Thursday, May 4, 2023

Why the left wants to normalize sex with children

I feel this issue deserves relevance in my posts. Most people assume there is one left. As a children's rights conservative, I know there are two lefts, one worth defending and one worth offending (because they get offended about absolutely everything). I support the children's rights left, as we can do better as a society for our children. But, the parental rights left wants to undermine children's progress, and that's why they want to take away our religion and our values as a nation.

Where did the left come from? Many conservatives think children's rights is where the left started, meaning in 1970s with the peace activists. We at children's rights were among the peace activists, but were ostracized when we decided as a movement to only oppose the Vietnam War (I oppose all wars as per my faith values). The left that has taken over this country has even murkier roots. Maybe even sinister roots.

There is a group of researchers called "exist" is the root of the left. "Exist" is a group of researchers with a stated anti-religious bias. On one front, they have a whole team of biblical scholars trying to disprove the existence of God. They have convinced the greater scientific community to consider God a myth. Why do they want to disprove the existence of God?

Without God, you can believe whatever you want, including the belief that sex with children should be legal. The Bible clearly prohibits sex with children as fornication, and so the only way to condition society to go back to having sex with its children is to make society devoid of religion.

For most of human history, religion was non-existent in our nature. We were like other wild animals, only more savage than any other wild animal. Human beings in prehistoric times communicated through rape, inclduing towards children. We all know as Christians the Truth - God saved us from a peacekeeping past. God civilized a group of wild animals that turned their back on Him.

The academic community is now ruled by a radical woke leftist ideology that wants to revert all human beings back to peacekeeping times. They actually could get their way if they get their surface agenda passed, which is a ban on all religion. 

The left consists of a few wacko professors wanting to legalize sex with children, and a safe space full of lost souls preyed on by a mammoth of an agency wanting to take away the values of young people and indoctrinate them. Then, they blame us at children's rights for it all.

I am allied only with the children's rights level of the left. All other levels need to be chopped off due to where it originates, meaning not at children's rights. Anti-religion has always been a leech attached to us as a community. The mainstream children's rights view on religion is religious liberty, as long as your values don't tell you to harm or abuse others, including children.

We are living in a world of lies. That is because the world is not God's domain, but that of Satan. Even within the Christian Church, there exists lies, as all churches were created by men, and none by God. The perfect church was the Early Church, and we as a Christian Church have strayed away from the pro-child tenets of the Early Church. One of the reasons the Christians were hated in Rome was because they were too "soft" on their children. God primarily rules over His Kingdom, not the world, and thus Satan is allowed to play around until the very last day - when his fate is sealed, and he is captured and cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices. As a child advocate, I say that any "Christian" who speaks against the rights of the child is an accomplice of Satan. Same with anyone who abuses a child in any way and defends it. 

The depraved and decadent academics who want sex with children to be legalized will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire! Repent!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Birth nudity: Why God wants birth nudity in the family home

Many parents believe that children deserve punishment when they cry. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American paren...