Thursday, January 21, 2021

Plot to discredit VirPed: "Max crush"

 What is Virtuous Pedophiles? A support group for pedophiles 18 and up who seek to not abuse children sexually...Several individuals within this movement, both men and women, are currently cyberstalking me through airborne means, and thus misrepresenting the community in the process, and/or did in the past, meaning both can exist in different individuals.

Virtuous Pedophiles is about pedophiles choosing not to abuse children. Most everyone here was given a chip in case I were to attack the complex or abuse anyone...(chopped off).

Most people here who have that chip use it widely, meaning the unsung members of our community. Several of the more prominent members of the children's rights community have untreated sexual sadism disorder centered solely around ME (sigh). meaning they see witch-doctors for issues surrounding the condition (anti-CR). 

Ultimately, the outcome was embarrassing for VirPed, and goes against what WE believe as a movement ourselves. These people act as if "I can't help myself" when you interrogate them, when I can help myself by just knowing that abuse is wrong. Why do you need to fight back and self-flagellate against "Max urges". Just do the VirPed way in relation to cases like mine...We don't feel sorry for ourselves all the time.

Sea. Stopped. "We  don't want VirPed, so we used him as a mule to get them down". Nope, GET OUT! Even if only one member (myself) benefitted from their services, using another person to take down a community because "they scare me" is a form of abuse, and worthy of collective ban upon trial and conviction. We don't like you much here at Max, all in one. Up and down. I judge linear, straight down, allowing the subject to prove their innocence every step of the way (pro-social clarification), and on the last day, either apology or reconciliation, or broomsweep...She is also doing experiments on me, in which case I ask that she do that through in-person/online interview, not gaslighting prodding. She'll get a biased answer from me, expressing a bias I don't mean. I don't see you as "miss meanie" or any GirlChat crap on that level - just the Robbyn behind the page, just as any parent here. Now, I might see you that way, but if you leave me alone, it will blow over. Stop asking if you will be attacked by me, or you won't - you'll just tick me off and infuriate me. Papers flying. Through the roof...This evidence is two-sided, so one can come to their own conclusion. Jury is out, so advice is welcome but may be shot down.

We don't like valid support groups undermined. Some who were involved have already apologized. I haven't heard it from others. It was a grooming gang that arose separately yet together. I'm glad non-offending pedophiles have more support than they did a few years ago.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...