context goal is political rights for children, which punitive parenting stands in the way of.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent! 

Co-sleeping: Why the Bible endorses co-sleeping when understood in context

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice to make as a parent. Most parents avoid co-sleeping for reasons of "sleep dependence" appointed by inexperienced professionals such as pediatricians. The fear of a parent is that the child will become dependent on sleeping next to parents, and won't ever cease to want to sleep next to parents without parents "severing the umbilical cord". The fact of the matter is that not only is co-sleeping a temporary fixture, but it can prevent child sexual abuse. 

Co-sleeping is an outward expression of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, where children rest securely in the loving arms of mothers, and with mothers holding children in their arms submissively. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up the customary law commanding a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, in which case parents submit to children while expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

It is common knowledge that children aged 2-5 often refuse to go to bed on their own. Refusing to go to bed is a common reason for punishment. What most parents don't realize is that children that young aren't ready to sleep on their own. Children up until age 6 have an underlying fear of being devoured by predators when isolated in a dark room alone. Many parents today would say that there are no predators in the home to devour children, but, in fact, there are - sexual predators. Most child sexual abuse is committed by a father or father figure, and is committed when the child is isolated in their room, usually at nighttime. Mothers in biblical times protected their children from the sexual entitlement of their fathers by sleeping next to their children in skin-on-skin format, thus guarding them from harm, and also bringing out any low-level sexual entitlement in her children's father. Fathers then had a parent attraction to their daughters primarily, and daughters were, in most cases, attracted to their father. Mothers kept the two separate, for sake of sexual purity, and kept them separate by sleeping next to her daughter, with the father on the other side of the mother. All fathers still have this parent attraction, but most fathers - especially in punitive homes - repress it, with sexual abuse occurring when it comes out sideways onto the child. Co-sleeping would solve this problem, as it would force fathers to confront their issues with parent attraction, especially if done in skin-on-skin format. 

A common reason for parents to be avoidant of co-sleeping is "sleep dependence". Many pediatricians and other professionals serving children often say that if you co-sleep with your child, you are "setting them up for failure" as they will "then become dependent on parental warmth". Children in biblical times slept next to their mothers in skin-on-skin format, with young children - perhaps up to age 6 (or possibly older) - being allowed to breastfeed while the mother was laying on her back. Children continued to sleep next to their mother come nightfall, with this closeness ending at puberty, when children wanted a place to sleep on their own. 

Co-sleeping took place within the context of birth nudity, where mother and child were naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. All co-sleeping was in skin-on-skin format, with both mother and child in the nude, snuggling in bed come nightfall. The whole family slept in the nude next to each other. Children were breastfed, usually for the first 2 years of the child's life, and sometimes up until age 6, or even older in rare cases.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Terrible twos": How to prevent toddler temper tantrums

Most all, if not all parents, have had to deal with it. Toddler meltdowns and temper tantrums happen with most all children. Most parents punish temper tantrums in children, usually by putting them in forcible time-out, and then maybe a disciplinary spanking. According to research, corporal punishment usually starts as a habit when the child turns age 2. 

The solution to the terrible twos is constantly holding the child, like an infant, and swaddling the child when out and about in public. This is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, with children resting securely in the loving arms of parents. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul to lift up customary law that commanded a secure attachment between parent and child in the family home. This secure attachment came from parent submission, where parents submitted while expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The "terrible twos" are a modern fixture of parenting. Most parents assume that all parents across cultures and time periods experienced their toddlers the same way. The fact of the matter is that in biblical times, the "terrible twos" were non-existent, and parenting a 2-year-old was pleasant, in a sustaining way.

2-year-olds, and also children up until age 6, were held as infants, especially when out and about in public. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mothers and children were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. Children went naked wherever they went, until they earned their clothing at their baptism as an adult. Children aged 0-3 were constantly held, in skin-on-skin format. A 2-year-old in biblical times was treated as an infant, and breastfed as such. When a 2-year-old cried, mothers picked up the child and held the child close to her bosom while cooing, then co-snuggling with the child in skin-on-skin format.

2-year-olds, when in public, were held close to mothers. Mothers swaddled their 2-year-olds next to their bosom in swaddling blankets, perhaps breastfeeding her child in public if summoned to by said child. The child was tucked under the mother's thin, revealing dress that resembled an apron. One side of the swaddling blankets was tied to her left breast, and the other end across the dot to her right leg, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. When children cried in public, they were held closer to the mother's bosom so that they could hear the mother's heartbeat, with the mother cooing, and with children possibly breastfed if milk-hungry. Children who were swaddled to their mother's bosom usually cried silently, so only the mother could hear, and so others wouldn't be disturbed by the crying.

