Thursday, September 2, 2021

What we do here at Opposing Parental Entitlement

Many are confused as to what we do here at Opposing Parental Entitlement. We ban parents, and that's all there needs to be said. But, wait, there's more!

We are an anti-parent organization, meaning against parents identifying anywhere in the world, meaning anywhere in plain sight, meaning anywhere on the Internet. We gentle parents hide. 

If you say "I am a parent" when I call out your abuse of your child, and your parental entitlement, expect that to be the last time you ever hear from me. 

We are an academic gaslighting powerhouse, in list-of-facts format to bring the pro-spanking parents to repentance, convicting them in the Lord of their depraved, wicked adult nature. We don't want parents to exist, anywhere in perception, meaning we want people raising children to parent, and parent the right way, without punishment or control of any kind, or any entitlement imposed on children.

Anyone on my page who identifies as a parent is first questioned, then banned, or banned when the identification is obviously trolling. We want to know easily who the parent trolls are by how they identify, and if they don't call themselves out by their glorified title, I will.

As for my regular readers, I know you are a parent, in the way I like, you're fine, unless you cause a disruption. But, there is no reason, given what I have written about parents, for even my core readers to say they are a parent except to gaslight me. Talking about parenting your children is quite alright, and I talk about parenting in exemplary tense as well. But, why BE a parent, meaning say it all the time? That's virtue signaling, much?

As for pedophilia? Why not a pro-social honest replacement to parents? Pedophiles every once and a while in the therapy room, and you can just tell, because it is on the surface.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Righteous co-sleeping: Why God wants parents to sleep next to their children

Many parents think that co-sleeping is the irresponsible choice for a parent to make. This is a common attitude from American parents. Most ...