Synopsis of Anti-Parent/Children's Rights investigation

 I have found my main abuser, and he is within my family - Robert "Bob" Hall. "Bob" refers to his peacekeeper, who hates us all here at Children's Rights.

What happened was a false report made to anti-pedophile in Knoxville, Tennessee, meaning the Knoxville Police Department, based on fraudulent information about a "future context children's right attack" against my person and my blog here at Children's Rights by Focus on the Family. This report also fraudulently and falsely, in the form of perjury, accused my mother, Jessica Lynn Scheibner of sexual abuse, dishonoring her like I honor and revere her for what she does for me and how she listens to my upset.

The Community did not hurt me one bit, meaning they were sent as enlists to abuse me on behalf of the parental rights lobby. There are two main co-conspirators on the Children's Rights side, Jonathan Crisp and Blake Hutchison. Blake and an executive at Stop Spanking (name redacted due to moral legal apology) took a report, alongside a parent coach and executive at Parenting Beyond Punishment (name redacted for same reason as first).

WE are Anti-Parent/Anti-Spanking, and WE are pedophiles, and WE are clinical informational pedophiles/self-advocates, and WE are Children's Rights herself in singular male format. WE are Opposing Parental Entitlement, and we as an organization kick out all parents and anti-CRs on the last day, and forgive them only on the last day, by silencing their "helpful" voice in relation to me. WE shun all entitled and damned parents who seek to abuse a PEDOPHILE and a SURVIVOR all in one. 

I, Maxwell Clark Scheibner, don't feel in any danger. Light at the end of the tunnel. Maybe a few hurtful words will come out of this, but I just brush insults off. No big deal.

Why "back talk" isn't sin for a child

Many parents abuse their children, meaning most in the United States. 94% of parents punish their children, with 1/3 possibly being in violation of the law while doing so. My parents followed the law while spanking and punishing me, with few obscure exceptions. Talking back to parents was the number one reason I was punished.

It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, as is right. Honor thy father and mother, as is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath, but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust, in the care and safety of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to children, confiding absolutely anything in relation to them, owing nothing in relation to parents, nonetheless being convicted by gratitude to give back to your parents, and listen to them, because they are so kind and warm to you, being charitable towards their children. Christian love and charity is referred to in the New Testament by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to dutiful and selfless submission towards a child as their enemy, being convicted of ones mere sinful existence in relation to children, sacrificing for oneself just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering yourself beneath your child, devaluing yourself as her servant and indentured servant, paying due penance for your wretched existence as an adult in relation to children, ministering to and serving the every need of children, with said child being extended by God for care and protection, expecting absolutely nothing in return.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" means παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, specifically for parents in relation to children, with parents being centered and disciplined in relation to children in a warm way that allows for children to be listened to and validated by parents, with children learning self-control and self-discipline in exemplary format. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the word "no" and its various variants, and/or to any setting of limits and boundaries. The word "no" should be rare, as children are immature and blameless, and cannot cease certain behaviors as a result of their developmental capacity, meaning lack thereof.

Back talk was encouraged in ancient Israelite culture, as well as adjoining churches. When a child talked back, many times with throwing a crying fit or even hitting the mother, the mother assumed the child had a need, much like diagnosing infant needs. Fathers were interactive in disciplining their child through positive encouragement. In fact, most child abuse that did, in fact, occur then was false encouragement of children, particularly fathers corrupting the morals of and perhaps sexually abusing her. Usually, children were just amped up with assertiveness, meaning they were encouraged in getting what they need by parents, namely mothers, providing when a child screamed and cries, diagnosing what the issue was that was the antecedent for the cries, then replenishing the need. Surrender to parents meant listening to parents automatically, by instinct, perhaps even when you have another opinion, because you trust parents due to them providing your every need, including attachment needs such as benign want.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be tormented and languish in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Vaccine rights for children - Why I am anti-vaxx

The COVID-19 virus is spreading once more, and has mutated to a Delta variant. Many people talk about vaccine rights as a parental right. What about the child's consent? Due to my makeup, which is more well-known to my base readers, I can be very starry eyed and idealistic about a child's ability to consent to anything but sex.

Informed consent is a biblical concept, and is an element of the Tenth Commandment, as cross-referenced by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to the attitude of "I am the child's parent, therefore I own their body" leading to wanting what is best for them in terms of medical choices, while imposing said decisions on them, excluding them from the table, with this including vaccines. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "offense" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses in the Bible, namely the torts and damages associated with the Eighth Commandment, including assault and battery laws. Put a needle into a child, and it can be physical battery under biblical law if not done with the child's informed consent.