The toddler years don't have to be a pain in the rear end. Toddlers are overgrown babies, meaning they deserve to be treated as babies, and fed like babies. Anyone who has tried to treat a 2-year-old like a baby likely has succeeded. In many ancient cultures, including the Early Christian culture, toddlers were held like babies, and were either directly held or swaddled constantly until they wanted down. Toddlers "act like monsters" because they aren't meant to be stationery children - they need their mom, and they need her right now.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

 

Change of heart: How to effect a change of heart in children (without punishment or force)

Many parents want a change of heart in their children, whether they say they do or not. Change of heart is a part of our nation's Christian heritage, and will always be a guiding tenet for our Christian society. Sadly, the only way many parents feel comfortable effecting a change of heart in a child is punishment and controlling demeanor, such as spanking and corporal punishment. The idea of many so-called "Christian" parents is to break the will of the child through corporal punishment. The fact of the matter, however, is that a change of heart can be effected through attachment parenting.

A change of heart in a child is effected through the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to anger: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended to lift up the customary law that commanded a secure attachment in the family home between parent and child. This secure attachment came from parent submission, where parents expected absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law with the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church at Ephesus. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, to modeling Christian discipline to children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, coming from a sinful nature, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, with children then following suit. Children were caught being good then, and not caught being bad. When a child was caught emulating the disciplined example of parents - such as showing self-control or accepting the word "no" - they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep going down the straight path". Sometimes, you have to give your child direct parental instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to direct parental instruction. Parents could not issue lawfully binding orders towards dependent children, and so they pleaded with children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, knowing they would get nothing in return. Parents asked politely and humbly for favors from their children, from the bottom of their heart, expecting absolutely nothing in return. Most children did listen to parents, out of a secure attachment formed between parent and child.

What motivated children to follow the example of parents? Christian parents in biblical times sought a secure attachment with their children. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, meaning mothers and children were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. When children cried, mothers cooed and picked up the child, then co-snuggling with the child in skin-on-skin format, reassuring the child's separation anxiety. When out and about, young children - under age 6 - were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with mothers perhaps breastfeeding in public if summoned to by their child. This closeness during the formative years set the stage for children to heed the Christian example of their parents, and have a change of their heart of their own. Usually, children showed discipline in the latter years of childhood. However, young children under age 6 showed separation anxiety towards their mothers by crying constantly, and thus mothers reassured children of their presence with sustaining warmth and comfort. This sustaining warmth invited children to absorb the disciplined example of parents. 

Change of heart in your children starts with change of heart in yourself. This means declaring yourself a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing, thus turning yourself in to God. When you come to the conviction that you are deserving of absolutely nothing, you deprive yourself of the right to demand things from others. You cease to want what you are pining for, and then the anger subsides. This means taking an undeserving attitude towards your child as well, as you are deserving of absolutely nothing from your child. Children will then copy your good work on yourself, and have a change of heart.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Benign" deprivation: Why "benign" deprivation is unbiblical

Many American parents support the concept of "benign" deprivation. "Benign" deprivation is a facet of punitive parenting where children are deprived of most all of their self-advocated needs, apart from "what they really need". I was abused in the name of this parenting concept. So were most children in this country. The fact of the matter is that "benign" deprivation is unbiblical, as the Bible commands that the child's every vulnerable need be met by the parent. 

"Benign" deprivation is a violation of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment was intended to lift up the customary law that commands a secure attachment in the family home between parent and child. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, with parents expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal slights perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing their children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Parents in biblical times used attachment parenting as a means of bringing up their children. For the first 6 years of childhood, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, the child went with her. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, with mothers and children in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. Mothers responded to the EVERY cry of their child, not just the cries that they wanted to respond to. 

Mothers in biblical times responded to the every cry of a child by picking them up and co-snuggling with them in skin-on-skin format. Mothers, when in public, swaddled children up until age 6 next to their bosom in swaddling blankets. When children cried, they were held closer to the mother's bosom, with the mother perhaps breastfeeding in public if need be. Children, while swaddled to their mothers, cried silent tears. 

"Benign" deprivation is when you deprive your child of self-advocated needs - usually by crying - and then only give them what they "really" need. This is the most common way that children are abused in America, and it usually a parent, with that parent usually being entitled on the level of laziness. I myself survived lawful child abuse in the form of "benign" deprivation. When I complained too loud, I received a disciplinary spanking "out of love" of a few swats with an open hand, to a clothed bottom. Even that was enough to mess me up, and make me terrified of parents for life. I only trust gentle parents now, as they give me hope. The other parents can burn in Hell for all that I care. My parent abuser apologized, and I forgive, but I will never forget what it is like to pinned to a bed and struck. His calm demeanor creeped the heck out of me. I don't even remember what I did, and the memory I have today is hazy because I had to put my experiences with lawful child abuse behind me. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Religious child abuse of pedophilic children: Understanding the roots of the hysteria

Many people hate pedophiles. Most American adults hate pedophiles. However, a growing number of people are supporting pedophiles in recent years. Quite a few people in the United States support the rights of sex offenders, and think they are supporting pedophiles. The fact of the matter, however, is that most pedophiles are VICTIMS of abusers and sex offenders, with the most oppressed of pedophiles being children themselves.

