POSITION STATEMENT: The existence of the Virtuous Pedophiles board

Let them have their board. I do have an account there myself, but plan to post rarely. The Virtuous Pedophiles board is for virtuous pedophiles. I'm not one of them. 

We at Anti-Parent classify the Virtuous Pedophiles forums a self-help group for caregivers and parents struggling with pedophilia or other attraction to children, meaning a trauma board. We have observed that the collective trauma at VirPed is "pedophile" trauma in the affirmative, meaning they need to identify due to a religious trauma of theirs. I have views similar to their abuser, so I advocate from afar, and rarely compare notes.

We want there to be a board for pedophiles, and we defend their right to have a board for clinical celebratory discussion that leads to healing and growth.

I myself am grateful for the support from family, and mentors and colleagues in this children's rights community. I avoid VirPed in terms of giving them their space because I have a parental rights trauma (and have to see them as a youth right entity in remorseful format). I sometimes struggle by way of rationalizing the age of consent. Think a coconut, and you understand my brain on that issue. I am struggling to be anti-contact, and sound more astute because I want to roll over and erase the bad thoughts by advocating against my self-interest. Most pedophiles will never understand my admittedly draconian side as a children's rights pedophile. Most of them at VirPed are actually on my good side, which is rare for any group of adults. Most of them are just random guys sexually fetishizing childhood with some sexual fetish for children that is weird to most Americans, but in my experience, when explained right, not frightening at all.

A Virtuous Pedophile is, by default, an implied parent, due to their admission of their flawed nature, but if pro-spanking views are expressed genuinely, meaning not as a form of anti-contact gaslighting (I can tell by the tone), they will be put on my foes list, but unfortunately, the board does not allow me to campaign against pro-spanking parents due to the neutral spanking status of VirPed. Most pedophiles do not like that sort of thing, and from what I have seen, those that support such abuse lay their heads low and do not proselytize on that issue.

I was banned mistakenly, so I make this statement to make it clear what my stance on VirPed is. The gist of my righteous judgment is that anyone who identifies themselves as a parent in their entitlement or defended glorified title is one. Parental rights trauma, however, is not something that requires accommodation. It is so low that I can read varying lenses of text and tell if a children's rights writer is masking their parental rights views with children's rights language, which is what a lot of modern behaviorist authoritative parents do. It is like looking under the text, and telling your motives, and whether you want to empower the children or the parents, and it better be the former, or else I, for one, am not reading your posts...I can advocate children's rights with a parental rights twang.