Fantasy rights - Why it is a cause against child abuse of pedophiles

 Many people do not like the idea of fantasy rights. Fantasy rights is an initiative of the Virtuous Pedophiles organization, and many in liberal America do know offhand what VirPed and fantasy rights is, but see it as a group of men who want to fantasize about children, "don't know they actually can", and thus amount to a bunch of harmless yet quirky guys who have romantic fantasies about children, and call themselves pedophiles. These are better times for pedophiles than ever before. But, fantasy rights refers to the lowest level of child abuse and oppression, intersecting with said shared experience of children and former children - child abuse against a pedophile.

Child/pedophile is the children's rights designation for a child with pedophilic disorder. Such children are the lowest among children in terms of oppression, and the bulk of them, even worse, are fully aware that what their parents are doing is immoral and a form of abuse. This movement, even, is not entirely a safe place for a pedophilic child, as I am told by one is the accepted term. I am a safe person for these children, meaning they are the core pedophiles I stand up for. Many grow up in religious homes that do not allow for fantasy. This is where fantasy rights begins.

I never experienced this except as an abuse simulator, but it is the most enraging thing possible. Parents, however, have also been reported to say things like "I know what kind you are, and when I find out, you'll be kicked out in no time". To many of these prejudicial parents, "kicked out" might mean something even more than child abandonment.

In the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, there are no child abandonment laws, meaning there are, but only in your head. Why do we care about these children? They are children with special needs, meaning pedophilia is actually a neurodivergent condition when controlled, in terms of genetic history. The default, most common form of pedophilia exists in a child with a mental disability, with pedophilia being the arrested sexual development of the older child or teenager, with age-oriented expression. If you want to kick out that type of child, you're dead in my eyes. No adult responds equally to all children, and I want to KILL anyone who abuses a pedophilic child, meaning I am LIVID when I hear of their abuse. Think thrashing apart a piece of meat. The most impacted pedophiles by stigma are children, and child hatred and stigma, in the form of religious child abuse, are the core drivers of pedophile hatred, and the impact of this abuse lasts a lifetime for pedophiles.

Adult sexual entitlement is a broad term, and that can include sexual shaming of pedophiles as children. The Greek root word cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment in the New Testament, and refers to entitlement, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers here to wanting your child to not engage in self-stimulatory behavior to the point of seeking to impose said want onto the child, leading to theft/abuse upon offense taken by the child. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to the offenses under biblical law, meaning the torts and damages under the Mosaic Law linked to the Eighth Commandment, summed up in the New Testament, implicitly, as the slightest of personal slights against a child. Abstaining from all sexual fantasy is based on personal conviction, meaning one can be convicted of that teaching, but it sure isn't for everyone, and should not be imposed on one's children, due to the existence of a possible pedophile in the house that means no harm except maybe to himself/herself. 

Most clinical pedophiles are more of a danger to themselves than to any child that crosses their path, due to them feeling the reverse. The teenage years are the worst years for this for pedophiles. Many might be the type of teenager to hide in their bedroom, maybe not want to grow up or else thinking they can take on the adult world as a child. Common co-morbid conditions to pedophilia are agoraphobia and pedophobia, with pedophobia being a fear of children. Many survivors avoid children, or having children, because the children remind them of their own childhood, and what they didn't have. Pedophiles can be avoidant of children because they are convinced that they will attack a child in the local supermarket at a moments notice, so maybe buy groceries off the Internet and maybe find a job where you can work from home. It is not always that bad, but that's a compelling example. Usually ordinary trauma survivors are subtle about their aversion to children, whereas pedophiles are overt about it, on another level feeling the need to impress children, in an attracted way that causes public embarrassment.

On the other hand, some of us were not shamed by parents for being pedophiles, meaning we simply were given boundaries, and could tell parents anything. So, we know more than many at VirPed that there is a real danger for normalizing sex with children. The more non-offending pedophiles get accepted, the more we will have to turn down offers from bleeding heart SJWs saying "Now come on, they are just ordinary people - they need an outlet, don't they?" We don't need that sort of help. A pedophile like me can see things right on her level, and we know it will never work, no matter what science you can throw in front of my face, and I say this because I am a flawed pedophilic adult with children, and am prone to rationalizing when focusing on the topic of the age of consent too much. Much of that threat might be in this movement. Amy Bryant, the official leftist in this movement, organized to have the age of consent lowered to 16 here in Pennsylvania, and now I make a proposal that we raise both the age of consent and the marriageable age to 18 here in Pennsylvania, and keep it there. In the future context, we can clamp down on sex outside of marriage, bringing America back to its founding values, while learning that children are oppressed and marginalized, and do not deserve violence or abuse of any kind, including spanking. 

