Attention-seeking behavior: How to deal with attention-seeking behavior

Many parents have to deal with this sort of behavior. Most parents, if not all, have had to deal with their child engaging in attention-seeking behavior. This is a common behavioral issue for parents, and most parents don't know how to deal with attention-seeking behavior. The fact of the matter is that attention is a core attachment need of children, and thus when they are deprived of attention, they act out.

Giving children necessary attention is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, with parent believers resting securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by the child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child.

Attention-seeking behavior can be understood as a cry for help. In biblical times, mothers intuitively knew that children who cried merely for attention needed that attention. When children cried in biblical times, mothers responded by cooing and holding children close to their bosom, reassuring them with the phrase "this too will pass". Mother and child were both naked when in the family home, with the mother holding the child frequently with sustaining warmth, and possibly allowing the child to suckle her teat if milk-hungry.

Children have five main categories of needs; food, water, shelter, transportation, and attachment - and the greatest of these needs is attachment! The core of a child's attachment needs is the need for attention. This is why a mother should hold her baby constantly instead of isolate him/her in a crib or stroller. This way, when a young child wants attention, all mothers have to do is pick them up, and all is solved.

Christian attachment parenting is distinct from all other forms of attachment parenting by its stress on child nudity, also known as birth nudity. In biblical times, women went naked when in the family home, and otherwise wore a thin, revealing dress - like an apron - when out and about. Children always went naked, until they became adults. This setup was to hasten the formation of a secure attachment, and also make it easier for mothers to give children skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. This sort of sustaining warmth is what is necessary to give children the attention they need, when they are begging for it. If a child's behavior is begging for attention, why not give it to them, the right way?

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast in to the lake of fire and burning sulfur,, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend in to the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Why the left wants to normalize sex with children

I feel this issue deserves relevance in my posts. Most people assume there is one left. As a children's rights conservative, I know there are two lefts, one worth defending and one worth offending (because they get offended about absolutely everything). I support the children's rights left, as we can do better as a society for our children. But, the parental rights left wants to undermine children's progress, and that's why they want to take away our religion and our values as a nation.

Where did the left come from? Many conservatives think children's rights is where the left started, meaning in 1970s with the peace activists. We at children's rights were among the peace activists, but were ostracized when we decided as a movement to only oppose the Vietnam War (I oppose all wars as per my faith values). The left that has taken over this country has even murkier roots. Maybe even sinister roots.

There is a group of researchers called "exist" is the root of the left. "Exist" is a group of researchers with a stated anti-religious bias. On one front, they have a whole team of biblical scholars trying to disprove the existence of God. They have convinced the greater scientific community to consider God a myth. Why do they want to disprove the existence of God?

Without God, you can believe whatever you want, including the belief that sex with children should be legal. The Bible clearly prohibits sex with children as fornication, and so the only way to condition society to go back to having sex with its children is to make society devoid of religion.

For most of human history, religion was non-existent in our nature. We were like other wild animals, only more savage than any other wild animal. Human beings in prehistoric times communicated through rape, inclduing towards children. We all know as Christians the Truth - God saved us from a peacekeeping past. God civilized a group of wild animals that turned their back on Him.

The academic community is now ruled by a radical woke leftist ideology that wants to revert all human beings back to peacekeeping times. They actually could get their way if they get their surface agenda passed, which is a ban on all religion. 

The left consists of a few wacko professors wanting to legalize sex with children, and a safe space full of lost souls preyed on by a mammoth of an agency wanting to take away the values of young people and indoctrinate them. Then, they blame us at children's rights for it all.

I am allied only with the children's rights level of the left. All other levels need to be chopped off due to where it originates, meaning not at children's rights. Anti-religion has always been a leech attached to us as a community. The mainstream children's rights view on religion is religious liberty, as long as your values don't tell you to harm or abuse others, including children.

We are living in a world of lies. That is because the world is not God's domain, but that of Satan. Even within the Christian Church, there exists lies, as all churches were created by men, and none by God. The perfect church was the Early Church, and we as a Christian Church have strayed away from the pro-child tenets of the Early Church. One of the reasons the Christians were hated in Rome was because they were too "soft" on their children. God primarily rules over His Kingdom, not the world, and thus Satan is allowed to play around until the very last day - when his fate is sealed, and he is captured and cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices. As a child advocate, I say that any "Christian" who speaks against the rights of the child is an accomplice of Satan. Same with anyone who abuses a child in any way and defends it. 

The depraved and decadent academics who want sex with children to be legalized will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

Child nudity: Why the Bible endorses child nudity in the family home

Most parents want their children to be clothed, usually citing modesty. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most parents want children to keep on the clothing. This is seen as common sense by most American parents. Christian attachment parenting is attachment parenting based off of the Early Christian context. The Early Christians allowed for their children to go without the clothes everywhere they went.

