Do trauma survivors now like pedophiles

The Max controversy is a rather small controversy that surrounds my advocacy. I try to carry on with my work, despite certain roadblocks occasionally put in place for me to maneuver, some which you can expect in a police investigation like this (concerning child on child sexual abuse). It rattles off as tricksters playing tricks on you. Picture a scarecrow. What should not be a menace should be the myth that survivors want to legalize their abuse. They just like me for some reason.

WE are pedophiles, and WE are traumatic pedophiles, and WE are restraining pedophiles, and WE are pedophile survivors, and WE have earned our rights to speak out against OUR abuser, who are parents, who are parents, who are spoogs and specks with that glorified title. Would your average survivor empathize with that strong anger? Yes, we want it. Many here can't quite voice anti-spanking anger, and so we might just need a pedophile around here to be a pro-social terrorist, meaning a terrorist from afar, looking down on a whole city of parents, counting heads and tails for the last day.

As for the age of consent? We don't have a view in common, but most here don't disagree with my age of consent of 18. Most here only encourage sex between teenagers, at worst. My views on teen sex is more of a flow flow type of disapproval, with me wanting sex to be within a marriage. 

The idea is for the pedophile not to define the individual. Person with pedophilic disorder, meaning I HAVE a disorder. I am not a label. Is it good to have an inherent self-concept of being a pedophile? No, because then you are an abusive trait towards children, because you defined yourself inherently as such, instead of putting your condition in a box, in a quadrant of your life - like a pie chart - and then just live your life focusing on other things. Work, career, hobbies, perhaps? Advocating for children, perhaps? Start a blog that is legit, and we will catch it, and if you cause trouble here, *I* will either call you out or be your advocate, depending on how sorry you are for hurting children in particular, if you have in the past - I actually think survivors can be unfair here, and that is due to a collective co-victim situation where Blake has caused chaos by making phony police reports. 

I would label the opinion here pro-pedophile/anti-pedophilia, especially on my page. What that means is that they hate the strand. We survivors are called to hate pedophilia, and will never glorify it even as a figurative statement. We just support the individual, who has not abused a child and seeks not to, to have the appropriate mental health services available in their community. 

This is what we call mental health awareness/rights, and it means that we non-offending pedophiles have earned our rights in society by not offending against a child, and thus have the same mental health rights as any other member of society struggling with mental illness. We recognize people with narcissistic personalities, antisocial personalities, and so forth, and humanize them in the media. Why not pedophiles?

Most here agree with me, but quietly, and will change their mind on me in a jiffy when I start advocating for adult sexual entitlement towards children, and thus using children as sexual servants, since that's how it would most certainly play out.

I am not a pedophile, everywhere I go, yet I am. I am to myself, but am I that label to others? At work? No way. Standing in line in the restaurant? No. To my therapist, or other supportive person? Yes, that is their business, by their consent. Not everyone can handle that topic, and I am grateful that the trauma survivors here in the United States actually can. If I were in the UK, I may not have gotten such a warm welcome.

Nothing will be legalized, and I hope we get everything back to illegal status soon that isn't within a marriage. Not optimistic though.

I am a human being despite a pedophilic condition I have, not because. Just another self-diagnosis. That's all.