But, fantasies hurt nobody, and are not sin. All sins, meaning moral crimes, must be visible to be judged, meaning the judge must be able to bear witness to a moral crime, including fornication, meaning the crime must impose legal damages upon another person. It says in 1 Corinthians 6:18 KJV:

Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body: but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

The Greek root word translated πορνεία (Latin: porneia) and refers to imposing sexual entitlement on a child, as perceived by said child, starting with the briefest of inappropriate glance, as perceived by the child and the child alone. Simply having afterthoughts about a child, or any fantasy, is not sin in and of itself, unless the individual Christian is convicted that it could lead to fornication if left unchecked (1 Thess. 5:22). My religious beliefs actually encourage sexual fantasy about children instead of imposing my sexual desires onto them, thus using them as a sex object. Pro-social fantasy is all about the word "instead". Instead of picking out a real child target, just think of her and then let go of the want to be with her. Then, internalize that you are not entitled to anything from children, meaning they owe me nothing. Then, the fantasy is something you bring out fairly frequently to think about, and you do that to practice not doing it with a real child, like turning a dial away from the child and into yourself.

The depraved and entitled prejudicial parents and pastors who abuse pedophiles with religion through sexual shaming will burn in eternal Hell-fire! Let them suffer! Let them burn! Let them descend into darkness! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Child's orders - Why biblical surrender to parents is empowering to children

 How common is gentle, attached parenting? Fairly common, yet rare, in a hidden way. You'll see it from time to time. Not all parents become gentle parents by coming here. Pedophiles are actually a good example of a group of people that have "fallen into" gentle parenting, meaning a good "fallen into" (yet one they won't readily credit themselves for). Pedophiles prefer the term "positive discipline", and a pedophile understands positive parenting in terms of general rules, guided by non-entitlement strategies. If you are following the orders of a child, yet aren't afraid of them, and get along great with your child, you are a gentle parent. A great many parents have this type of relationship with their children. Lawful and binding orders. Invoice. Temper tantrum. Children are a legal force in the Bible, and an indemnified one entirely.

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the care, support, and protection of parents. This sort of rest can be understood in terms of attachment theory, meaning secure attachment. Secure attachment is achieved by breaking down barriers to children feeling safe around parents, which is why most children don't listen to their parents and rebel. It is pro-social rebellion, meaning you allow children to think for themselves, and question your judgment as a parent, and you let it descend to the point where they are ordering you around.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and literally translates to "stir up" and refers to the offenses, meaning torts and damages imposed under Jewish law, which includes assault and battery. The New Testament, in the Early Christian context, sums this up to the slightest of personal slights perceived by one's parents, meaning anything the child finds offensive, by way of their orders. Thus, merely saying "no" unnecessarily will lead to you getting into trouble with your child through lawful and binding orders issued by certain emotional reactions such as crying, whining, or rebellion towards parents. But, at the same time, a child who is more mature, older in age, and trusts you as a parent will allow you take liberty by way of withholding offense, turning the other cheek. It becomes a casual understanding, but one where you give lawful orders to your parents, and they they heed and obey your lawful and binding commands, fearing their child inward, listening to children's needs and benign wants outwardly.

Children in ancient Jewish culture gave their parents, especially mothers, lawful commands as to needs and benign wants. The Greek root word translated "parents" is γονεύς (Latin: goneus) and referred to leadership, not control over a child, and refers to, in context, children leading parents to what they need, and parents being attendant, with mothers closely attending to their child's needs, and fathers being the protector of the family and breadwinner, not dictator or tyrant. Children in the biblical context were demanding, but only in the private context of being around their parents. Otherwise, they were very quiet when in public while clinging to their mother, knowing they could save their upset and frustration for their parents, when they would be listened to and validated, with parents being indentured servants, paying due penance for their existence as an entitled adult, which is the situation of all adults.

