Wednesday, June 30, 2021

If spanking was banned tomorrow - How the system would handle massive change

Many parents believe that spanking and corporal punishment is the right thing to do in order to discipline and control a child. Most parents are opposed to a spanking ban in modern day, as am I, in fact - I support the natural flow of history, in terms of patterns, meaning physical abuse definitions are widening in many states, and this will eventually lead to a complete ban, once the local culture changes. But, what if the law did change? Would anything else change? No.

Here in my hometown of Berks County, Pennsylvania, caseworkers for Children and Youth Services (CYS) are underpaid, with their work underfunded and underappreciated. I am an advocate for them, and in past years was more vocal about support for child protective services agencies, and the need to fund them in order to make their job easier. Here in my locale, they are the closest to children's rights you can get. A spanking ban would change nothing right away here.

"Every parent would be arrested" is not what would happen. If such a law were to pass, the reports that might stem from children perceiving abuse from their parents by way of physical and mental anguish would sit in a filing cabinet and be ignored. I oppose a sudden ban in Pennsylvania for this reason, meaning under the civil laws. Nothing would get done. But, at the same time, educational efforts would stem from the ban hopefully, and educate parents about the law. However, there are countries where a law has been passed and few parents know about it, meaning the abuse still happens, and the authorities are neck-deep in cases of physically-injurious abuse.

America is a Christian nation, founded on Judaeo-Christian family values. Our traditions, customs, and norms come from the Bible. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged.

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and is one of the Greek words referencing the offenses under the Law, meaning torts and damages stemming from the Eighth Commandment, and is summed up in the New Testament as the slightest of personal slights, including the slightest of personal touch without consent. Anything the child perceives as abuse objectively is, no matter how little this biblical tradition is honored, as the "reasonable chastisement" defense does not exist. This is because God's Law is above the law of the land, and if they ever get to banning gentle parenting, I'll be here regardless, and they can cone and arrest me.

YOU SHALL HEAR MY CRIES! YOU SHALL HEAR MY ANGER! F*CK PARENTAL RIGHTS, and advance children's rights throughout the land, ransacking every parent, rescuing and validating every child, terrorizing the entitled parents with the wrath of the state in protection of children. Then, I just sit back in my pro-social evil chair, as a sadist for parent blood. WE will not tolerate our abuse being imposed on children within the law. Sadly, we must wait against our righteous impulses to plunder and ransack our abuser, the parent who identifies him/herself by way of their abuse. KILL every parent, VALIDATE every victim. "Kill" means slam them on the dash of the police car for spanking their child, roughing up their child like they roughed up that child of theirs, watching the blood flow underneath the windshield wiper. Kill them all simply means arrest them all. That's how we feel at survivors of parental rights abuse, at survivors of abuse within the law/lawful corporal punishment. WE F*CKING HATE PARENTAL RIGHTS! Those are earned. Children's rights are inherent, due to their vulnerable status...Usually, we just raid the pro-spanking parents once they cross a certain line where even the law can't tolerate. That line should be changed - to whatever the child victim perceives as abuse, based on the intent of the parent to control, manipulate, demand, or harass the child. Entitlement leading to offense...Evil can be good for children, so lock up all the parents. Every single one of them deserves punishment for what adults as a whole have done to children.

Right above there is anger from a broken man. A broken man due to events in childhood beyond his control, with no earthly justice apart from an apology (rare even with this form of abuse - very grateful indeed). But, pro-spanking parents who hate their children with their rabid views will descend and burn on the last day, languishing in the lake of fire and brimstone, suffering the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand! Spanking is banned under Divine Codified Jurisprudence. May the state follow suit with religious tradition, no matter how underrecognized said tradition is.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Expanding child abuse definitions: Why the Bible endorses stronger laws to protect children

Many American parents think that the child abuse definitions should stay the same. This is a common attitude amongst American parents. Most ...