Friday, January 22, 2021

Sorry, the airline company denied me a plane ticket

F*CK YOU, American Airlines! I WANT TO GO SEE ROBBYN! I will KYA down the drain! Mom ganged up with them. I just wanted to be her friend. She's a good advocate.

I've never feigned anything in my life. F*CK YOU, Robbyn! F*CK you, mom. F*CK you, pop pop (who just came home from Florida).

"Stop showing us who you really are"

 Says everyone in the tape...reaffirms my beliefs in the doctrine of original sin.

I'm not here for myself

 Maybe I'm him. Feign caretaker self-destruct. Hopelessness. Defeated. Undermined at advocating for my child. So low that calm and angry.

YOU WILL NOT EJECT ME! ERASE ALL IF THAT IS CASE! KILL ALL! KILL ALL! NOTHING ELSE MATTERS!

I will f*cking stay, and YOU f*cking leave, or I will f*cking drive you aground with a floorboard, and inflict a REAL children's rights trauma onto you, ya scumbag. Go KYS. A pedophile CAN believe in children's rights AT EVERY LEVEL! YOUI HEAR ME? YOU HEAR ME? YOU WERE RIGHT THE FIRST TIME. 

STOP opposing SURVIVORS by opposing one of us. YOU eject one of least of us, you eject ALL OF US! WE want you, in, out, in, out, in, depending on your apology, depending on its genuineness. If you f*cking sick that sick, depraved organization on me one more time, I'll f*cking sick the Oregon State Police on you, ya sick stalking creep. I know where you live...meaning the opposite, because I don't flipping care. 

I turn myself into the Oregon State Police ahead of time in the case I travel to the State of Oregon to harm Robbyn Peters Bennett in any way. I do not drive. I also am not attracted to older women. I am only attracted to adults that are slightly younger than me going downwards, but the peak of my age range is 11-12. Only to girls. I keep certain reassuring information hidden to further avoid the appearance of defensiveness, which is a trait of an entitled adult towards children. I'm perfectly willing to share this information, which would garner in my defense. I just won't unless pressed in a certain way, in a specific opportune situation...Same with any law enforcement agency - if I hurt a survivor or child, lock me up and throw away the key. I am capable of trying to befriend children, and the failed attempt might be perceived as abuse in and of itself under harassment laws. Use the laws, children and parents, to the degree that you can in your state.

I'm not here for myself. I'm here for THEM, meaning CHILDREN, meaning CHILDREN, meaning me last!!!! I'll never leave the movement.

EDIT: Now Amy put me on house arrest. She says "we want you to leave, so we are trying to scare her into not leaving by giving her the fact that a pedophile wants to menace her"...Decide for yourself Robbyn...This looks fishy.

He's dead

 This is Jessica Lynn Scheibner. This is to inform you that Maxwell Clark Scheibner has passed away by suicide. He is afraid of "the trauma counselor taking him away".

Nobody makes a post like this unless they are for real, about something. He was working on those urges. I thought it was reckless for him to post like that, but he told me on the way out (he overdosed) that he wasn't here for himself...I don't know why he had these urges, but he does.

Sincerely,

Maxwell

No Todd, not angry

 Nope, I am not angry. I don't think you get out peacekeepers, Todd, and it is ridiculous that you have to feign it.

*I* ACTUALLY DO, and YOU depraved pro-spanking scum should GTFO out of our movement. YOU WILL NOT eject me from CHILDREN'S RIGHTS, and-CR (speaking aside diagonal to Todd)

Just demonstrating how I am, with ALL adults I judge as abusive (including a minority of pedophiles - about 1 out of 4). If I thought you were abusing a child, I would have exposed you already, right on this page. You are with your nephew? How does he feel about it? Does he want to? I don't know anything, and my court judges by pro-social ignorance, with "I don't know" logic. 