The entitled parents and adults who provoke children to anger will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Corporal punishment of children shall not exist within the borders of the several states that constitute the United States of America, or adjascent territories or commonwealths, and if you identify to me as a pro-spanking parent, YOU shall not exist, but since murder is sin, you shall exist only in a prison cell. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

What is childhood?

 Many people see this question as redundant, until they focus on it more, then it becomes vague. I am opposed to the concept of childhood innocence as broader society understands it. "Innocent of guilt", yes, but I say "exempt" to distance myself from the abusers who use childhood innocence to oppress children and deny them their individuality.

It says in Colossians 3:20 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the care, support, and accountability of adults. This setup, as understood in context, respects the individuality of the child, as children here are not required at all to fit a demure, submissive role in relation to adults, always smiling, willing to serve adults with gratitude, meaning often forced gratitude due to the jackboot of adult zealots.

A child is an individual below the age of majority, which was 12 for females and 13 for males under Jewish law then. In today's society, in the United States, this translates to age 18 in most states, and 21 in the State of Mississippi. Apart from these laws, children can define themselves however they wish.

Childhood is living under a power of attorney, meaning having a collective guardian that exploits you and cheats you, as in the case of an individual with a mental disability. That is what adult oppression is like. Ensnared in the trap of an abuser, as the abuser has all the power to make the laws and the rules, shutting you out of any input. Power of attorney means an individual is deemed legally incompetent to manage their affairs, and needs a guardian to make legal decisions for them. With adults, you can fire your guardian. Children can't.

The defining characteristic of childhood is not themselves or their small size, but whom is looming over to misuse it to suppress any child input into society. It is like living under a compress, meaning you are not allowed to even think that adults mean harm. 

Child abuse is everywhere in the United States, meaning it is a societal problem, not a problem among individuals. Yet, it should be treated as an individual problem in light of the collective due to the American value of individual responsibility.

As far as individual child identity goes, anything goes. So they want to wear a showy, revealing outfit, so be it, and adults must deal with it. Adults can look, and children can glare or even flip them off if they don't like the attention. 

I see a child in relation to me as simply a human being who is smaller due to immature physical and/or mental development, and happens to be under a certain magic age. They aren't anyone special, except that many girls are attractive. But, I see myself as distant to them, not assuming anything about them. Guessing? Maybe, but I have no clue about even her name most of the time. 

Children end up being the ones to give the orders, and I thus totally submit to children in such very rare situations. I just have to realize that I don't have to follow ALL of their orders, meaning if it isn't feasible, it's okay to say "no" and I should to avoid permissiveness. The more I let them order me around as to needs and benign wants, the more of a bond I have towards her, and at that point sexual/romantic desire might just be the coincidental connotations added to the friendship, that might not be there if he happens to be a boy. It is reverent fear of a child, where you know you are out of line when they point it out...Submission to parents and adults is something caused by submission to children by adults, meaning mutual submission.

The depraved and entitled parents who force children into a mold to justify entitlement will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and suffer in the lake of fire and brimstone, which is the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The teaching of original sin - and why the focus should be on parents

The teaching of original sin is the most misunderstood teaching out there. Most parents see it as a religious excuse to punish and control one's child. Most Christian parents do not understand what original sin is in the context of parenting, or that it convicts them and not their child.

The Tenth Commandment in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

The Greek root word translated "covet" is למחוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers not merely to wanting things from children, but wanting things to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child, leading to theft/abuse.

