Thursday, January 21, 2021

Mow over the parents/adults - where should the submission to children start? (with pedophiles)

What is children's rights about? Mowing over. Labels, largely accusatory, leading to reversal of compress. Pro-social compress, in the reverse. Pro-social cut down, in label format. Pro-social disappear, leading to ambiance of children. We don't want accusatory pedophiles to exist - we want THEM to give up the accusatory label, and shed it for themselves. They are.

Many think of a children's rights movement as a circular blob, or an orchestra in the corner of society, and stereotype us as either a "gang of angry women" or else may support us distantly with feminist connotations. Children's rights started with feminism, but will not end with it - it will end with our country, the United States of America, and our founding Judaeo-Christian values. Children's rights is a peacekeeping movement in terms of structure, in terms of how it plays out nationwide in terms of progress.

There are really only two sides to the children's rights debate - children and adults, with parents being the sole orchestrator of child abuse within this country. Parents and other adults can be understood as a high cliff in their natural state, keeping the children down with a compress. Therefore, God punished mankind, meaning adult-kind, by banishing it from the Garden of Eden, with the earthly punishment for adults being lawful subjection and help-servitude to children, with said children being extended by God as a lawful and dutiful authority to parents/adults, trembling in reverent fear and terror in relation to children.

ALL adults, by default, are deserving of DEATH and DESTRUCTION merely for existing in relation to children, and are marked for deletion for said moral crime. An adult does not have the right to exist in relation to a child, at all, and all except a few will be swept of by God, and will be destroyed and annihilated. Parents/adults are commanded to submit to the child's every vulnerable need, working against their depraved sin nature, fearing the Lord (Latin: ψοβός), leading to bondservice and indentured servitude towards the child, expecting absolutely nothing in return, being grateful for any respect or kindness coming from a child, knowing that adults are undeserving of any grace from a child, being the filthy, repulsive creatures that tower over them. When this attitude of service leads to a child's needs being validated.

Pedophiles are one of the first outlying groups of individuals to admit their privilege over children. Trauma survivors have, in fact, started the line of dominoes that is parents/adults choosing to not abuse children, and work against entitlement. Most everyone else in this country who chooses not to abuse children has pedophilic traits of some kind. Most people don't care, or care very little, in a seeping, low-level way. Pedophiles, meaning those with a clinical condition geared towards attraction to children, are actually more likely to positive discipline strategies in dealing with children (think educated, think nerdy, think good with children [but in a quirky, passive way]).

First pedophiles, then ordinary parents (physically aggressive parents). Then children's equality - because we adults submitted to the needs of a child.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

The word "no": Why children need to hear the word "no" seldom (meaning almost never)

Many parents think that children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of American ...