Every single adult, by default, is guilty of abuse against children, in a collective individual manner, merely for existing relation to children. We adults are the enemy to children, just as mankind is the enemy to God, and needs to atone for his sin and his existence in relation to our Lord, which children are being put in place of God, as the "least of these" (Matt. 25:31-46).
Love for a child is adversarial, by default, and is a form of submission denoted by the Greek root word αγαπαο (Latin: agapao) and refers to selflessly and dutifully choosing to be subject to bondservice and indentured servitude towards a child, righteously enslaved to their every need. I am just a tool to a child - a piece of property at their disposal for their every need. That's my only worth to them, unless they give me some.
One remote group of people is not responsible for the abuse of children. You are not enemy because you are a pedophile. You are my enemy if you defend child abuse of any kind. That also includes lawful domestic violence. You shall not defend force or control imposed upon children, or you shall not exist. You shall not exist within the periphery of my perception, and you shall exist, ideally, only in a prison cell, when we remove your disciplinary rights. We'll chasten you up here, being the anti-spanking fascists and authoritarians that we are - and maybe one or two pedophiles here and there.
I willfully and dutifully submit to my child neighbor, leaving her alone without complaint or gripe, as any opposition to a child - just one inch of antimosity - is entitlement towards children. Children first, adults last - I might have a plackard saying that somewhere. I'm THAT type of conservative. The children's rights variety. Children's rights conservatism will be come back, and will be reborn within God's Church, meaning the movement for children itself.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.