The Greek root word cross-referencing the Tenth Commandment, and denoting a general attitude of entitlement, is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers to a core level of entitlement, meaning the attitude of "I am a good person" leading to thinking you are invincible, meaning beyond blame, because "I don't do anything wrong, so it must be the fault of other people". This when the adult should be focusing on themselves and their faults, and not other people. Adults, namely parents, have a depraved sin nature deserving of divine punishment merely for existing in relation to children. It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, as this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord and refers to the admission of one's totally depraved parent nature to God through one's child, centering oneself like an hourglass, but in a way that allows listening to and validates children's upsets and tears. This attitude punishes itself when it trespasses against the child, but rewards itself for increased self-discipline. It is remaining calm, in an active listening and reassuring way, all the while modeling self-discipline to children. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the admonition of the Lord, meaning setting limits with a child, which was done in the biblical context like a friend would set a limit, obliging to most childhood requests or else negotiating alternatives to benign wants, only saying "no" rarely, when absolutely necessary when protecting the child, and preferably using alternatives to "no" such as "that won't work" or "that isn't possible".  This is weighed by the Greek root word translated "provoke...to wrath" is παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and refers to the offenses, meaning the torts and damages under Jewish law linked to the Eighth Commandment, such as assault and battery laws, which offered legal protection from domestic battery to children as well. This legal context is repeated in the New Testament by the Greek root word κλεπτω (Latin: kleptó) and all words that describe a form of theft or damage, such as παροργίζο which refers to damages from fits of anger or fornication directed towards a child, or else any battery or assault damages imposed upon a child.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the care, support, and protection of parents, being able to share anything with parents, confiding everything with them at every level, owing nothing in return to children, but nonetheless listening to parents based on this trust. This form of surrender is conflated with the concept of pro-social rebellion, meaning children can question their parents and "talk back", as well as cry or even strike and physically act out, and parents are to listen and validate emotions like a sounding board. It is being their friend, but their mature, responsible friend, and listening and setting limits that way, but more so a friend to them that they can vent to about anything, and feel free to voice any opinion, no matter how harsh or brusque it comes out.

Ancient Hebrew culture was an attachment parenting culture, meaning obedience in the Bible refers not to a broken will, but a child being attached at the hip to a parent, with parents being their best friend. Closeness was valued in Hebrew families, especially with young children, but also with fairly older children in comparison to our modern culture. Punishment was only legal as a sentence for a crime, and only for an adult over the age of majority. Children were never charged for anything they did wrong.

The depraved and entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn and suffer in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices. Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

The goal of anti-parent

 Anti-parent is a system of parent identification and classification based on the acronym "We hide", which here means we don't boast or brag about being a parent. Anti-parent is the lowest function of this community, and is raised up to be bared, teeth and all, to the general public.

The goal of children's rights, in actuality, has little to do with pedophiles. We just were too kind in letting them in for asylum seeking purposes, and let in some real low life individuals with that disorder. Children's rights is about two terms, "child" and "parent". We put parents into submission, with show being submission.

What is the goal? Pro-social sequester, after pro-social (creep up). Pro-social sequester, to be fair, can mean how I sequester my parent/pedophile to these pages. The idea is to run all the parents over with a steam roller, erasing their footprint in the mud, then placing the remaining parents in the corner to be vacuumed up by the great American child protection system, in an afterhours raid. We at Opposing Parental Entitlement are like dracula for parent blood, not by way of sexual force, but any other force to subdue an errant parent is okay. We just have our standards. Pro-social gang rape, in floorboard format. We all turn on the parents, and floorboard them until they show their trauma in a tantrum, and only when they blame their parents do we take anything they say seriously. Watch the parent scream. Watch the parent choke. Watch the parent be terrorized, and have total schadendreude in it in the form of traumatic sadism. Parent tears of fake despair are yummy, such fake victimizers.

Get them arrested. Arrest them all. Kill every parent, validate every victim. What does "kill" mean to me? Slam that parent down on the sidewalk, then on the dash, with parent blood flowing down the street, and me watching with utter glee! I flipped the switch, ya know? I love flipping such switches. Switch happy, all day. We want to hurt them like they hurt their child, and break their will so that they accept that they are an abuser to their children, and then we pray together and work ourselves back up.

The parents are the ones abusing, so this is a holy war against the parents, so that their glorified identity does not exist, and is wiped clean from the face of the earth. We want to see parents raising children, not parents. So, they have consigned themselves to the fringes of society, by way of my children's rights compound.. I don't know any pro-spanking parents, and when I do, I never did in the first place.

Get 'em in prison. Get 'em registered.

Respect in parenting - Why it is earned

 Many parents abuse their children, meaning most according to statistical research into child maltreatment. 94% of parents commits acts of domestic battery against their children, and 1/3 might be violating the civil laws when doing so. New laws are being put in place to strengthen physical abuse laws for children, with striking a child under age 1, whereas 30% of parents have firsts truck their child by age 1.

It says in Ephesians 6:1-4 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honor thy father and mother, as this is the first commandment with promise; That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live upon the earth. And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath, but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to secure, vulnerable rest in the care, support, and protection of parents, being able to say anything when confiding into parents, being able to be themselves when in the providing custody of their parents, owing nothing in return to parents, but listening nonetheless not out of fear, but out of trust parents. It is a respect that empowers you to shout at your mother and say anything, and your input is valid and treated as such, even if met with a word "no" and an explanation.

