Friday, May 14, 2021

ANNOUNCEMENT: Policy on pro-social religious abuse

 My page was attacked by an individual in Australia named "urgeless". The who know him see him as the most evil individual with autism on the planet. He claimed religious abuse against my page.

I operate on the premise that if people are offended by anything I say, they can just click to another page that they like. Contrary to what some anti-CR guru will tell you, none of my posts are directed covertly towards one person. If I send it to one person, I usually state that using their name directly.

Harassment, by my understanding, would be posting a blog post of mine on a page where it isn't welcome, hence why no blog posts appear on other pages.

Pro-social religious abuse is controlling the abuser with religion with their consent, meaning picking apart ways to control them, get them to expose a guilty conscience, and maybe better yet educate them, using strong religious statements. It is fighting bad religion with good religion masked as the same kind of bad religion...I simply meet the pro-spanking parents at their game, meaning using their own religious academic gaslighting tactics against them, in shut-down format. I shut them down with biblical facts as opposed to fake Christianity that supports child abuse.

My actual beliefs are pacifist and non-violent in nature, meaning any death threats or other threats you would have gotten "from Max" actually weren't. The only Facebook account I have access to is MAXWELL Scheibner. The others I am locked out as I have forgotten the password. Some anti-CR drill sergeant must have hacked in and had a blast making those threats...My view is that society's definition of murder should be expanded, not retracted, as I am pro-life for the whole life. I am actually against the death penalty, but images of gruesome biblical executions scare parents, and are the best way I can express my trauma from being lawfully abused as a child. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

Time-in: Why mammary closeness is the biblical way of doing time-in

Many parents think that time-out is a safe alternative to corporal punishment of children. This is a common attitude amongst American parent...