The parent invasion of children's rights

 WE are children's rights, and WE are not parents. The parents stand tall, all around us, like weeds - an eyesore to the general public, since nobody cares about the emotional welfare of the child victims. There is inter-movement dispute because of anti-children's rights at Focus on the Family, a parent group, trying to get me out of this community quite failingly - it would be my choice. I would do it, but not at this rate, or any forseeable rate.

I would remove myself from this movement, if it came to that. When would I? When everyone hated me, which I know isn't the case at all here. A bunch of Max sympathizers on one level, fighting over what's best for a grown adult, and then a bunch of feigned survivors showing sexual hatred to one of their own due to what conflates his survivor.

Robbyn is on my side, but has long acted as if she was the only one who cared, and that others do not. That is concerning, except that she has renounced all hostility to me until I attack her, which is never, because I don't want war with someone I wish to work alongside.

The bulk of the community seems to be Switzerland on this issue, and that actually is the most helpful. The most prominent of the "Switzerland" group is Amy Bryant. She has finally figured out that when I say "pedophile", it is ALWAYS a clinical word. This is actually a good stance to have on the issue. It is a foreign entity indeed in this context, and I came in expecting to be treated like a research subject. Robbyn has been excluded due to showing bias. I'm just grateful she cares.

Ultimately, things aren't that dire, in terms of movement support. Most people here just don't care, and don't want to be pulled into the nitty gritty of things. They know the real Max can solve his own problems. Robbyn is what I'd classify as the same as my father, a "worry" narcissist - a well-meaning abuser, but still an abuser. I don't want her to worry. I want her to take a load off and be Switzerland like everyone else.

I speak in exclusionary terms about Foursquare - they aren't here by my standard, so they don't exist. Such sexual deprivation and impropriety does not exist in our movement, meaning I deem them shunned parties pending complete surrender of arms and apology, which may be never. I am not one to be easily offended (I qualify because of their tone-deafness), but I have the right to be offended by abuse. This is a form of sexual abuse of a pedophile, meaning that is the sole reason for it. You have to be very careful accusing someone of prejudice against you for being a pedophile, but in this case, you're gone. Your days are numbered, for as far as I'm concerned. Fook parents, and fook parental rights - that's my trauma.