With VirPed, I give you the benefit of the doubt, all the way, with superficial suspicion, until I can no more, and then I flame you, with individual guilt. I deem every member of VirPed, by default, non-existent, meaning not standing out as parents, meaning not entitled. Talking about one's sexual disorder as a way to vent is not entitlement, and neither is defending such. Defending your "right" to abuse a child is, and VirPed rules support that logic that I find in the Bible.

An example of any questioning would be, when someone talks about risky behavior such as texting a child, and claiming to "not have any sexual reasons", either ask them "are you sure?". If they admit to it, and then don't back down, then goodbye from me, and everyone else in the thread. Most people at VP agree that online contact is very dangerous.

The board is written in clear literal English, and the words mean as they say, along the lines of any mental health support board. The reason you weren't allowed in is that the founders/admin thought you meant me harm, and I don't think they can be swayed. The parent lobby has an agenda to shut down the board. The children's rights community has a pro-social ignore policy with VirPed, alongside pro-social "lack of resources". That is how we are trained to treat such sites, by official policy. Otherwise, if you test as a victim, it is okay to join VirPed. The atmosphere here is not too different from VirPed...A lot of pro-spank monitors actually think parts of the movement are too cozy with my condition, with poor enforcement in terms of eradicating pro-contact pedophiles, and I'd agree with that stance. I want only anti-contact pedophiles permitted to stay - meaning the age of consent will always exist, and sex with children will always be wrong...Some people here pain themselves trying to praise my condition, knowing I mean no harm, and some just get very angry about it in a mixed way. What I ask is that people listen in a way that admits ignorance, with a sort of lukewarm sort of sensitivity (ex. "I don't get that sort of thing, but whatever - I'm glad you're not molesting children"). If you praise my condition, or feign praise (think forced emphasis on something upsetting), I think you want something. I think we got the wrong advice. My mother's understanding, as others in my personal life, is lukewarm. Due to my gentle parenting/children's rights community, I actually WANT you to indicate very lightly that you feel uncomfortable with the condition. Trying to sit down with me, and pretend to be interested alongside me, shows me that you want something, ESPECIALLY if you can't feign it, meaning the opposite. There are roles on my side of mutual privilege - I am calm, and non-chalant (I simply live with a disorder) and perhaps being able to talk about it like it is nothing, and you be distant and concerned, and there if I need listening and validation. The more distant you are, the less responsibility you have. You don't have to listen at all if you don't want to, but you do have to make sure I am safe, with distant supervision if possible. Those very close to me, namely family and mental health professionals, do have to listen...The condition is remote in terms of necessary support, meaning it is not the job of everyone to be supportive. Some people just exist...("children's rights" intervention - I've said enough, haven't I? Off your high horse from aside, Dr. Cantor).

Robbyn with "Det" Greensbruck

 St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center psychiatric ward. I was there due to behavioral complications due to an overdose on medication for Tardive Dyskenesia. Some medications lose their ability to be effective when you take too much (it was an "as needed" medication). TD is a movement disorder, and is indeed very overwhelming to deal with. I took more and more, and then needed more and more. My mom didn't understand the "more and more" part, and I had trouble explaining because I was so overwhelmed...Some general medical conditions can lead to a mental health crises. I wasn't exactly opposed to the hospital stay, but maybe thought it wasn't the right fit because there was nothing they could do to help me. They had no reason to change medications (and they didn't), and group therapy focused on issues that had nothing to do with my needs. The stay had nothing to do with pedophilia.

I have no shame about discussing matters surrounding stays in in-patient psychiatric stays. I might go again if I am at risk of hurting a child, and stay in a safe haven. I am opposed to any form of mental health stigma, at all.

I was loopy, not manic, meaning I was out of it. Sleep a couple days, and that would have been better. My mother doesn't realize that I am now able to realize when I am manic, and I don't like it. I remember roughly what it was like when I decreased a mood stabilizer I was on (lithium carbonate).

Yes, he was right there...the officer and the once respected child advocate. All of the major institutions here in Reading are bribed to get me out of the movement. 

