Lawful child abuse is a much understood term, and often conflated with either pedophilia and/or hatred of pedophiles. It is a fact that pedophiles are more susceptible to the impact of anti-spanking trauma. I myself am living proof of that.
I grew up in a lower middle class home in a middle-sized city. I grew up in a punitive household of the authoritative type. This meant that spanking wasn't even the default punishment growing up. Time-out and loss of privileges, instead, were staples of abuse growing up, with spanking being a last resort.
Lawful trauma of this sort is a parent informational trauma, meaning parent existence, meaning the fact that parental abuse even exists to the degree it does. It is a legal trauma since one law, the "reasonable chastisement" - just a piece of paper, as God's Law prohibit spanking, punishment, or any control of a child.
I am at peace now, with God, with my mother, knowing that spanking/punishment doesn't even exist, even if it does over there. God will destroy this world in due time, now or later. The prophecies say it could happen any day now, meaning the opposite.
I can bring out my trauma at any time - at the pedophile level, and fitting the label as well, while being a survivor while holding that label.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.