Meterstick: The link between social skills deficits and pedophilic sexual abuse

Many people think that abuser pedophiles cannot be treated at all, so just kill them all, and put "but a bullet in his brain". When a child is abused in any way, I share that anger, as their advocate and representative. However, I am indeed a flawed advocate, due to the evil nature in which my advocacy is conflated with. It is called meterstick. That's what every predatory pedophile like that needs.

There are two types of abuser, narcissistic and sympathetic. Sympathetic abusers are the most common form of abusive adult, and make up the majority of the 94% of parents who punish their children physically. Abusers can have empathy, and that can be the victim's downfall, in the form of trauma bonding leading to ANGER at all parents everywhere. Everywhere except here, for me.

Social skills deficits, meaning here ability to talk to and relate to children, are the number one cause of child abuse. Most adults take a high plane, narcissistic attitude towards children, meaning they are above the children in a way that children reach up for, then get knocked down. A pedophile is permissive in nature, in a co-dependent way, meaning they have poor skills in relating to children, and thus commit abuse because they can't "read the cues", projecting "she loves me" onto the child, not knowing his size.

A pedophilic sexual abuser is a low-high level abuser, meaning lawful level. Think following a female student home from school, then showing up at her house in entitled distemper. The problem is not knowing appropriate distance from the child and when.

Yes, I do believe in Hell, and that's a good thing, because I know where I'm headed if I make the willful choice to abuse a child, and defend it my entire life. That's not hard to avoid at all, yet so many adults refuse to avoid it in relation to adults. I also believe in not visiting a child at their home just to be around them. The idea is to follow a cursor other than sexual/romantic. Maybe that cursor is colored by sexual attraction, but you have a practical reason for being at her house, which I can't think of for any child I have met.

The Tenth Commandment denotes the moral crime of entitlement, and is cross-referenced by the Greek root word πλεονέκτης (Latin: pleonektés) and refers not simply to wanting children, but wanting to the point of seeking to impose said want onto the child, leading to theft/abuse. It says in Colossians 3:21 KJV:

Fathers, provoke not your children to anger, lest they become discouraged,

The Greek root word translated "provoke...to anger" is ερεθιζο (Latin: erethizo) and is one of the Greek words that refers to the offenses, meaning torts and damages under the Mosaic Law linked to the Eighth Commandment, with the New Testament summing the offenses up as the slightest of personal slights perceived by the child. Under the authority of 1 Thess. 5:22, meaning the commandment to avoid wherever the opportunity to commit sin, in combination with this commandment, I must avoid all interaction with children, including antisocial "leer", meaning looking at a young girl out of lust, to the point where she perceives said lust. Looking respectfully, in fact, is okay, as long as "respectfully" means don't go up and approach the child. Wait for children to speak to you, and presume they never will, because you are undeserving of a gentle parenting friendship of a child.

The meterstick, in real life, isn't a stick I hold, but a shamefaced, reverent respect for a child next to me in public, leading to looking down ashamedly, with my hands twiddled behind my back. Afraid? No. Respect? Yes, absolutely. I'm happy to be their friend, but they most always want to live a life aside of mine. Oh well.

I surrender to children, turning myself into their authority. I am grounded in my place by respecting their cries for help and support, meaning personal space in this case.