Child nudity is part of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission, and is implied in the Bible, based off of the context. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, with parent believers resting safely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishment or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Mothers in the Early Church sought to form a secure attachment with their children. What helped was the fact that both mother and child were naked in the family home, with children being naked wherever they went until adulthood. This setup was meant to both hasten the process of forming a secure attachment with children, and make it easier for mothers to hold their children in skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. 

Children, in biblical times, were constantly held as infants by mothers. Thus, when children got older, they wanted to be held by mothers frequently. Because both mother and child were naked, it resulted in easy skin-on-skin traction. Mothers, when a child was crying or tantrumming, would simply pick up their children while cooing, then hold them in their bosom in skin-on-skin fashion, reassuring children with the phrase "this too will pass".

How can the abovementioned context be applied today? Allow your children to go naked in the house from birth, with this called birth nudity. Put clothing on your baby only when they leave the house, and otherwise allow them to be naked, with you as a mother constantly holding the baby, wherever you go. Mothers should be nude whenever serving the attachment needs of children, and thus she should be naked wherever she is when in the household, ready to serve children with skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Fathers should remain clothed, and if they find the nudity of any of their children arousing, they should indulge in masturbatory fantasy about such a child, thus purging unrequited lusts.

Child nudity is a core aspect of Christian attachment parenting. Women and children were naked in biblical times, when in the home. When outside the home, married women wore a thin, revealing dress that only covered up the basics. It was loose enough to tuck a child underneath, with the child wrapped up in swaddling blankets. When at home, mothers and children often snuggled in skin-on-skin format, or else mothers held their children in skin-on-skin format. 

By night, children co-slept next to mothers in skin-on-skin format, with children usually not insisting on sleeping on their own until the onset of puberty. Co-sleeping is the core of all forms of attachment parenting, including Christian attachment parenting. But, you aren't really emulating the Early Christian parenting context until you, every night, have complete skin-on-skin co-sleeping next to your child. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of Heaven! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffeiring God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, fot the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Sex education: Why it should be banned in schools (but mandated in homes)

Many parents are angry at the woke left for indocrinating their children with sex-positive ideologies. This is a common and valid concern for American parents. Most parents don't want woke teachers filling children's heads with ideas such as "how to make love appropriately". There are sex-positive reasons why extensive sex education for children is unnecessary and possibly harmful.

The children's rights reason for sex education is primarily to prevent child sexual abuse, not to intentionally lead children astray sexually. What does the Bible have to say about sex education. It says in 1 Corinthians 6:18-20 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body. What? Know ye not that your body is the temple of the Holy Ghost which is in you, which ye have of God, and ye are not your own? For ye are bought with a price: therefore glorify God in your body, and in your spirit, which is God's. 

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to anything outside of proper channels, which then meant any sexual relations outside of marriage. This commandment also prohibits any rape or sexual assault of a child, statutory or otherwise, determined by the age of majority and not the age of consent. Both forms of fornication are good to point out to a child of any age, in order to teach them the straight path in terms of human sexuality. I oppose any sex education, anywhere, that doesn't stress abstinence. Also, I oppose any sex education that leaves out any encouragement of children following their natural instincts when spotting sexual predators. 

Masturbation is not fornication or sexual entitlement, as the Greek root word translated "lust" in the Bible is επιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and does not refer to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. Approaching anyone but your wife as a man, for sexual or flirtatious purposes, is sexual sin in and of itself. But, masturbation is a safe way to vent pent up sexual lusts so they do not fester and become sexual entitlement. It is good to point out to your children that they can masturbate to whatever fantasy meets their needs, as this is what prevents actual sexual sin, which is when the approach becomes more than an approach. Fathers may need this outlet in order to be comfortable talking to children about human sexuality, as all fathers are sexually attracted to their children, usually daughters.

Children are born with natural instincts to spot adults at-risk for commtting sexual violence against a child. Children are born with the capacity to be attracted to adults, but usually of the apprehensive type of attraction. Whenever a child is apprehensive around an adult, it is a bad sign, meaning the adult is at-risk for sexually abusing children. This is why children get nervous about sex - they know what it is naturally, and don't need to be taught what it is.

Punitive parenting only serves to repress these instincts. That's why the left thinks your child needs to be told what they already know - they had experiences where they didn't know, meaning they forgot. When a child is raised with secure attachment, they are fully sexually aware from day one, and don't need extensive sex education. 

What should a parent say about sex to their children? Simply say "What you feel about others is real. Know that sex with others is something to save for marriage. Go off to your room and masturbate instead". Children around age 3-6 will start to have sexual attractions to the parent of the opposite sex, or of the same sex if predestined to become a homosexual. It is the responsibility of parents not to cave to these attractions, and instead encourage children to masurbate to their attractions to their parents. Also, tell them that when they feel apprehensive about any situation with an adult, to run and contact the nearest safe adult. 

