I do have anti-existence beliefs, and because I am a pedophile, people in the children's rights community are understandably worry that I might use it against someone I don't like.
Anti-existence, in the grand scheme of things, means no human being should exist, and that the world shouldn't even exist. There is a reason God allows for all the child abuse and other atrocities to occur - this world wasn't intended for us, but as a playground for Satan and his angels.
However, for me personally, abusers don't exist. They do exist, objectively, where they are, where I sequester them, but not to my perceptions, and whatever and whomever I don't perceive doesn't exist, and I shun all entitled abusers to the level of existence, and avoid them as much.
You shall not exist while punishing that child, because none shall exist within the United States of America, and none does according to my righteous judgment as a children's rights advocate until seen. Then, we take notes for the Lord, and for the last day...When all the parents will be arrested for how they choose to discipline their children, and persecuted for such legally. And children's rights flipped the switch, as the anti-spanking zealots and pedophiles that I/we are, with me being the literal one.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.