Responsible vs. irresponsible mental illnesses: Why pedophilia is a responsible mental illness

Pedophilia is a mental illness and sexual disorder involving sexual attraction to children under age 14. Pedophilia is, perhaps, the most stigmatized mental illness in the DSM-5, and the surrounding issue concerning pedophile stigma and hatred surrounds issues relating to mental health rights and parity. I, as a pedophile, have earned my rights. They could be dialed back anytime I commit acts of abuse against a child, and I would have earned that outcome as well. Society expects too little of pedophiles - and then expects too much of us in the process in terms of bureaucratic red tape.

Mental health parity here means pedophilia should be treated on a level similar to any other disorder that conflates itself with an antisocial, aggressive parent. PTSD itself, when not treated, can lead to child abuse, usually lawful corporal punishment such as spanking and hitting children. Pedophilia, in terms of veracity of impulses, is controllable in a manner on par with other aggressive disorders a parent may suffer from such as PTSD/childhood trauma, explosive anger disorder, and OCD. It is a disorder you deal with yourself, and not rely on the government or some nanny stepping in to micromanage. It is called learned helplessness, and that is why most pedophiles offend. They think they are helpless to their desires, therefore they are, and masculinist societal beliefs that "men can't help it" prop up their learned helplessness.

What do urges to molest children feel like? Drawn in. Allure. Hot body. Spark/trigger. She may look at you a certain way, namely one that indicates that she notices you and wants to be your friend. It is a desire to go through doors, namely by befriending parents and family, and then ending up in her room - only you didn't end up there...YOU chose to be there by following all the beforementioned steps. It would basically be going to a back room of a house, and then imposing adult sexual entitlement onto a child. It isn't a compelling, overwhelming urge, but an antisocial "smoke signal" projected onto the child.

So you "couldn't help it" when you raped that family member of yours in her room? Why were you even there in the first place? Why were you even associating with her in the first place? Why were you off your medication (can be an antecedent)? Why were you drinking? Why were you on so many drugs? Eliminate just one of these factors, and an offense couldn't occur. Yes, that's how it is with me.

Pedophile hatred is an anti-child, anti-woman hatred. Why? Who is most likely to accept pedophiles according to my own experiences and attachment theory. It is a matter of a mother having an "ugly child", and everyone thinking "how could you love such a child". But she does. Same with pedophiles. But then she's told by male influences from outside the home "knowing your child at that level is improper/immoral/abusive" and then is given a complex behavior plan for her child that is a mile long, that she just knows, intuitively, isn't necessary and simply makes him more oppositional, when all she needed to do was listen to and validate her child's cries and upset. Her son likely doesn't like having the condition and/or has a crush that needs to be vented to her instead of the child.

"Male influence" means basically anyone outside the realm of the selective attachment because mother and her pedophilic child, since even many women are under that influence (parental rights feminists, conservative women, etc.). Ultimately, the hatred comes from hate churches and denominations that hate everyone else that isn't like them as well, including children. Children clamped down on one end of the parent-monster, and pedophiles on the other. Children are oppressed the same way as pedophiles, but are instead subjugated as such out in the open. Both can be both.

I am very lucky to have an understanding mother, family, and support system here at children's rights. My advocacy on pedophiles rights is gratitude-based attitudes. We have earned what we have kept, and have rights as pedophiles to be treated on par to any mental health client. We need more services for this issue in Pennsylvania and elsewhere in the country.

"Being a child's friend": What providing custody really looks like

 Many parents in this country believe in the lie that they are the authority over their children, alongside a whole line of adults. However, the Bible does not see parents as authority figures, but instead custodial providers to children. What does this look like?

What is Christian love in parenting? The Greek root word translated "love" is αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to a form of submission to children, from beneath yet from above. It is being convicted of deserving DEATH and DESTRUCTION merely for existing in relation to children, leading to the parent submitting to the every need of a child as her servant, being bound and beholden to said child in a form of involuntary servitude and servile attitude towards the child. 