What is pedophilia? Most people think that a pedophile is something hidden. The fact of the matter is that pedophilia is a form of immature autism where the age-oriented sexual preferences of the individual with autism correspond with the immature developmental level of the individual. Most pedophiles have an autistic specialty in children in terms of knowledge and social skills. Pedophilia is a humanizing attraction to children, where the pedophile sees children as full human beings, but with sexual connotations attached. When you see a man or teenage boy with autism just "get" children, in a nurturing way, think pedophile. Most individuals with autism are cold with children, and see children as difficult to relate to. A pedophile with autism specializes in children, in a humanizing way, and knows just how to relate to children. Usually, they have the type of autism that comes with high empathy, but also the desire for solitude at the same time, meaning "exist" autism. Pedophilia is the understory of child-centered autism.

What is the core of pedophile hysteria? Help entitlement on the part of broader society to "cure" pedophiles. Most pedophiles are survivors of religious child abuse on the part of parents. We as pedophiles have a collective parent trauma, meaning most pedophiles have parent trauma to some degree, usually in the form of adult trauma. Most pedophiles have lawful trauma from parents in the form of sexual shaming abuse. There are several Bible verses used by sexually shaming parents in order to sexually shame their children in the name of "God" and religion. See Matthew 5:27-28 KJV:

Ye have heard that it was said by them of old time, Thou shalt not commit adultery: But I say unto you, That whosoever looketh on a woman to lust after her hath committed adultery with her in his heart. 

The Greek root word translated "lust" is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, or even sexual desire towards children. The word refers to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach, when the sexual target is someone other than the individual's spouse. However, this passage continues to be used as a sexual shaming tool against pedophiles, who need to indulge in masturbatory fantasy in order to stay afloat.

The romanization of the Western church led to the prejudicial hysteria of pedophiles. Before Rome took over, the Early Church welcomed pedophiles openly, and used them as deacons for child protection purposes. When Rome took over, the Bible was reinterpreted in an anti-masturbation way, when the Early Church actually held righteous masturbation as a tenet. This shift in church teaching marginalized pedophiles who needed masturbation to stay afloat. This change in church teaching motivated an epidemic of religious child abuse that would keep pedophiles down - with parents being the main culprits of the religious abuse.

Today, the most ardent haters of pedophiles are sex offenders. Most sexual offenders of children project their abuser onto pedophiles, in projectory format. Many pedophiles have experienced corrective rape as a child. Pedophiles are an easy target for sex offenders to project onto, and so they all project onto pedophiles. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled sex offenders who provoke children to anger through rape and sexual assault will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Getting children to listen: How to get children to listen (without punishment or force)

Many parents want children to listen to them. This is a common wish for parents. Most American parents want children to listen. Sadly, most American parents still think that punishment gets children to listen. The fact of the matter is that punishment is not a way to get children to listen. Children need a secure attachment, formed in the first 6 years of a child's life, in order to listen to parents for a lifetime. Children need a securely attached start to life in order to listen to parents. Children are not obligated to listen to parents until they leave the house. 

A secure attachment is a part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment lifts up the customary law that commands a secure attachment within the family home between parent and child. This secure attachment comes from parent submission, while expecting absolutely nothing in return. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. 

Children in biblical times listened better, in fact, than children today. This is because they had a secure attachment with their parents - first their mother, and then their father. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, meaning that mothers and children were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. Mothers responded to the every cry of children, cooing while picking up the child, then co-snuggling with children in skin-on-skin format. Children under age 6 showed separation anxiety towards their mothers, fearing that mom will "go away and never come back". Mothers responded to the cries of separation anxiety with reassuring and sustaining warmth. Older children played freely outside, then retreating to the sustaining warmth of mothers come nightfall, in the form of skin-on-skin co-sleeping. Co-sleeping ended when the child hit puberty, and wanted their own place to sleep. 

Respect for parents was a mandate under church ordinance in the Early Church, but only after the child both became an adult and left the home. Until then, parents sought to earn the respect of their children, forming a secure attachment with their children. Children were pampered and coddled for the first 6 years, and then allowed to roam free for the latter 7 years of childhood. When children left the home, they gave thanks to their parents by treating them with the utmost respect, with parents earning the every respect that they were given.

Parents had no authority to issue lawfully binding orders in biblical times towards dependent children. Children listened to parents anyway, as children had a secure attachment with parents, meaning they were close to their parents. Parents pleaded with their children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, but nonetheless got much cooperation in return. The first 6 years of closeness with mothers set children up to listen to their parents, including their fathers. Parents could only issue lawfully binding orders after the child left the house, and the child could still issue orders to their parents. Abusive parents were usually shunned by their children, and Christian law in the Early Church allowed for it. 

Religious education was also motivated, on the part of the child, by secure attachment. Parents left out a Bible where the child could find it. The child usually found it, and learned to read on the Bible. Fathers would read their child the Bible, and the child would learn to study the Bible on their own. When caught studying the Bible on their own, they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep going down the straight path".

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous pampering: Why God wants you to pamper your children

Many parents think that children need to earn their good parents. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. I myself, as a child, got warmth only when I "deserved" it, and otherwise was punished. Most American parents think that pampering children is the wrong way to parent. However, the fact of the matter is that children need to be pampered. God wants YOU, as a parent, to pamper that child instead of punish him/her.

