Fore!: What should happen to pro-spanking parents in society

 Many people avoid the biblical context on parenting because of denial of the obvious - it does not condone spanking in the slightest. The rod of correction can be visualized as a protective grandfather stepping in and whipping his errant son who abused his grandchild. Grandparents rights did exist in the Old Testament, and that is how most child abuse legislation was enforced by the Israelite government, meaning the Law, which gentile Christians such as I keep in spirit. Knock them all out! That's what was done in the Early Church, and those were the good old days.

The Early Church was not friendly to pro-spanking parents. Spanking was explicitly banned under church ordinance, even as Greco-Roman fathers whipped their sons and spanked their daughters. Children could bear witness to the abuse from their parents, usually through the co-parent, usually the mother. Women, unlike elsewhere in the ancient world, were equal to men in terms of church citizenship. Children were not to be punished because they were not full citizens, meaning they were presumed to be ignorant of the Law, and thus indemnified of any punishment.

Church structure was based on collective judgment, meaning collective gaslighting, meaning the Early Christian churches were gaslighting organizations that operated at the lowest level of Greco-Roman society, meaning the lowest caste. An abusive parent was first flagged by another parent or a co-parent, alongside the child him/herself. The Early Christian judgment style was lamppost judgment, meaning judgment was overt, meaning when you were being judged, you knew you were being judged, and if you didn't confess within a certain amount of time, you would be flamed out of the church community by every member of the congregation, and perhaps left to be charged with any Roman law if applicable, which always was in the adverse tense, since being a Christian alone was a violation of Roman law.

Today, pro-social stalking, meaning "stagecoach" gaslighting, of parents who identify themselves in the store is acceptable. I don't confront parents in the store. I simply take notes for the Lord, as a righteous judge behind enemy lines. Sometimes I publish the big fish that trigger my parental rights trauma, and sometimes I post the most miniscule and irrelevant acts of entitled abuse to show that children's rights has that power - we can publish what we see, and document it on a blog. It's called subversive gaslighting, in note format, leading to shunning by way of association meaning lack thereof. Document a parent sighting, and put it on the blog, with a description of the defendant, being judge and jury over the parent already. The main standard that existed in the Early Church applies today, meaning the presumption of innocence beyond a reasonable doubt, with due suspicion "beyond what the eye can see", in the form of double-sided judgment.

The depraved and entitled parents shall be excommunicated from God's Church until they learn to behave, and treat their children with respect! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!