Saturday, April 10, 2021

Clarification

 I deleted a post directed at Ethan Edwards. He now is spreading rumors that it was directed towards Robbyn Peters Bennett.

We think Robbyn is an excellent advocate at this point, but is being used for a nefarious purpose. When you saw the post, it seems the names of the defendant were reversed. 

I had an EEG attack ("SHUT UP!") that pressured me to delete several articles at knifepoint, figurative speaking. 

I support Robbyn, even if I don't, due to my opinion of her being distorted by the tape. So this was on your page? I seem to have deleted a similarly worded post, but with Ethan's name there.

I want nothing from you now, Robbyn. Just relax, and don't let anti-children's rights keep you down with this utter libel.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization

will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.

"Benign deprivation" : Why saying "no" to children "frequent and often" is child abuse

Many parents think children need to hear the word "no" frequent and often. This is a common attitude on the part of parents. Most ...