Righteous pampering is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment lifts up the customary law that commands a secure attachment in the family home between parent and child. This secure attachment starts with parent submission, while expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Righteous pampering means that God wants you to pamper your children. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that for those formative years, wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, meaning that mothers and child were in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. Mothers breastfed their children usually until age 3 (when they refused the nipple), or else perhaps until age 6 or possibly older. Children were treated as babies until age 6. Mothers responded to the every cry of their child, cooing and picking up the child, then co-snuggling with him/her in skin-on-skin format. Young children under age 6 showed separation anxiety for their mother, meaning they feared their mother "going away and never coming back". Thus, mothers accommodated this normal developmental stage by providing reassuring warmth and sustenance. 

When out and about in public, young children - up until age 6 - were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with mothers breastfeeding their child in public if summoned to by the child. The swaddled child was tucked underneath the thin, revealing dress of a mother that resembled an apron. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet, and were tied to one breast of the mother, and then across the dot to the right leg of the mother, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. Mothers responded to crying by holding the swaddled child closer to her bosom, and then cooing. In most cases, children cried silent tears. 

For the latter 7 years of childhood in the Early Church, children played outside freely, venturing farther and farther from home, but then retreating to the sustaining warmth of mothers once more come nightfall, in the form of skin-on-skin co-sleeping. Children co-slept next to mothers until they hit puberty, in which case they wanted their own place to sleep. When children shook off parents then, it was seen as the beginning of the end of closeness with children, in a bittersweet way by mothers, and in an exciting way by fathers.

Respect for parents is commanded in the Bible, but that comes after the child is pampered by their parents for their whole childhood. The pampering of children actually earns their respect and honor. When you pamper your children from day one, they want to respect and honor you as a parent when all is said and done, and they are young adults living on their own. Once children live on their own, the commandment to honor parents kicks in, and then you will see how good of a job you did pampering them, based on how much they respect you. If they totally reject you, that is your fault, not theirs. True respect for parents consists of the child resting in your arms, and no matter how non-entitled or adult they are, they always melt and come undone when you are there. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdon of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever!

Personal responsibility for adult attraction to children: Why all adults are culpable for the sexual abuse epidemic

Most people think pedophiles are solely responsible for the child sexual abuse epidemic. This is a common sentiment amongst American adults. However, pedophile hatred is a projectory response to scrutiny for committing child sexual abuse. The most ardent of pedophile haters are sex offenders themselves, projecting their moral crimes onto a group of people that are highly vulnerable to such an accusation for replicating their abuser. The fact of the matter is that ALL adults are culpable for the child sexual abuse epidemic. I draw a collective ban on all parents, and by extension all adults in relation to children, meaning all who identify, because the child abuse epidemic in this country has got to end, and they are the ones who do it. 

All adults, but especially parents, are guilty merely for existing in relation to children, and are deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT for their wretched existence in relation to children. All adults are capable of sexually abusing a child under the right/wrong conditions, and need to exercise righteous avoidance in those instances. Simply map out the conditions in which you would sexually abuse a child, and avoid those conditions like the plague. 

Another tenet of child sexual abuse prevention is righteous masturbation. Most child sexual abuse occurs when the adult represses their sexual drive towards children, and then, in a once in a lifetime opportunity, the repressed sexual desire comes out sideways on the child, usually a pubescent child at some stage. The sex offender is usually a parent. The idea is to try and masturbate to thoughts of a child. Every adult who has done this in a clinical setting has found that sweet spot where they are attracted to children, usually their own child, and they always come to the conclusion that they have risk towards children. When you feel that tug towards a child, and you feel a child crush forming, follow the sexual thoughts to the end through masturbatory fantasy. 

The anti-parent system is a variant of the anti-entitlement system. All parents, and the adults they extend into children's lives, are presumed innocent until proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, with doubting suspicion. What to look for in a parent is surface-level pedophile hysteria, meaning trying to name and shame every parent around them as a "pedophile". Once you see that, there is no reason to doubt that overzealous behavior on the part of the parents, because that behavior is projectory behavior. Everything they accuse other parents of doing is what they are doing, full admission, but in projectory format. Basically, anyone who takes a vigilante stance and claims flagrantly to "protect children" has something to hide. Notify the authorities immediately. 

I myself am a former abuser. I was an obvious sexual abuser, meaning I committed serial acts of sexual harassment. I was an antisocial "flirt", meaning I flirted with young girls inappropriately. I am deserving of nothing but DEATH and PUNISHMENT for my mere existence in relation to children after committing those depraved and decadent acts tied to my existence. On one occasion, I sexually assaulted a cousin by engaging in antisocial "roughplay". Sexual assault, under Christian law, is understood as ranging from leering to rape. I started all this by way of that incident in my grandparents' attic with my cousin.

The depraved and decadent, defiled parents and other adults who rape and sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into a Hell-fire of torrents! Repent!

Discipline and limit setting in Christian homes: How to set limits with children (without punishment or force)

Many parents think that they need to punish children in order to enforce limits on them. This is a common attitude amongst American parents, who often seek to enforce rules and regulations onto children, in policing format. The fact of the matter, however, is that punishing children to set limits is immoral and sinful. Children instead need parents to model good discipline to them, and back up their example with a secure attachment.