The bottom line is the necessity to speak to children about vaccines, what getting a shot does, and why doctors feel the need to give children vaccines. Give the child, from there, a chance to say "no vaxx" in an informed way, in so many words. Beyond that point, vaccinating your child is a form of child abuse.

Know that certain states, but not all, have mandatory vaccinations of a certain schedule, and that is the law of the land, with encouraging a child to violate the law being a form of child abuse in the form of antisocial "corruption". Some vaccines are optional during pandemics like this, and children shouldn't be forced to get vaccinated. There is no law mandating vaccinations, as such is a hoax from conservatives that are the type that I avoid. Thus, since it is a recommendation, it can be shot down by a child, in collaboration with the parents who pay the medical bills. If there is a religious exemption for vaccines in any state where your child makes an informed choice to opt out, use it.

People are not robots or machines. 1984 hasn't come, yet. People can discern for themselves what is true and what isn't, as most people do mean testing of some sort, even if they appear not to. This extends to your child. I would recommend vaccinations in any child I have, but would give them enough information to make their own medical decisions in all regards, but including vaccinations.

The depraved and entitled parents who keep things ignorant will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and His accomplices! Repent, in the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

"Church dissenter" added to header

 Yes, I don't God's Church or conservatism in general. Just a dissenter in terms of church policy. I'm conservative - work with the Judaeo-Christian values we have as a nation to ban spanking and include children in society.

BEHAVIOR PLAN FOR: Maxwell Clark Scheibner

 The first one was deleted, and I am having a showdown with "urgeless" of Google, Inc. of Australia, meaning he's just another aboriginal operator at customer service. Foursquare collectively made the abuse report, which self-abuse is not an offense under Google/Blogger rules.

Children's rights is my employer, at will, meaning any page can ban me, for any reason, or no reason, but namely due to any abuse perceived by the admin, which is any offense perceived by the admin linked to entitled intent, meaning wanting things to the point of seeking to impose things on others on a page or in a group. Offense taken can be clarified by a defendant by asking for the intent for verbal and other actions against survivors. The first person to attack is generally the abuser, until proven otherwise, meaning when the abuser leaves the area, stay put. The abuser will come back when he/she comes back, or else monitor with screenshots. Don't attack preemptively because that is against my religious beliefs.

I go by legal forgiveness, based on righteous judgment that presumes innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, leading to offense, leading to shunning by either ban and/or block, and I generally only do this these days when someone is imposing their platform onto mine in some way, usually in terms of values. I often use a strikes system without stating the number of strikes planned, ad lib...I welcome the same judgment back, because I presume everyone around me is a gentle parent, or else nothing, narrowing down. I assume nothing about anyone apart from what they share, and I expect the same kind of respect.

This will be copy and pasted, since many at VirPed even underestimate a pedophile's ability to control themselves. I am responsible for attacking the community just like any advocate/survivor here.

EDIT: Had a good conversation with "urgeless" meaning I f*cking hate his parents.

Dress policing: Why this is sin

There are, indeed, many sexual predators out there, and this is why parents want children to wear clothes, even while in the house. This is an entitled and controlling attitude towards children, and a victim-blaming way to treat children.

The Greek root word denoting entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to wanting things from children, such as dressing the way you want them to, to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to theft by way of personal offense. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable trust and rest in the care and safety of parents. Children, while in that care in ancient Hebrew culture, were naked when around parents in a family home. This was seen as vulnerability, meaning the vulnerability of the bond between mother and child. Skin-to-skin contact is a major way that parents should bond with their children from very young. Mothers, in family homes, rarely were clothed, and simply slipped on a loose dress when going on errands, perhaps to market or elsewhere in the city. The dress was open just a bit in the front to allow young children to be swaddled next to her, in order to feed the child closely, with the child being as young as 3. Nudity was not seen as inherently sexual, depending on the context, but more the natural self, before original sin took over.

It says in 1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he who committeth fornication sinneth against their own body.