It says in Colossians 3:20-21 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord. Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "obey" is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to surrender to parents in the form of secure attachment and rest, meaning that I can tell my parents anything, and they will listen and validate. That includes things that most people won't understand. The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers to short-term damages such as pain, shame, fornication, or defamation of character, guided by entitled tendencies inherent of all adults. Punishing a child was illegal under Jewish law then, and punishing an adult was only legal within a judicial setting, when the defendant was proven to be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Parenting in ancient Jewish culture was attachment-based, with boys remaining with their mother until age 6, and girls until age 12, with infancy lasting until age 3 with both sexes.

How would this appear in real life? A friendship, but an unequal one. I myself am smaller than her for being bigger, meaning her needs would have more priority than mine, with said child standing in high judgment above me, standing on a high pillar, striking terror into me as an entitled adult in relation to her. Pro-social ragdoll. Pro-social passivity. Pro-social selflessness. Pro-social servitude. It would be a parent and child hanging out, with the child dragging me around, showing to me what she needs, and I obey blindly in a validating manner.

Let the entitled parents burn in the lake of fire and brimstone, suffering the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Childhood bipolar disorder - the need for pro-social permissiveness with some children

What is childhood bipolar disorder? A disorder where mood fluctuates, stereotypically from manic to depressive, and everywhere in between in terms of combination. Many parents and other adults...

This article was a planned article to reassure a mother of a child I met in a hotel in North East, Maryland. No plans. Encouraging children to act on autopedophilic sexual attractions is sin, and so I walked away. I did not take kindly being told to abuse a child...False encouragement I later find out.

I interpreted the girl's behavior as a lawful command to "do the opposite" of what the child wants me to do sexually towards then, meaning at all sexually, to the point of egress and escape. Implied lawful order.

Please get me out of parental rights...

 Survivors stand by each other in the face of an attack

Please get me out of children's rights...

 ...fake message.

"Pedophiles don't have trauma": A falsehood plagiarized by pro-parent crusaders (the best, meaning worst, of lawful physical abuse victims)

 Spanking and corporal punishment are widely accepted forms of child abuse in American society. 94% of parents spank or otherwise physically punish their child. Pedophiles exist. Many people believe a pedophile cannot be traumatized. That is actually the opposite, often to the disadvantage of a child target/victim. Pedophiles have trauma, just like most other adults have trauma. It is simply expressed differently. Angry/sad box.

I myself was spanked/punished as a child, with my father inflicting around 5-6 swats to the buttocks. I, at the very time, thought what was happening was wrong, at every level. I went onto children's rights websites in the United States, especially liking the anti-spanking sections. I was very angry, and defiant, in an aggressive way that modeled my parents' entitled attitudes straight back at them. The trauma evolved, and conflated itself with children eventually.

I myself, for the past few years, have struggled with pedophilic disorder, meaning that I am afraid of harm/trauma inflicted upon a child's person, in the form of heightened parental anxiety and alarm. It was at a very low, yet very aware level, in a freezing motion. It wasn't a spur to action, per se, but one that is a spur to action leading to inaction. It is a paralyzed state, where you can't do anything for your child, who isn't your child, who is being abused by THEIR own parents. I wish I could just call some hotline, but the law won't let me. I am a very alarmed, up-and-atom person on even lawful spanking. Think urgency. Think rushing to the scene. Think pro-social monitor. I am a neighborhood watch type, but I only observe neighbors at the lowest level. Otherwise, my righteous judgment doesn't exist to them. 

My trauma is compacted currently, but in the past, I wanted to kill myself out of caretaker suicide (a kamakaze type feeling). I felt compelled and obligated to stop parents from treating their children like that, because YOU WILL PAY IN PRISON as A PARENT if you punish that child, YOU HEAR ME? Fook "reasonable chastisement", and fucken slam the parent to the muthafucken ground, and watch the blood flow. That is parent anger. That used to be anxiety, of the avoidant/self-isolating type. I don't get adults (they tower over me). I only get children.

