The proper privilege attitude of any attached parent

In conservatism, we rarely discuss privilege except that of the left, meaning the left being a great monolith that shuts out certain voices just because of their status in society, the very definition of prejudice. Privilege does exist as a concept in conservatism, and it is called individual privilege.

The concept of privilege is rooted in the teaching of righteous judgment, meaning moral legal judgment on an individual level. As soon as you start judging groups blindly, you run into the moral crime of collective perjury, or prejudice, which is denoted by the Ninth Commandment, repeated in the New Testament by the Greek root word λοιδορος (Latin: loidoros). Righteous judgment is denoted in Christ's commandment in John 7:24 KJV:

Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.

"Judge" and "judgment" is translated by the Greek root word κρινο (Latin: krino) and refers to surround sound judgment of one's neighbor, meaning your neighbor is innocent until proven guilty, beyond a reasonable doubt, with due suspicion "beyond what the eye can see", regardless of unchosen group status, meaning judging any group based on unchosen traits as collectively guilty is perjury, including in a conversation between two people of different groups. Adult privilege/entitlement is the fact that adults will never again fully understand the oppressed and abused position of being a child in this country, judging children one by one with psychologist's judgments, looking into children, seeing the good in them, and assuming goodness in children no matter what, as children are exempt from prosecution under Divine Codified Jurisprudence. Suspect all adults like surround sound, but presume innocence in children like surround sound nonetheless, taking up cases as they come up, with children being a clinical case and not a legal case, due to youthful ignorance and inexperience. 

Judge your child like a psychologist would, using clinical profiling and not forensic profiling. Ask them questions about their well-being periodically, or when they seem upset. When they want a ready answer that they won't like, ask a question back to get them to think. Every child is a victim, but their victimhood is unique, so assume nothing about even your own child, apart from what they share with you. Assume your child is simply a blank canvas, and let them paint you a picture of themselves on that canvas, the best they can, being there like a psychologist, diagnosing needs based on input and status alone. If they are crying, they are crying for some reason, and it might just be that they want attention - so give them attention, and quit being a lazy and whiny parent for punishing an "attention-seeker". Get to know your child. Don't paint on their blank canvas - let them paint on it for you, delineating the bullet points as to who they really are, like a slide show. I believe nothing about a child's personality apart from what they share. I might infer other things, but I don't know, so I assume nothing.

Apart from adult privilege, there is no organized privilege on the right. We are all individuals, and even when judging children, you should invoke individual privilege as well. I don't know what a child I just met wants from me, so I let them paint a picture on a blank canvas of who they are, and I sort of get into that, meaning sort of share their interests, at least while they are there.

Let the depraved group perjurors burn in the lake of fire and brimstone, suffering the second death! Let them burn forever and ever! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!