Sex education should be mandated in homes, with lack of sex education being seen as a form of neglect, meaning offending a child by omission. See Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including offenses by omission or inaction. Children need to know that they can trust their own sexual feelings about predators, but also know that they should abstain from sexual relations until marriage.

Sex education should not exist in schools, at all. It is not up to the state to teach children about human sexuality, because they will get it wrong, and encourage sexually amoral behavior. But, as a children's rights advocate, I have little faith in parents giving their children a sex education without some law mandating that they do so. 

I myself am a purity Christian conservative with children's rights leanings. I am strongly opposed to any sexual relations outside of a lawfully-ordained marriage between one adult man and one adult woman. I am an anti-fornicator Christian, and oppose planting fornicators in young minds. But, parents need to step up to the plate and teach their children abstinence. 

The depraved and decadent, defiled adult fornicators of children who sexually offend children who lack sex education will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into a fire of torrents! Repent!

Child authority: Why adult authority does not exist (and why child authority does exist)

Many adults think that they are authority figures in relation to children. This is a common sentiment amongst American parents and other adults. Adults, especially parents, are encouraged by society to be authority figures over children. The fact of the matter is that children have authority over parents, and parents are to fear the authority of their children.

Child authority is a component in the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children just as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God. Christian love for children is a specific form of submission where parents are willing to martyr themselves for their children. 

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating their children as quartered slaves. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings. 

Children, in biblical times, had lawful authority over parents, as vulnerable extensions of God. Children were seen as vulnerable appearances of God on earth, called to judge righteously the charity and generosity of adult-kind, bringing out the best and the worst of adult-kind, convicting parents especially with their vulnerability. Children were seen as the "least of these" in this regard (see also Matt. 25:31-46). Children could issue lawful orders to their parents, and parents had to obey children's orders unless the orders were in violation of the Law or otherwise unworkable. Children were treated with reverence, with parents reverently terrorized by the wrath of their children. 

Speaking against children was considered perjury under Christian law in the Early Church, meaning even complaining about children could be construed as an accusation, and children were seen as sacrosanct. Children could do no wrong in the eyes of the Early Christians, even if they did do things that were considered morally wrong, technically legally. Sometimes, children abused their parents, and parents were instructed to take a beating from their child, and go with the flow in that regard. Society looked the other way at child-to-parent violence, often deeming battered parents a social pariah. Most parents joked about being beaten later, believing they deserved a good beating from their children. Not all children were that demanding, but some were, and they were held in the highest honor as vulnerable extensions of God. 

How did children usually enforce their authority onto parents? Young children cried to summon mothers over to them. Mothers usually comforted the child with skin-on-skin comfort, cooing and reassuring the child with the phrase "this too will pass". Mother and child were naked next to each other, with children being naked all of the time. Older children demanded things from mothers in the form of lawful orders, breaking parents down to the point where they caved to the orders and demands of children. 

Children called the shots in biblical times, not adults. Adults were simply servants to children, providing children with their every need and benign want. Ancient Jewish culture, including the Early Church, was an attachment parenting society, as well as a child worshipping society. Adult authority did not exist like it does today. Children were in authority over their parents, from above yet from beneath, striking reverent fear and terror in parents and other adults with their vulnerability. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Reverse policing: Why children are authority figures to parents

Many parents think that they call the shots at home. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents see themselves as authority figures over their children, and feel entitled to respect in that regard. Most parents will cite the Bible for evidence that their parenting conclusions are correct. The fact of the matter is that the Bible endorses a specific form of attachment parenting known as Christian attachment parenting, and the core element of Christian attachment parenting is reverse policing.

Reverse policing is understood using the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things: for this is well pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest securely in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

Parents, in biblical times, were under the lawful authority of their children, fearing and revering their children as vulnerable extensions of God, submitting to children from beneath yet from above. Parents could only say "no" to a request that was immoral or unworkable, and otherwise, children of any age could sue their parents at law. Parents were seen as bondservants to their children, waiting on children head and foot, to the point of full and dutiful submission, from beneath yet from above, expecting absolutely nothing in return. Children brought their parents to this full and dutiful submission by enforcing their law on their parents, especially as older children.

Reverse policing is a concept in Christian attachment parenting where you revere children as you would the police. Parents are to submit to the higher authority which is their children (see also Rom. 13:1-4), and give up the fight with their children, and then give in to their children's orders and demands. This is also known as a policing attachment, and was the most common form of secure attachment in biblical times. Children called the shots in biblical times, and issued lawful orders to parents and other adults.