Robbyn, let it be known that you basically broke into a hospital, with a rogue detective, and attempted to fish me out of a movement. I had no clue what children's rights trauma was, and found the mere concept OFFENSIVE, you mutha-f*cking scum. Lots of people here don't like the condition. Even I don't when being honest with myself. We don't want a parent here at children's rights. Get out! Most people here didn't know any of this before, and you hid it, and you went behind the scenes to try and frame me for a trauma I don't have. I had no concept then of what a "children's rights death" was, nor that I was being investigated.

I do not believe a word you say about anything. I do not believe a word you post anywhere on the Internet, except from other people's sources. I do not believe you when you are sorry, except on my own accord, meaning not yours. You are to shut up, and leave the pedophile survivors get a children's rights bullet to the head, meaning a children's rights death. We did not need your "help". We wanted to endanger ourselves, and risk harm from an ideology that you agree with. 

Let it also be known that Ms. Bennett worked with Focus on the Family to have me shipped from children's rights to a hostile land that hates my trauma and doubts its existence. 

You DO have trauma, Robbyn, so why do you doubt mine (responding to abusers overhead). You have no rights, including to kill yourself, even though you may want to in relation to me. I will continue to not bombard your private messages and pages, and watch you be ungrateful. 

Sit down, shut up, and stop being the angry, controlling parent you are. Talk about phobias? I have a phobia - a child phobia, connected to their PARENTS, and sometimes I'm the adult finding the young girl attractive (or simply worrying about the little boy who is simply in danger - that happens). What are you doing to cure that phobia? Cure it, and you'll still hate the concept. Coming from someone with the condition themselves. There is a reason I often use person-first language - it isn't who I am. It is something I have, that may color things about my personality. I see children on their level, or more perhaps slightly above my level in an assertive level. Everything children, or linked to. And politically oriented, towards giving them their rights. It shapes my whole personality, like a parent attached to a person might shape someone's whole worldview. It's not a flickr, but an L - one L finding a young girl attractive/a cause of concern (or a boy simply a cause for concern), and the other side of the L being a strong arm and pro-social dictator over any abuser to the child. Is this a good thing? No, due to what it is conflated with, and once you lose the phobia, you'll still think it is a bad thing. I've heard the hidden parts, and most adults have those parts attached to them as well. No adult means well in relation to children...Now GTFO of everything because I don't think you care about anything I say. Just sit high and proud, and laugh. I have a PARENTAL RIGHTS trauma, meaning I'll never leave. I just won't attack you on your page either.

I don't think you are sorry. I was very shocked when I heard that someone who openly supported empathy like you hated pedophiles. Usually, people just hate abusers and call them pedophiles when they molest children, and don't care about the ramifications. You study us and hate us. Why? You run StopSpanking - an anti-spanking organization. Why not care about that cause? That same entitlement motivates sexual abuse of children. That's why they do it - they are "stressed", and see children as a projectile board for that stress, coming up with excuses to do so. Why are pedophiles relevant...A healthy pedophile can make a great child advocate. The problem is that most haven't been seen by anti-pedophile. Now we are arising, and most of us are ordinary caregivers and adults, and can just choose not to take our stress out on a child like anyone else, and not "run away" with them to get away from stress. That's why I support stronger prison sentences - because not raping people is real easy to do. Just don't do it. Thoughts don't make me want to do it either (just a daydream)...I've found that I have a phobia of sexual abusers themselves, only it isn't really a phobia, it is ANGER at the rape level. F*CK you if you do that and defend it - otherwise, we're good if you are a pedophile (better than any other parent besides a gentle parent). I'm afraid of children being abused - morbidly so. That's why I retreat into fixations regarding children. I'm that child, and I'm hurt by those nasty words and hands. I'm scared. It's never going to stop. Please mommy, don't yell at me like that. I just want to die, only I can't get that feeling up yet. I WANT YOU TO SUFFER! SUFFER! SUFFER! It's like an L. Nurture on one end, and protect on the other, like any other antisocial parent (meaning all of them) but conflated with sexual aggression instead. Me? Just look in public. Just glance, and nothing more. She doesn't even notice.