The Greek root word translated "fornication" is πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to the sex crime statutes under the Mosaic Law, denoted loosely as any sexual behavior or impurity outside of marriage. A man was expected to wear clothes, and respect that a child might not be wearing any clothing, and if he did anything to take advantage of the situation, he was guilty of a moral crime, not the child. Thus, dress policing itself is the moral crime of adult sexual entitlement, meaning anything as little as "cover up" and "don't touch yourself there". Children have the right to go around the house wearing nothing, or covering up everything in a hood. Whichever suits their fancy. Usually young girls dress a certain way to be looked at, but then are offended because adults tend to look in a more entitled way (I don't have that problem, by the way - I don't exist to them). Young girls generally do not want sex with adults, even as teenagers. They just want to look pretty...Children in biblical times went completely naked until the age of majority in public, and if any man were to slip a hand, he'd be deemed a fornicator, not the child. Sadly, for child's freedom sake, that can't be replicated today in most places. Nude beach, maybe?

The depraved sexually entitled adults will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them languish in the lake of burning fire and brimstone, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Original sin: Why adults have a depraved sin nature (down to the bone)

Many parents punish their children because they believe their children are inherently "bad". The doctrine of original sin is one of the most misunderstood of teachings in parenting. The doctrine of original sin is the centerpiece of my religious beliefs, and of attachment parenting - but only in first-person, not third-person projectory onto the child. Parents are flawed beings in relation to children, meaning charred and depraved to the bone.

Original sin can be understood by the Tenth Commandment, as laid down in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour.

The Hebrew root word translated "covet" is לחמוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers to wanting something from a child to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to an offense under the Eighth Commandment. 

The Tenth Commandment is denoted by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to, in the broadest sense, mankind's sin nature in general. Mankind was born to sin, meaning want in a way that he can't get, meaning leading to stealing from his neighbor in some way, with children being the neighbor of parents, and all adults in general. It is in the nature of adults to want things from children, and want things from children that children aren't readily willing to provide, as children are not to provide, but be provided for.

What the Tenth Commandment, in practice today, implies in stated format is that mankind's nature is inherently evil, depraved, and wicked, deserving nothing from children or anyone else, with said parent being grateful for their child's cooperation as is, earning more cooperation with children is the only way to "get" them to listen. 

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest and trust in the care and safety of parents, being able to be oneself in relation to parents, being able to say anything to parents, being a confidant to them, owing nothing in relation to children, yet nonetheless showing gratitude for the love and grace of parents by listening to them not out of fear of punishment, but out of trust and warmth towards parents. This comes from Christian love of children, denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao), admitting the one does not deserve to even exist in relation to a child, being convicted of one's sin nature, leading to sacrifice for the child just as Christ sacrificed for His children, rendering oneself at a level lower than the child, devaluing yourself as a servant to the child, ministering to and serving the child's every need, with said child being an extension of God and the "least of these" (Matt. 25:31-46), expecting absolutely nothing in return from children. The Greek root word translated denoting convicting fear ψοβός (Latin: phobos) and refers to reverent fear or otherworldly fear, meaning being struck with low-level terror in a way that leads to treating children with respect. It is a fear that leads to centeredness. It says in Hebrews 12:11 KJV:

Now no chastening seemeth to be joyous, but grievous: nevertheless afterward it yieldeth the peaceable fruit of righteousness unto them which is exercised thereby.

The Greek root word "chastening" refers to the chastening of the Lord, denoted by the Greek root word παιδεία (Latin: paideia), meaning parents being centered in the Lord in relation to the children extended to them by God for care and protection. It is chastening oneself up in a controlled manner in a way that allows children to run to parents for comfort, safety, and security, with the adult being calm and collected while the child feels safe showing their true emotions with you as a parent. The Greek root word translated "grievous" is λυπε (Latin: lupe) and refers to the pain of self-punishment for trespasses against one's child, chastening parents up even further, learning from their mistakes.

Parents in ancient Israel and adjoining churches were the centered type, in a listening way, meaning children confided their every emotion, with Hebrew mothers holding them close, with swaddling clothes attached to the mothers body up to age 3 or even older. Attachment parenting was the norm then in that culture. The Fifth Commandment simply means, for parents, that forming a secure parent-child bond is commanded by God, with mother and child especially attached at the hip. The Christ child is seen as wearing swaddling clothes in a manger, but that was simply because he was a newborn, and was wet as a result of just being born. There is very little written about Christ as a child, but chances are he was swaddled next to Mary until age 3 or even more. The account of him being scolded in the temple showed all - the parents were wrong, and he simply was verbally admonished, meaning not physically admonished with a whip. The idea was to admit one was evil due to the capacity to harm a child, like any parent, and work from there to char oneself, then replenish with seeing yourself do good works to children, like an hourglass, with the stressful events of parenting chastening up the parent.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and His angels! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!