My judgment standard: Lamppost judgment

 Many people are afraid of my righteous judgment coming towards them, and attacking for their parenting, and now some of them want to erase my Christian belief in the damage system, which is a core part of my beliefs. At least this was how it was in 2017.

The Greek root word κλέπτω (Latin: kleptó) and refers to theft in two levels - theft, as in stealing a material object, called larceny in the biblical context. The other half is committing the moral crime of theft itself, namely in terms of damages, usually to the honor of another person.

Damages, by the understanding set forth in the New Testament, means whatever any individual perceives as an affront to their personage or honor, and this includes a child. I am not to offend a child by anything, under my Christian beliefs. The most common thing I do that is abusive is look in a way that offends or embarrasses her.

I do not have a right to have MY feelings coddled, even if I technically do. It says in Matthew 5:38-39 KJV:

Ye hath heard that it hath been said, An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth, But I say unto you, That ye resist not evil, but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn the other also.

This means I have the right, at the lowest level, to take offense at anything I want, but on a higher level, should not get so easily offended. This means, as a conservative Christian, stopping oneself when wanting to lash out for one's own rights, and get offended by the slightest slight to your identity. You should get more offended about other people being harmed, not yourself...Nothing about a child offends me in terms of childhood anger, but may "offend" me, meaning her, regarding to reacting to her lack of wardrobe.

I am a lamppost judge, and not an easily offended one (in case others try to rile me up). That means an honest judge, meaning if figure out that I am investigating you, and you ask questions, you will be questioned in a clear, direct manner, holding back no suspicion, but presuming innocence beyond a reasonable doubt. It is "presume"/"reason to believe" judgment of parents, including those at VirPed - keep guessing at reasons why the parents are innocent. This goes until I know nothing good about the parents, and everything bad, and shun the parents. I need reason to suspect - think a flag hanging in the text - to start the investigation, coming in the form of pro-social question, pro-social clarify. I want you to clarify that my presumption is right, and my abuser isn't in my presence.