How did children police their parents in biblical times? Children under age 6 would cry for their every need, including attachment needs such as attention. Even when mothers discerned that children were crying just for attention, mothers responded with sustaining warmth, cooing and placing their children in their bosom in skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Older children barked orders at mothers, and sometimes at fathers, and both parents had to comply with their orders in most cases. Parents were in a vulnerable position in most cases, where children could easily manipulate parents to give them what they wanted. Siblings did not rival each other, but worked in unison to bring the parents down to full and dutiful submission to children, being one united front lobbying their parents. 

Most Christian parents in the Early Church did not get angry with their children, ever. When children went into policing mode, parents felt reverent fear of their child, and complied out of reverent fear and terror for their child. Apart from children's orders, parents in biblical times were driven by worry and concern, not anger. When children cried, mothers felt automatic concern, cooing to show that love and concern for their children. Fathers also cooed when a child cried, in unison with the mother usually.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Christian attachment parenting: Keeping the Christian tradition

Many parents are authoritative parents. Authoritative parents usually control their children by way of frequent time-outs, and the occasional disciplinary spanking. Most parents still punish their children, and some still do so severely. Most parents see punitive parenting as a Christian tradition. The fact of the matter is that attachment parenting is the actual Christian tradition.

Christian attachment parenting can be understood in the context of the Christian doctrine of mutual submission. See Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord: for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in tbe nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the love and grace of parents. Children are to rest securely in the sacrifice of parents, just as parent believers rest in the Sacrifice of Jesus Christ. Parents are to be extensions of Christ in the family home, dutifully and selflessly submitting to children as they would to God, expecting absolutely nothing in return, with children resting safely and securely in the submission of parents. Parents are to submit to children as their enemy, from beneath yet from above, revering and fearing children as vulnerable extensions of God.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to damages or offenses, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, including, but not limited to, the slightest of offensive touch or speech perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. This commandment was intended by the Apostle Paul, and understood in its original context, as a moral statute prohibiting all forms of punitive parenting, including any punishments or controlling demeanor towards children. In the Old Testament, punitive parents were put to death by way of bloodletting, after punishing their children one last time. Parents who punished their children were charged with kidnapping, with "kidnapping" being being defined under the Law as the slightest of damages or offenses stemming from hostage-taking - child punishment was seen in biblical times as holding your child hostage merely for things that they did wrong, thereby treating your child as a quartered slave. Paul here was lifting up the Law in order to convict a group of Greek Christian parents who brought their pagan custom of spanking and punishing children into the church. Paul, contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punishment of a child in his writings.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to, in this context, modeling Christian discipline to children. The standard of Christian discipline is deserving of absolutely nothing, therefore grateful for everything, coming from a depraved and decadent sin nature. In the Early Christian church communities, parents worked to center their entitlement, and children followed in the footsteps of parents. When children were caught emulating the disciplined example of parents, they were lavishly praised and encouraged by fathers to "keep going down the right path". Children in the Early Church were, instead of caught being bad, caught being good. "Good" here means avoiding entitlement, and when children were caught avoiding entitlement, they were lavishly praised and encouraged in their efforts to overcome their sinful nature. For example, if a child accepted the word "no" or avoided something they really wanted, they were praised for it. Sometimes, children need direct instruction from parents. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to direct parental instruction. Parents could not issue lawful orders to their children, with children being the lawful authority issuing orders. Parents instead made polite requests to their children, from the bottom of their heart, saying "please" and "thank you" in the process. The hope was that children would listen due to have a secure attachment with parents, which all Christian parents in the 1st Century strove for. 

Children are in the providing custody of parents, primarily that of mothers, and secondarily that of fathers. Children, for the first 6 years of life, were in constant closeness to mothers, never leaving her side, being wrapped up to either her bosom in swaddling blankets, or worn on her back in a papoose bag, when out and about. Mothers and children were both naked in the family home, and children were naked wherever they went until adulthood. Christian attachment parenting is unique in how it stresses child nudity and motherly nudity as a means to bond better with children, and gain more ease in giving children skin-on-skin comfort and sustenance. Children, around age 6, started to venture further and further from home, playing outside with neighborhood friends, then retreating back to the closeness of mothers come nightfall, in the form of skin-on-skin co-sleeping. Children usually slept next to their mothers until puberty, when they wanted to sleep on their own.

America is a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian family values. We have a secular government, balanced by a religious society, and historically traditionally, that religion has been Christianity, in all its denominations. The Bible is a founding document of this country, above even the Constitution itself. All of our criminal statutes and civil torts are based off of Judeo-Christian moral standards. Since we now know that the Bible commands attachment parenting, we know that attachment parenting is a tradition in this country that we have overlooked for most of our history. When a Christian teaching becomes popular enough in a country like ours, it becomes enshrined into law. God's Law is above the law of the land, and thus Christian attachment parenting is the unwritten law of the land.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to wrath through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be forever cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is rhe second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torment, suffering God's Wrath forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!