Thank you for blocking me, because I don't want your help "leaving children's rights". I now know it is an optional service, thus is not "help" entitlement/narcissism. In the case that you ever pester me about it, it becomes such. Understood?
I can tell when others are using anti-contact gaslighting, and perceive it as gaslighting coming from anyone who isn't an accepted member of VirPed, and isn't an anti-contact pedophile.
I am not angry with the whole community, and I am impressed with how the United States movement is understanding, but perhaps my acceptance is the product of a staff shortage. Most people here get pedophile acceptance well - love the person, hate the pedophile, know that both exist in the same person, and listen and validate, like a sounding board. Nadine is a minority, and I hope she learns to get with the times on this issue. Due to my status as also having autism, I feel of limited worth in convincing her that I have no plans to attack her, and find anti-children's rights to be a menacing and threatening organization, so just leave her alone. Let's hope she keeps her word and does the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.