Wednesday, April 7, 2021

Nadine Block, we (think we) know what you are up to

 INVOICE/UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE

You have been known to intermingle with anti-children's rights operatives, meaning the Media Police Department.

You remove yourself from enemy representation, and do not have any contact with me. You will not try to exclude and exile me from the community by falsely lumping me in with peacekeeping scum.

I do know that you want me to leave, assuming some form of children's rights trauma. None...and do you realize how INSULTING that is to someone who actually believes in children having rights, yet has to endure false psychiatry otherwise.

I will never stand down. I will always defend my child. I will not be silenced.

I order you to fire yourself from that filthy organization, or else GTFO of children's rights. You leave me alone, and I leave you alone regardless. I don't creep airborne tapes into your feed. If you don't care about my trauma, like I know you are capable of, why should I care about yours? I care enough anyway to avoid you in a locational manner.

Nobody else here wants me out, and is neutral about me staying or leaving. I'm not neutral. I'm here. We don't want anyone killing themselves, so let them suffer in misery in a psychiatric hospital. Been there, done that, survived.

Nadine may well be a victim here, but she isn't owning up to it by rescinding efforts to remove me from the movement. She is, in fact, at the hand of the Media Police Department, but nobody gaslights like that and is simply a sheep to anti-CR. She is using opposite gaslighting...She sent me a reassuring message that she was on my side, but then it lead to strife because her plan involved getting me out. Most people only wish not to be attacked. It's called pro-social avoidance, for reassurance's sake, meaning my plain is to avoid people so that they can feel safe. I want this to end smoothly, meaning no conflicts or flame wars, and I will ensure of it with my own Internet actions, to the best of my ability with everyone else's cooperation...I'm actually fairly calm at the upper level, but am irritated with Nadine and her speech which is intended to confuse someone with autism, and get them to agree to leave a movement they have no intent of leaving. Since she states ANY self-interest, and defends her choice, she is culpable.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Child punishment: Why God hates any punishment of a child

Many parents think that they feel entitled to punishing a child. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents f...