A Christian example for children is backed up by the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with a promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment lifts up the customary law that commands a secure attachment in the family home between parents and children.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is ποροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church at Ephesus. 

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) refers to here, in this context, to modeling Christian discipline to children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything. Christian parents in the Early Church worked on centering their entitlement in view of their children, with their children then following suit. Children were caught being good, rather than being caught being bad. When children were caught emulating the disciplined example of parents - such as showing self-control or giving up willingly something they really wanted - they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep going down the straight path". Children were otherwise left alone or else comforted when engaging in childish and immature behavior, most of which is developmentally appropriate. Sometimes, children needed direct parental instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to direct parental instruction. Parents had no authority to issue lawfully binding orders, as children had eminent authority over parents in biblical times. Thus, Christian parents pleaded with their children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, knowing they would get nothing in return. Most Christian parents then asked for things from their children politely and humbly, from the bottom of their heart, expecting absolutely nothing in return. Most children listened to their parents anyway due to a secure attachment between parent and child, where children trusted their parents infinitely.

What backs up a good Christian example for children? Children need a secure attachment to parents in order to heed their Christian example. During the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the child. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, with mothers and children in the nude next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. When young children cried at home, mothers picked them up and co-snuggled with them, in skin-on-skin format, perhaps breastfeeding them if milk-hungry. When out and about in public, children were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets. Now, children don't absorb the disciplined Christian example of parents until the latter years of childhood and adolescence. Before then, most children have separation anxiety where they morbidly fear that their mother will somehow disappear and won't come back, and so they cling to her, including when swaddled to her bosom. When separation anxiety is accommodated in the formative years of childhood, they can come to their own internalization of Christian discipline later in childhood. By the time they are teenagers, they should be well disciplined in an emotionally mature way.

Discipline in children starts with discipline in yourself. The key thing to do is to declare yourself a depraved and decadent sinner in relation to your anger or parent attraction towards your child, surrendering yourself to God. When you come to the conviction and knowledge that you are deserving of absolutely nothing from your child, you end up demanding less and less, until those angry demands go away. In terms of parent attraction, you learn to approach less and less until the approach goes away, usually by centering your sexual entitlement using masturbation. When you have an undeserving attitude adjustment, you essentially take away everything you want, including everything you already have, and then you are grateful once you come to the knowledge that you deserve none of it. Then, your child will notice that you are doing this good work on yourself, and will do the same work on themselves, little by little as they mature. It is in the nature of children to copy the habits of their parents, for good or for bad.

There is no need to impose discipline on children. Discipline is how a human being centers their entitlement. Children have a sinful nature, and there is no debate there. However, children are capable of self-improvement on their own accord, when guided by a parent's example. When children absorb non-entitlement, they will learn discipline on their own accord, on their own terms, and they won't need constant nagging from parents. Some children may need more direct instruction than others to point them in the right direction - such as a child with autism or ADHD - but even those should be rare, or else the child becomes prompt dependent. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! 

Righteous closeness: Why parents are to seek closeness with their children (not obedience)

Many parents think that the point of parenting is to get children to obey. This leads to parents using punitive measures. Most American parents use punitive measures in parenting. This simply creates a break in the parent-child relationship. The fact of the matter is that God's Law prescribes righteous closeness, not righteous punishment. Closeness during the child's first 6 years leads to children honoring their parents later in life.

The acronym of righteous closeness is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment lifts up in biblical times that commands a secure attachment in the family home between parent and child.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Righteous closeness means parents are to seek closeness with their children, especially during the first 6 years of the child's life. For the first 6 years of a child's life, mothers were in constant closeness to their children, meaning that wherever the mother went, the child went with her. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, with mothers and children in the nude next to each other in the family home, in skin-on-skin format. Children, when milk-hungry, would suckle the teat of their mothers. Children, when out and about in public, were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with mothers breastfeeding in public if summoned to by her child.

Closeness during a child's formative years is crucial to having children honor you as a parent. Except in rare cases of elder abuse by independent adult children, respect and honor for parents is earned. The way to earn that honor from your child is to seek closeness with them. When you hold space for closeness with your child during the first 6 years of a child's life, your child will honor you and take care of you the same way when you are old and gray. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Elopement: What a parent can do about elopement

Many parents have had to deal with this. A young child running off, perhaps in a store or beside a busy street. Most parents are at a loss as to what to do when a child runs into a busy street. Many American parents punish their children in some way for running into a busy street or eloping in a store. The fact of the matter is that children in biblical times were swaddled next to the bosom of their mothers in swaddling blankets.

Swaddling blankets are part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This commandment lifts up the customary law in biblical times that commands a secure attachment in the family home between parent and child.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. 

Elopement of young children is a modern problem. The ancients in biblical times protected their children from running off and perhaps hurting themselves, and they did so by way of the art of swaddling. This was imperative then, because children could be bit by a venomous snake or a scorpion when out and about with their mother.

