Many parents think that pedophiles are the main threat to children. This is a common projectory excuse from parents and other adults charged with the duty of caring for children. However, the fact of the matter is that any old adult can sexually abuse a child, under the right/wrong conditions.
Every single adult is guilty just for the capacity to sexually abuse a child, meaning that adults are individually responsible for righteous avoidance in relation to children. The most necessary of all righteous avoidance is righteous masturbation.
Children are perfectly capable of discerning whether an adult is sexually abusive or non-abusive. Children who perceive an adult as a threat have a special attraction to the adult that is repellant in nature, meaning instinct alone guides them away from harm. When children want to go with a stranger, think pedophile. Zig-zag groomers are the only abusers that evade the righteous judgment of children, and that is because they operate on the surface, without being guided by a narcissist.
The Greek root word denoting lust is έπιθυμέω (Latin: epithumeo) and refers not to ordinary sexual desire, but to sexual entitlement. Sexual entitlement is defined under God's Law as, officially speaking, sexual want, to the point of sexually motivated approach. It is okay to look the look, and then think the think later, but if you find yourself doing the deed with a child, you shouldn't have approached them. "Approach" refers to taking the first steps towards sexually abusing a child.
I myself take the concept of adult abstinence seriously. I myself did commit an act of sexual abuse towards a child. I was a dating abuser, meaning I wanted a simple date with a child, and approached children in order to proposition them. Mentally disabled abusers such as how I was are the hardest of the abusers to rehabilitate. Mentally disabled abusers don't have a mere distant narcissist, but instead revolve their whole identity around a crush on a child.
A pedophile is not an anger packet directed at a child. Instead, a pedophile is an individual who has a sexual preference towards children under age 14. A pedophile has a form of immature autism that specializes in children in terms of intense interests. A pedophile is someone with autism who has child smarts, meaning the pedophilic individual is a walking and talking encyclopedia about children. Autism means "one with..." with pedophilia being a form of autism that is "one with" children. Usually, a pedophile is an ambivert, meaning they are extroverted around children, but otherwise introverted. Most pedophiles have moderate-severe autism, with a large part of the pedophile population having non-verbal autism. I myself have autism on the moderate end of the autism spectrum, meaning I have a passion for children's rights, and that I think a lot about children as a special interest.
Most adults who sexually abuse children are not pedophiles, but instead are ordinary adults being confronted with a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to rape or sexually assault a child. Most adults who sexually abuse children has a secondary sexual attraction to children that they repress, with the repressed desires coming out sideways onto the child, like a ton of bricks. The only way out of sexually abusing a child is in, meaning the masturbation basket.
The sexual dynamics in a family home come in the form of a criss-cross. Fathers and prepubescent daughters have a mutually unrequited attraction to each other. Boys have a dead end attraction to their mothers. Sexual abuse happens when parents repress their child attractions, with the repressed desires coming out onto the child, like a ton of bricks. The father-daughter dynamic here is called the "electra" complex. Sometimes, the mother sexually abuses her child, in which case we call that the "oedipus" complex.
All adults presumably have some attraction to children. Usually, the attraction is to teenagers, especially older teenagers who look like adults. Most men have a sexual attraction to teenage girls, and most women have a sexual attraction to teenage boys. 20% of men have a secondary attraction to prepubescent children. Most adults repress these attractions, in which case the repressed desires come out sideways, usually when the adult is left alone with a child. With righteous masturbation - meaning masturbation without pornography - the desire is quelled by the masturbatory orgasm, and an adult then can be alone with a child with no problem. I myself can handle being alone with a child, and that is because I know I can sexually fantasize about the girl later in my masturbatory fantasies.
It is the individual responsibility of all adults to abstain from child sexual abuse. It is not enough for others to stop a sexual predator, but instead, adults need to individually avoid anything that would lead them towards taking the first steps towards sexually abusing a child. We all as adults are capable of the worst forms of abuse towards children. I myself am a pedophile, and I choose not to sexually abuse a child. Part of choosing not to sexually abuse a child is masturbating righteously to sexual thoughts of children. When you discharge a fantasy about children, it quells the desires instantly, and brings you down to earth from a lust high. Righteous masturbation ends the struggle with lust, so that men in particular can be at ease with themselves. Masturbation was seen in the Early Church as a purification ritual, meaning if an individual wanted to flee fornication, they would masturbate to distract themselves from their sexual target.
The depraved and decadent, defiled adults who rape or sexually assault children will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them descend into torrents of Hell-fire, prepared for Satan and his accomplices! Repent!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.