We are not open to religious advertisements telling us to change our autoerotic habits. We know not to post about it, thank you very much...to the level where no reminder is needed, and any reminder is commonsense and redundant.
Everyone can see it, before the perpetrator deletes it:
@Opposing parental entitlementHi there dear friend! I just want to say I love a lot of your work and I ask that you please keep up the good work!Please check out and review this article here: https://412teens.org/.../is-it-a-sin-to-find-someone...It seems to attempt to reinforce the "thought crime" or "lust" interpretation of Matthew 5:28 even after acknowledging information saying the contrary.
Funny way of telling me I'm not guilty. Some jokes just aren't funny. You are joking about a specific form of child abuse with that fake/hacked account of yours - religious child abuse. Sorry, didn't read that rag, and already know what it will say. A young girl is not married, therefore no adultery, but fornication if I look in a way that she perceives as a sexual menace.
Not all Christians agree on these issues.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.