Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible calls for tougher laws on the books protecting children from abuse

Most American parents think that the Bible has no concept of child abuse, apart from obeying the law of the land. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most American parents support the present-day child abuse definitions under state and federal law. However, the Bible has its own definition of child abuse - whatever the child victim perceives as abuse.

The Greek root word denoting parental entitlement is πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and is defined as, officially speaking, wanting things from children, to the point of imposition. Unofficially speaking, parental entitlement consists of a parent who is sorely disappointed when they don't get the well-behaved child that they feel that they deserve. Parents are deserving of absolutely nothing in relation to children ust for existing. Even any parent anger directed towards a child is parental entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. Whenever this sense of entitlement in parents was perceived as offensive or damaging by a child, it was deemed child abuse. See also Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they be discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and refers here to offenses or damages, namely the slightest of personal offense perceived by a child, stemming from entitlement. Child abuse in the Bible, as a legal concept, consists of entitlement in parents, leading to offense in children. The key to not abusing your child is to avoid offense in children. Avoiding offense in children is the same as avoiding offense in other adults. Just as hurt feelings are inevitable in relations between adults, hurt feelings are also inevitable in children when dealing with them. Thus, in order to avoid offense in children, you need to be willing to give a meaningful apology whenever you hurt your child's feelings. Usually, all that is necessary is a reassurance of good intent coming from parents, in the form of an informal apology, whenever you hurt your child's feelings with limits not set out of anger, such as "I'm sorry, but I had to set X limit for Y reasons". However, if you ever lose your cool with your child as a parent, including while setting limits you definitely need to give a formal apology for hurting your child's feelings with your anger, such as "I apologize for losing my temper with you", and then commit never to lose your cool with your child ever again, as any parent anger directed towards a child is entitlement, and was seen as entitlement in the Early Church. This commandment cross-references the Eighth and the Tenth Commandments, with the Apostle Paul here convicting a group of Greek Christian parents who brought into the church their pagan custom of patrias potestas, which is a Latin term roughly translating to "power to the parent", namely the power to impose punitive sanctions on children, such as spanking or other forms of punishment of children. However, this commandment ultimately was received as prohibiting all forms of offenses in children as perceived by a child, at minimum. Paul. contrary to popular legend, was anti-spanking, and opposed any and all punitive parenting in his secular writings. Attachment parenting was banned under Roman law, but the Early Christians did it anyway, obeying God over men. 

The Greek root word translated "they be discouraged" is αθυμέω (Latin: athumeo) and refers here to long-term damages, namely childhood trauma. The ancients in the Bible had a concept of childhood trauma. Whenever a child grew up to be atheist, shame fell onto the parents for being too harsh with their child. An atheist was seen then as an abused child, not merely a "lost soul" to be "won over".

The ancients in the Bible even had a concept of child sexual abuse. The Greek root word translated "fornication" in the New Testament is πορνεία  (Latin: porneia) and refers here to any sexual relations or advances outside of the context of a Christian marriage between one adult man and one adult woman, with this marriage being equal in nature. A groom was only allowed a bride his age or up to 4 years older. Any sexual relations or advances towards a child, including an intergenerational marriage, was banned in the Early Church. Also prohibited was any pornography on the possession of an adult. Most child sexual abuse came in the form of father-child incest, with daughters being the usual targets. Fathers usually spent away their parent attractions towards children by way of righteous masturbation, meaning masturbation without pornography for health reasons. Child sexual abuse was rare in the biblical context, meaning next to non-existent. When it did happen, it was a huge moral outrage in the community. Sexual attraction to children was on the surface level in biblical times, meaning the joke level, with the abuse showing by the attempts of the abuser to hide their attractions towards child victims.

It is a myth that the Early Christians were well-integrated into Greco-Roman society. The Early Christians instead lived in enclaves in major cities, policed into ghettos by the Roman authorities, shunning the outside Greco-Roman world, as well as shunning the world at large. The 1st Century Christians had their own music and cuisine, and even their own sectarian courts.

Child abuse in the Early Church was prosecuted by way of internal church investigation. This investigation started with a child confiding into a clergyperson about their home life. From there, the parents were summoned to appear before the council of 3 elders who presided over the internal investigation. If the parents at all got defensive in open court, they were swiftly excommunicated from the Early Christian Churches of God for their entitlement alone. Also excommunicated were any witnesses testifying on behalf of parents.

The Bible is an anti-spanking document. All 88 books of the Bible - from Genesis to Revelation - were written by anti-spanking Jews, with Judaism as a whole prohibiting any punishment or force in parenting. All of the biblical writers also wrote parenting manuals that advocated attachment parenting. Even King Solomon issued an attachment parenting manual, with the rod in Proverbs referring to the 40 minus 1 lashes as a sentence for a crime. It just so happens that these attachment parenting manuals were not translated into English until the 1960s. Before then, this knowledge about proper parenting was known only to the Jewish world. Around this time, pro-spanking pastors constructed the Revised context that serves to scare men in particular from exploring the Hebraic context of the Bible, as there is nowhere in the Hebraic condoning the sexual abuse of a child.

The Bible is America's book. America is a Christian nation, founded on Judeo-Christian values. We as a society glean from the Bible and its context as to how to live and treat each other with respect. Even our legal codes, under the English common law, are rooted in the Bible. However, the legal defense of "reasonable chastisement" is rooted in dated biblical teaching. It is about time that we repeal the "reasonable chastisement" defense, and redefine child abuse under state and federal law as prohibiting anything perceived by the child victim as abuse. 

The depraved and entitled parents who provoke their children to anger through punitive parenting will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them be cast forever into the lake of fire and burning sulfur, which is the second death prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Let them descend into the abyss which is the ever-burning Hell of fire and torrents, suffering God's Wrath day and night forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!