I am deeply sorry for the fact that you were abused, sexually and otherwise, as a pedophilic child, Alan. I do not approve of those sorts of gentle parents that try to correct and save their pedophilic children. I am one to represent pedophilic children - both present and past - as the core of my pedophile self-advocacy.
Pedophilic children are at the core of the prejudicial hatred and hysteria against pedophiles. That is why pedophile rights ARE children's rights. Pedophilic children are punished for fantasizing sexually about much younger children, and are corrected for looking at much younger children.
I think you have a very real children's rights trauma. Know that such a trauma is not common. I can't relate to that trauma at all, and so I do not understand your very real pain from children's rights. I am a children's rights advocate, but I don't think a genuine pedophile is headed for Hell. If you are a Hell-bound sex offender, you lose the right to wear the pedophile label, unless you can admit that you have a problem.
My abusive liberal parents were parental rights liberals, and they abuse using authoritative parenting too. I was frequently put in time-out by both parents, with one parent adding a disciplinary spanking to the mix. That is why I identify as children's rights. I was never harmed by a pedophile, and that's why I don't oppose them. I AM a pedophile, after all, and I only oppose myself in terms of personal conviction of a sinful nature. Most pedophiles, I think, do char and tar themselves privately. I know that if I go up to a young girl, I go to Hell.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.