Young children in biblical times, meaning children up until age 6, were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with children being tucked underneath the thin, revealing dress of mothers. Milk-dependent children were breastfed in public. Swaddling blankets were worn on the mother's body, meaning tied to the left breast of the mother, and then across the dot to the right leg of the mother, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet, which was grown by Christian farmers. That way, the child could not possibly elope, because they were being held constantly by mothers.   

Elopement did not happen much in biblical times. Some children squirmed out of the swaddling blankets, in which case the rule was that the child stay beside the mother. These stand-beside-me children would today be diagnosed as having autism, bipolar disorder, and/or ADHD. Elopement otherwise was a non-existent issue, because mothers protected their children by swaddling them up next to their bosom. That way, the child could not run anywhere, and had to stay with the mother. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Lett them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Separation anxiety: Why separation anxiety is developmentally appropriate for children of a certain age group

Many parents think separation anxiety is a sign that something is wrong with their child, and perhaps that they have done something wrong as a parent. This is a common mistake most American parents make. However, the fact of the matter is that if your child is having separation anxiety before age 6, the parents must be doing something right.

Separation anxiety is developmentally appropriate for children ages 0-6, and is a morbid feat of harm befalling a trusted parent caregiver, usually a mother. Separation anxiety of this type is treated by the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This implies that parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of parent submission. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul, contrary to popular belief, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Separation anxiety was a common facet of parenting young children under age 6 in biblical times. The Early Christians practiced birth nudity, where mothers and children were naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin format. This setup brought out the separation anxiety in children, for sure. Children constantly cried out for their mother, and mothers responded to their child's every cry, usually by picking up the child and holding the child against her bosom. Children objectified their parents - including mothers especially - as milking-objects.

When in public, mothers swaddled their children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets. Those swaddling blankets were situated underneath the thin, revealing dress that married women wore for modesty and to honor their husbands, which looked like an apron and just covered up the basics. The swaddling blankets were tied to the left breast, and further tied across the dot to the right leg of the mother, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins. The swaddling blankets were made of velvet. Children were swaddled for safety's sake and to prevent elopement of children, especially given that predators such as venomous snakes and scorpions existed then.

Separation anxiety is a normal developmental stage for children aged 0-6. Infants and young children often want their mothers. When your young child is constantly crying out for you as a mother, you are actually doing something right, meaning you aren't doing anything wrong. When separation anxiety lasts later than age 6, then it becomes a mental health disorder in the child. Usually, separation anxiety comes from improperly applied attachment parenting, or more precisely, punitive elements mixed in with attachment parenting. The more an infant, toddler, or young child wants their mother, the better off they will be in the long run. Just be there for them, and be the anchor in their storm. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Righteous ordering: Why children call the shots in Christian homes

Many parents think that children are to obey them. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents want children to obey them. The power structure in most American homes is top down. The power structure in biblical times, however, was bottom up. Ancient Israel and the Early Church were child worshipping societies, in first-to-last format. 

Righteous ordering means that children call the shots. This is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of parent submission. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating them as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul. contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Children, in biblical times, held lawful authority over their parents. Parents had to answer to the court of their children, and could not defend themselves against their court. When parents took their children to court, they were forced to apologize to their child for committing perjury against the child. Children were seen as having valor, meaning they could do no wrong, even if they did technically do things lawfully wrong. Biblical culture was a child worshipping culture, and so children were seen as extensions of God called to rule over their parents.

Children had eminent authority over their parents. Children could issue lawfully binding orders towards their parents, and parents had to comply with those orders, or else they could be taken to court by their children, meaning put before a panel of 3 elders that could excommunicate the parents if they disobeyed their child at the wrong time. The time to righteously disobey their children was when their orders were either unworkable or in violation of the Law, in which case parents were required to comfort children. 

Children were considered vulnerable extensions of God, called to judge righteously the charity and generosity of adult-kind. Parents, and all adults, surrendered to the eminent authority of children, revering children with trembling reverent fear and terror. A mother's worst fear was her child rejecting her, as that made her accursed. So, mothers served children without expecting anything in return, seeking a secure attachment with their children.

Young children's cries were seen as lawfully binding summonses, in which case mothers responded to the every cry of their child, perhaps breastfeeding them if the child was milk-hungry. Children were in constant closeness to mothers up until age 6, meaning that wherever the mother went, so did the young child. When out and about, mothers swaddled their young children next to their bosom in swaddling blankets, tucking the young child underneath her thin, revealing dress which was similar to an apron. Older children knew how to use the ordering system and issued lawfully binding orders to both parents. Parents could easily be used for the children's purpose, and parents then were happy to be of use, with children objectifying their parents, and with parents delighting in being needed in an objectifying way. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Toughening up children: How to toughen up your children (without punishment or force)

Many parents want children to grow up to be sturdy and tough. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. This generation is a bunch of wusses. Most Millennials and Gen-Z youth are not toughened up, and melt easily. This is due to lawful child abuse in the form of punishment and controlling demeanor. Every generation was that unsturdy when they were younger. There is a way to toughen up children without using punishment or force in parenting. 