Pedophilic trauma can be misused. It is usually an anti-spanking trauma imposed on a child by way of adult (sexual) entitlement. It is a dissociative trauma, meaning the perpetrator "runs away" or "escapes" with a child to dissociate from fear, usually in the form of sexual harassment, but maybe leading to sexual assault/rape.

What happened? In the 1990s, our movement decided to "pitch the word" and spread the misuse of medical terminology throughout the country, and throughout the globe. This was by hostile parties attached to this movement. Children's rights, as a movement framework, is not entirely hostile to pedophiles. We have to appear anti-pedophile completely (as opposed to only word format) on the surface, but we have an underground railroad mechanism, of sorts, where pedophiles can identify in a clinical pathological manner and seek support. They can advocate for the people they are attracted to. We were never supposed to be this big pedophile hating machine...and it's about time we reeled things back.

Parental rights is the enemy of both children and pedophiles alike. Parents have too many rights in this country, including the "right" to physically and perhaps verbally abuse a child in the name of discipline. It isn't that parents are "overprotective", but that they don't protect enough. We need to annihilate parental rights, and replace it with children's rights. If you are a parent, you have no rights. Only duties towards your child.

Yes, dear parents. I have trauma - and mine weren't. They just implied themselves.

Pro-swoon, pro-social parent free: Banning GPNOs (who I want out)

Many expect me to try and ban a group of people from the community. Blacks/African-Americans/POC? They're okay. Women? They're okay. Jews? They're okay. Muslims? They're okay (namely progressive Muslims - I hate fundamentalist Islam on a moral level). GPNOs? How about GTFO and go KYS. We don't want you here. We were abused by scroungenecks like you. Messiah swoon. Save us all, by leaving us all - at least all of us at Max, with "parent" trauma conflated with pedophiles.

What is a GPNO? Gentle parent in name only. Gentle parenting itself has a very broad continuum of application, centered around the children's rights code. The one thing to avoid as a parent is entitlement leading to theft/abuse, which leads you to no punishment, control, or sexual/behavioral neglect. Apart from this, parent as you wish, and I don't care. But, inflict any damages upon a child's person, property, or effects (impact without consent, at the least), and you end up on my bad side, and I cast you away alongside the conglamorate...We are talking someone who says that "gently" spanking a child can be gentle parenting. It isn't, and I was seriously messed up by that very setup.

It says in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

The Greek root word translated "judge" κρινο (Latin: krino) and refers to courtroom judgment, meaning surrounding the person, with the presumption of innocence, beyond a reasonable doubt, with superficial suspicion. I do not know anything about you as a gentle parent, so I presume the best, that nothing is going on at home that might concern me, that you aren't spanking a child defensively, that you aren't hiding a sexual predator/fornicator. I do not judge with a two-sided window, but a clear window looking in from above, like a hawk swooping in for carrion. Parents are prey, and children are friends aside me. Hand in hand. Be their friend, not their enemy. Pro-social avoidance of bias also, as I am to have no bias in terms of my righteous judgment of others, apart from right versus wrong, and who did it. Doesn't matter why or the "humane" circumstances (the latter can matter when an apologetic confession can be fished out). Simple, rigid whodunnit judgment of parents. Once I deem you guilty, you are my property, and I can project onto you whatever I want in order to keep myself safe.

The sex-critical acronym here is pro-social excursion, pro-social bright-light. We all search for evidence on the parents, in a slow, seep-down manner, creeping on their misuse of our parenting, using righteous tests as a way to poke and get out guilty spurts onto the page. Then, once the parent erupts, we all turn on it! That thing, yes, is an "it" to me. It could well lash out on such a little thing such as me if it hits its children. We all rebuke, then walk away...for EVER! Shun them for all time!

The desired result for an entitled parent defending such filth...door hang. Tongue exposed. Bloody mouth. Swoon all around. Child/pedophile liberated from an abusive home. So you feel sorry for these sick bastards? I don't. Viva la anti-spanking revolution. Viva la bloodlust.