Do adults have rights in relation to children - the concept of earned rights

 Many adults insist on a certain set of rights over children, setting children off as a separate class of individuals that are to be kept down in a punitive nature. Parental rights is about the notion that parents have inherent rights. Children's rights is about earned rights, for all adults, but especially parents, who have an important title, and should use it to bring up children with respect and love. The problem is that parents abuse their title, to the point where we now are in the process of banning it, to screen for abusers.

It says in Exodus 20:17 KJV:

Thou shalt not cover thy neighbor's house. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.

The Hebrew word translated "covet" is לחנוד (Latin: lachmod) and refers not only to wanting things from children, but wanting to the point of seeking to impose said want onto a child. Rights are wants and entitlements, engraved in a list, and placed on a legal document. The United States Constitution, namely the Bill of Rights, is a list of pro-social entitlements for all Americans. We hope that American principles of civil liberties and equality are afforded to children in this country.

Children have inherent rights, because they not of age, meaning too young to discern right from wrong, thus not responsible for misdeed. As for us adults? We can be expected to know better, as we are of age, meaning the age of majority. Thus, when we as adults demand "rights" to abuse children, we lose our rights in relation to them, and thus had none to begin with. If you are an entitled parent or adult, I don't care about your rights, and if you use the glorified title "parent" and "adults" in an argument on the Internet with me, at all, to justify yourself, that will the last time you shall exist within my sight, for I then cast you away like a loose stone.

Every single adult is guilty for their mere existence in relation to children, and must submit to the needs and rights of children, being convicted of our depraved sin nature as adults, knowing nothing once more about childhood and being a child, and knowing one's capacity to harm or abuse a child, leading to complete submission and surrender of all worldly parental rights of children to their children, with said child being in place of God, and the parents sacrificing as Christ did for His children, figuratively speaking, adhering to the gentle parenting principle of pro-social self-crucifixion.

I often say that I have no rights in relation to others, and that is a figurative statement. If I fell into a struggle, and needed extra support in not abusing a child, isn't that a right? But you have to want that right first, as pushing it onto adults who hate children and support the abuse and control of children is useless - they'll just defend their habits, thus literally have no rights. I support the doctrine of understatement in speaking of your role in relation to children, downplaying one's strengths in relating to children, but nonetheless feeling confident and happy anyway, in an internalized, yet humble way that prompts you to respect children...That's my attitude, and it should be everyone's here in America.

Let the entitled parents burn! They never had any rights to begin with, as God made sure of that! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!