Toughening up children starts with the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This implies that parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of parent submission. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, to modeling Christian discipline to children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian parents in the Early Church centered their entitlement in view of their children, and then their children followed suit. Children then were caught being good, instead of being caught being bad. Whenever a child emulated the disciplined example of parents - such as by showing self-control or by giving up something they really wanted - they were lavishly praised and encouraged to "keep going down the straight path". Children were otherwise allowed to be children. Parents didn't expect children to absorb their disciplined example right away, with children being comforted with skin-on-skin contact when they had a meltdown. Children were in constant closeness to mothers for the first 6 years of their life. Children sometimes needed to hear direct parental instruction. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to direct parental instruction. Parents could not issue lawfully binding orders to children, as children had eminent authority over parents to issue lawful orders. So, parents pleaded with their children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, knowing they would get nothing in return. Most of the time, children listened to parents, out of trust as a part of a secure attachment. 

Toughening up your children starts with fortifying yourself. This all starts with declaring yourself a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing. This will, in turn, force you to be grateful for absolutely everything. This means also taking an undeserving attitude towards your own child. Know that you are a depraved and decadent sinner who is deserving of absolutely nothing in relation to children. When you come to the conviction that you are deserving of absolutely nothing when you are angry or anxious, you end up not wanting what you were angry or anxious about, and then you let go of the anger or anxiety, and end up being grateful for what you have. Centering yourself as a Christian in this regard involves becoming aware of your own self-talk, and then telling yourself that you don't deserve what you are pining for because you are a depraved and decadent sinner. Declaring yourself a depraved and decadent sinner means finding an entitled habit to atone for, and then telling yourself how depraved and decadent your sinful nature is because of your entitlement problem. Sometimes, it takes denying yourself of the right to have everything you already have, and everything you want, in order to find true gratitude. When your children see you doing this work, in which case they will, they will copy your good deeds.

What motivates children to follow this fortified example? Children need a secure attachment to their mother in order to hear out their father. When mothers form a secure attachment with their children, their children form a close secondary attachment to their fathers in the way that they related to their mothers. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness with mothers, with Christian mothers in the 1st Century practicing birth nudity. Mother and child were naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy, with mothers breastfeeding their children if they were milk-hungry. When mother and child were in public, a mother swaddled her child next to her bosom in swaddling clothing. This sustaining warmth opens the door to children wanting to copy the disciplined example of parents. This discipline will not show in children until the latter years of childhood, when they want to be more independent and play freely on their own. Young children under age 6 will always have separation anxiety for their mother, and thus will need their mother constantly.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the Christian way of doing time-in

Many parents think that crying and upsets in children are bad behavior deserving of punishment. The most common form of punishment for children in America today is forced time-out, and maybe also the occasional disciplinary spanking. However, these methods are no way to bring up a child. Time-in is the right way to deal with crying and upsets in children, and there is a biblical way to do time-in - mammary closeness with mothers.

The proper application of time-in involves the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, where the child rests securely in the loving arms of mothers. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This implies that parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of parent submission. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punish their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Time-in has a special, righteous application that is Christian in nature. That application involves mammary closeness. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children were in constant closeness to mothers, meaning that wherever the mother went, the child went with her. Mothers provided for their children in the form of birth nudity, where mother and child were naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. Whenever a child cries, the mother cooed and then held the crying child close to her bosom, perhaps breastfeeding in the process if the child was milk-hungry. This closeness to the bosom is called mammary closeness. Mothers were naked whenever in the family home, as was the man when he got home. Children were naked wherever they went until being baptized as adults. This setup of family nudity helped mothers bond more closely with their children with ease. 

When mothers were in public, young children - up until age 6 - were swaddled next to the bosom of mothers in swaddling blankets, with mothers perhaps breastfeeding in public if summoned to by her child. One end of the blanket was tied to her left breast, and the other side tied across the dot to her right leg, or vice versa, or both in the case of twins, with the child tucked underneath the mother's thin, revealing dress. Swaddling young children kept them from eloping, and also ensured a secure attachment between parents and children.

Mammary closeness works as a form of time-in because it causes traction between the mother and child that soothes both parties. The female breasts in women were intended for nurturing, not primarily for the sexual attention of men. As soon as a mother starts using skin-on-skin mammary closeness, she will surely regret not using that method in parenting earlier. It is best if the mother care for the home and her children while naked, while allowing children to be naked. When a child is crying, co-snuggling in skin-on-skin format will alleviate the pain that the child is feeling, and reassure them that mom is right there for them.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke your children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Father's Day: The duties of Christian fatherhood

Happy Father's Day to all fathers out there! Many in our society think fathers aren't supposed to nurture, but are supposed to be disciplinarians. This is a common belief amongst American fathers themselves especially. Most of the time, it is the father stepping in and insisting children have "discipline". Fathers do have that role in disciplining children, but they should do so with love and gentleness towards the child, meaning a father should never punish his children. Fathers nurture from afar, while the mother nurtures from up close. 