It looks like she is making amends, but I'll leave this up anyway as a progress report.

Pro-social role reversal, with lightswitch application, with children controlling parents; pro-social conviction of original sin

Many parents are terrified of the concept of a role reversal, and want to be in charge of their children. Most parents in America see themselves as above their children, with parents controlling children from above. That is how the Bible prescribes parents to raise children. Proper parenting of a child is like a light switch.

In the biblical context, parenting was not position of power and control over a child, like it is today, but a position of servitude and submission towards a child. The word "parent" does not exist anywhere in the Old Testament. Only the words "father" (HEB: אָב, ab) and mother (HEB: אֵם, em) appear in the Hebrew Bible. The word "parent" only appears a few times in the Pauline Epistles, denoted by the word γονευν (GRK: goneus) and refers to a "begetter", as cited from the Blue Letter Bible. Pave the way. 

What is the biblical definition of "pave the way"? Trust. The presumption, in parenting, is that your child hates you, and fears you because you are bigger than them, and thus can overpower them. Their first reaction is to control parents, and demand that they get what they want/need. A child is in complete and utter control of me, as a symbolic parent in relation to them, with me trembling in reverent fear and terror of their every vulnerable need, with said fear denoted by the Greek root word ψοβος (Latin: phobos). 

It is a specific type of fear of letting your child down, and offending their needs and safety. Steeple hill. Courthouse. It is this type of righteous terror and conviction, putting a child on a high pillar, with her being the judge of all in your parenting relationship/friendship, striking terror, shame, and hatred of one's own adult nature in relation to her, leading to submission to God, with one's child as His extension to her. She is the law, meaning the law over her own needs and interests. She is bigger than me for being smaller than me.

In order to win over and earn the respect of a child, one must be cooperative and obedient with their needs, and respectful to their needs and boundaries. I, by default, am segregated from children by God's Divine Jurisprudence, to the level of presence, or at least speech (that's what I want - be her friend, then hang out, then do other things). Only when children want to interact, and indicate that they wish for the conversation to be on casual terms, with me then - and only then - freely conversing and talking to a child. 

Eventually, the lightswitch switches up, and I earn my keep as the parent, and earn the right to be a parent to the child. In the biblical context, that was the case. Parenting was, indeed, attachment based, with boys remaining with their mother until age 6, and girls until age 12. Punishing a child, in that culture, was a violation of Jewish law, and punishment could only occur within a court of law, and only men over age 13 were legal subjects. Anyone under the age of majority could not be charged. Infancy lasted until age 3, and children were breastfed until that age as well. The father stood there, and was the primary protector of the home. The mother had the right to protect her children, even from the father, despite him being the head of the household.

Basically, children hate your guts, usually based in fear of you harming or hurting them for being bigger than them. As you treat them with respect anyway, and submit to them and their needs on their level, you grow in significance and worth to them, and the roles switch - if you are a parent, earn your keep, and earn your respect. Don't demand it. Colossians 3:20 KJV:

Children, obey your parents in all things, as is well-pleasing unto the Lord.

The Greek root word translated "obey is υπακουο (Latin: hupakouo) and refers to a certain surrender to parents, preferably at a young age - secure, vulnerable attachment to parents, always trusting in them, knowing that one can talk to them anytime, including about uncomfortable subjects that others might not understand.

The depraved, entitled parents will not inherit the Kingdom of God! Let them burn! Let them suffer in the lake of fire and brimstone, suffering the second death! Repent, for the Kingdom of Heaven is at hand!

Redefining child abuse: Why the Bible calls for tougher laws on the books protecting children from abuse

Many parents think that the Bible has no concept of child abuse apart from obeying the law of the land. Most American parents support the pr...