What just happened? An investigation, for something I didn't do, based on something I did do. What is antisocial "rough-play"? What I actually did. Damages are evidence of child abuse, and a momentary frightened and offended expression is enough to be abuse under the children's rights code, meaning God's Law, meaning both, meaning both.\
I am very ticked off right at a sleazy section of our law enforcement establishment here in Berks County. It all started when a few family members and friends of family picked up on my beliefs in children's rights, and assumed they weren't genuine, meaning they got advice from false teachers and false healers who oppose children having rights entirely, and support children being mere property of their parents, while being deceptive and claiming the oppose. What is their lowest acronym? Pro-social America hate, meaning alliance with terrorist groups in the Middle East. That's where anti-CR gets a lot of their funding. You have your terrorists, and then your terrorists, and anti-CR loves them both,
Many of my family members now believe in anti-CR, and they have a "search party" trauma that they indeed blame our movement for. All this means is that I will have to bite my tongue on my children's rights views. Children's rights, however, can be a low-level sport, at the level of pro-social spy/monitor judgment. I see all in relation to children, like a grandfather clock, but remain silent in my observance of worldly horror committed against children.\
A whole bunch of rapes excused by the law, all because of a false report. Michael and Debi Pearl have been stalking me since day one, meaning literally the day I was born. The children's rights movement simply watching on the other side, meaning something else, meaning the same thing, meaning whatever you want to believe. Focus on the Family is my abuser, not children's rights, so FOOK parental rights, meaning "disciplinary rights" don't exist. Such is an idea of this world, whereas children's rights is an idea of the next.
All a political stunt, out of nowhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Any comment that
1. Endorses child abuse (including pornography of such)
2. Imposes want to the point of imposition, meaning entitlement.
3. Contains self-entitled parent rhetoric, to the point of self-victimization
will not be published. Flexible application. Debate is allowed, but only civil arguments that presume the best of intentions in their opponent, on both sides.