Thursday, September 2, 2021

Opposing Parental Entitlement is a pro-pedophile entity

Opposing Parental Entitlement is a pro-pedophile entity, meaning we are all for pedophiles identifying as having a clinical condition out in the open, talking about adult sexual entitlement just like any other parenting or child-care struggle.

We are, however, still anti-pedophilia in the clinical sense, and neutral pedophilia in the moral sense. I don't care if anyone is a pedophile. All I care about is if children are safe and their rights and civil liberties respected alongside pedophiles.

We are not a treatment center, but we refer parents to treatment and peer support resources for pedophiles like Virtuous Pedophiles (VirPed) and the Association for Sexual Abuse Prevention (ASAP). This is a rally children's rights page against spanking and other forms of child abuse coming from parental entitlement. Parental entitlement is the most horrific and catastrophic of evils against children, and is the core of the depraved nature of man, and pedophilic children are its worst victims. "Pedophilia" simply is a medical term denoting one form of parental entitlement that is under control in most of its holders, thus we have bigger fish to fry than focusing on pedophiles in the negative. Mental health labels should have no moral value, thus no child abuser is a pedophile, but simply is an abuser of children. Pedophiles are their victims, with children being the most oppressed of pedophiles.

We hate parental entitlement more than anyone else, and are the one page in the children's rights community to still ban parents who identify by their glorified title, as well as adults with their glorified title. We know where those parents are headed...straight to Hell, if they don't have a change of heart about their entitled and violent ways.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...