Wednesday, April 7, 2021

When told "he is being obstructionist"...

 ...Ask for written or pictorial documentation, such as screenshots of a conversation. There is no reason why I would try to withhold contact from children's rights and Facebook.

Saying such a thing would go against my self-interest, which would be to get back on Facebook.

I'm left out of the loop here, meaning I speak to nobody. People are putting words in my mouth, and putting me in conversation that never takes place.

I shun anti-children's rights thugs when they offer me advice, which is never in person. All they do is harass me at this point, meaning all of them at Ethan Edwards.

If I ever make an obstructionist statement like that, you can deny it and/or ignore it. I want collaboration, and everyone on the same page, and that is what is upsetting to me - people can't just sit down and see eye to eye on this. Ridiculous.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible calls for stronger child abuse definitions

Many parents think that the ancients in the Bible had no concept of childhood, let alone child abuse. Most American parents support the curr...