It says in Ephesians 6:4 KJV:

And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was convicting a group of Greek Christians who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church at Ephesus. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to here, in this context, to modeling Christian discipline to children. The Christian standard of discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for absolutely everything, leading to a chastened up example for children to follow. Christian fathers in biblical times centered their entitlement in view of their children, and then their children followed suit in following their parents' disciplined example. Children were caught being good in biblical times, instead of being caught being bad. Whenever children showed discipline - perhaps by controlling themselves or giving up something they really wanted - they were lavishly praised and encouraged by fathers to "keep going down the straight path". Children were otherwise allowed to be children, with childish and immature behavior being excused and maybe even responded to by mothers as a cry for assistance. Sometimes, parents needed to give children direct instructions. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to direct parental instruction. Fathers even could not issue lawfully binding orders to their children, as fathers - like mothers - were subject to the rule of children. Thus, parents pleaded with children, expecting absolutely nothing in return, knowing they'd get nothing in return. Most of the time, children listened to parents anyway, because they were securely attached to their parents. 

Fathers, in biblical times, had limited access to children, meaning they could not be in providing custody of children except with the permission of mothers. Younger children, meaning children up until age 6, were completely in the care of their mothers, in the form of birth nudity, with mother and child naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. Young children were in constant closeness with mothers, following her everywhere throughout the house. When out and about, mothers swaddled children next to her bosom in swaddling blankets, breastfeeding in public if summoned to by her child. After children squirmed out of the loving embrace of mothers, they were handed over to the custody of their father for religious instruction.

Fathers knew when it was time to start religious instruction with their children. Parents left out a Bible where the child could find it, and then the child learned to read on that Bible. From there, fathers praised and encouraged the child to study further, and then come to their father with their findings. Religious instruction in the Early Church was a fact-finding mission, where children scoured the Scripture and then talked about what they found with their fathers.

How should a man approach a child respectfully? By default, fathers should remain on formal terms with their children, with the mother being the one on casual terms with the children. This means no speaking to the children except when children address you, and even then, only to the degree that children want to talk to their father. The exception to this rule is when children "break the ice" and seek casual conversation with their father.

All fathers have a repressed attraction to their older children, usually their older daughters. This isn't something to deny, but something to face head on by following the sexual thoughts about your child to the end through masturbatory fantasy. The Greek root word denoting lust in the New Testament is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, or even sexual desire for children, but to, in this context, adult sexual entitlement. Adult sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual wants from children, to the point of sexually motivated approach. When you masturbate enough about your sexual fantasy about your child, you will come to an end where the fantasy becomes stale, and if you can't get to that point, you are a pedophile. Men who are aware of their sexual drive towards their children are more nurturing than men who repress it.

Fathers are to be secondary nurturers of children, with mothers being the primary nurturers of children. The man of the house is the primary nurturer of his wife, meaning the mother of his children, and he is to take care of the mother by submitting to her dutifully and selflessly, expecting absolutely nothing in return. This shows to the family what nurturing is, including to the mother, who then nurtures and dotes on her children. A man is to bring up his wife like he would a daughter, meaning without any punishment or controlling demeanor.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Birth nudity: Why this is an American Christian tradition

Many parents think that their children should wear clothing. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents force their children to wear clothing. However, there is something to be said for birth nudity. Birth nudity is a traditional practice that predates this country itself, and dates back to biblical times.

Birth nudity eases the application of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing into the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged. 

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and submission of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. This implies that parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the wake of parent submission. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. 

Birth nudity is a practice dating back to biblical times. In the Early Church, birth nudity was practiced by way of mothers and children being naked next to each other, in skin-on-skin closeness and intimacy. For the first 6 years of a child's life, children went wherever the mother went, with mothers holding children pretty much constantly until age 3. Birth nudity gave mothers the opportunity to give children skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance easier. 

Birth nudity is practiced today by not giving children their clothing until they ask for it, and until then, allow them to be naked in the home. This makes it easier for parents to treat their children to skin-on-skin warmth and sustenance, including, but not limited to, in the realm of co-sleeping. It also improves the parent-child bond, as it brings the parent-child relationship down to an equal level, especially when skin-on-skin comfort is applied. Birth nudity ends when a child requests their clothing, in which case they are given their clothing. 

Skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance strengthens the parent-child bond. The traction between the skin of the mother and the skin of the child calms both parties, and allows both parties to bond. Birth nudity is the ideal context of skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. It was done in many ancient cultures, including Ancient Israel and the Early Church. The moment you try bonding with your child this way, you'll wonder why you waited so long to try skin-on-skin contact. 

Fathers may find that they grow attracted to their children as they are running around the house naked. In this case, it is recommended that fathers use righteous masturbation in order to center their sexual drive for their child, which makes them more nurturing in terms of nature and demeanor. Remember, mothers nurture up close, whereas fathers nurture from afar. The Greek root word denoting lust in the New Testament is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach, when the sexual target is not one's spouse. Masturbating righteously is not sin.

America is a Christian nation, founded on Christian family values. The Bible and its context is something we as a nation glean from. In that context, birth nudity was the main staple of parenting, especially during co-sleeping. The Bible is a founding document of this country, even more so than he Constitution itself, and since the Bible condones birth nudity when understood in context, birth nudity is an American tradition.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them forever be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!