The Greek root word translated "nurture" is παιδεία (Latin: paideia) and refers to the chastening of the Lord, centering oneself next to a child by way of exemplary teaching of children, by way of parents disciplining themselves and chastening themselves up, being your child's best friend, but in a centered, disciplined way that involves the parent listening and validating the child's upsets. The Greek root word translated "admonition" is νουθεσία (Latin: nouthesia) and refers to the admonition of the Lord, meaning God's Loving Reproof. This simply means stating the word "no" every once in a blue moon, when absolutely necessary, or the word's various variants in negotiation format. Setting a boundary should be like setting a limit for a friend, such as turning down your friend's request to borrow $1,000 so they can fix their car, because you know in advance that your friend is unreliable and disorganized, so you just say "nope, not giving you any money, because I know I won't get any back". With children, you have to be nicer, but speak to them like any adult friend that you are setting boundaries with, but on their level linguistically. The admonition of the Lord is weighed out by the language "provoke...to anger", which is translated by the Greek root word παροργίζο (Latin: parorgizo) and is one of the Greek words in the New Testament that refers to the offenses, meaning the torts and damages under the Law connected to the Eighth Commandment, which included assault and battery torts even for children. In the New Testament, all this was summed up as the slightest of personal slights against a child, stemming from controlling or punitive entitlement. Punishment was only acceptable in a judicial setting, and only for adults. Punishing children at all then was illegal, and that is only implicitly mentioned in the Law, or the first five books of Moses, and in the Greek "pull up" words, because corporal punishment wasn't the custom of Hebrew parents. Closeness and attachment were Jewish norms in parenting then, and that is repeated in the New Testament in 

In Christian homes in the Early Church, Hebrew parenting traditions were attachment-based in nature, as Ancient Israel was attachment parenting country, meaning obedience as a value was expressed in that culture as a form of closeness to parents, even from afar, where you listened instinctively to parents, not out of fear of punishment, but because you trusted parents closely enough that you instinctively listened to them, and heeded instruction accordingly. It was an instinct that was part of secure attachment in a child.

Parents had a close relationship with their children that was not litigious in nature, and involved closeness and an ability to share one's true self, to the vulnerable level, with parents, knowing you won't be punished for anything. Co-sleeping was the norm in ancient Jewish culture, as was holding even fairly older children on one's back or front as a mother. Children as old as age 3 were seen as infants, and treated as such, including things like tantrums and meltdowns.

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke children to anger through punitive or permissive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them BURN in the lake of fire and burning sulfur, suffering the second death for all eternity, in the place created for Satan and his accomplices! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

ANNOUNCEMENT: Reason for posting break

I have not posted in a while, and there is action on my Facebook page. I had a hissy fit, meaning I was very scared. Accounts being disabled all the sudden, in the form of pro-social stalking. "Pro-social" means they needed to prompt me to make a statement showing my guilt or lack thereof. 

The Pennsylvania State Police were afraid of me posting something pornographic about my cousin, meaning detailing a memory that is actually kind of hazy, vague, and otherworldly in terms of distance. That would be an moral crime according to my Christian beliefs, and a form of child sexual abuse, thus marking me an adult fornicator towards her, and her past child.

Do I have a sexual attraction to my cousin? Yes. Is it compelling? Absolutely not. Just vague chemistry, meaning a Pandora's box that shouldn't have been opened. What I did wrong was what I did in the attic, which would be summary harassment if I did it again, perhaps after a patrol officer from the Reading Police Department warning my mother and if I behaved that untoward toward her again, I would be slapped with a $300 fine for either harassment or disorderly conduct. 

I actually am an abuser, of the very low-level situational type, meaning I visit children and then get kicked out when I overstay my welcome, and that might spill over into the legal system if not careful. I center my pedophile/parent on the surface, meaning I can talk about it with ease, meaning one can stop and ask questions, and get an honest answer, with me answering to the court.

One thing to note is that the search party is going overtime, because these corrupt officers of the law in the Berks County Detectives want me to cry. I think they got what they wanted, but if they wanted tears, goodbye, my tear ducts don't manufacture them due to autism. If the home is still cordoned off, then maybe the arrest was illegal, but I'll allow the police to decide.